B&G Mortgage

Subprime historians can try to trace back the first subprime pool of loans that was successfully sold in the secondary market with AAA blessing from the credit rating agencies. That must have been around 2002 to 2003. Once proven as a viable channel to dump large amounts of bad debt to the sheer infinite pool of unsuspecting investors who relied solely on the rating agencies, just a few minor players came to dominate the entire mortgage market at first by offering loans with no regards to qualifications. Legitimate lenders had to decide whether to participate in this scam or be crowded out of the market completely. In the end only one major lender, Wells Fargo, decided not to play the game.

The subprime story is not over yet.  Today the entire residential real estate market is dominated by one super subprime company that goes by the name of  B&G Mortgage.

B&G of course stands for Bernanke and Geithner.  Ironically, B&G were not founders of the company.  With not a trace of real estate, housing or mortgage experience, they just happened to walk into the co-CEO positions and proceeded to change real estate as we knew it.  B&G mortgage is not for profit, in fact it is anti-profit. It has no clear objective. It has no strategy for operation. It has no exit plan. It is the mountain blocking the road to real estate recovery.

B&G Mortgage is not publicly listed, but public ownership is mandatory. We all are forced to pay the price.

 


 

 

Meet the principals of B&G Mortgage Co. after a hearty meal.

(Photo via puppetgov.com)

 


 

Mr. B. is manipulating mortgage interest rates. With Herculean effort, he has driven mortgage rates down to their current lows. Unfortunately for Mr. B., this no longer has any stimulative effect. The market is  taking these low rates for granted today. Home prices are perched precariously on the edge, while sales volume continues to decline. Mr. B. can always say "if not for me, it would have been much worse" and declare success. In reality, if mortgage rates were to move up to, say, over 5%, the real estate market would collapse instantaneously.

If mortgage rates simply remain at their current low levels, the refinancing activity will end while sales will continue on their steady downward course.

If the objective is to re-inflate the real estate market, the only choice Mr. B. has is to launch another round of 'QE', similar to his purchase of residential MBS [mortgage backed securities, ed.] in 2009/10. How much lower must mortgage rates drop in order to have an effect,  and at what cost to the Federal Reserve's balance sheet?

As for Mr. G., monumental government interventions have only exacerbated the problems and brought about the current state of utter hopelessness. Wasteful ideas such as the tax credit have proven to have even less effect than a band-aid. Giving tax refunds to builders so they can build more future REO's ['real estate owned' – owned involuntarily by the banks after foreclosures, ed.] was about as stupid and corrupt as we have come to expect from Washington.

By absorbing all the losses, delaying foreclosures and using other forms of interventions, he is passing the burden to taxpayers while benefiting bondholders and those who are not paying their mortgages. It has been three years since the Treasury took over Freddie and Fannie. What comes next? Is it time for principal reduction? Are they really going to rent the REO's to  borrowers? Are they really expecting borrowers who aren't paying their mortgages to pay rent, either voluntarily or involuntarily? Stay tuned, because Mr. G. is rumored to be launching a new and improved round of government intervention in the immediate future.

The destruction of the free market in real estate by B&G Mortgage is absolute. There is no private label that dares to compete with it. Put yourself in the position of an MBS investor.  On one side you have a private label (PL) issuer and on the other side you have B&G mortgage securities. Let us just compare a few of the major differences.

 

Default risk: With PL, the investors have to analyze the underlying mortgages and assess the potential losses in the event of a default. With B&G, Mr. G. with his very deep pockets has said he will guarantee all loans.

Foreclosure risk: With PL, the investors have to calculate the loss severity in the event of default and foreclosure.  The government has declared war on the foreclosure process, changing the rules at will.  Not only would PL investors need to absorb this risk, it has become impossible to quantify this risk. B&G takes all those worries off investors.

Interest rate risk: B&G's securities are basically the equivalent of a Treasury note with an even benchmark to compare it to. PL's securities on the other hand may fluctuate wildly. What should be the initial spread between a PL security and a B&G security? By how much is this spread expected to fluctuate?


Mr. B. and Mr. G. have repeatedly complained about the fact that lenders are not lending. Who can possibly lend under these circumstances?  Who would borrow from a private lender, presumably for a higher rate, if he can qualify for a B&G loan? Therefore the big bad banks are only too happy to let Mr. B. and Mr. G. carry the torch, while they benefit from making fees off originating and servicing the loans. They are more than willing to pass through all the loans to B&G Mortgage and let the taxpayers unknowingly assume all the associated risks.

In summary, the real estate world of B&G Mortgage is neither stable nor sustainable. Mr. B. and Mr. G. have exerted extreme effort just to bring the market to its current condition. Much more will be required to maintain this level, not to mention trying to boost the real estate market.

What is the current condition? On the default and foreclosure front, there is not a  trace of improvement. Per the latest LPS data:

4.1 million loans are 90 days delinquent or in foreclosure with another ~2.2 million that are <90 days delinquent.

Do not misunderstand these terminologies. The average number of days for a "90 days delinquent" loan is actually 397 days and the average number of days for a "foreclosure" is 599 days, as of July 2011. All these loans are so far gone that there is really only one solution – foreclose.

If you look at all the real estate indicators, such as the Case Shiller Index or new and existing home sales, there is not one that is even faintly encouraging.  Most importantly, employment is nowhere near the level that could support a robust real estate recovery.  In this current round, do not look for a real estate recovery to lead job creation. There is an excess supply of millions of homes and builders are still building more, compounding the problem.

The weekly MBA Mortgage Applications data are usually pretty useless, but they serve a good illustrative purpose here.

Rates have been going down to the ridiculously low level of 4.32%.  Even that low rate is not attracting all those phantom buyers supposedly on the side lines. I've got news for the housing bulls: the sidelines are empty. Everyone who can refinance has already done so or is in the process of doing so. This week the percentage of refinances declined from 79.8% to 77.8%, resulting in a decrease of 9.6% of the index on a seasonally adjusted basis. If rates were to move back up to, say 5%, there would be ZERO refinancing applications and the applications index could well drop by 50% or more.

With the housing crisis, there is a golden opportunity to correct many past mistakes and rebuild the foundation of the real estate market for a better tomorrow. 

Unfortunately, with B&G Mortgage, I think we will only see further destruction.

 

Addendum

by Pater Tenebrarum

 

Indeed, as Bruce Krasting reports, rumors of the next major intervention in the housing market are already percolating.

In the meantime, here are the most recent Case-Shiller Index charts:

 


 

Case-Shiller National Home Price Indices as of August 30 – click for higher resolution.

 


 

Case Shiller Index level vs. its year-on-year percentage change. On a national level, home prices are back to where they were in 2003, the beginning of the bubble's 'parabolic' stage – click for higher resolution.

 


 

Fixed-rate mortgage interest rates, 15 and 30 years – click for higher resolution.

 


 

Lastly, readers can download a wide-ranging summary of the latest US residential real estate indicators published by S&P here (pdf). As Ramsey says, none of the data look particularly encouraging.

As we have often noted, the housing bubble must count as one of the greatest malinvestment episodes of the entire post WW2 era. It was a long time in the making – today people generally blame the ratcheting down of interest rates by the Greenspan Fed following the bursting of the tech bubble for its gestation and it is certainly true that this policy egged the bubble on and initiated its 'parabolic phase'.

As Ramsey notes above, this is also the time to which we can trace back the hey-day of the issuance of ever more complex sliced-and-diced CDO's (collateralized debt obligations) and related structured finance products, which greatly facilitated the marketing of sub-prime mortgage debt to investors bound by strict mandates that allowed them to buy only the most highly rated securities. Greed (the famous 'hunt for yield'), an overly accommodative central bank, Wall Street's inventiveness and the irresponsible connivance of the credit rating agencies combined to create the ingredients for one of the biggest financial and economic disasters ever.

However, one must not lose sight of the fact that long before the bubble 'took off', its foundations had been laid by the misuse of the GSE's [government sponsored enterprises, ed.] as 'reliquification conduits' during previous financial crises, such as the Asian/Russian crisis of 1997/1998.  Almost no-one remembers it today, but a small handful of market observers predicted the eventual failure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac already back in late 1990's (!). It was blindingly obvious even at that early stage that one day the extreme leverage of these institutions would be their undoing and that the 'implicit' treasury guarantee would become an 'explicit' one.

The late 1990's/early 2000d's were also the time when  the Fed first loosened its collateral rules and began to accept agency securities in its open market operations. For this reason alone it was obvious that tax payers would eventually be on the hook, no matter how many times the US treasury department insisted that there was 'no government guarantee' for GSE debt.

People should also not forget the role of politicians who were constantly bribed by the GSE's with campaign contributions in order to steer regulation in a direction that undermined free competition, fostered the growth of the bubble and was 'bonus-friendly' for the CEO's of these institutions. Under cover of 'providing affordable housing' to 'underprivileged classes', politicians and the GSE's ensured that the bubble attained ever greater heights of absurdity.

 


 

 


 

In the end many jokingly remarked that all that was required from a borrower to get approval for a gigantic mortgage loan was the ability to 'fog a mirror'. Reality soon overtook satire however, as even recently deceased people began to receive approvals for mortgages in mid six-figure amounts in their mail – without ever having asked for them while they were still alive. In fact, even being dead for 19 years and residing in Jamaica didn't necessarily keep one from being approved for a mortgage exceeding $500,000. We wonder who owns the 'senior CMO tranche' today that contains that particular mortgage.

No wonder people aren't so eager to agree to a settlement with the banks that would cost the banks a tiny fraction of what they were able to funnel to themselves over the past few years as a result of the Fed's ongoing war on savers, while precluding any future claims against them. 

As an aside to all this, S&P continues to bless sub-prime mortgage products with AAA ratings, as Bloomberg reports – a rating it does not even bestow on the US government anymore.


Standard & Poor’s is giving a higher rating to securities backed by subprime home loans, the same type of investments that led to the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, than it assigns the U.S. government.

S&P is poised to provide AAA grades to 59 percent of Springleaf Mortgage Loan Trust 2011-1, a set of bonds tied to $497 million lent to homeowners with below-average credit scores and almost no equity in their properties. New York-based S&P stripped the U.S. of its top rank on Aug. 5, saying Washington politics were making the country less creditworthy.

Treasuries gained about 1.95 percent and U.S. borrowing costs have fallen to record lows as investors repudiated the downgrade, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch indexes. S&P has awarded AAAs to more than $36 billion of securities in the U.S. this year that were created by bankers who continue to gather thousands of loans, bundle them into bonds of varying risk and pay ratings firms a fee to assign credit rankings.

“Everybody has been led to believe over the years that AAA means AAA means AAA across the board,” Gregory W. Smith, the general counsel for the $41 billion Public Employees’ Retirement Association of Colorado, said in a telephone interview on Aug. 24. “Anybody that didn’t learn in the 2008 crisis that doesn’t apply should find another line of work.”

Money managers are lending to the government at rates that, in some cases, are about a third of what they demand to hold top-rated mortgage notes, four months after Congressional investigators said S&P helped spur the longest economic contraction since the 1930s by assigning inflated grades to the bonds from 2005 through 2008.

More than 14,000 securitized bonds in the U.S. are rated AAA by S&P, backed by everything from houses and malls to auto- dealer loans and farm-equipment leases, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.”

 

(emphasis added)

As we often say on such occasions, you couldn't make this up.

 

Addendum 2:

Watch for an update on the euro area in these pages after the close of trading on Thursday. From a parliamentary commission in Greece lamenting that government's fiscal situation has considerably worsened instead of getting better,  to Italy eagerly abandoning the last vestiges of 'austerity' in the face of the now slightly lower bond yields it enjoys following the ECB's intervention, the euro area just keeps being a fount of ever more bizarre news flow. In addition to the usual mixture of comedy and tragedy we also have a few data points well worth considering, especially in the context of the ongoing banking system crisis in euro-land. Nothing is resolved, so we expect major turbulence to return with a vengeance in the fall.

 



 

 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 


 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke

   
 

5 Responses to “B&G Mortgage”

  • jfraasch:

    Love the blog.

    In a post you have subsequent to this one, you mention that B&G now need to figure out what it is they want to “solve”.

    I don’t think that they necessarily intend to solve the housing crisis with this program, but I do think they are interested in addressing the economy in general and putting more money in people’s pockets.

    Think about what they wish to do. Everyone who has an 800 credit score has no problem refinancing at a good, low rate. Anyone who is already late 60-90 days on their mortgage already can get some kind of capital reduction/mortgage payment reduction program. But anyone with a sub 700 (or sub 620 more specifically) who is current on their mortgage has no chance to refi a mortgage they did when rates were 6.5% or 5.25%. On a $200k mortgage, the payment difference between an existing 6.5% mortgage and a B&G Special Mortgage at 4% is more than substantial!

    While it will most certainly allow for more flexibility in existing homeowner ability to keep up with payments, I feel that it will have a larger impact on other aspects of the economy. Those with a sub 700 credit score are more likely to be up to their eyeballs in debt and have some late payments/collections on their record. To date, no Federally Passed Program with a Ridiculously Long Acronym That Does Nothing for the Economy (or FPPWARLATDNFTE for short) has been able to help them due to a bad credit score- even if they were up to date with their mortgage payments. All the programs out there today help those that are already late or have a good credit score.

    To me, this appears to be the last place where B&G can go to try to help homeowners. While I don’t think it will help housing get out of the current crisis, (it might slow the decline but that’s it) it will help some homeowners be able to better afford their existing mortgage and also allow them to better afford their other bills from credit cards, cars, etc.

    Again, B&G want to stimulate the economy. Adding $400 a month into the pockets of a couple million folks just might goose that GDP and avoid recession so these guys can keep their jobs past the November 2012 elections.

    And just to be clear, this is most definitely a program Congress will drool over. The Republicans will like that it puts money in people’s pockets and that it has no associated tax increase and that it is a backdoor bank bailout. The Dems will love that it will help the poor and disenfranchised and is a backdoor bank bailout. Of course, neither will think of the long term and how these mortgages that go sour will eventually become the responsibility of the collective (pun intended) taxpayer.

    But hey, if you want to goose GDP and avoid a recession, this program is your huckleberry.

    Just my two tax dollars speaking.

    James

  • I still have the report put out in 2002 or 2003 by Mr. Falcon. Doug Noland started reporting on the excesses of FNMA and FHLMC back in 2000. Mr. Noland’s writings can be found at this link. http://www.safehaven.com/author/2/doug-noland

    The October 19, 2001 post by Doug is Titled “Franklin Raines, Director of Central Planning. It contains a part of Mr. Raines’ speech in front of the mortgage bankers convention. In so many words, Mr. Raines predicts the future, except on a rosy basis. It was his clear intent to double mortgage debt in the 2000’s, his comments by 2010. He won that race in a short 6 years or so.

    The video was quite interesting. Look who they had defending Mr. Raines. Some will point to this video as racist, because so many black representatives are put in the position of defending Mr. Raines and attacking Mr. Falcon. Raines took care of the Congressional Black Caucus with plenty of campaign contributions along with men like Barney Frank and Christopher Dodd as well. Our dear President was a recipient of a sizable portion of these funds and he carried Mr. Raines as one of his economic advisors, along with Robert Rubin and Larry Summers. I credit these 3, beyond even Greenspan and Bernanke as the creators of the bubbles in the USA.

    There is something I think out of what I have deduced that not many people seem to recognize. The credit markets in the US operated without any reserves at all, the credit of the banks themselves substituting for reserves. The cash put out by the Federal Reserve had left the system years ago and the proposed balance sheets of the various banks were the reserves. There isn’t much room for error when the entire system rests on net worth of 5% or less, especially when the 5% is of dubious value at best. I don’t believe that reserves mean much in the current system other than to buy and sell government debt securities between the various banks and the Fed. I also believe they don’t exist beyond the capital of the various banks, which is the primary reason there hasn’t been much private lending in the current system.

    One thing is clear and that is the bankers need the debts on homes to remain intact. Remember, in this system, one persons debt is another persons or entities money. In the case of intermediaries, the shrinkage comes out of their pockets first, thus we have the current lockup, mark to fantasy, put off foreclosure games being played. As long as this game goes on, housing isn’t going anywhere. Plus, in a matter of a few years, demand will begin to shrink, not increase, as boomers start to look for smaller homes and the generation that follows is smaller. Buyers and tenants are both acting as tenants as the bankers hold them between a rock and a hard place.

    The theory of debt deflation by Irving Fisher is fine and dandy, save for the fact that it is impossible to solve a debt problem by keeping the debt intact. This is the clear goal of the government and the Fed. There is a policy of no bad loan left behind. I have always felt that debt was like a black hole in that the money goes back into the hole from which it came. The ledger economy is based on the maintenance of a fallacy, that ever growing piles of savings can be serviced by ever growing piles of debtors. The net is there isn’t a real savings rate, there isn’t a growing amount of income to be paid out on the debt and equity instruments other than what can be created in the future in excess of what there already is. In truth, it isn’t a bad system as long as man doesn’t fight mother nature and the rules of mathematics for too long. Too long started over 20 years ago.

    • Indeed, Doug Noland was among the people talking of the coming demise of the GSE’s as early as the beginning of the naughties decade. So was I as it were (see posts under my handle on Silicon Investors at the turn of the century).
      Back then it sounded like crazy talk, but anyone who looked closely at the tiny equity supporting these mountains of debt should have been able to see that this was inviting disaster. Not to mention the myriad of derivatives the GSE’s wrote, which became a huge accounting nightmare even before the crisis – it had become impossible to actually track these positions. An army of accountants (2,000 from what I heard at the time) needed half a year to sort it all out.

  • amun1:

    Excellent post PT. Regarding the rumors of a new plan to refinance every home at rock bottom rates, the NY Times declares that this will provide a $85B stimulus but costs the taxpayer nothing. Huh, I guess there is such a thing as a free lunch after all. That being the case, I think we can all see the ideal solution to our problems.

    Here’s the plan. The government should buy a home for everyone who needs assistance. Fannie and Freddie finance the home for the government at zero percent. When the occupant dies or moves, the government gets its house back and since housing values will have risen by that time, the government will turn a profit on the whole deal just by selling the home into the open market. Voila, a free home for Americans that need it, no cost to the taxpayers.

    • Oh my God – yes, it sounds like the kind of plan that would find approval with the New York Times.
      That rag is truly the US media stronghold of statism, socialism and economic illiteracy, closely followed by TIME magazine as it were. It is not only Krugman who stands out in this regard – I’ve noticed that the entire editorial line of the economics department is basically neo-Keynesian (or is it ‘new’ Keynesian? I’m not sure). A bunch of naive, and yet dangerous inflationary cranks, who appear to believe that the government exists somewhere outside of the market, in a parallel universe where economic scarcity has been abolished.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • How to Survive the Winter
      A Flawless Flock of Scoundrels One of the fringe benefits of living in a country that’s in dire need of a political, financial, and cultural reset, is the twisted amusement that comes with bearing witness to its unraveling.  Day by day we’re greeted with escalating madness.  Indeed, the great fiasco must be taken lightly, so as not to be demoralized by its enormity.   Symphony grotesque in Washington [PT]   Of particular note is the present cast of characters. ...
  • Credit Spreads: The Coming Resurrection of Polly
      Suspicion isn't Merely Asleep – It is in a Coma (or Dead) There is an old Monty Python skit about a parrot whose lack of movement and refusal to respond to prodding leads to an intense debate over what state it is in. Is it just sleeping, as the proprietor of the shop that sold it insists? A very tired parrot taking a really deep rest? Or is it actually dead, as the customer who bought it asserts, offering the fact that it was nailed to its perch as prima facie evidence that what...
  • The Strange Behavior of Gold Investors from Monday to Thursday
      Known and Unknown Anomalies Readers are undoubtedly aware of one or another stock market anomaly, such as e.g. the frequently observed weakness in stock markets in the summer months, which the well-known saying “sell in May and go away” refers to. Apart from such widely known anomalies, there are many others though, which most investors have never heard of. These anomalies can be particularly interesting and profitable for investors – and there are several in the precious metals...
  • A Falling Rate of Discount and the Consumption of Capital
      Net Present Value Warren Buffet famously proposed the analogy of a machine that produces one dollar per year in perpetuity. He asks how much would you pay for this machine? Clearly it is worth something more than $1.00. And it’s equally clear that it’s not worth $1,000. The value is somewhere in between. But where?   We are not sure why Warren Buffett invoked a money printing machine of all things – another interesting way of looking at the concept is by e.g....
  • Business Cycles and Inflation – Part I
      Incrementum Advisory Board Meeting Q4 2017 -  Special Guest Ben Hunt, Author and Editor of Epsilon Theory The quarterly meeting of the Incrementum Fund's Advisory Board took place on October 10 and we had the great pleasure to be joined by special guest Ben Hunt this time, who is probably known to many of our readers as the main author and editor of Epsilon Theory. He is also chief risk officer at investment management firm Salient Partners. As always, a transcript of the discussion is...
  • What President Trump and the West Can Learn from China
      Expensive Politics Instead of a demonstration of its overwhelming military might intended to intimidate tiny North Korea and pressure China to lean on its defiant communist neighbor, President Trump and the West should try to learn a few things from China.   President Trump meets President Xi. The POTUS reportedly had a very good time in China. [PT] Photo credit: AP   The President’s trip to the Far East came on the heels of the completion of China’s...
  • Is Fed Chair Nominee Jay Powell, Count Dracula?
      A Date with Dracula The gray hue of dawn quickly slipped to a bright clear sky as we set out last Saturday morning.  The season’s autumn tinge abounded around us as the distant mountain peaks, and their mighty rifts, grew closer.  The nighttime chill stubbornly lingered in the crisp air.   “Who lives in yonder castle?” Harker asked. “Pardon, Sire?” Up front in the driver's seat it was evidently hard to understand what was said over the racket made by the team of...
  • Business Cycles and Inflation, Part II
      Early Warning Signals in a Fragile System [ed note: here is Part 1; if you have missed it, best go there and start reading from the beginning] We recently received the following charts via email with a query whether they should worry stock market investors. They show two short term interest rates, namely the 2-year t-note yield and 3 month t-bill discount rate. Evidently the moves in short term rates over the past ~18 - 24 months were quite large, even if their absolute levels remain...
  • A Different Powelling - Precious Metals Supply and Demand Report
      New Chief Monetary Bureaucrat Goes from Good to Bad for Silver The prices of the metals ended all but unchanged last week, though they hit spike highs on Thursday. Particularly silver his $17.24 before falling back 43 cents, to close at $16.82.   Never drop silver carelessly, since it might land on your toes. If you are at loggerheads with gravity for some reason, only try to handle smaller-sized bars than the ones depicted above. The snapshot to the right shows the governor...
  • Heat Death of the Economic Universe
      Big Crunch or Big Chill Physicists say that the universe is expanding. However, they hotly debate (OK, pun intended as a foreshadowing device) if the rate of expansion is sufficient to overcome gravity—called escape velocity. It may seem like an arcane topic, but the consequences are dire either way.   OT – a little cosmology excursion from your editor: Observations so far suggest that the expansion of the universe is indeed accelerating – the “big crunch”, in...
  • Claudio Grass Interviews Mark Thornton
      Introduction Mark Thornton of the Mises Institute and our good friend Claudio Grass recently discussed a number of key issues, sharing their perspectives on important economic and geopolitical developments that are currently on the minds of many US and European citizens. A video of the interview can be found at the end of this post. Claudio provided us with a written summary of the interview which we present below – we have added a few remarks in brackets (we strongly recommend...
  • Inflation and Gold - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Reasons to Buy Gold The price of gold went up $19, and the price of silver 42 cents. The price action occurred on Monday, Wednesday and Friday though so far, only the first two price jumps reversed. We promise to take a look at the intraday action on Friday.   File under “reasons to buy gold”: A famous photograph by Henri Cartier-Bresson of a rather unruly queue in front of a bank in Shanghai in 1949 in the final days of Kuomintang rule. When it dawned on people that the...

Support Acting Man

Top10BestPro
j9TJzzN

Austrian Theory and Investment

Archive

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com