Brandolini’s Law

“The Phillips Curve is alive,” said Fed Chair Janet Yellen at Wednesday’s post FOMC meeting press conference. We’ll offer some remarks on this in just a moment, including why Yellen is toast.  But first we must put her utterances into proper context.

This week, at a business meeting, we experienced the full veracity of Brandolini’s Law.  If you happen to be ignorant of Brandolini’s Law, we must apologize.  For we must forever end your bliss.

 

BrandoliniAlberto Brandolini introduces his magnificent, if sobering, law to the world.

 

Brandolini’s Law, or the BS Asymmetry Principle, as formulated by Italian programmer Alberto Brandolini, says: “The amount of energy needed to refute BS is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.”

In other words, it takes 10-times the energy to debunk a falsehood than it takes to spew it.  Certainly, Brandolini is on to something.  In fact, as far as we can tell, there are countless applications of this law.

 

Spewing Nonsense

Money, policy, economics.  You name it.  There’s an abundance of nonsense out there for each of these subjects.  Moreover, it’s exhausting to negate. But nowhere else does money, policy, and economics mix with such special vigor than in the dishonorable world of central banking.

Fiat money. Legal tender.  ZIRP.  NIRP.  Operation twist.  Quantitative easing.  Can you think of another profession out there that so dangerously operates upon a foundation of pure BS? Janet Yellen, no doubt, is in the business of spewing nonsense.  It’s a cornerstone job function of central bankers.  But, alas, she isn’t very good at it.

 

Yellen_data_dependent_cartoon_11.18.2015_largeIn fact, Ms. Yellen picks whatever data seem convenient…which is actually not a criticism. Even if a central planner were completely aware of all the data that exist at a given point in time and could firmly rely on their correctness, central planning of the economy would still be impossible.

 

For drivel to be effective it must be carried forward with unequivocal confidence.  It can be incoherent.  It can be contradictory.  It can be complete gibberish.  It can be all of these things, and more.  But it can’t be hesitant.

Yet everything that comes out of Yellen’s mouth is tentative and unsure.  She hedges.  She prevaricates.  She dithers.  She evades.  What’s more, she does so with the confidence of silly putty.  Nonetheless, we won’t give her a pass.

 

Yellen_cartoon_02.27.2015This cartoon will probably never get old…

 

As noted above, at Wednesday’s press conference Yellen remarked that “The Philips Curve is alive.”  This, indeed, is utter BS…driveled out in just five words.  Now, as established by Brandolini’s Law, we must expend 10-times the energy – or more – to refute it.

 

Why Janet Yellen is Toast

The Phillips curve, if you didn’t know, says there’s an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment.  When unemployment goes down, inflation goes up.  Conversely, when unemployment goes up, inflation goes down.

The curve was produced by economist William Phillips using data for wage rates and unemployment in the United Kingdom in the years 1913 to 1948.  Like any economic theory derived from empirical data, the practitioners always miss one very important insight.  Namely, that the economy isn’t stagnant; it’s dynamic.  Its inputs change over time.

 

1-Phillips CurveThe modern-day adaption of the Phillips curve is known as “NAIRU” (or “non-accelerating inflation rate of employment”), the theoretical way for which was paved by Keynesian economist Abba Lerner in 1951 in “The Economics of Employment” (Lerner inter alia strongly believed in socialist central planning, natch). The study of wage rates and employment published by William Phillips actually came later, in 1958. In the 1960s, Samuelson and Solow published papers on the topic, while the term NAIRU was coined by Friedman in the 70s – he began to differentiate between “short-run” and “long-run” Phillips curve effects in a vain attempt to explain the stagflation of the 70s. In a word, it is all complete balderdash  – which should be glaringly obvious to anyone looking at the chart above. Supposedly, the two data series should be negatively correlated at all times. As Henry Hazlitt showed, if one looks at the post war data from 1946 to the late 1970s, it is in reality no better than a coin toss – the Phillips curve seemingly “worked” about half of the time. It hasn’t gotten any better since. So Ms. Yellen might as well have said “coin tosses are alive and well”. If anything, the Phillips curve shows why one cannot possibly construct a valid economic theory on the basis of historical data. Not surprisingly, at least 7 Nobel Prizes were won in the late 70s/ early 80s for papers debunking it! Not that it is difficult to debunk – it is already nonsense from a theoretical perspective. But Keynesians have no capital theory, and look at the economy in terms of aggregates and equilibrium equations. This has nothing to do with the real world, it is ultimately just a poor attempt to make economics more like physics. Of course, admitting to the fact that this is approach makes no sense would imply that central planners are surplus to requirements. A great many people would have to look for a real job – click to enlarge.

 

Perhaps, the Phillips curve provides a snapshot of what reality was like during a certain time and place.  But that certain time and place was prior to globalization, involved an on again off again pseudo gold exchange standard, and encompassed the Great Depression and two World Wars.

Extrapolating that reality into the present and attempting to fabricate new data to support it is an application of absurdity. Since Phillips first derived the Phillips Curve there have been lengthy episodes that are inconsistent with his original findings.  Particularly, the late 1970s – when inflation and unemployment went vertical in tandem.

How could it be that both went up at once?  Weren’t they mutually exclusive?  According to the Phillips Curve this was impossible.  Yet it happened all the same.  In short, the Phillips Curve is a BS theory.

The fact that Yellen still spews this nonsense is intolerable and insulting.  This, among other reasons, is why she is toast.  Her four-year appointment is set to end in February 2018.  We suspect she won’t make it much past the next Presidential inauguration.

 

Chart by: St. Louis Federal Reserve Research

 

Chart and image captions by PT

 

M N. Gordon is the editor and publisher of the Economic Prism.

 

 

 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 


 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 12vB2LeWQNjWh59tyfWw23ySqJ9kTfJifA

   
 

3 Responses to “Why Janet Yellen is Toast”

  • MikeWilliamson:

    I agree with everything except Yellen being toast.
    Incredibly, even as the global economy grinds to a halt, she will be spewing more BS and she will be eulogised for it by politicians, fellow bureaucrats and the media.
    Why?
    Because they will never have the guts to admit they were wrong and will keep applying the same failed policies.
    And, let’s be honest, Hillary ‘More of the same’ Clinton is going to be the next president, so get ready for NIRP, deeper NIRP, confiscation of gold, the cashless society, punishment for bartering or using cash substitutes, theft of savings and pensions and, ultimately, abject poverty for all but the ‘elite’.
    And still they will not recognise what they have done.

  • JoeBren:

    For the definitive explanation of the curve check out: http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc110404.htm

  • wmbean:

    One of the greatest false assumptions of economics and economists is the use of aggregates. Aggregate demand is suppose to meet aggregate supply. It is the lazy academician’s way to think about national and world economies. Thus the Phillips Curve relies on all things being equal when at least half the time they are not. Lumping all energy supplies (nuclear,hydro, natural gas, solar, wind, heating oil, gasoline, etc.) into one aggregate category called energy supply means that depending on the demand and supply of each energy type one’s general energy cost can easily be skewed. It is much the same as lumping all fruit supply and demand by inclusion of every possible type of fruit and then attempting to find the average cost of apples and oranges. It really makes no sense but that is what is taught by those with PhDs in the subject. And if one wants to pass the classes and obtain that degree one must come to believe in the insanity. The fact that so many continue to believe such stupidity only confirms Einstein’s early observance. Janet Yellen is a political appointment supposedly made on the basis of merit. Her merit is that she believes what the main stream economists believe.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • America Goes Full Imbecile
      Credit has a wicked way of magnifying a person’s defects.  Even the most cautious man, with unlimited credit, can make mistakes that in retrospect seem absurd.  But an average man, with unlimited credit, is preeminently disposed to going full imbecile.   Let us not forget about this important skill...  [PT]   Several weeks ago we came across a woeful tale of Mike Meru.  Somehow, this special fellow, while of apparent sound mine and worthy intent, racked up...
  • Retail Capitulation – Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Small Crowds, Shrinking Premiums The prices of gold and silver rose five bucks and 37 cents respectively last week. Is this the blast off to da moon for the silver rocket of halcyon days, in other words 2010-2011?   Various gold bars. Coin and bar premiums have been shrinking steadily (as have coin sales of the US Mint by the way), a sign that retail investors have lost interest in gold. There are even more signs of this actually, and this loss of interest stands in stark...
  • Credit Spreads: Polly is Twitching Again - in Europe
      Junk Bond Spread Breakout The famous dead parrot is coming back to life... in an unexpected place. With its QE operations, which included inter alia corporate bonds, the ECB has managed to suppress credit spreads in Europe to truly ludicrous levels. From there, the effect propagated through arbitrage to other developed markets. And yes, this does “support the economy” - mainly by triggering an avalanche of capital malinvestment and creating the associated boom conditions, while...
  • Gold Divergences Emerge
      Bad Hair Day Produces Positive Divergences On Friday the ongoing trade dispute between the US and China was apparently escalated by a notch to the next level, at least verbally. The Trump administration announced a list of tariffs that are supposed to come into force in three week's time and China clicked back by announcing retaliatory action. In effect, the US government said: take that China, we will now really hurt our own consumers!  - and China's mandarins replied: just you wait, we...
  • Industrial Commodities vs. Gold - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Oil is Different Last week, we showed a graph of rising open interest in crude oil futures. From this, we inferred — incorrectly as it turns out — that the basis must be rising. Why else, we asked, would market makers carry more and more oil?   Crude oil acts differently from gold – and so do all other industrial commodities. What makes them different is that the supply of industrial commodities held in storage as a rule suffices to satisfy industrial demand only for a...
  • Chasing the Wind
      Futility with Purpose Plebeians generally ignore the tact of their economic central planners.  They care more that their meatloaf is hot and their suds are cold, than about any plans being hatched in the capital city.  Nonetheless, the central planners know an angry mob, with torches and pitchforks, are only a few empty bellies away.  Hence, they must always stay on point.   Watch for those pitchfork bearers – they can get real nasty and then heads often roll quite literally....
  • Lift-Off Not (Yet) - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Wrong-Way Event Last week we said something that turned out to be prescient:   This is not an environment for a Lift Off Event.   An unfortunate technical mishap interrupted the latest moon-flight of the gold rocket. Fear not true believers, a few positive tracks were left behind. [PT]   The price of gold didn’t move much Mon-Thu last week, though the price of silver did seem to be blasting off. Then on Friday, it reversed hard. We will provide a forensic...
  • Cryptocurrency Technicals – Navigating the Bear Market
      A Purely Technical Market Long time readers may recall that we regard Bitcoin and other liquid big cap cryptocurrencies as secondary media of exchange from a monetary theory perspective for the time being. The wave of speculative demand that has propelled them to astonishing heights was triggered by market participants realizing that they have the potential to become money. The process of achieving more widespread adoption of these currencies as a means of payment and establishing...
  • The Fed's “Inflation Target” is Impoverishing American Workers
      Redefined Terms and Absurd Targets At one time, the Federal Reserve's sole mandate was to maintain stable prices and to “fight inflation.”  To the Fed, the financial press, and most everyone else “inflation” means rising prices instead of its original and true definition as an increase in the money supply.  Rising prices are a consequence – a very painful consequence – of money printing.   Fed Chair Jerome Powell apparently does not see the pernicious effects...
  • Merger Mania and the Kings of Debt
      Another Early Warning Siren Goes Off Our friend Jonathan Tepper of research house Variant Perception (check out their blog to see some of their excellent work) recently pointed out to us that the volume of mergers and acquisitions has increased rather noticeably lately. Some color on this was provided in an article published by Reuters in late May, “Global M&A hits record $2 trillion in the year to date”, which inter alia contained the following chart illustrating the...

Support Acting Man

Item Guides

j9TJzzN

The Review Insider

Dog Blow

Austrian Theory and Investment

Archive

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

Mish Talk

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com