“The Phillips Curve is alive,” said Fed Chair Janet Yellen at Wednesday’s post FOMC meeting press conference. We’ll offer some remarks on this in just a moment, including why Yellen is toast. But first we must put her utterances into proper context.
This week, at a business meeting, we experienced the full veracity of Brandolini’s Law. If you happen to be ignorant of Brandolini’s Law, we must apologize. For we must forever end your bliss.
Alberto Brandolini introduces his magnificent, if sobering, law to the world.
Brandolini’s Law, or the BS Asymmetry Principle, as formulated by Italian programmer Alberto Brandolini, says: “The amount of energy needed to refute BS is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.”
In other words, it takes 10-times the energy to debunk a falsehood than it takes to spew it. Certainly, Brandolini is on to something. In fact, as far as we can tell, there are countless applications of this law.
Money, policy, economics. You name it. There’s an abundance of nonsense out there for each of these subjects. Moreover, it’s exhausting to negate. But nowhere else does money, policy, and economics mix with such special vigor than in the dishonorable world of central banking.
Fiat money. Legal tender. ZIRP. NIRP. Operation twist. Quantitative easing. Can you think of another profession out there that so dangerously operates upon a foundation of pure BS? Janet Yellen, no doubt, is in the business of spewing nonsense. It’s a cornerstone job function of central bankers. But, alas, she isn’t very good at it.
In fact, Ms. Yellen picks whatever data seem convenient…which is actually not a criticism. Even if a central planner were completely aware of all the data that exist at a given point in time and could firmly rely on their correctness, central planning of the economy would still be impossible.
For drivel to be effective it must be carried forward with unequivocal confidence. It can be incoherent. It can be contradictory. It can be complete gibberish. It can be all of these things, and more. But it can’t be hesitant.
Yet everything that comes out of Yellen’s mouth is tentative and unsure. She hedges. She prevaricates. She dithers. She evades. What’s more, she does so with the confidence of silly putty. Nonetheless, we won’t give her a pass.
This cartoon will probably never get old…
As noted above, at Wednesday’s press conference Yellen remarked that “The Philips Curve is alive.” This, indeed, is utter BS…driveled out in just five words. Now, as established by Brandolini’s Law, we must expend 10-times the energy – or more – to refute it.
Why Janet Yellen is Toast
The Phillips curve, if you didn’t know, says there’s an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment. When unemployment goes down, inflation goes up. Conversely, when unemployment goes up, inflation goes down.
The curve was produced by economist William Phillips using data for wage rates and unemployment in the United Kingdom in the years 1913 to 1948. Like any economic theory derived from empirical data, the practitioners always miss one very important insight. Namely, that the economy isn’t stagnant; it’s dynamic. Its inputs change over time.
The modern-day adaption of the Phillips curve is known as “NAIRU” (or “non-accelerating inflation rate of employment”), the theoretical way for which was paved by Keynesian economist Abba Lerner in 1951 in “The Economics of Employment” (Lerner inter alia strongly believed in socialist central planning, natch). The study of wage rates and employment published by William Phillips actually came later, in 1958. In the 1960s, Samuelson and Solow published papers on the topic, while the term NAIRU was coined by Friedman in the 70s – he began to differentiate between “short-run” and “long-run” Phillips curve effects in a vain attempt to explain the stagflation of the 70s. In a word, it is all complete balderdash – which should be glaringly obvious to anyone looking at the chart above. Supposedly, the two data series should be negatively correlated at all times. As Henry Hazlitt showed, if one looks at the post war data from 1946 to the late 1970s, it is in reality no better than a coin toss – the Phillips curve seemingly “worked” about half of the time. It hasn’t gotten any better since. So Ms. Yellen might as well have said “coin tosses are alive and well”. If anything, the Phillips curve shows why one cannot possibly construct a valid economic theory on the basis of historical data. Not surprisingly, at least 7 Nobel Prizes were won in the late 70s/ early 80s for papers debunking it! Not that it is difficult to debunk – it is already nonsense from a theoretical perspective. But Keynesians have no capital theory, and look at the economy in terms of aggregates and equilibrium equations. This has nothing to do with the real world, it is ultimately just a poor attempt to make economics more like physics. Of course, admitting to the fact that this is approach makes no sense would imply that central planners are surplus to requirements. A great many people would have to look for a real job – click to enlarge.
Perhaps, the Phillips curve provides a snapshot of what reality was like during a certain time and place. But that certain time and place was prior to globalization, involved an on again off again pseudo gold exchange standard, and encompassed the Great Depression and two World Wars.
Extrapolating that reality into the present and attempting to fabricate new data to support it is an application of absurdity. Since Phillips first derived the Phillips Curve there have been lengthy episodes that are inconsistent with his original findings. Particularly, the late 1970s – when inflation and unemployment went vertical in tandem.
How could it be that both went up at once? Weren’t they mutually exclusive? According to the Phillips Curve this was impossible. Yet it happened all the same. In short, the Phillips Curve is a BS theory.
The fact that Yellen still spews this nonsense is intolerable and insulting. This, among other reasons, is why she is toast. Her four-year appointment is set to end in February 2018. We suspect she won’t make it much past the next Presidential inauguration.
Chart by: St. Louis Federal Reserve Research
Chart and image captions by PT
M N. Gordon is the editor and publisher of the Economic Prism.
You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.
Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke
3 Responses to “Why Janet Yellen is Toast”
Most read in the last 20 days:
- Gold Sector Update – What Stance is Appropriate?
The Technical Picture - a Comparison of Antecedents We wanted to post an update to our late December post on the gold sector for some time now (see “Gold – Ready to Spring Another Surprise?” for the details). Perhaps it was a good thing that some time has passed, as the current juncture seems particularly interesting. We received quite a few mails from friends and readers recently, expressing concern about the inability of gold stocks to lead, or even confirm strength in gold of...
- Don’t Blame Trump When the World Ends
Alien Economics There was, indeed, a time when clear thinking and lucid communication via the written word were held in high regard. As far as we can tell, this wonderful epoch concluded in 1936. Everything since has been tortured with varying degrees of gobbledygook. One should probably not be overly surprised that the abominable statist rag Time Magazine is fulsomely praising Keynes' nigh unreadable tome. We too suspect that this book has actually lowered the planet-wide IQ –...
- Incrementum Advisory Board Meeting, Q1 2017 and Some Additional Reflections
Looming Currency and Liquidity Problems The quarterly meeting of the Incrementum Advisory Board was held on January 11, approximately one month ago. A download link to a PDF document containing the full transcript including charts an be found at the end of this post. As always, a broad range of topics was discussed; although some time has passed since the meeting, all these issues remain relevant. Our comments below are taking developments that have taken place since then into...
- What is the Best Time to Buy Stocks?
Chasing Entry Points Something similar to the following has probably happened to you at some point: you want to buy a stock on a certain day and in order to time your entry, you start watching how it trades. Alas, the price rises and rises, and your patience begins to wear thin. Shouldn't a correction set in soon and provide you with a more favorable buying opportunity? Apple-Spotting – a five minute intraday chart showing the action in AAPL on February 1, 2017 - an...
- Trump and the Draining of the Swamp
Swamp Critters BALTIMORE – The Dow is back above the 20,000-point mark. Federal debt, as officially tallied, is up to nearly $20 trillion. The two go together, egging each other on. The Dow is up 20 times since 1980. So is the U.S. national debt. Debt feeds the stock market and the swamp. What’s not up so much is real output, as measured by GDP. It’s up only 6.4 times over the same period. Debt and asset prices have been rising three times as fast as GDP for 36 years! Best...
- Gold and Silver Divergence – Precious Metals Supply and Demand
Gold and Silver Divergence – Precious Metals Supply and Demand Last week, the prices of the metals went up, with the gold price rising every day and the silver price stalling out after rising 42 cents on Tuesday. The gold-silver ratio went up a bit this week, an unusual occurrence when prices are rising. Everyone knows that the price of silver is supposed to outperform — the way Pavlov’s Dogs know that food comes after the bell. Speculators usually make it...
- When Trumponomics Meets Abenomics
Thirty Year Retread What will President Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe talk about when they meet later today? Will they gab about what fishing holes the big belly bass are biting at? Will they share insider secrets on what watering holes are serving up the stiffest drinks? [ed. note: when we edited this article for Acting Man, the meeting was already underway] Japan's prime minister Shinzo Abe, a dyed-in-the-wool Keynesian and militarist, meets America's...
- The Great Wailing
Regret and Suffering BALTIMORE – Victoribus spolia... So far, the most satisfying thing about the Trump win has been the howls and whines coming from the establishment. Each appointment – some good, some bad from our perspective – has brought forth such heavy lamentations. Oh no! Alaric the Visigoth is here! Hide the women and children! And don't forget the vestal virgins, if you can find any... You’d think Washington had been invaded by Goths, now...
- Receive a One Percent Gift When Buying or Selling a Home
How to Save Money When Buying or Make More When Selling a Home In your professional capacity and perhaps also in your private life, you may be closely involved with financial and commodity markets. Trading in stocks, bonds or futures is part of your daily routine. Occasionally you probably have to deal with real estate as well though – if you e.g. want to purchase an apartment or a house, or if own a home you wish to sell. The people who took this photograph probably want to...
- Silver Futures Market Assistance – Precious Metals Supply and Demand
Silver Is Pushed Up Again This week, the prices of the metals moved up on Monday. Then the gold price went sideways for the rest of the week, but the silver price jumped on Friday. Taking off for real or not? Photo credit: NASA Is this the rocket ship to $50? Will Trump’s stimulus plan push up the price of silver? Or just push silver speculators to push up the price, at their own expense, again? This will again be a brief Report this week, as we are busy...
- Unleashing Wall Street
To Unleash or Not to Unleash, That is the Question... LOVINGSTON, VIRGINIA – Corporate earnings have been going down for nearly three years. They are now about 10% below the level set in the late summer of 2014. Why should stocks be so expensive? Example of something that one should better not unleash. The probability that a win-lose proposition will develop upon meeting it seems high. It wins, because it gets to eat... Image credit: Urs Hagen Oh,...
- Boondoggles for the Swamp Critters
Monster or Mozart? BALTIMORE – Investors seem to be holding their breath, like a man hiding a cigarette from his wife. It’s just a feeling, and it’s not the first time we’ve had it... but it feels as though it wouldn’t take much to send them all running. Actually, they're not going anywhere yet... but there is a lot of overconfidence by those who were very worried when prices were a lot better - click to enlarge. Meanwhile... we’re coming to a deep...