“The Phillips Curve is alive,” said Fed Chair Janet Yellen at Wednesday’s post FOMC meeting press conference. We’ll offer some remarks on this in just a moment, including why Yellen is toast. But first we must put her utterances into proper context.
This week, at a business meeting, we experienced the full veracity of Brandolini’s Law. If you happen to be ignorant of Brandolini’s Law, we must apologize. For we must forever end your bliss.
Alberto Brandolini introduces his magnificent, if sobering, law to the world.
Brandolini’s Law, or the BS Asymmetry Principle, as formulated by Italian programmer Alberto Brandolini, says: “The amount of energy needed to refute BS is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.”
In other words, it takes 10-times the energy to debunk a falsehood than it takes to spew it. Certainly, Brandolini is on to something. In fact, as far as we can tell, there are countless applications of this law.
Money, policy, economics. You name it. There’s an abundance of nonsense out there for each of these subjects. Moreover, it’s exhausting to negate. But nowhere else does money, policy, and economics mix with such special vigor than in the dishonorable world of central banking.
Fiat money. Legal tender. ZIRP. NIRP. Operation twist. Quantitative easing. Can you think of another profession out there that so dangerously operates upon a foundation of pure BS? Janet Yellen, no doubt, is in the business of spewing nonsense. It’s a cornerstone job function of central bankers. But, alas, she isn’t very good at it.
In fact, Ms. Yellen picks whatever data seem convenient…which is actually not a criticism. Even if a central planner were completely aware of all the data that exist at a given point in time and could firmly rely on their correctness, central planning of the economy would still be impossible.
For drivel to be effective it must be carried forward with unequivocal confidence. It can be incoherent. It can be contradictory. It can be complete gibberish. It can be all of these things, and more. But it can’t be hesitant.
Yet everything that comes out of Yellen’s mouth is tentative and unsure. She hedges. She prevaricates. She dithers. She evades. What’s more, she does so with the confidence of silly putty. Nonetheless, we won’t give her a pass.
This cartoon will probably never get old…
As noted above, at Wednesday’s press conference Yellen remarked that “The Philips Curve is alive.” This, indeed, is utter BS…driveled out in just five words. Now, as established by Brandolini’s Law, we must expend 10-times the energy – or more – to refute it.
Why Janet Yellen is Toast
The Phillips curve, if you didn’t know, says there’s an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment. When unemployment goes down, inflation goes up. Conversely, when unemployment goes up, inflation goes down.
The curve was produced by economist William Phillips using data for wage rates and unemployment in the United Kingdom in the years 1913 to 1948. Like any economic theory derived from empirical data, the practitioners always miss one very important insight. Namely, that the economy isn’t stagnant; it’s dynamic. Its inputs change over time.
The modern-day adaption of the Phillips curve is known as “NAIRU” (or “non-accelerating inflation rate of employment”), the theoretical way for which was paved by Keynesian economist Abba Lerner in 1951 in “The Economics of Employment” (Lerner inter alia strongly believed in socialist central planning, natch). The study of wage rates and employment published by William Phillips actually came later, in 1958. In the 1960s, Samuelson and Solow published papers on the topic, while the term NAIRU was coined by Friedman in the 70s – he began to differentiate between “short-run” and “long-run” Phillips curve effects in a vain attempt to explain the stagflation of the 70s. In a word, it is all complete balderdash – which should be glaringly obvious to anyone looking at the chart above. Supposedly, the two data series should be negatively correlated at all times. As Henry Hazlitt showed, if one looks at the post war data from 1946 to the late 1970s, it is in reality no better than a coin toss – the Phillips curve seemingly “worked” about half of the time. It hasn’t gotten any better since. So Ms. Yellen might as well have said “coin tosses are alive and well”. If anything, the Phillips curve shows why one cannot possibly construct a valid economic theory on the basis of historical data. Not surprisingly, at least 7 Nobel Prizes were won in the late 70s/ early 80s for papers debunking it! Not that it is difficult to debunk – it is already nonsense from a theoretical perspective. But Keynesians have no capital theory, and look at the economy in terms of aggregates and equilibrium equations. This has nothing to do with the real world, it is ultimately just a poor attempt to make economics more like physics. Of course, admitting to the fact that this is approach makes no sense would imply that central planners are surplus to requirements. A great many people would have to look for a real job – click to enlarge.
Perhaps, the Phillips curve provides a snapshot of what reality was like during a certain time and place. But that certain time and place was prior to globalization, involved an on again off again pseudo gold exchange standard, and encompassed the Great Depression and two World Wars.
Extrapolating that reality into the present and attempting to fabricate new data to support it is an application of absurdity. Since Phillips first derived the Phillips Curve there have been lengthy episodes that are inconsistent with his original findings. Particularly, the late 1970s – when inflation and unemployment went vertical in tandem.
How could it be that both went up at once? Weren’t they mutually exclusive? According to the Phillips Curve this was impossible. Yet it happened all the same. In short, the Phillips Curve is a BS theory.
The fact that Yellen still spews this nonsense is intolerable and insulting. This, among other reasons, is why she is toast. Her four-year appointment is set to end in February 2018. We suspect she won’t make it much past the next Presidential inauguration.
Chart by: St. Louis Federal Reserve Research
Chart and image captions by PT
M N. Gordon is the editor and publisher of the Economic Prism.
It is that time of the year again – our semi-annual funding drive begins today. Give us a little hand in offsetting the costs of running this blog, as advertising revenue alone is insufficient. You can help us reach our modest funding goal by donating either via paypal or bitcoin. Those of you who have made a ton of money based on some of the things we have said in these pages (we actually made a few good calls lately!), please feel free to up your donations accordingly (we are sorry if you have followed one of our bad calls. This is of course your own fault). Other than that, we can only repeat that donations to this site are apt to secure many benefits. These range from sound sleep, to children including you in their songs, to the potential of obtaining privileges in the afterlife (the latter cannot be guaranteed, but it seems highly likely). As always, we are greatly honored by your readership and hope that our special mixture of entertainment and education is adding a little value to your life!
Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke
3 Responses to “Why Janet Yellen is Toast”
Most read in the last 20 days:
- Gold Price Skyrockets in India after Currency Ban – Part III
When Money Dies In part-I of the dispatch we talked about what happened during the first two days after Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi banned Rs 500 and Rs 1000 banknotes, comprising of 88% of the monetary value of cash in circulation. In part-II, we talked about the scenes, chaos, desperation, and massive loss of productive capacity that this ban had led to over the next few days. Indian prime minister Narendra Modi – another finger-wagger, as can be seen in this...
- Gold Price Skyrockets in India after Currency Ban – Part II
Chaos in the Wake of the Ban Here is a link to Part 1, about what happened in the first two days after India's government made Rs 500 (~$7.50) and Rs 1,000 (~$15) banknotes illegal. They can now only be converted to Rs 100 (~$1.50) or lower denomination notes, at bank branches or post offices. Banks were closed the first day after the decision. What follows is the crux of what has happened over the subsequent four days. India's prime minister Nahendra Modi, author of the...
- Gold Price Skyrockets in India after Currency Ban – Part IV
A Market Gripped by Fear The Indian Prime Minister announced on 8th November 2016 that Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 banknotes would no longer be legal tender. Linked are Part-I, Part-II and Part-III updates on the rapidly encroaching police state. The economic and social mess that Modi has created is unprecedented. It will go down in history as an epitome of naivety and arrogance due to Modi’s self-centered desire to increase tax-collection at any cost. Indian jewelry...
- A Note on Gold and India – What is Driving the Gold Price?
Hidden Motives It is well-known that India's government wants to coerce its population into “modernizing” its financial behavior and abandoning its traditions. The recent ban on large-denomination banknotes was not only meant to fight corruption. Obviously, this very bad Indian has way too much cash. Just look at him, he looks suspicious! Photo via thenewsminute.com In fact, as our friend Jayant Bhandari has pointed out, fresh avenues for corruption ...
- Will Trump Do What Reagan Couldn’t?
Depravity and Degeneration BALTIMORE – Finally, it’s over. We were both delighted and appalled by the news. A smile spread over our face... and our steps lightened... as we looked ahead to four years without Hillary Clinton’s know-it-all mug in the news. Praise be! This mug will be largely missing from the airwaves and the intertubes in coming years. And your caption scribbler PT won't have to look for a fall-out shelter! We thank the Lord and the American public for...
- India's Currency Debacle – An Interview with Jayant Bhandari
A Major Crisis Last week Jayant Bhandari related the story of the overnight ban of certain banknotes in India under cover of “stamping out corruption” (see Gold Price Skyrockets In India after Currency Ban Part 1 and Part 2 for the details). Banned 500 rupee banknotes The problem is inter alia that the sudden ban of these banknotes has hit the Indian economy quite hard, given that 97% of all transactions in the country are cash-based. Not only that, it has...
- Inflation Expectations Rise Sharply
Mini-Panic Over Inflation After Trump's Election Victory We have witnessed truly astonishing short term market conniptions following the Donald Trump's election victory. In this post we want to focus on one aspect that seems to be exercising people quite a bit at present, namely the recent surge in inflation expectations reflected in the markets. Will we have to get those WIN buttons out again? A 1970s “whip inflation now” button. The only thing that was actually needed...
- There Are Two Types of Credit — One of Them Leads to Booms and Busts
Stumped by the Bust In the slump of a cycle, businesses that were thriving begin to experience difficulties or go under. They do so not because of firm-specific entrepreneurial errors but rather in tandem with whole sectors of the economy. People who were wealthy yesterday have become poor today. Factories that were busy yesterday are shut down today, and workers are out of jobs. What has caused the bust? The modern-day economic orthodoxy continues to be unable to provide...
- Will the Swamp Swallow Trump?
Permanently Skewed TRUMP HOTEL, New York – Trump’s rambling army – professionals, amateurs, camp followers, and profiteers – is marching south, down the I-95 corridor. There, on the banks of the Potomac, it will fight its next big battle. Lieutenants in Trump's army: Bannon, Flynn & Sessions Photo credit: Drew Angerer / AFP Here at the Diary, we do not like to get involved in politics. But this is a special time in the history of our planet – a...
- Gold Bull Market Remains Intact – Long Term Fundamentals Outweigh Short Term Market Gyrations
A Strong First Half of the Year, Followed by Another Retreat In early 2016 gold had a big bull run. The precious metal rose close to 25% this year, pushed higher in a summer rally that peaked on July 10th. Gold experienced a bumpy ride over the remainder of the summer though, as investors became increasingly concerned about a potential rate hike by the Federal Reserve. Uncertainty returned to gold market and has intensified further since then. Initially, gold rallied sharply...
- Too Early for “Inflation Bets”?
The Trump Trade After 35 years of waiting... so many false signals... so often deceived... so often disappointed... bond bears gathered on rooftops as though awaiting the Second Coming. Many times, investors have said to themselves, “This is it! This is the end of the Great Bull Market in Bonds!” The long bond's long cycle – red rectangles indicate when the post 1980 bull market was held to be “over” or “over for sure” or “100% over”, etc. We have...
- All Aboard! Trump’s Express Train to the Future
Free Money! BALTIMORE – Last week, the Dow punched up above 19,000 – a new all-time record. And on Monday, the Dow, the S&P 500, the Nasdaq, and the small-cap Russell 2000 each hit new all-time highs. The last time that happened was on the last day of December 1999. Ironically, two events that were almost universally expected to trigger large stock market declines were followed by quite rapid and strong gains. Would the market have fallen if Hillary Clinton had won...