Swamp Critters

BALTIMORE – The Dow is back above the 20,000-point mark. Federal debt, as officially tallied, is up to nearly $20 trillion. The two go together, egging each other on. The Dow is up 20 times since 1980. So is the U.S. national debt. Debt feeds the stock market and the swamp.

What’s not up so much is real output, as measured by GDP. It’s up only 6.4 times over the same period. Debt and asset prices have been rising three times as fast as GDP for 36 years! Best bet: Sell stocks and bonds (debt). Buy GDP. How? To be addressed in due course.

 

SGG! The “something’s gotta give” chart: total US credit market debt, federal debt, the Wilshire Total Market Index an GDP. Unless something gives, we will need a microscope in a few years in order to detect GDP on this chart. Consider also that GDP has been “upgraded” numerous time in recent decades, most recently less than two years ago (these upgrades involve adding hundreds of billions of dollars to economic output no-one has ever spent or received – they are merely statistical artifacts. It is slightly different with debt; we can simply count that) – click to enlarge.

 

But let’s not get distracted. We’re applying a revolutionary new formula, S = rv (w-w – w-l), that will tell us whether President Trump is making America great… or not.

 

[Satisfaction (S) equals the real value (rv) of win-win deals (w-w) minus win-lose deals (w-l).]

 

As you can see, in order to do the job, the president must follow through on his vow to “drain the swamp.” Because that’s where the win-lose deals come from.

The swamp is home to the Deep State swamp critters – the major beneficiaries of regulations, wars, politics, government spending, bureaucracy, deficits, debt – and, importantly, the Fed’s fake money.

The bigger, deeper, and thicker the swamp – the less real wealth and satisfaction for everyone else. Swamp critters – in Lower Manhattan or the upper Potomac – do not add wealth; they live at others’ expense. They are always on the win side of win-lose deals. If you’re not one of them, you’re on the other side.

And if President Trump is really looking out for you, he must cut those win-lose deals. We’ve gotten a lot of mail on the subject already. Not all of it flatters your editor’s inflated ego or his fragile opinion of himself. But he reads all the mail with interest and curiosity before going into the bathroom to cry.

 

Editors are human too…

Image vua twitter.com

 

Now, back to the subject at hand.

 

Super Bowl World

People don’t willingly enter win-lose deals. That’s why they need the government – to force people to take the other side of the bad trade.

Most people instinctively know that if you’re forced to do something, it’s a losing proposition. But they think we live in a Super Bowl world, where one side always wins and another must lose.

That is, more or less, the way the pre-civilized world worked for thousands of years. Competition was a zero-sum game: One group won at another’s expense. But since the invention of money, property rights, and the “do unto others as you would have them do unto you” code, capitalistic win-win deals have made the world richer.

People hustle. They produce. They trade. Everyone is better off. We’ve also seen that the only way you can identify real value is by looking at what people really want.

Some choose gold. Some choose leisure. Some choose illegal drugs or Elvis outfits. People don’t necessarily get what they want, but they get what they deserve.

 

Seduction vs. Rape

Government evolved in the pre-civilized era. It doesn’t trade. It insists. It doesn’t take “no, thanks” for an answer. Government is not a seducer, not a sweet talker; it is a rapist. (and here we draw a veil over the psychological perversities of the human race – the Patty Hearsts who fall in love with their kidnappers… the Soviet Gulag inmates who cried when Stalin died).

 

The bizarre spectacle of North Koreans responding to Kim Long Il’s departure for the eternal hunting grounds.

Photo credit: APTN / AP

 

This is not to say that the government produces nothing of value. There are a lot of good people working for the feds. Many do good work: Teachers. Doctors. Police and judges. If the fire department gets your cat out of a tree, for example, that is a win for you.

But wait… Nothing the feds produce is subject to the discipline of price and quality competition or the need to satisfy a customer. So, how do you know that more resources weren’t consumed getting the animal out of the tree than it was really worth?

And why should your neighbors – whose taxes support the firefighters – pay to get your mangy pet out of your damned tree?

 

Simple Test

Nothing is ever as neat and clear as we would like. There is always some ambiguity and much doubt. Here at the Diary, we take it as a fact of life that nobody really knows anything. Including us. We see through the glass darkly, along with everyone else. But at least our new formula wipes off some of the dust.

“War is the health of the state,” wrote American journalist Randolph Bourne. Swamp critters love it. Everyone else loses. But if a foreign army is invading your country, you accept the cost of defending yourself. You’re going to lose something – the question is: “How much?” And you’re happy to have the government take the lead in protecting you.

 

Randolph Bourne recognized that the State used war to arrogate more power to itself. Even after the war ends, the bloated Leviathan created to pursue it invariably remains in place.

Photo credit: Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Columbia University

 

Since the War of 1812, there has been only one invasion of the continental U.S. Then, the enemy burned down whole cities and shot everyone who stood in its way. Naturally, Americans did what they could to defend themselves. But it was lose, lose, lose… all the way.

The most recent estimates put the number of losers (the death toll) as high as a million, not to mention the economic loss, which was catastrophic. And the invader, of course, was the U.S. feds themselves, invading Virginia in 1861. The South was crushed. The swamp grew.

 

Critical moments in the swamp.

Which brings us, finally, to three of Mr. Trump’s proposals: a “border tax” to force the Mexicans to pay for the wall… beefing up the “defense” budget… and funding more infrastructure programs with deficit spending.

Win-win? Or win-lose? Making America richer or poorer? Draining the swamp – or adding more water?

 

Chart by St. Louis Federal Reserve Research

 

Chart and image captions by PT

 

The above article originally appeared as “Why Trump Must Drain the Swampat the Diary of a Rogue Economist, written for Bonner & Partners. Bill Bonner founded Agora, Inc in 1978. It has since grown into one of the largest independent newsletter publishing companies in the world. He has also written three New York Times bestselling books, Financial Reckoning Day, Empire of Debt and Mobs, Messiahs and Markets.

 


 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 


 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 12vB2LeWQNjWh59tyfWw23ySqJ9kTfJifA

   
 

2 Responses to “Trump and the Draining of the Swamp”

  • wmbean:

    Yes, sports are an example of zero sum games where one side wins the game and the other loses the game. But not all of living is a win – lose proposition. If I trade my labor for a wage with which to feed, house, and clothe myself then I have still entered a zero sum game of living. That is, I hope to get as much out of my efforts to “play the game”. Will my employer receive more labor from me for the wage I receive? Very possibly. On the other hand, assuming that there is competition in the job market and I have skills that are in demand, I should be able to find better employment. Economics is a zero sum game in that growth only comes with the expansion of the number of consumers or at the expense of the consumers. With the latter, that expense tends to be short lived, one runs out of consumers willing or able to pay.

    But with government, the assumption is that bigger is always better and that the consumer will always be willing to pay the freight of big government, until it isn’t. Ask Louis XVI. The problem is that government is a monopoly and yet is never treated as one. You want to remodel your house or add an addition? Good lord, the city is not your friend unless you hire the required contractors. There is not another planning board or inspection department to compete for your business. And the codes get very stupid at times. Is it any wonder that some many homeowners decide not to get permits if they can get away with the work and not inform the city. Most of out teachers do not do good, test scores point that out. As for doctors, few are independent and thus must steer you into expensive tests that are often not needed and provide little benefit. Education is a monopoly and a racket as is healthcare, so don’t tell me these people do good. It’s not in their contract. I can’t complain too much about cops these days but firefighters are way overpaid. City, state, and federal workers are grossly overpaid as well. We have far too many of them doing a lot of useless work.

    What’s the answer? Close the Department of Education, the Department of Transportation, HUD, and many more of these useless services. Reinforce rule of law and end corporations as well as limited liability organizations. Becoming bigger without the increase in personal responsibility is not better. And talking about win – win like the outcomes are even is a myth. Some one always get a little more than the other fellow.

  • zerobs:

    Many do good work: Teachers. Doctors. Police and judges.

    This is grossly exaggerated and increasingly false.

    Teachers unions do everything they can to bilk taxpayers and ensure that bad teachers do not lose their jobs.
    Police unions do everything they can to bilk taxpayers ensure that bad police do not lose their jobs.
    Very few doctors are employed by government, and government generally gyps plenty of doctors on medicare payments.
    Fire departments are notorious for expanding the number of regulations. A tax increase by another name.

    I’ll leave generalizations about judges aside for now, but I’d venture to say that that the percentage of good ones to bad ones is no different than in any other walk of life.

    It’s time to wise up and start realizing these professions have too much power. This namby-pamby “many do good work” trope is the only opening they need to steal money. The free market would be the best judge of how good their work is.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • America Goes Full Imbecile
      Credit has a wicked way of magnifying a person’s defects.  Even the most cautious man, with unlimited credit, can make mistakes that in retrospect seem absurd.  But an average man, with unlimited credit, is preeminently disposed to going full imbecile.   Let us not forget about this important skill...  [PT]   Several weeks ago we came across a woeful tale of Mike Meru.  Somehow, this special fellow, while of apparent sound mine and worthy intent, racked up...
  • Retail Capitulation – Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Small Crowds, Shrinking Premiums The prices of gold and silver rose five bucks and 37 cents respectively last week. Is this the blast off to da moon for the silver rocket of halcyon days, in other words 2010-2011?   Various gold bars. Coin and bar premiums have been shrinking steadily (as have coin sales of the US Mint by the way), a sign that retail investors have lost interest in gold. There are even more signs of this actually, and this loss of interest stands in stark...
  • Credit Spreads: Polly is Twitching Again - in Europe
      Junk Bond Spread Breakout The famous dead parrot is coming back to life... in an unexpected place. With its QE operations, which included inter alia corporate bonds, the ECB has managed to suppress credit spreads in Europe to truly ludicrous levels. From there, the effect propagated through arbitrage to other developed markets. And yes, this does “support the economy” - mainly by triggering an avalanche of capital malinvestment and creating the associated boom conditions, while...
  • Gold Divergences Emerge
      Bad Hair Day Produces Positive Divergences On Friday the ongoing trade dispute between the US and China was apparently escalated by a notch to the next level, at least verbally. The Trump administration announced a list of tariffs that are supposed to come into force in three week's time and China clicked back by announcing retaliatory action. In effect, the US government said: take that China, we will now really hurt our own consumers!  - and China's mandarins replied: just you wait, we...
  • Industrial Commodities vs. Gold - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Oil is Different Last week, we showed a graph of rising open interest in crude oil futures. From this, we inferred — incorrectly as it turns out — that the basis must be rising. Why else, we asked, would market makers carry more and more oil?   Crude oil acts differently from gold – and so do all other industrial commodities. What makes them different is that the supply of industrial commodities held in storage as a rule suffices to satisfy industrial demand only for a...
  • Chasing the Wind
      Futility with Purpose Plebeians generally ignore the tact of their economic central planners.  They care more that their meatloaf is hot and their suds are cold, than about any plans being hatched in the capital city.  Nonetheless, the central planners know an angry mob, with torches and pitchforks, are only a few empty bellies away.  Hence, they must always stay on point.   Watch for those pitchfork bearers – they can get real nasty and then heads often roll quite literally....
  • Lift-Off Not (Yet) - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Wrong-Way Event Last week we said something that turned out to be prescient:   This is not an environment for a Lift Off Event.   An unfortunate technical mishap interrupted the latest moon-flight of the gold rocket. Fear not true believers, a few positive tracks were left behind. [PT]   The price of gold didn’t move much Mon-Thu last week, though the price of silver did seem to be blasting off. Then on Friday, it reversed hard. We will provide a forensic...
  • Merger Mania and the Kings of Debt
      Another Early Warning Siren Goes Off Our friend Jonathan Tepper of research house Variant Perception (check out their blog to see some of their excellent work) recently pointed out to us that the volume of mergers and acquisitions has increased rather noticeably lately. Some color on this was provided in an article published by Reuters in late May, “Global M&A hits record $2 trillion in the year to date”, which inter alia contained the following chart illustrating the...
  • Cryptocurrency Technicals – Navigating the Bear Market
      A Purely Technical Market Long time readers may recall that we regard Bitcoin and other liquid big cap cryptocurrencies as secondary media of exchange from a monetary theory perspective for the time being. The wave of speculative demand that has propelled them to astonishing heights was triggered by market participants realizing that they have the potential to become money. The process of achieving more widespread adoption of these currencies as a means of payment and establishing...
  • The Fed's “Inflation Target” is Impoverishing American Workers
      Redefined Terms and Absurd Targets At one time, the Federal Reserve's sole mandate was to maintain stable prices and to “fight inflation.”  To the Fed, the financial press, and most everyone else “inflation” means rising prices instead of its original and true definition as an increase in the money supply.  Rising prices are a consequence – a very painful consequence – of money printing.   Fed Chair Jerome Powell apparently does not see the pernicious effects...

Support Acting Man

Item Guides

j9TJzzN

The Review Insider

Dog Blow

Austrian Theory and Investment

Archive

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

Mish Talk

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com