The Rationale for Interventionism

It has been almost eight years since former U.S. President George W. Bush warned the world that “without immediate action by Congress, America could slip into a financial panic and a distressing scenario would unfold.”

 

rescue party before destroying villageSeptember 2008: a solemn-faced “rescue party” of bureaucrats and politicians (from left to right: Ben Bernanke, GW Bush, Hank Paulson and Donald Cox) announces that the village needs to be destroyed in order to save it (“normally, we’re all for free market capitalism, just not this time”).

Photo credit: Credit Larry Downing / Reuters

 

The government’s response to the crisis was a USD700 billion rescue package that was supposed to prevent U.S. banks from collapsing and encourage them to resume lending, which was soon to be followed by a series of Quantitative Easing (QE) packages injecting money into the economy.

The rationale for this government intervention was that it would boost spending, restore confidence in the market and reignite economic growth to everyone’s benefit – but has it succeeded in doing so?

 

QE: Faith-Based Monetary Policy

With QE still ongoing (albeit tapered down to reinvestment of maturing debt), it is no longer part of a “rescue” package – it has now become the new normal – despite the utter lack of positive results.

Since end-2007, the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet has expanded from about USD 890 billion to more than USD 4.5 trillion. And yet, U.S. growth rates have remained in the vicinity of just 2% since 2010 (see chart below).

It is no different in Europe. The European Central Bank (ECB), which first embarked on QE in March 2015, has raised the monthly amount for asset purchases from EUR 60 billion to EUR 80 billion, and expanded the range of assets to include corporate bonds.

Despite that, the growth outlook remains dim, with consensus expectations of 1.4% in 2016, and 1.7% in 2017 (source: Bloomberg). So why do governments continue to cling to an approach that simply doesn’t deliver?

 

1-gdp_growth_US_2007_2015GDP growth in the US and euro zone economies since the financial crisis – click to enlarge.

 

“All present-day governments are fanatically committed to an easy money policy”, Ludwig von Mises observed in Human Action in 1949, and to this day, nothing about that seems to have changed.

Ever since governments, represented by their central banks, have monopolized the production of money, while backstopping fractionally reserved banks, the markets haven’t been free from intervention.

Monetary expansion happens all the time, not just in crises. In fact, the world has grown accustomed to this monetary policy, the new normal – and here is why:

To justify increasing liquidity, they say, “unemployment is high” or “economic growth rates are lower than expected”, and “inflation is too low”. But as we see in the chart below, the economy hasn’t really improved now, has it?

 

2-real_rates_gdp_growth_2006_2014US real interest rates and GDP growth – no improvement in sight

 

The False Promises of QE – There Are Only Few Winners

Even though Keynesians and other opponents of free market economics say there is no such thing as a “trickle-down effect”, QE is based on the very assumption  that it will trickle down and spur economic growth by boosting spending.

But with low growth rates, weak currencies, and zero-to-negative interest rates, one has to wonder: who really stands to gain from this monetary policy stance?

Developed economies have been increasingly dominated by the financial sector in recent decades. Compared to the 1960s, the share of the financial sector has more than doubled from 4% to about 10% today, according to Forbes.

This can be attributed to the closing of the gold window back in 1971, when the American administration looked for an easy way to finance the welfare- warfare state.

The American citizenry was deluded into thinking that higher spending and more money printing were intended to improve the economy’s performance.  In reality the government was trying to use an unbacked currency to print its way out of its debt burden.

Inflation does not affect everyone equally. Those who are wealthy and well-connected to the banking system are benefiting from inflation, because they are usually among the earliest receivers of newly-created money.

 

Richard_CantillonThe fact that monetary inflation inter alia causes a kind of “reverse wealth redistribution” because newly created money doesn’t reach everyone in the economy at the same time and gradually distorts prices as it spreads from earlier to later receivers has been known since Richard Cantillon published his treatise on economics and monetary theory in the early 18th century. Of course modern-day central bankers deny that this is the case, or simply pretend that this knowledge doesn’t exist. Unfortunately that means they are  either lying or ignorant – and yet, they get to make decisions that affect us all.

Image via Wikimedia Commons

 

The lower one goes down the socio-economic pyramid, the more adverse the effects will be, as by the time new money gets into the hands of those less well off, it will already have lost a lot of purchasing power.

The fiat money system protects and serves only certain strata of society: the financial sector (and those connected to it), the government, various government cronies and the rich. Everyone else is impoverished by the system, and what is even worse, becomes dependent on it.

Those familiar with the system often know what to do to hedge against the risks of deterioration in the economy and the currency. But many others, such as middle class professionals and the working class, as a rule have less opportunity to diversify what wealth they have, and usually don’t have the time and opportunity to properly inform themselves about the system’s workings.

They are more likely to simply hold savings in the form of bank deposits. This fully exposes them to monetary debasement, zero or even negative interest rates, as well as bank insolvency risk.

 

An Idea Boomerangs

Negative interest rates imposed by central banks are supposed to encourage lending and stimulate spending. But because commercial banks are now required to pay for keeping reserves at the central bank’s deposit facility, they are charging customers for current accounts, are lowering the interest they pay on savings to next to nothing, and often even refuse to open accounts for lower income clients these days.

Ultimately this will discourage depositors with limited means from keeping money at banks altogether and increase the number of the so-called “unbanked” – people who have no banking facilities whatsoever at their disposal. In the U.S. this currently applies to about 7% of all households (approximately 25 million people).

And what if banks actually don’t pass on negative rates on the deposit side? Ironically, they will then end up charging more on loans, by introducing higher fees (even on credit cards), or interest rate floors on variable rate loans, as has already happened at German banks.

The idea that imposing this policy would  make loans cheaper has completely boomeranged and actually created the opposite effect.

 

3-ECB-ratesThe ECB’s main refinancing rate and deposit facility rate: stuck at 0% and -0.4% since March of 2016. The treatment seems to be killing the patient.

 

Penalizing Saving and Encouraging Reckless Spending

This flawed system penalizes saving and encourages reckless spending. Although we are all stuck in the same environment of negative interest rates and monetary debasement, it is particularly the lower strata of society that are destined to lose from this state of affairs.

Discouraged from saving by zero or negative rates, they tend to end up spending more than they would have otherwise and often even begin to accumulate debt in order to keep up with increasing prices.

And then there is the handful of winners, who know how to take advantage of the system and are actually thriving in it. All of this is ultimately made possible by a government monopoly on money production.

Should one assume that social equality would be ensured in a free market environment without government intervention? There is no such guarantee, and such a utopian promise has never been made by supporters of a free society.

 

P. BagusEconomist Dr. Philipp Bagus: when is inequality unjust?

Photo credit: zVg

 

However, as my friend Philipp Bagus pointed out in a recent interview, there is a difference between inequality in a free society and inequality imposed by bureaucratic activism and there is certainly a moral dimension to consider:

 

“We should distinguish between morally justified and unjustified inequality. When someone gets rich because he is productive and satisfies the wishes of people in a cheaper and better way than his competitors, we should applaud him. The resulting income inequality is justified.

The problem starts if someone earns an income due to government intervention such as licenses, other regulations, or simply tax transfers. The resulting income inequality is unjustified. Getting richer at the expense of others through the use of the fiat monetary system, which represents a government monopoly and banking privileges, is unjust.”

 

Conclusion: Delaying the Inevitable Only Makes it Worse

The truth is that government officials have failed to solve the economy’s problems. They have merely delayed the downfall and have poisoned the investment environment in the process.

Had they really wished to address the root causes, they would have allowed  the bubble to deflate and the bust to proceed. Yes, it would have been a harsh experience.

Possibly Bush and other officials at the time wanted to spare the citizenry from having to endure a great deal of short term misery, but obviously, the economy has not exactly flourished since then.

In fact, loose monetary policy has essentially kept the economy in a miserable state of suspended animation since 2008. It has transitioned from one bubble to another, merely postponing the inevitable.

It could be argued that the poorer members of society would have been most vulnerable to the effects of a bust as well. But this ignores that every time a needed economic correction is artificially postponed, the subsequent bust will be even worse.

The denouement cannot be avoided, it is solely a question of whether it should be faced sooner or later. Since the current system has succeeded in stripping away many people’s savings, they are ultimately exposed to far greater risks than ever before.

 

Charts by World Bank, Forbes, PGM Capital

 

Chart and image captions by PT

 

Claudio Grass is the managing director of Global Gold, a Swiss bullion depository. Acting Man is an affiliate of Global Gold (here is our landing page at Global Gold, where you can obtain additional information about the service).

 

 

 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 


 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 12vB2LeWQNjWh59tyfWw23ySqJ9kTfJifA

   
 

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • America Goes Full Imbecile
      Credit has a wicked way of magnifying a person’s defects.  Even the most cautious man, with unlimited credit, can make mistakes that in retrospect seem absurd.  But an average man, with unlimited credit, is preeminently disposed to going full imbecile.   Let us not forget about this important skill...  [PT]   Several weeks ago we came across a woeful tale of Mike Meru.  Somehow, this special fellow, while of apparent sound mine and worthy intent, racked up...
  • Retail Capitulation – Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Small Crowds, Shrinking Premiums The prices of gold and silver rose five bucks and 37 cents respectively last week. Is this the blast off to da moon for the silver rocket of halcyon days, in other words 2010-2011?   Various gold bars. Coin and bar premiums have been shrinking steadily (as have coin sales of the US Mint by the way), a sign that retail investors have lost interest in gold. There are even more signs of this actually, and this loss of interest stands in stark...
  • Credit Spreads: Polly is Twitching Again - in Europe
      Junk Bond Spread Breakout The famous dead parrot is coming back to life... in an unexpected place. With its QE operations, which included inter alia corporate bonds, the ECB has managed to suppress credit spreads in Europe to truly ludicrous levels. From there, the effect propagated through arbitrage to other developed markets. And yes, this does “support the economy” - mainly by triggering an avalanche of capital malinvestment and creating the associated boom conditions, while...
  • Gold Divergences Emerge
      Bad Hair Day Produces Positive Divergences On Friday the ongoing trade dispute between the US and China was apparently escalated by a notch to the next level, at least verbally. The Trump administration announced a list of tariffs that are supposed to come into force in three week's time and China clicked back by announcing retaliatory action. In effect, the US government said: take that China, we will now really hurt our own consumers!  - and China's mandarins replied: just you wait, we...
  • Industrial Commodities vs. Gold - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Oil is Different Last week, we showed a graph of rising open interest in crude oil futures. From this, we inferred — incorrectly as it turns out — that the basis must be rising. Why else, we asked, would market makers carry more and more oil?   Crude oil acts differently from gold – and so do all other industrial commodities. What makes them different is that the supply of industrial commodities held in storage as a rule suffices to satisfy industrial demand only for a...
  • Chasing the Wind
      Futility with Purpose Plebeians generally ignore the tact of their economic central planners.  They care more that their meatloaf is hot and their suds are cold, than about any plans being hatched in the capital city.  Nonetheless, the central planners know an angry mob, with torches and pitchforks, are only a few empty bellies away.  Hence, they must always stay on point.   Watch for those pitchfork bearers – they can get real nasty and then heads often roll quite literally....
  • Lift-Off Not (Yet) - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Wrong-Way Event Last week we said something that turned out to be prescient:   This is not an environment for a Lift Off Event.   An unfortunate technical mishap interrupted the latest moon-flight of the gold rocket. Fear not true believers, a few positive tracks were left behind. [PT]   The price of gold didn’t move much Mon-Thu last week, though the price of silver did seem to be blasting off. Then on Friday, it reversed hard. We will provide a forensic...
  • Merger Mania and the Kings of Debt
      Another Early Warning Siren Goes Off Our friend Jonathan Tepper of research house Variant Perception (check out their blog to see some of their excellent work) recently pointed out to us that the volume of mergers and acquisitions has increased rather noticeably lately. Some color on this was provided in an article published by Reuters in late May, “Global M&A hits record $2 trillion in the year to date”, which inter alia contained the following chart illustrating the...
  • Cryptocurrency Technicals – Navigating the Bear Market
      A Purely Technical Market Long time readers may recall that we regard Bitcoin and other liquid big cap cryptocurrencies as secondary media of exchange from a monetary theory perspective for the time being. The wave of speculative demand that has propelled them to astonishing heights was triggered by market participants realizing that they have the potential to become money. The process of achieving more widespread adoption of these currencies as a means of payment and establishing...
  • The Fed's “Inflation Target” is Impoverishing American Workers
      Redefined Terms and Absurd Targets At one time, the Federal Reserve's sole mandate was to maintain stable prices and to “fight inflation.”  To the Fed, the financial press, and most everyone else “inflation” means rising prices instead of its original and true definition as an increase in the money supply.  Rising prices are a consequence – a very painful consequence – of money printing.   Fed Chair Jerome Powell apparently does not see the pernicious effects...

Support Acting Man

Item Guides

j9TJzzN

The Review Insider

Dog Blow

Austrian Theory and Investment

Archive

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

Mish Talk

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com