Lumpy but Robust

 

[ed note: this article has originally appeared at the Evil Speculator and was written by trader and ES contributor Scott. We provide a link to Scott’s past articles below this post for readers who want to get more familiar with his ideas and/or any unusual terminology used in this article]

 

One continual theme in my trading is that every time I think I have it figured out, I get punched in the face by an unexpected problem. The tendency is to go more complicated, but often the solution is a degree of acceptance with respect to the nature of the game. Sometimes my edges work, sometimes they don’t. Sometimes they stop working for long periods of six months or more.

 

Financial markets – multi-layered like onions

 

That’s actually fine for me, but it isn’t for many other people. The systems one ultimate chooses have to suit one’s personality. If one cannot handle extended periods of working hard without making money (I can) one has to retool one’s trading systems to avoid such situations.

My opinion is that the best edges are robust. Robust edges tend not to disappear, but don’t post objectively high results either (in terms of SQN, Sharpe or expectancy). I’m investing in a fund that generates the returns (after fees) shown below, by using a very simple and standard approach to trend following, not much different from very similar methods employed by numerous other firms.

The fund is clearly an amazing investment, but its returns are lumpy; e.g. it generated a 108% return in 2008, but had a few negative years as well. Its Sharpe ratio is only around 0.7, not exactly institutional grade for most people. But its edge is robust, demonstrably provable, the system is simple and I understand it.

 

Mulvaney Capital – a fund with a “lumpy” history of returns, but one that can be highly rewarding in certain market environments, particularly in sharp downturns – click to enlarge.

 

It is almost inconceivable that 20 years from now (the time frame I intend to keep this investment) I will be looking at an empty account saying “I wonder why trend following stopped working”. If the dreams of the bears come true, the odds are very strong that this fund will post another triple digit year. This is the gold standard of a robust edge for me.

 

Looking for an Edge

My opinion is that simplicity is sophistication, and complexity is laziness. The first thing one needs to figure out before going any further is: Does a system have an edge? Use a scatter plot to figure that out. If you don’t want to do that, pick the classic edges used by other professionals and you won’t go too far wrong.

At Evil Speculator, user Francis (Mulv) has gone out of his way to provide some excellent statistics. What he discovered is a classic property of mean reversion systems, which segues into a classic mistake often made in back-testing. That problem is selection bias; if e.g. a random entry is selected and tested on a market one knows has gone up, it will probably show an edge.

One can avoid this tendency to deceive oneself by testing random markets (and keeping the results hidden so one cannot trick oneself). Professionals refer to this as “out of sample data”. Another method is to sequester part of the available data and keeping it aside, and then test one’s data against it to see if one’s hypothesis matches clean data.

One thing we know for sure is that mean reversion works dramatically better in the direction of the higher time frame trend. So if this works as a short setup in the current stock market, it should work even better as a long setup (or something is very wrong). Let’s delve deeper into this and take a look at the bounty Francis has provided.

I haven’t had the time to personally verify the statistics, but at a glance they look right. Take it for what it is, an interesting exercise you can apply to your own potential setups, rather than an authoritative data set. Also, there is a significant chance that I have misinterpreted the data, since it isn’t my own spreadsheet I’m working with. If so, mea culpa, but it remains a valuable exercise to learn from.

Detailed instructions on how to do this can be found by clicking here (read the bit about adding regression lines). I will break down the results below. First off,  Francis has tested with and without the condition “break of the low of the setup bar”, so we can take a look at how much, if at all, it changes things.

The reason we want to test first without the break of the low/high and then with the break, is that we can test everything one at a time this way. If the setup works with a break of the low, the effect may possibly only be due to the break. That is the kind of thing we want to find out.

 

Short trigger after breaking the low of the set-up candle – click to enlarge.

 

Back-Testing Setups

At this stage I will only look at long setups. In a bull market the short side is categorically not an edge (not surprisingly, shorting the e-mini has been a good way to get one’s face ripped off over the last 7 years). The bottom line is that one has to take all these results with a grain of salt, since it is a strong market.

First let us look at what the market does on the day after making a double bottom (without breaking the high). You can see below that there is a decent positive correlation, the points are reasonably clustered (i.e., the R squared value is OK). This tells us what we would usually expect, namely that the market is trying to go up after making a double bottom.

Things that would be worth testing in this context would be buying the close and selling the following close, or alternatively buying the old spike low on a limit and selling the following close.

 

The regression line indicates a mild positive tendency on day one after a double bottom – click to enlarge.

 

Day 2, however, is showing that the results of the first day are just a blip – the market is now negatively correlated. That is not what one would want to see, but perhaps there is a retest of the low (that’s drawing a very long bow).

 

Returns on day two have a negative tendency, partly reversing the result of day one – click to enlarge.

 

On Day 3 we have a weak positive correlation, so the market is trying to rise again.

 

A very weak positive correlation is evident on day three – click to enlarge.

 

Conclusion

So what do we have here? We have a market with a very weak tendency to rise on days one and three after making a double bottom. This is not at all what we would expect from a strong edge. Aside from the result obtained on day one it actually isn’t an edge at all.

When we move on we will look at how it behaves with a break of the lows/highs as part of the conditions. Next we will consider it as a component of mean reversion, at Bollinger bands, Keltner bands and 50-bar highs/lows. The logic behind  this is that a reversal setup is likely to work better at extremes.

For now we have to conclude that there is nothing inherently bullish about a short term double bottom in ES beyond producing an intraday bounce, which is actually great to know.

 

To be continued.

 

Here is a link to Scott’s previous articles at Evil Speculator for readers interested in learning more about the systematic approach discussed above and other strategies Scott has written about.

 

Charts by Mulvaney Capital Management, Scott/ Evil Speculator

 

Chart and image captions by PT, as well as light editing of the original article

 

 
 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke

   
 

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • The Biggest Stock Market Crashes Tend to Happen in October
      October is the Most Dangerous Month The prospect of steep market declines worries investors – and the month of October has a particularly bad reputation in this respect.   Bad juju month: Statistically, October is actually not the worst month on average – but it is home to several of history's most memorable crashes, including the largest ever one-day decline on Wall Street. A few things worth noting about 1987: 1. the crash did not presage a recession. 2. its...
  • Canada: Risks of a Parliamentary Democracy
      A Vulnerable System Parliamentary democracy is vulnerable to the extremely dangerous possibility that someone with very little voter support can rise to the top layer of government. All one apparently has to do is to be enough of a populist to get elected by ghetto dwellers.   Economist and philosopher Hans-Hermann Hoppe dissects democracy in his book Democracy, the God that Failed, which shines a light on the system's grave deficiencies with respect to guarding liberty. As...
  • Federal Reserve President Kashkari’s Masterful Distractions
      The True Believer How is it that seemingly intelligent people, of apparent sound mind and rational thought, can stray so far off the beam?  How come there are certain professions that reward their practitioners for their failures? The central banking and monetary policy vocation rings the bell on both accounts.  Today we offer a brief case study in this regard.   Minneapolis Fed president Neel Kashkari attacking a block of wood with great zeal. [PT] Photo credit: Linda Davidson...
  • Thoughtful Disagreement with Ted Butler
      Too Big to Fail?   Dear Mr. Butler, in your article of 2 October, entitled Thoughtful Disagreement, you say:   “Someone will come up with the thoughtful disagreement that makes the body of my premise invalid or the price of silver will validate the premise by exploding.”   Ted Butler – we first became aware of Mr. Butler in 1998, and as far as we know, he has been making the bullish case for silver ever since. Back in the late 90s this was actually a...
  • Donald Trump: Warmonger-in-Chief
      Cryptic Pronouncements If a world conflagration, God forbid, should break out during the Trump Administration, its genesis will not be too hard to discover: the thin-skinned, immature, shallow, doofus who currently resides in the Oval Office!   The commander-in-chief - a potential source of radiation?   This past week, the Donald has continued his bellicose talk with both veiled and explicit threats against purported American adversaries throughout the world.  In...
  • The Donald Can’t Stop It
      Divine Powers The Dow’s march onward and upward toward 30,000 continues without a pause.  New all-time highs are notched practically every day.  Despite Thursday’s 31-point pullback, the Dow is up over 15.5 percent year-to-date.  What a remarkable time to be alive.   The DJIA keeps surging... but it is running on fumes (US money supply growth is disappearing rapidly). The president loves this and has decided to “own” the market by gushing about its record run. During...
  • Precious Metals Supply and Demand Report
      Fat-Boy Waves The prices of the metals dropped $17 and $0.35, and the gold-silver ratio rose to 77.  A look at the chart of either metal shows that a downtrend in prices (i.e. uptrend in the dollar) that began in mid-April reversed in mid-July. Then the prices began rising (i.e. dollar began falling). But that move ended September 8.   Stars of the most popular global market sitcoms, widely suspected of being “gold wave-makers”. From left to right: Auntie Janet...
  • 1987, 1997, 2007... Just How Crash-Prone are Years Ending in 7?
      Bad Reputation Years ending in 7, such as the current year 2017, have a bad reputation among stock market participants. Large price declines tend to occur quite frequently in these years.   Sliding down the steep slope of the cursed year. [PT]   Just think of 1987, the year in which the largest one-day decline in the US stock market in history took place:  the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged by 22.61 percent in a single trading day. Or recall the year 2007,...
  • On the Marc Faber Controversy
      Il n'y a rien à défendre - by Vidocq   Dr. Marc Faber, author of the Gloom, Boom and Doom Report Photo credit: Michael Wildi / RDB     Il n'y a rien à défendre - There is nothing to defend Personne n'a lu ce qui a été écrit. - Nobody read what was written. Personne n'a pensé avant d'agir, comme la plupart des gens de nos jours. - No one thought before acting, like most people nowadays. L'homme que tu pends est l'homme que tu as fait, pas l'homme que...
  • Stocks Up and Yields Down – Precious Metals Supply & Demand
      Where the Good Things Go Many gold bugs make an implicit assumption. Gold is good, therefore it will go up. This is tempting but wrong (ignoring that gold does not go anywhere, it’s the dollar that goes down). One error is in thinking that now you have discovered a truth, everyone else will see it quickly. And there is a subtler error. The error is to think good things must go up. Sometimes they do, but why?   Since putting in a secular low at the turn of the millennium,...
  • The 2017 Incrementum Gold Chart Book
      A Big Reference Chart Collection Our friends at Incrementum have created a special treat for gold aficionados, based on the 2017 “In Gold We Trust Report”. Not everybody has the time to read a 160 page report, even if it would be quite worthwhile to do so. As we always mention when it is published, it is a highly useful reference work, even if one doesn't get around to reading all of it (and selective reading is always possible, aided by the table of contents at the...
  • Tales From a Late Stage Bull Market
      Pro-Growth Occurrences An endearing quality of a late stage bull market is that it expands the universe of what’s possible.  Somehow, rising stock prices make the impossible, possible.  They also push the limits of the normal into the paranormal.   This happens almost every time Bigfoot is in front of a camera. [PT] Cartoon by Gary Larson   Last week, for instance, there was a Bigfoot sighting near Avocado Lake in Fresno County, California.  But it wasn’t just...

Support Acting Man

Top10BestPro
j9TJzzN

Austrian Theory and Investment

Archive

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com