US Expatriation Picks Up
A good friend recently pointed us to an interesting statistic published at the Tax Prof blog. More and more Americans are renouncing their citizenship these days. This is quite a reversal from how things used to be.
US expatriation, quarterly average since 2004 – the official statistic. We have heard (but can not confirm) that due to delays in confirmations of expatriations from embassies, this may actually understate the true state of affairs somewhat.
The same data in actual quarterly numbers. As can be seen, US expatriation is on quite an upswing – albeit from a very low base. In terms of the total US population these numbers are very small, but one must suspect that the expatriates are heavy hitters in terms of brains and financial standing.
As the WSJ reported on this recent trend:
“These are small numbers of course. With 300 million Americans, 499 expatriates is hardly a drop in the ocean. Yet the trend is almost a straight line up.
Why is this happening?
The IRS doesn’t tell us why people expatriate, or who they are or where they go. Lawyers say most are wealthy Americans who have expatriated to all manner of countries. One argument is that they are leaving because of President Obama and the nation’s leaders.
“There is growing concern, particularly among the wealthy, about the future financial direction of the country,” said Paul L. Caron, Charles Hartsock Professor of Law at the University of Cincinnati College of Law. “This President constantly demonizes the wealthy, who undoubtedly are concerned about the tax policy that would emerge in 2012 if a re-elected Barack Obama, unconstrained by re-election concerns, finally confronts the budgetary train wreck that he has done so much to exacerbate.”
Other attorneys who specialize in helping the Americans expatriate say the reason is that the IRS is cracking down on overseas bank accounts and offshore income. There is a population of U.S. citizens who live overseas and may never have paid U.S. taxes on their non-U.S. earnings and non-U.S. accounts. Now that the IRS is enforcing the rules, with criminal penalties for scofflaws, the overseas residents would prefer to expatriate rather than pay.
“I think this is coming to the forefront because of offshore reporting and banker reporting issues,” said Peter Connors, a tax attorney in New York. “there is a price to being a citizen of the U.S. and at a certain point the price may not be worth it.”
Whatever the case, the numbers are clearly headed in the wrong direction.”
If a government enacts policies that threaten wealth, it can easily end up shooting itself in the foot (or in the face, as Chris Weber has more colorfully put it – more from him below). What if the trickle becomes a flood? Getting more milk from the cow can hardly be accomplished by chasing away the cow.
A cartoon from the time the bailouts were in full swing. Here the abstract 'US treasury' entity is the haggard cow, but it really is a stand-in for the tax payers of course.
The crackdown that is supposedly designed to catch only 'scofflaws' has in the meantime had a myriad of consequences – possibly unintended, but how can one be sure? The minds of collectivists are not wired the same way as those of producers of wealth after all.
As Chris Weber, the investment editor of the noted in a recent missive:
“Everywhere I go in the financial world in Europe," writes Investment Editor Chris Weber, "I hear the same thing: The U.S. is shooting itself in the face.
"The problem is the regulations the U.S. now insists every nation impose on U.S. companies or people seeking to do business or lower their taxes.
"For instance, there are two Swiss cantons that are using low corporate taxes to lure companies to place their headquarters there. The more famous one is Zug, but the up-and-coming one is Obwalden (which just passed a flat tax rate of 6% of a company's profits).
"Companies from all over the world are using this to lower their taxes. But when even the bluest-chip U.S. company, publicly traded on the NYSE, sought to do so recently, it was turned away. Almost no one wants to deal with U.S. companies or people anymore. They've decided it is more problem than it is worth, due to the intense regulatory atmosphere from the United States.
"It used to be that anyone, from whatever nation, could come to the Obwaldner Kantonalbank (OKB) and open an account, even if they had just US$100. (Those who know the gold and silver ETFs offered by the Zuricher Kantonalbank (ZKB) know these banks are backed by the cantonal governments and are thus very safe. These are the banks that are regarded as public utilities.)
"But starting around four years ago, with the UBS debacle and the U.S. financial crisis, this all changed. The long arm of the U.S. government and the numerous new regulations have made OKB decide it will not take on American clients.
"And please don't think I'm talking about tax-evaders here. Americans who used to be able to open accounts with tiny amounts of money at a safe bank like this and treat it just as they would their local banks, fully declaring all their money…these people are no longer welcome. It was with sadness that they told me this. But it is just too much trouble dealing with all the American red tape. The effect of this is to deny small U.S. investors a way to protect themselves from unsafe banks and devalued U.S. currency. Now, pretty much anyone except Americans can do this.”
"It goes the other way, too. Non-U.S. companies used to dream of listing themselves on the NYSE. That was the 'big-time.' But it is no accident that the overall number of listings on the Big Board reached its peak in 1997 and has been falling ever since.
"Again, the problem is excessive regulation. The companies can list themselves on Hong Kong, Singapore, or London exchanges with much less cost and headache. The list of companies who have turned down a chance to list themselves on U.S. exchanges is long.
"It goes further than this. There are many nations on earth that have no inheritance taxes, or maybe just small ones. But if a non-U.S. person buys stocks in the United States (in excess of about US$60,000), their estate has to pay U.S. estate taxes if they die. No wonder people are not excited to buy U.S. stocks.
"If the object of the government is to encourage investment and entrepreneurship and to create jobs, this is exactly the wrong way to go about it.
"And I'm not blaming any one political party. Things are the same now as under the last American president. It's as if the nation has decided it no longer wants to encourage its companies or foreigners to invest in the U.S. Most likely, they don't think of it in those terms; they likely still think that, because the United States is such a great country, then of course anyone would want to invest there.
"But the truth is that by doing these things, non-U.S. people are less likely to invest. Thus the United States is seen to be simply hurting itself.
"More than just hurting itself, it is building up ill will all around the world. It is getting so that people will be avoiding the U.S. entirely, going around it to invest and even to trade. I know this sounds like an extreme reaction. But if things continue the way they've been going for the last four or five years, this will be the result.
"The American government can put on all these restrictions and keep out foreign investors and companies who want to list on the NYSE. It can deny the right of even the smallest investor to diversify into another banking system with a stronger currency.
"But will this make for a stronger United States? Are we entering a new world where everyone prospers except for Americans? If so, it is particularly sad, because America will be turning its back on the very ideas that made it so great.
"You see, 100 years ago, there was outright famine in Obwalden. With so many farmers, who often had 10 children, the available farmland was just not enough for the people. Starvation got so bad that the Swiss government offered anyone free passage to America if they would promise never to come back. Many of these emigrants settled in the Imperial Valley of California, about as far from the Alps and green meadows as you can get.
"The U.S. was haven for the poor people of Obwalden, who were starving and saved by moving to America. These people are very appreciative of what America offered to their great-great-grandparents. America literally saved their lives.
"And that is why they don't understand why America is now 'destroying itself,' as one of them told me. They are very, very sad to see it happen. In fact, they seem much sadder and more concerned about what has happened to the United States than most Americans do."
However, it is not only in the realm of taxation and financial matters that the US is 'shooting itself into the face' by means of over-regulation and merciless enforcement.
Scenes from Atlas Shrugged and Killing New York
The recent reform of the US health care system has borne some remarkably strange fruit. It turns out that there are exemptions from the more oppressive aspects of the law – the granting of which which is of course a preserve of politicians and bureaucrats. As the 'International Liberty' blog notes, this is akin to a scene from Ayn Rand's novel 'Atlas Shrugged'. Writes author Dan Mitchell:
“In a column about the revolving door between big government and the lobbying world, here’s what the irreplaceable for folks trying to escape the burden of government-run healthcare.
Congress imposes mandates on other entities, but gives bureaucrats the power to waive those mandates. To get such a waiver, you hire the people who used to administer or who helped craft the policies. So who’s the net winner? The politicians and bureaucrats who craft policies and wield power, because this combination of massive government power and wide bureaucratic discretion creates huge demand for revolving-door lobbyists. It’s another reason Obama’s legislative agenda, including bailouts, stimulus, ObamaCare, Dodd-Frank, tobacco regulation, and more, necessarily fosters more corruption and cronyism.
This seemed so familiar that I wondered whether Tim was guilty of plagiarism. But he’s one of the best journalists in DC, so I knew that couldn’t be the case.
Then I realized that there was plagiarism, but the politicians in Washington were the guilty parties. As can be seen in this passage from Atlas Shrugged, the Obama Administration is copying from what Ayn Rand wrote – as dystopian parody – in the 1950s.”
The International Liberty blog already noted on a previous occasion that the Obama administration seemed to encourage people to 'go Galt' – a phrase that describes a peaceful but effective way of hitting back at the collectivists. Productive, wealth generating people simply withdraw their talents from the economy and thereby no longer produce anything the statists can loot. The administration's point man for recommending this course of action to Americans who don't like 'Obamacare' was the president's solicitor general, Neal Kumar Katyal.
“President Obama’s solicitor general, defending the national health care law on Wednesday, told a federal appeals court that Americans who didn’t like the individual mandate could always avoid it by choosing to earn less money. Neal Kumar Katyal, the acting solicitor general, made the argument under questioning before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Cincinnati, which was considering an appeal by the Thomas More Law Center.
As Margaret Thatcher once famously said: "The problem with socialism is that eventually, you run out of other people's money”.
Especially, one should perhaps remind Mr. Katyal, if those 'other people' actually decide to earn less. Or, as the case may be, decide to simply expatriate.
What we are asking ourselves is this: in what way do these ideas and rules conform to American ideals? It appears to us that America is indeed busy shedding everything that once made the nation great. Mind, it is not really our intention to solely pick on the Obama administration. What is at stake is freedom as such, whether it is threatened by the welfare statism of the socialist party or the the warfare statism favored by the conservative party. In our opinion, the shredding of the bill of rights under Obama's predecessor G.W. Bush is equally if not even more deplorable. What all these activities have in common is this: they amount to an exchange in which (perceived) 'safety' is achieved by surrendering something that seems to us far more precious, namely liberty. Liberty is of course what the US once stood for, as a shining light for others to emulate.
Another example of how the nanny-state has begun to infest American life was recently discussed in the 'Spectator'. The article, which we strongly recommend reading in its entirety, is entitled ''. As we mentioned to friends who pointed this article out to us, 'a place where they no longer allow you to smoke should be considered highly suspect by everyone, whether one is or isn't a smoker'. As the article notes, a closer examination of the various 'pro-health' regulations that are now covering New York like a deadening blanket apparently designed to take all the joy out of living, reveals that the intentions of their authors are less than pure.
“New York is currently governed by a gaggle of health-obsessed bigwigs who believe they have a duty to grab New Yorkers by the scruffs of their outsized necks and drag them towards lives of bicycle-riding, non-smoking, booze-avoiding, fruit-snacking conformity. City Hall, under Mayor Michael Bloomberg, is awash with that new breed of psycho-politician known as the ‘nudger’, who believes that he has the right to use psychological techniques and brute censorship to manipulate and ‘improve’ human behaviour. he Bloombergers have become world-beaters in the banning of public smoking and the demonisation of junk food. It is testament to their successful colonisation of these islands that the banning of smoking in all public parks, pedestrian plazas and beaches passed without incident, and even without much angry commentary, on 24 May. Under the Smoke Free Air Act (it is clever, in an Orwellian kind of way, to use the word ‘free’ in an act of law that diminishes freedom), New Yorkers can no longer light up in Central Park, Prospect Park, the Brooklyn Promenade, the Coney Island concrete walk or even Times Square, that flashing, noisy advertisers’ paradise where you can still watch naked cowboys play guitar and buy Sarah Palin condoms from streetsellers — so long as you don’t puff on a ciggie at the same time. ‘Where can I smoke now?’ one New Yorker said to a newspaper. ‘In an underground fortress of shame?’
In 2003, NYC became one of the first cities in the western world to outlaw the evil weed in bars, restaurants, workplaces and theatres. But the outdoor smoking ban is of a different, more jaw-dropping order. It gives the lie to the idea that bans on public smoking are driven by a good-hearted instinct to protect non-smokers from second-hand smoke. (How could that possibly be a problem in a space as vast and airy as Central Park?) Rather it exposes the Bloombergers’ desire to monitor more closely what people ingest, not only at work or on the bus, but now in Central Park too, a place that was originally designed, in the words of David M. Scobey’s book Empire City, to ‘enhance the experience of freedom’ and allow New Yorkers to ‘lose themselves’. The outdoor smoking ban has stubbed out something of the spirit of New York. As one smoker who was reprimanded by the NYPD for daring to light up in Union Square on the day ‘Smoke Freedom’ was enforced, put it, ‘New York is kind of lame now.’
The article also highlights the almost comical regulatory 'fight against fatty and sugary foods' which forces street vendors and restaurants to prominently display the calories of the items they sell. As it says in the title of this blog post, the people inventing all these regulations are regular killjoys. They don't even make a secret out of the fact that they not only want to impose a 'healthy', but also a decidedly joyless life on their fellow citizens.
“Walking down Fifth Avenue, I saw a huge poster in a Burger King window advertising two burgers for the price of one, alongside an equally huge notice saying: ‘1320 CALORIES.’ Even the temporary stalls that hawk hot dogs and ice-cream in Central Park and elsewhere display calorific facts. That salted pretzel you buy as you stroll back to your hotel (‘500 CALORIES’) now comes with a side order of inner turmoil and gym fantasies. It is hard to convey the impact of this state-enforced calorie-counting. It effortlessly zaps the fun from eating out. It is designed to induce caution, even guilt, in New Yorkers, to make them stop and think before snacking or dining, to make them treat calorific consumption as something akin to snorting cocaine — an act that can have grave consequences.” […]
“The lowest blow in City Hall’s war on wicked food is its recurring efforts to ban the buying of fizzy pop with food stamps. In an initiative that could easily be titled ‘No Coke for poor black folk’, the Bloombergers have sought federal permission to prevent welfare recipients from using government cash to purchase fizzy drinks. The killjoyism of this campaign, the Scrooge-infused miserabilism of it, is astounding. City Hall has launched an advertising campaign demonising sugary drinks as one of the great evils of our time, and its internal email correspondence about the campaign, which was leaked to the New York Times, shines a rather harsh light on the evidence-lite nastiness of the modern-day nudge-and-nanny industry. Scientific advisers emailed Thomas Farley, Bloomberg’s overactive health adviser, to say that the ad’s claim that drinking pop can make you gain 10 or 15 pounds is ‘simplistic’ and ‘exaggerated’. Overriding them, Farley responded: ‘I think what people fear is getting fat, so we need some statement about what is bad about consuming so many calories.’ Who needs evidence when you have fear? The ad shows human fat gurgling from the top of a can of soda. One City Hall employee could barely conceal his excitement: it is ‘deliciously disgusting’, he said in one of the emails that was leaked.
In an effort to counter the efforts of these killjoys a bit we would recommend starting one's day with a shot of Bourbon, as suggested by Jeffrey Tucker. The book 'Bourbon for Breakfast – Living outside the Statist Quo' can be (pdf). A critique of the book written by Michael Lawrence is available here.
In our opinion, people who fearfully impose 'healthy living' on themselves to the extent that they take all the joy out of their lives are at great risk of not only missing a lot of fun, but of dying very early. Those who try to impose it on others are a great deal worse still.
One of the greatest paragons of a healthy lifestyle was Adolf Hitler, who neither drank, smoked nor reportedly ate any meat. His politics not surprisingly mirrored his joyless life perfectly. He imposed double-plus-joylessness on millions of people. Now, we certainly don't want to suggest that New York's administration is as bad as Hitler, we just mention him as an example of a killjoy whose alleged virtues masked a personality that was intent on imposing its own dour outlook on life on everybody else. He was unhappy and he wanted to make damn sure that the rest of the world would end up even more unhappy. Who knows, if he'd had a regular shot of Bourbon for breakfast, he may have decided to never pursue his crazy Nazi shtick.
Charts by: US Treasury Department
It is that time of the year again – our semi-annual funding drive begins today. Give us a little hand in offsetting the costs of running this blog, as advertising revenue alone is insufficient. You can help us reach our modest funding goal by donating either via paypal or bitcoin. Those of you who have made a ton of money based on some of the things we have said in these pages (we actually made a few good calls lately!), please feel free to up your donations accordingly (we are sorry if you have followed one of our bad calls. This is of course your own fault). Other than that, we can only repeat that donations to this site are apt to secure many benefits. These range from sound sleep, to children including you in their songs, to the potential of obtaining privileges in the afterlife (the latter cannot be guaranteed, but it seems highly likely). As always, we are greatly honored by your readership and hope that our special mixture of entertainment and education is adding a little value to your life!
Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke
6 Responses to “America’s Killjoys”
Most read in the last 20 days:
- A Striking Chart
The Economy and the Stock Market As long time readers know, we are always paying close attention to the manufacturing sector, which is far more important to the US economy than is generally believed. In terms of gross output it is the largest sector of the economy, and it should of course be obvious that saving, investment and production are the only ways to create wealth. What's left of the Brooklyn Domino Sugar Refinery. Photo credit: Paul Raphaelson Contrary...
- Trump and Putin Narrowly Escape Assassination Attempt
The Gloves are Coming Off First a little bit of recent history. Readers are probably aware that some questions about the occasionally malfunctioning Deep State android... no, wait, we'll start again. Questions have recently been raised about the health of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton by various “alt-right” tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy theorists, such as this one. The monsters are normally hiding under Hillary's bed, but lately they have come out into the open...
- Why the Fed Destroyed the Market Economy
What Have You Done for Me Lately? Swing voters are a fickle bunch. One election they vote Democrat. The next they vote Republican. For they have no particular ideology or political philosophy to base their judgment upon. The primacy of the wallet. They don’t give a rip about questions of small government or big government. Nor do they have any druthers about the welfare or warfare state. In effect, they really don’t care. What’s important to the...
- Donald’s Electoral Struggle
Wicked and Terrible After touting her pro-labor union record, the Wicked Witch of Chappaqua rhetorically asked, “why am I not 50 points ahead?” Her chief rival bluntly responded: “because you’re terrible.”* No truer words have been uttered by any of the candidates about one of their opponents since the start of this extraordinary presidential campaign! Electoral map (note that the coloration may no longer be applicable...) That Hillary Clinton is...
- Janet Yellen’s Shame
Playing Politics In honest capitalism, you do what you can to get other people to voluntarily give you money. This usually involves providing goods or services they think are worth the price. You may get a little wild and crazy from time to time, but you are always called to order by your customers. In the market economy, consumers reign supreme. There is no such thing as a “lost” vote in the marketplace; every penny spent affects production. Mises noted: “Consumers...
- Get Ready for a New Crisis – in Corporate Debt
Imposter Dollar OUZILLY, France – We’re going back to basics here at the Diary. We’re getting everyone on the same page... learning together... connecting the dots... trying to figure out what is going on. The new three dollar bill issued by the Apprehensive States of America. We made a breakthrough when we identified the source of so many of today’s bizarre and grotesque trends. It’s the money – the new post-1971 dollar. This new dollar is green. You...
- The Economy, the Stock Market and the Fed
John Hussman on Recent Developments We always look forward to John Hussman's weekly missive on the markets. Some people say that he is a “permabear”, but we don't think that is a fair characterization. He is rightly wary of the stock market's historically extremely high valuation and the loose monetary policy driving the surge in asset prices. The S&P 500 Index and the NYSE advance-decline line. Most market internals weakened steadily until early February 2016, but...
- Hanjin Marooning in San Pedro Bay
Global Trade Reversal Expansions and contractions in global trade have played out over long secular trends for thousands of years. The Silk Road, for example, was established by the Han Dynasty of China in 130 BC, and allowed for continuous trade between East and West for nearly 1,600 years. In addition to economic trade, the Silk Road was also a conduit for culture and knowledge among its network of civilizations. A map of the main ancient Silk Road - click to...
- Great Causes, a Sea of Debt and the 2017 Recession
Great Cause NORMANDY, FRANCE – We continue our work with the bomb squad. Myth disposal is dangerous work: People love their myths more than they love life itself. They may kill for money. But they die for their religions, their governments, their clans... and their ideas. Famous French hippie and author Voltaire. He wears the same sardonic grin in every painting, whether he's depicted at a young or an old age, doesn't matter. His real name was François-Marie Arouet; he...
- The Donald Versus Killary: War or Peace?
War: A Warning from the Past Although history does not exactly repeat itself, it does provide parallels and sometimes quite ominous ones. Such is the case with the current U.S. Presidential election and the one which occurred one hundred years earlier. The Donald probably has the better slogan... The dominating question which hung over the 1916 campaign was whether the country would remain neutral in regard to the horrific slaughter which was taking place on the...
- A Rift in the Space-Time Continuum
Weird and Unnatural NORMANDY, France – First, a quick look at the markets. The Dow bounced on Monday, recovering 239 points of the nearly 400 it lost on Friday. Why the comeback? FOMC member Lael Brainard: her comments on Monday were touted as the “reason” for the stock market recovering half of Friday's losses. We suspect the real reason is the triple witching on Friday... Photo via twitter.com The financial press has a ready answer: “Stocks gain...
- Crimea: Digging For The Truth
Renewed Escalation This summer witnessed a renewed escalation between Russia and Ukraine after Russian President Vladimir Putin accused Ukraine of sending saboteurs to attack Russian troops, targeting “critical infrastructure”. Kiev denied the allegations and claimed Russia’s “fantasy” was nothing but a false pretense to launch a “new invasion”. August 10: Russian president Putin announces that there was an altercation involving a group of Ukrainian saboteurs at...