US Expatriation Picks Up

A good friend recently pointed us to an interesting statistic published at the Tax Prof blog. More and more Americans are renouncing their citizenship these days. This is quite a reversal from how things used to be.



 

US expatriation, quarterly average since 2004 – the official statistic. We have heard (but can not confirm) that due to delays in confirmations of expatriations from embassies, this may actually understate the true state of affairs somewhat.

 


 

The same data in actual quarterly numbers. As can be seen, US expatriation is on quite an upswing – albeit from a very low base. In terms of the total US population these numbers are very small, but one must suspect that the expatriates are heavy hitters in terms of brains and financial standing.

 


 

As the WSJ reported on this recent trend:

 

“These are small numbers of course. With 300 million Americans, 499 expatriates is hardly a drop in the ocean. Yet the trend is almost a straight line up.

Why is this happening?

The IRS doesn’t tell us why people expatriate, or who they are or where they go. Lawyers say most are wealthy Americans who have expatriated to all manner of countries. One argument is that they are leaving because of President Obama and the nation’s leaders.

There is growing concern, particularly among the wealthy, about the future financial direction of the country,” said Paul L. Caron, Charles Hartsock Professor of Law at the University of Cincinnati College of Law. “This President constantly demonizes the wealthy, who undoubtedly are concerned about the tax policy that would emerge in 2012 if a re-elected Barack Obama, unconstrained by re-election concerns, finally confronts the budgetary train wreck that he has done so much to exacerbate.”

Other attorneys who specialize in helping the Americans expatriate say the reason is that the IRS is cracking down on overseas bank accounts and offshore income. There is a population of U.S. citizens who live overseas and may never have paid U.S. taxes on their non-U.S. earnings and non-U.S. accounts. Now that the IRS is enforcing the rules, with criminal penalties for scofflaws, the overseas residents would prefer to expatriate rather than pay.

I think this is coming to the forefront because of offshore reporting and banker reporting issues,” said Peter Connors, a tax attorney in New York. “there is a price to being a citizen of the U.S. and at a certain point the price may not be worth it.”

Whatever the case, the numbers are clearly headed in the wrong direction.”

 

If a government enacts policies that threaten wealth, it can easily end up shooting itself in the foot (or in the face, as Chris Weber has more colorfully put it – more from him below).  What if the trickle becomes a flood? Getting more milk from the cow can hardly be accomplished by chasing away the cow.

 


 

A cartoon from the time the bailouts were in full swing. Here the abstract 'US treasury' entity is the haggard cow, but it really is a stand-in for the tax payers of course.

 


 

The crackdown that is supposedly designed to catch only 'scofflaws' has in the meantime had a myriad of consequences – possibly unintended, but how can one be sure? The minds of collectivists are not wired the same way as those of  producers of wealth after all.

 

As Chris Weber, the investment editor of the Overseas Opportunity Letter noted in a recent missive:

 

“Everywhere I go in the financial world in Europe," writes Investment Editor Chris Weber, "I hear the same thing: The U.S. is shooting itself in the face.

"The problem is the regulations the U.S. now insists every nation impose on U.S. companies or people seeking to do business or lower their taxes.

"For instance, there are two Swiss cantons that are using low corporate taxes to lure companies to place their headquarters there. The more famous one is Zug, but the up-and-coming one is Obwalden (which just passed a flat tax rate of 6% of a company's profits).

"Companies from all over the world are using this to lower their taxes. But when even the bluest-chip U.S. company, publicly traded on the NYSE, sought to do so recently, it was turned away. Almost no one wants to deal with U.S. companies or people anymore. They've decided it is more problem than it is worth, due to the intense regulatory atmosphere from the United States.

"It used to be that anyone, from whatever nation, could come to the Obwaldner Kantonalbank (OKB) and open an account, even if they had just US$100. (Those who know the gold and silver ETFs offered by the Zuricher Kantonalbank (ZKB) know these banks are backed by the cantonal governments and are thus very safe. These are the banks that are regarded as public utilities.)

"But starting around four years ago, with the UBS debacle and the U.S. financial crisis, this all changed. The long arm of the U.S. government and the numerous new regulations have made OKB decide it will not take on American clients.

"And please don't think I'm talking about tax-evaders here. Americans who used to be able to open accounts with tiny amounts of money at a safe bank like this and treat it just as they would their local banks, fully declaring all their money…these people are no longer welcome. It was with sadness that they told me this. But it is just too much trouble dealing with all the American red tape. The effect of this is to deny small U.S. investors a way to protect themselves from unsafe banks and devalued U.S. currency. Now, pretty much anyone except Americans can do this.”

"It goes the other way, too. Non-U.S. companies used to dream of listing themselves on the NYSE. That was the 'big-time.' But it is no accident that the overall number of listings on the Big Board reached its peak in 1997 and has been falling ever since.

"Again, the problem is excessive regulation. The companies can list themselves on Hong Kong, Singapore, or London exchanges with much less cost and headache. The list of companies who have turned down a chance to list themselves on U.S. exchanges is long.

"It goes further than this. There are many nations on earth that have no inheritance taxes, or maybe just small ones. But if a non-U.S. person buys stocks in the United States (in excess of about US$60,000), their estate has to pay U.S. estate taxes if they die. No wonder people are not excited to buy U.S. stocks.

"If the object of the government is to encourage investment and entrepreneurship and to create jobs, this is exactly the wrong way to go about it.

"And I'm not blaming any one political party. Things are the same now as under the last American president. It's as if the nation has decided it no longer wants to encourage its companies or foreigners to invest in the U.S. Most likely, they don't think of it in those terms; they likely still think that, because the United States is such a great country, then of course anyone would want to invest there.

"But the truth is that by doing these things, non-U.S. people are less likely to invest. Thus the United States is seen to be simply hurting itself.

"More than just hurting itself, it is building up ill will all around the world. It is getting so that people will be avoiding the U.S. entirely, going around it to invest and even to trade. I know this sounds like an extreme reaction. But if things continue the way they've been going for the last four or five years, this will be the result.

"The American government can put on all these restrictions and keep out foreign investors and companies who want to list on the NYSE. It can deny the right of even the smallest investor to diversify into another banking system with a stronger currency.

"But will this make for a stronger United States? Are we entering a new world where everyone prospers except for Americans? If so, it is particularly sad, because America will be turning its back on the very ideas that made it so great.

"You see, 100 years ago, there was outright famine in Obwalden. With so many farmers, who often had 10 children, the available farmland was just not enough for the people. Starvation got so bad that the Swiss government offered anyone free passage to America if they would promise never to come back. Many of these emigrants settled in the Imperial Valley of California, about as far from the Alps and green meadows as you can get.

"The U.S. was haven for the poor people of Obwalden, who were starving and saved by moving to America. These people are very appreciative of what America offered to their great-great-grandparents. America literally saved their lives.

"And that is why they don't understand why America is now 'destroying itself,' as one of them told me. They are very, very sad to see it happen. In fact, they seem much sadder and more concerned about what has happened to the United States than most Americans do."

 

However, it is not only in the realm of taxation and financial matters that the US is 'shooting itself into the face' by means of over-regulation and merciless enforcement.

 

Scenes from Atlas Shrugged and Killing New York

The recent reform of the US health care system has borne some remarkably strange fruit. It turns out that there are exemptions from the more oppressive aspects of the law – the granting of which which is of course  a preserve of politicians and bureaucrats. As the 'International Liberty' blog notes, this is akin to a scene from Ayn Rand's novel 'Atlas Shrugged'. Writes author Dan Mitchell:

 

“In a column about the revolving door between big government and the lobbying world, here’s what the irreplaceable Tim Carney wrote about the waiver process for folks trying to escape the burden of government-run healthcare.

Congress imposes mandates on other entities, but gives bureaucrats the power to waive those mandates. To get such a waiver, you hire the people who used to administer or who helped craft the policies. So who’s the net winner? The politicians and bureaucrats who craft policies and wield power, because this combination of massive government power and wide bureaucratic discretion creates huge demand for revolving-door lobbyists. It’s another reason Obama’s legislative agenda, including bailouts, stimulus, ObamaCare, Dodd-Frank, tobacco regulation, and more, necessarily fosters more corruption and cronyism.

This seemed so familiar that I wondered whether Tim was guilty of plagiarism. But he’s one of the best journalists in DC, so I knew that couldn’t be the case.

Then I realized that there was plagiarism, but the politicians in Washington were the guilty parties. As can be seen in this passage from Atlas Shrugged, the Obama Administration is copying from what Ayn Rand wrote – as dystopian parody – in the 1950s.”

 

The International Liberty blog already noted on a previous occasion that the Obama administration seemed to encourage people to 'go Galt' – a phrase that describes a peaceful but effective way of hitting back at the collectivists. Productive, wealth generating people simply withdraw their talents from the economy and thereby no longer produce anything the statists can loot. The administration's point man for recommending this course of action to Americans who don't like 'Obamacare' was the president's solicitor general, Neal Kumar Katyal.

 

President Obama’s solicitor general, defending the national health care law on Wednesday, told a federal appeals court that Americans who didn’t like the individual mandate could always avoid it by choosing to earn less money. Neal Kumar Katyal, the acting solicitor general, made the argument under questioning before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Cincinnati, which was considering an appeal by the Thomas More Law Center.

 

(our emphasis)

As Margaret Thatcher once famously said: "The problem with socialism is that eventually, you run out of other people's money”.

Especially, one should perhaps remind Mr. Katyal, if those 'other people' actually decide to earn less.  Or, as the case may be, decide to simply expatriate.

What we are asking ourselves is this: in what way do these ideas and rules conform to American ideals? It appears to us that America is indeed busy shedding everything that once made the nation great. Mind, it is not really our intention to solely pick on the Obama administration. What is at stake is freedom as such, whether it is threatened by the welfare statism of the socialist party or the the warfare statism favored by the conservative party. In our opinion, the shredding of the bill of rights under Obama's predecessor G.W. Bush is equally if not even more deplorable. What all these activities have in common is this: they amount to an exchange in which (perceived) 'safety' is achieved by surrendering something that seems to us far more precious, namely liberty. Liberty is of course what the US once stood for, as a shining light for others to emulate.

Another example of how the nanny-state has begun to infest American life was recently discussed in the 'Spectator'. The article, which we strongly recommend reading in its entirety, is entitled 'The men who killed New York'. As we mentioned to friends who pointed this article out to us, 'a place where they no longer allow you to smoke should be considered highly suspect by everyone, whether one is or isn't a smoker'. As the article notes, a closer examination of the various 'pro-health' regulations that are now covering New York like a deadening blanket apparently designed to take all the joy out of living, reveals that the intentions of their authors are less than pure.

 

New York is currently governed by a gaggle of health-obsessed bigwigs who believe they have a duty to grab New Yorkers by the scruffs of their outsized necks and drag them towards lives of bicycle-riding, non-smoking, booze-avoiding, fruit-snacking conformity. City Hall, under Mayor Michael Bloomberg, is awash with that new breed of psycho-politician known as the ‘nudger’, who believes that he has the right to use psychological techniques and brute censorship to manipulate and ‘improve’ human behaviour. he Bloombergers have become world-beaters in the banning of public smoking and the demonisation of junk food. It is testament to their successful colonisation of these islands that the banning of smoking in all public parks, pedestrian plazas and beaches passed without incident, and even without much angry commentary, on 24 May. Under the Smoke Free Air Act (it is clever, in an Orwellian kind of way, to use the word ‘free’ in an act of law that diminishes freedom), New Yorkers can no longer light up in Central Park, Prospect Park, the Brooklyn Promenade, the Coney Island concrete walk or even Times Square, that flashing, noisy advertisers’ paradise where you can still watch naked cowboys play guitar and buy Sarah Palin condoms from streetsellers — so long as you don’t puff on a ciggie at the same time. ‘Where can I smoke now?’ one New Yorker said to a newspaper. ‘In an underground fortress of shame?’

In 2003, NYC became one of the first cities in the western world to outlaw the evil weed in bars, restaurants, workplaces and theatres. But the outdoor smoking ban is of a different, more jaw-dropping order. It gives the lie to the idea that bans on public smoking are driven by a good-hearted instinct to protect non-smokers from second-hand smoke. (How could that possibly be a problem in a space as vast and airy as Central Park?) Rather it exposes the Bloombergers’ desire to monitor more closely what people ingest, not only at work or on the bus, but now in Central Park too, a place that was originally designed, in the words of David M. Scobey’s book Empire City, to ‘enhance the experience of freedom’ and allow New Yorkers to ‘lose themselves’. The outdoor smoking ban has stubbed out something of the spirit of New York. As one smoker who was reprimanded by the NYPD for daring to light up in Union Square on the day ‘Smoke Freedom’ was enforced, put it, ‘New York is kind of lame now.’

 

(our emphasis)

The  article also highlights the almost comical regulatory 'fight against fatty and sugary foods' which forces street vendors and restaurants to prominently display the calories of the items they sell. As it says in the title of this blog post, the people inventing all these regulations are regular killjoys. They don't even make a secret out of the fact that they not only want to impose a 'healthy', but also a decidedly joyless life on their fellow citizens.

 

“Walking down Fifth Avenue, I saw a huge poster in a Burger King window advertising two burgers for the price of one, alongside an equally huge notice saying: ‘1320 CALORIES.’ Even the temporary stalls that hawk hot dogs and ice-cream in Central Park and elsewhere display calorific facts. That salted pretzel you buy as you stroll back to your hotel (‘500 CALORIES’) now comes with a side order of inner turmoil and gym fantasies. It is hard to convey the impact of this state-enforced calorie-counting. It effortlessly zaps the fun from eating out. It is designed to induce caution, even guilt, in New Yorkers, to make them stop and think before snacking or dining, to make them treat calorific consumption as something akin to snorting cocaine — an act that can have grave consequences.” […]

“The lowest blow in City Hall’s war on wicked food is its recurring efforts to ban the buying of fizzy pop with food stamps. In an initiative that could easily be titled ‘No Coke for poor black folk’, the Bloombergers have sought federal permission to prevent welfare recipients from using government cash to purchase fizzy drinks. The killjoyism of this campaign, the Scrooge-infused miserabilism of it, is astounding. City Hall has launched an advertising campaign demonising sugary drinks as one of the great evils of our time, and its internal email correspondence about the campaign, which was leaked to the New York Times, shines a rather harsh light on the evidence-lite nastiness of the modern-day nudge-and-nanny industry. Scientific advisers emailed Thomas Farley, Bloomberg’s overactive health adviser, to say that the ad’s claim that drinking pop can make you gain 10 or 15 pounds is ‘simplistic’ and ‘exaggerated’. Overriding them, Farley responded: ‘I think what people fear is getting fat, so we need some statement about what is bad about consuming so many calories.’ Who needs evidence when you have fear? The ad shows human fat gurgling from the top of a can of soda. One City Hall employee could barely conceal his excitement: it is ‘deliciously disgusting’, he said in one of the emails that was leaked.

 

(our emphasis)

In an effort to counter the efforts of these killjoys a bit we would recommend starting one's day with a shot of Bourbon, as suggested by Jeffrey Tucker. The book 'Bourbon for Breakfast – Living outside the Statist Quo' can be downloaded for free here (pdf). A critique of the book written by Michael Lawrence is available here.

In our opinion, people who fearfully impose 'healthy living' on themselves to the extent that they take all the joy out of their lives are at great risk of not only missing a lot of fun, but of dying very early. Those who try to impose it on others are a great deal worse still.

One of the greatest paragons of a healthy lifestyle was Adolf Hitler, who neither drank, smoked nor reportedly ate any meat. His politics not surprisingly  mirrored his joyless life perfectly. He imposed double-plus-joylessness on millions of people. Now, we certainly don't want to suggest that New York's administration is as bad as Hitler, we just mention him as an example of a killjoy whose alleged virtues masked a personality that was intent on imposing its own dour outlook on life on everybody else. He was unhappy and he wanted to make damn sure that the rest of the world would end up even more unhappy. Who knows, if he'd had a regular shot of Bourbon for breakfast, he may have decided to never pursue his crazy Nazi shtick.

 

Charts by: US Treasury Department


 
 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke

   
 

6 Responses to “America’s Killjoys”

  • Floyd:

    Wrt to green card stats, one should consider those who don’t even bother to get it.
    They work in the US legally, often in productive roles (e.g. hi-tech professionals), and leave after a while.

    Reasons are often a mixture of family networks (little to do with the US) and relative attractiveness.

    The fact that poor people from awful countries still want to immigrate should not mislead us. It is of no relevance to how attractive the US really is.

  • I have been raising hell about this for years. The term is FASCIST. It started with Roosevelt in the 1930’s. A lot of people buy into it, as in the old saying “there ought to be a law against”. You have several million cars belching smoke and exhaust gases and they are worried about cigarettes. At the same time, we have a state supported banking system set up to destroy the middle class. In the end, those that hold the paper will have to pay.

    There is something called the Sovereign movement. The press is trying to demonize it over the acts of a few. The American Press is literally Goebbels and Pravda at its best. Washington DC and NYC are one in the same, both sucking the blood out of the country. Americans have been the proverbial frog, boiled in a cold pan of water. Clearly a few are deciding to jump out. We have a President and the EU that are hell bent on world regulation and totalitarian government. This is all arranged around the international banking community. Bloomberg, by his position in financial news is merely a tool of the cartel.

    A case in point is the report of government statistics by the financial news. The unemployment data is manipulated from week to week, month to month, but the truth behind it is only exposed on the blogs I read. For the last 3 years, unemployment claims have been reported as decreases and increase from a revised upward prior week. Instead of saying the current week represented a decline of 2000 from 424K to 422K, they say it is a decline from the previous week figure of 428K, which was revised upward from 424. Usually you have to read the whole article to see if they even put the revision in. Had the reported figures about increases and decreases been actual, we would have people filing to give their unemployment back by now. I can’t remember a week the figure hasn’t been revised upward since I have been reading them, over 2 years ago.

    I would venture the story on second hand smoke is the big lie told over and over again. This is merely one more way to get the camels nose in the tent. The AMA is merely one more piece of the fascist propaganda machine. They have clearly devised a plan to give less care for more money and sell immortality to the world. When I was a kid, very few adults I knew didn’t smoke. We should all be dead from second hand smoke by now. Less smokers now, more diagnosed diseases. In the meantime, we are sold corn sugar by large chemical and agriculture outfits, which probably kills more Americans than cigarettes back in the 1960’s. They keep making the soda pops bigger, the better to kill you. In the meantime, we are sold corn ethanol that we pay for twice. Maybe 3 times when you figure the effects this program has had on the supply of food around the world.

    War is where the government derives its power. Eisenhower warned to beware of the military/industrial complex. He wasn’t exactly a darling of the American Constitutionalist, but he clearly had a birds eye view of its operation. FDR declared an emergency and enforced it under Section 5B of the trading with the enemy act, codified as 12USC95a and 50USC5. As much as 9/11 was viewed as a religious act, it was as much a result of an economic war waged through credit around the world. The current European debt crisis is nothing more than another subprime crisis, where international bankers filled countries up with debt they couldn’t pay. Now we have another economic war, another scapegoat.

    Our various governments treat the people as nothing more than managed livestock. Americans need to decide and decide quickly if they want to be treated as cattle or as free men. Lush pastures are nothing more than a pathway to slaughter. Government has no problem sending us to fight wars that may or may not have anything to do with our survival, expose us to the potential of atomic Holocaust, yet they enforce their will against nonsense like smoking in a park or on a street corner. The laws are against the Declaration of Independence. Just read the second paragraph, written when men knew something besides what they heard on TV or read in some fascist propaganda rag.

    • ‘Getting the camel’s nose in the tent’ – very well put.
      Thank you for your always very interesting comments.
      Unfortunately I’m always behind in reacting to comments – usually I tend to catch up every two weeks or so.

    • Floyd:

      I’m allergic to cigarette smoke (of all things).
      Yet, the legal onslaught is disturbing.
      I’d add the “war on drugs” to your list. It serves well various powerful interested parties, starting with the drug cartels.
      The case can be made that the “war on drugs” increases consumption as there are so many interested parties benefiting.
      But, even if the “war on drugs” reduces consumption, it should not have been criminalized.
      :(!

      • I agree, the prohibition is a failed policy that has only served to empower criminal cartels and the bureaucracy. Unfortunately the economic interests behind the status quo are extremely powerful, so we can probably not expect a change in this policy anytime soon (although some weakening of it at the edges can be observed lately). This is yet another case where a clearly failed policy will continue to protect powerful vested interests.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • India: Cash is Back
      But the Crisis has Deepened and has Become More Entrenched (Part XIV)   Nobody for President On 17th July 2017, India will elect a new President through a vote of the elected representatives. The two real choices are between Ram Nath Kovind and Meira Kumar. Afraid of looking completely ignorant, I asked a few people who Kovind is. No-one knew of him and people only vaguely remembered Ms. Kumar.   Adults and juveniles have been arrested in different parts of India for...
  • The Golden Age Has Just Begun
      Some Things Actually Go Up Before and During the Fall... In recent issues of Seasonal Insights I have discussed two asset classes that tend to suffer  performance problems in most years until the autumn, namely stocks and bitcoin. I thought you might for a change want to hear of an asset that will be in a seasonal uptrend over coming months.   Many things, including bitcoin, stocks and leaves tend to fall in the aptly named fall... but some things actually start to...
  • Work is for Idiots
      Disproportionate Rewards The International Monetary Fund reported an unpleasant outlook for the U.S. economy on Wednesday.  The IMF, as part of its annual review, believes the U.S. economic model isn’t working as well as it could to generate shared income growth.   Supping with the IMF (we recommend trying to avoid invitations to structurally adjusted suppers if possible. Their air of finality is reportedly unbearable). [PT]   On the same day, in an unrelated...
  • A Look at the Gold and Silver Price Drop of 3 July, 2017
      Mystery Nosedive The price of gold dropped from $1,241 as of Friday’s close to $1,219 on the close Monday, or -1.8%. The price of silver fell from $16.58 to $16.11, or -2.9%. It is being called a gold and silver “smash” (implication being that one party or a conspiracy is doing the smashing).   The flight of the gold rocket, different phases [PT]   Our goal is to help you develop a clear understanding. The move was no mystery. Monetary Metals makes an intensive...
  • Tales from the FOMC Underground
      A Great Big Dud Many of today’s economic troubles are due to a fantastic guess.  That the wealth effect of inflated asset prices would stimulate demand in the economy. The premise, as we understand it, was that as stock portfolios bubbled up investors would feel better about their lot in life.  Some of them would feel so doggone good they’d go out and buy 72-inch flat screen televisions and brand-new electric cars with computerized dashboards on credit.   The Wilshire...
  • Adventures in Quantitative Tightening
      Flowing Toward the Great Depression All remaining doubts concerning the place the U.S. economy and its tangled web of international credits and debts is headed were clarified this week. On Monday, Mark Yusko, CIO of Morgan Creek Capital Management, told CNBC that:   “…we’re flowing toward the path of 1928-29 when Hoover was president. Now Trump is president. Both were presidents with no experience who come in with a Congress that is all Republican, lots of big promises,...
  • How Dumb Is the Fed?
      Bent and Distorted POITOU, FRANCE – This morning, we are wondering: How dumb is the Fed? The question was prompted by this comment by former Fed insider Chris Whalen at The Institutional Risk Analyst blog.   They're not the best map readers, that much is known for certain. [PT]   [O]ur message to the folks in Jackson Hole this week [at the annual central banker meeting there] is that the end of the Fed’s reckless experiment in social engineering via QE and...
  • The Money Velocity Myth
      Popular Imagery of Money on the Move For most financial commentators an important factor that either reinforces or weakens the effect of changes in the money supply on economic activity and prices is the “velocity of money”.   An image from an article on the intertubes that “explains” the velocity of money (one of the articles we came across started out as follows: “The economy runs smoothly only when there is enough money in circulation. How much is enough?” ...
  • Gold and Silver Capitulation – Precious Metals Supply & Demand Report
      Last Week in Precious Metals: Peak Hype, Stocks vs. Flows and Capitulation The big news this week was the flash crash in silver late on 6 July.  We will shortly publish a separate forensic analysis of this, as there is a lot to see and say.   Silver - 1,000 troy ounce good delivery bars, approved by the COMEX. Whatever you do, do not let one of these things land your feet. For readers used to the metric system: these bars weigh approximately between 28 to 33 kilograms...
  • No “Trump Bump” for the Economy
      Crackpot Schemes POITOU, FRANCE – “Nothing really changes.” Sitting next to us at breakfast, a companion was reading an article written by the No. 2 man in France, Édouard Philippe, in Le Monde. The headline promised to tell us how the country was going to “deblock” itself.  But upon inspection, the proposals were the same old claptrap about favoring “green” energy... changing the tax code to reward one group and punish another...  and spending more money on various...
  • What Really Happened When Gold Crashed, Monday June 26?
      The Earth is Still Round Let’s establish three facts up front. One, the volume of contracts traded was not “millions” (as at least one conspiracy theorist is claiming). During the 1-minute window when the price of gold dropped from $1,254.10 to a low of $1,236.50 and recovered to $1,247, 18,031 August gold contracts traded. There was negligible volume in the October and December contracts. Two, the Earth is round. This did not occur while “everyone” was sleeping (as at least...
  • Putting the Latest Silver Crash Under a Lens
      An Unenthusiastic Market On Thursday, July 6, in the late afternoon (as reckoned in Arizona), the price of silver crashed. The move was very brief, but very intense. The price hit a low under $14.40 before recovering to around $15.80 which is about 20 cents lower than where it started.   1 kilogram cast silver bars from an Austrian refinery. These are available in 250 g, 500 g and 1 kg sizes and look really neat. We use the 250 g ones as paperweights, so this is an...

Support Acting Man

j9TJzzN

Austrian Theory and Investment

Own physical gold and silver outside a bank

Archive

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com

savant