An Important Reminder

Julian Assange, who was once considered a darling of the Left –  as long as his organization’s leaks primarily embarrassed the Bush administration over its insane Iraq war that is – has in the meantime advanced to the status of walking, talking assassination target for Hillary Clinton’s drones. He should probably be extra careful if she becomes president, because nothing and no-one will be able to hold her back anymore.

 

sweden_assange222In the cross-hairs: Julian Assange

Image via truepundit.com

 

Back when she was secretary of state, Ms. Clinton once inquired of her aides whether killing Assange with a drone strike in order to silence Wikileaks would be a viable option. Several of those present at the meeting later related that they were not quite sure whether she was joking or not, because it didn’t sound like a joke to them (it probably wasn’t).

Ms. Clinton herself naturally “cannot recall” ever having said it, and if she did, well, then it was of course only in jest. Hahaha! (She is known for her tasteless jokes about the brutal deaths of other human beings. She evidently has as much empathy as a psychopath). Ms. Clinton reportedly has severe memory problems. When interviewed by the FBI, she apparently answered the questions of investigators with “I can’t recall” 39 times all in all.

When asked to explains why her memory was so extraordinarily poor, she stated that she had fallen on her head (this is true) and that she had suffered problems with her memory ever since. FBI  agents thereupon wanted to review her health records. Alas, their chief Mr. Comey informed them that they were not allowed to do that. So they had to take her word for it.

 

memoirIn spite of her severe memory problems, Ms. Clinton somehow still managed to pen a memoir (yes, the two words have the same root).

Cartoon by Gary Varvel

 

We are just relating these things to remind readers of what a Clinton presidency actually means. Here you have someone who is either a consummate liar, or has some sort of brain damage. There is no third option. The brain damage may or may not be serious, but keep in mind that this person may soon be in control of the nuclear codes. Which she presumably won’t be able to recall if push ever comes to shove.

But who knows what else that hit on the head did to her? We may get an opportunity to find out, as early election returns indicate that the exceedingly odd alliance between the US oligarchy and the free shit army incarnated in Ms. Clinton will succeed in getting her elected.

As Stefan Molyneux notes in the video below, anyone who has read the emails released by Wikileaks in recent weeks no longer has an ethical or moral argument for giving her his vote. According to surveys, 83% of Americans believe she did either something illegal or unethical (the remaining 17% seem to be low information persons).

 

factual-relationsAmen to that.

Cartoon by Michael Ramirez

 

So why would one vote for someone like that? The answer can only be that she promised free shit to some people, which she will forcibly take from others on their behalf. Even if one dislikes Trump – and we can understand why some people may not be overly enamored of him – one can still decide to either vote for a third party candidate or no-one at all. This may not stop Clinton, but at least one’s conscience will be clear.

 

Stefan Molyneux explains why a Hillary Clinton victory will be really bad for Western civilization

 

Julian Assange Comments on Wikileaks and the Election

This brings us back to Julian Assange. The Clinton campaign has – quite successfully – turned the focus on the so far still completely unproven allegation that Wikileaks gets its information on the inner Clinton circle’s emails from Russia. But even if that were true (it probably isn’t), why would that even matter?

To our mind what matters is that the hitherto only suspected depth of corruption at the Clinton Foundation, within Clinton’s campaign and among certain mainstream media has been confirmed in black and white. Attempts to discredit the content of the emails have been halfhearted and have largely fallen flat – mainly because the mails are genuine.

You can look at a list of the most interesting examples here. Much of this is truly stomach-turning stuff. And yet, Ms. Clinton is on the verge of becoming US president. These revelations won’t go away though – if anything, their relevance will increase from here on out.

 

please-helpHelp definitely did manage to arrive, in spades – and from the most curious sources.

Cartoon by: Henry Payne

 

Mr. Assange has released a statement on the matter ahead of the election today, which we reproduce below:

 

In recent months, WikiLeaks and I personally have come under enormous pressure to stop publishing what the Clinton campaign says about itself to itself. That pressure has come from the campaign’s allies, including the Obama administration, and from liberals who are anxious about who will be elected US President. On the eve of the election, it is important to restate why we have published what we have.

The right to receive and impart true information is the guiding principle of WikiLeaks – an organization that has a staff and organizational mission far beyond myself. Our organization defends the public’s right to be informed. This is why, irrespective of the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election, the real victor is the US public which is better informed as a result of our work.

The US public has thoroughly engaged with WikiLeaks’ election related publications which number more than one hundred thousand documents. Millions of Americans have pored over the leaks and passed on their citations to each other and to us. It is an open model of journalism that gatekeepers are uncomfortable with, but which is perfectly harmonious with the First Amendment.

We publish material given to us if it is of political, diplomatic, historical or ethical importance and which has not been published elsewhere. When we have material that fulfills this criteria, we publish. We had information that fit our editorial criteria which related to the Sanders and Clinton campaign (DNC Leaks) and the Clinton political campaign and Foundation (Podesta Emails). No-one disputes the public importance of these publications. It would be unconscionable for WikiLeaks to withhold such an archive from the public during an election.

At the same time, we cannot publish what we do not have. To date, we have not received information on Donald Trump’s campaign, or Jill Stein’s campaign, or Gary Johnson’s campaign or any of the other candidates that fufills our stated editorial criteria. As a result of publishing Clinton’s cables and indexing her emails we are seen as domain experts on Clinton archives. So it is natural that Clinton sources come to us.

We publish as fast as our resources will allow and as fast as the public can absorb it.

That is our commitment to ourselves, to our sources, and to the public.

This is not due to a personal desire to influence the outcome of the election. The Democratic and Republican candidates have both expressed hostility towards whistleblowers. I spoke at the launch of the campaign for Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate, because her platform addresses the need to protect them. This is an issue that is close to my heart because of the Obama administration’s inhuman and degrading treatment of one of our alleged sources, Chelsea Manning. But WikiLeaks publications are not an attempt to get Jill Stein elected or to take revenge over Ms Manning’s treatment either.

Publishing is what we do. To withhold the publication of such information until after the election would have been to favour one of the candidates above the public’s right to know.

This is after all what happened when the New York Times withheld evidence of illegal mass surveillance of the US population for a year until after the 2004 election, denying the public a critical understanding of the incumbent president George W Bush, which probably secured his reelection. The current editor of the New York Times has distanced himself from that decision and rightly so.

The US public defends free speech more passionately, but the First Amendment only truly lives through its repeated exercise. The First Amendment explicitly prevents the executive from attempting to restrict anyone’s ability to speak and publish freely. The First Amendment does not privilege old media, with its corporate advertisers and dependencies on incumbent power factions, over WikiLeaks’ model of scientific journalism or an individual’s decision to inform their friends on social media. The First Amendment unapologetically nurtures the democratization of knowledge. With the Internet, it has reached its full potential.

Yet, some weeks ago, in a tactic reminiscent of Senator McCarthy and the red scare, Wikileaks, Green Party candidate Stein, Glenn Greenwald and Clinton’s main opponent were painted with a broad, red brush. The Clinton campaign, when they were not spreading obvious untruths, pointed to unnamed sources or to speculative and vague statements from the intelligence community to suggest a nefarious allegiance with Russia. The campaign was unable to invoke evidence about our publications—because none exists.

In the end, those who have attempted to malign our groundbreaking work over the past four months seek to inhibit public understanding perhaps because it is embarrassing to them – a reason for censorship the First Amendment cannot tolerate. Only unsuccessfully do they try to claim that our publications are inaccurate.

WikiLeaks’ decade-long pristine record for authentication remains. Our key publications this round have even been proven through the cryptographic signatures of the companies they passed through, such as Google. It is not every day you can mathematically prove that your publications are perfect but this day is one of them.

We have endured intense criticism, primarily from Clinton supporters, for our publications. Many long-term supporters have been frustrated because we have not addressed this criticism in a systematic way or responded to a number of false narratives about Wikileaks’ motivation or sources. Ultimately, however, if WL reacted to every false claim, we would have to divert resources from our primary work.

WikiLeaks, like all publishers, is ultimately accountable to its funders. Those funders are you. Our resources are entirely made up of contributions from the public and our book sales. This allows us to be principled, independent and free in a way no other influential media organization is. But it also means that we do not have the resources of CNN, MSNBC or the Clinton campaign to constantly rebuff criticism. Yet if the press obeys considerations above informing the public, we are no longer talking about a free press, and we are no longer talking about an informed public.

Wikileaks remains committed to publishing information that informs the public, even if many, especially those in power, would prefer not to see it. WikiLeaks must publish. It must publish and be damned.

 

 – Julian Assange

 

Hopefully Wikileaks will continue to do what it is doing so well. We certainly need these occasional glimpses into the inner workings of the corrupt system erected by the ruling elite.  Let us hope that Mr. Assange will be able to continue to dodge the drones (and we say this only half in jest).

 

FILE - In this Nov. 8, 2011 file photo, a Predator B unmanned aircraft taxis at the Naval Air Station in Corpus Christi, Texas. A U.S. military drone strike in Yemen in December 2013 may have killed up to a dozen civilians on their way to a wedding and injured others, including the bride, a human rights group says. U.S. officials say only members of al-Qaida were killed, but they have refused make public the details of two U.S. investigations into the incidentPhoto credit: Eric Gay / AP

 

Conclusion

People who continue to think in political categories such as “left and right” have not yet understood that this is no longer what it is about. The battle lines have shifted quite some time ago already. This is not to say that no such ideological divide exists in principle – it just doesn’t exist in our current systemic reality. Left or right, they are all wedded to statism and social engineering and are unanimous in their support of the welfare-warfare state.

The middle class is hollowed out and destroyed by a semi-feudal political and economic oligarchy,  the  central planning bureaucrats acting on its behalf and a legal system evidently in thrall to it. What they call themselves is irrelevant. The left-right divide is a detraction, it has simply become part of a divide and rule strategy. In many ways this system has become inimical to personal liberty, free markets and peace. So what can be done about it?

One has to be realistic about the situation. Changing the system from within is probably impossible. We would hate to see Clinton winning, but we are not sure what a Trump presidency would ultimately be able to accomplish. The political power of presidents should not be overestimated; they are gone after eight years, but the “system” remains. So one can only act with respect to those things one actually has under control. We plan to discuss this point in more detail in a follow-up post.

 

freezeIf you should ever find yourself in a similar situation, always remember: Quod licet Iovi, not licet bovi.

Cartoon by Catalino

 

 

 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 


 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke

   
 

2 Responses to “Assange vs. Clinton”

  • Hans:

    Zman, I agree with you regarding the MSM. I now refer to the
    entire industry as MOP or Ministry of Propaganda.

    It is entirely possible, that Assange was responsible for the
    Trump victory.

    He has my complete support both morally and financially. Mr
    Assange, is doing the work that was normally provided by the
    formerly known entity as the press.

    After all, cleaning up dirt is a very important societal function.

  • JohnnyZ:

    It is true that Assange has published some damaging information about HRC, but…he is a proven limited hangout / disinfo agent, who seems to be fed and controlled by the Western intelligence services. Examples of him burying the truth are 9/11 or strongly understating the number of dead Iraqis as a result of the last war. He also “leaks” his information to the likes of the NYT and Guardian – establishment stooges. Also the story about him being targeted by the West and his life in that embassy seems to be not entirely correct.

    Another example is PCR, an “ex government insider”, who is bashing the US, but promoting Putin as the savior of the world, thus promoting the fake East-West dialectic (both the East and the West are controlled by the same oligarchical cabal, Russia is the controlled opposition to the West)

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • How to Survive the Winter
      A Flawless Flock of Scoundrels One of the fringe benefits of living in a country that’s in dire need of a political, financial, and cultural reset, is the twisted amusement that comes with bearing witness to its unraveling.  Day by day we’re greeted with escalating madness.  Indeed, the great fiasco must be taken lightly, so as not to be demoralized by its enormity.   Symphony grotesque in Washington [PT]   Of particular note is the present cast of characters. ...
  • Credit Spreads: The Coming Resurrection of Polly
      Suspicion isn't Merely Asleep – It is in a Coma (or Dead) There is an old Monty Python skit about a parrot whose lack of movement and refusal to respond to prodding leads to an intense debate over what state it is in. Is it just sleeping, as the proprietor of the shop that sold it insists? A very tired parrot taking a really deep rest? Or is it actually dead, as the customer who bought it asserts, offering the fact that it was nailed to its perch as prima facie evidence that what...
  • The Strange Behavior of Gold Investors from Monday to Thursday
      Known and Unknown Anomalies Readers are undoubtedly aware of one or another stock market anomaly, such as e.g. the frequently observed weakness in stock markets in the summer months, which the well-known saying “sell in May and go away” refers to. Apart from such widely known anomalies, there are many others though, which most investors have never heard of. These anomalies can be particularly interesting and profitable for investors – and there are several in the precious metals...
  • A Falling Rate of Discount and the Consumption of Capital
      Net Present Value Warren Buffet famously proposed the analogy of a machine that produces one dollar per year in perpetuity. He asks how much would you pay for this machine? Clearly it is worth something more than $1.00. And it’s equally clear that it’s not worth $1,000. The value is somewhere in between. But where?   We are not sure why Warren Buffett invoked a money printing machine of all things – another interesting way of looking at the concept is by e.g....
  • Business Cycles and Inflation – Part I
      Incrementum Advisory Board Meeting Q4 2017 -  Special Guest Ben Hunt, Author and Editor of Epsilon Theory The quarterly meeting of the Incrementum Fund's Advisory Board took place on October 10 and we had the great pleasure to be joined by special guest Ben Hunt this time, who is probably known to many of our readers as the main author and editor of Epsilon Theory. He is also chief risk officer at investment management firm Salient Partners. As always, a transcript of the discussion is...
  • What President Trump and the West Can Learn from China
      Expensive Politics Instead of a demonstration of its overwhelming military might intended to intimidate tiny North Korea and pressure China to lean on its defiant communist neighbor, President Trump and the West should try to learn a few things from China.   President Trump meets President Xi. The POTUS reportedly had a very good time in China. [PT] Photo credit: AP   The President’s trip to the Far East came on the heels of the completion of China’s...
  • Is Fed Chair Nominee Jay Powell, Count Dracula?
      A Date with Dracula The gray hue of dawn quickly slipped to a bright clear sky as we set out last Saturday morning.  The season’s autumn tinge abounded around us as the distant mountain peaks, and their mighty rifts, grew closer.  The nighttime chill stubbornly lingered in the crisp air.   “Who lives in yonder castle?” Harker asked. “Pardon, Sire?” Up front in the driver's seat it was evidently hard to understand what was said over the racket made by the team of...
  • Business Cycles and Inflation, Part II
      Early Warning Signals in a Fragile System [ed note: here is Part 1; if you have missed it, best go there and start reading from the beginning] We recently received the following charts via email with a query whether they should worry stock market investors. They show two short term interest rates, namely the 2-year t-note yield and 3 month t-bill discount rate. Evidently the moves in short term rates over the past ~18 - 24 months were quite large, even if their absolute levels remain...
  • A Different Powelling - Precious Metals Supply and Demand Report
      New Chief Monetary Bureaucrat Goes from Good to Bad for Silver The prices of the metals ended all but unchanged last week, though they hit spike highs on Thursday. Particularly silver his $17.24 before falling back 43 cents, to close at $16.82.   Never drop silver carelessly, since it might land on your toes. If you are at loggerheads with gravity for some reason, only try to handle smaller-sized bars than the ones depicted above. The snapshot to the right shows the governor...
  • Heat Death of the Economic Universe
      Big Crunch or Big Chill Physicists say that the universe is expanding. However, they hotly debate (OK, pun intended as a foreshadowing device) if the rate of expansion is sufficient to overcome gravity—called escape velocity. It may seem like an arcane topic, but the consequences are dire either way.   OT – a little cosmology excursion from your editor: Observations so far suggest that the expansion of the universe is indeed accelerating – the “big crunch”, in...
  • Claudio Grass Interviews Mark Thornton
      Introduction Mark Thornton of the Mises Institute and our good friend Claudio Grass recently discussed a number of key issues, sharing their perspectives on important economic and geopolitical developments that are currently on the minds of many US and European citizens. A video of the interview can be found at the end of this post. Claudio provided us with a written summary of the interview which we present below – we have added a few remarks in brackets (we strongly recommend...
  • Inflation and Gold - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Reasons to Buy Gold The price of gold went up $19, and the price of silver 42 cents. The price action occurred on Monday, Wednesday and Friday though so far, only the first two price jumps reversed. We promise to take a look at the intraday action on Friday.   File under “reasons to buy gold”: A famous photograph by Henri Cartier-Bresson of a rather unruly queue in front of a bank in Shanghai in 1949 in the final days of Kuomintang rule. When it dawned on people that the...

Support Acting Man

Top10BestPro
j9TJzzN

Austrian Theory and Investment

Archive

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com