Are Recent Small Improvements Meaningful?
In recent weeks evidence has emerged that the weakness in the manufacturing sector has begun to spread to the services sector as well (see e.g. Mish’s summary on the Markit Services PMI as well as the worrisome state of services activity on a global basis). This is not particularly surprising: as we have frequently pointed out, economic slowdowns and busts always tend to hit the capital goods industries first.
The sky above the manufacturing industries continues to be dark…
Photo credit: Bernat Casero
At the same time, a few data points in manufacturing have actually slightly improved – which is to say, that the pace of the declines has slowed and was in some cases not as bad as expected. This always seems to happen: as soon as economists adapt their previously overoptimistic expectations to a recent worsening trend, they will promptly be proven wrong again, as the pace of the trend slows.
Few things in this world are more certain than the fact that the consensus forecasts of mainstream economists are likely to be wrong. One can probably easily improve on their hit rate by merely flipping a coin. It is quite eerie actually – it is as if they were all Gartman clones.
However, the question that interests us is this: do these improvements mean anything? Our friend Michael Pollaro has provided us with updated charts on the situation, several of which we present below. As we have repeatedly said in previous updates, the probability of a recession has clearly increased – but the evidence that one has already begun or is about to begin shortly is not yet definitive. The following chart depicts the year-on-year change rate in the value of new factory orders, unfilled orders and inventories for non-defense capital goods excl. aircraft. Focus on the areas highlighted by the black circles and green rectangles.
There have been two occasions when gyrations similar to the recent ones have preceded recessions – shown in the first two black circles (2000/2001 and 2007/2008). The important thing here is that the short term ups and downs just prior to the beginning of the recessions were actually meaningless. In both cases there were one or two occasions when the data improved in the short term, but it turned out in retrospect that these signals were misleading. A much sharper downturn followed shortly thereafter.
The green rectangles show “false signals” – in these two cases, capital goods orders and associated data (such as industrial production, manufacturing sales, etc.) also declined close to recessionary thresholds, but no recession ensued. Let us consider these two cases: the first occasion was in 1997-1998. This was during the Asian, resp. Russian crisis. At the time, the US economy was in the middle of a major credit expansion and in the grip of the greatest stock market mania in history.
Japan’s bubble economy could not be slowed down by the crash of 1987, and the same happened with the US bubble economy in the late 1990s: a little crisis overseas could not stop it from resuming its expansion, especially with Alan Greenspan’s Fed immediately easing monetary policy further and the GSEs vastly expanding their mortgage purchases so as to pump additional liquidity into the banking system.
The second occasion was in 2011/2012. This was at the height of the euro area debt crisis. What happened? The Fed embarked on Operation Twist, and shortly thereafter on “QE3” (the ECB concurrently began to implement various expansionary measures, such as its LTRO program). Bubble activities resumed with a vengeance.
So there were very good reasons why the beginning corrections were aborted on these occasions: in both instances the Fed loosened monetary policy significantly. However, this time, the Fed is reportedly eager to tighten rather than loosen monetary policy (for the time being, anyway). And although this “tightening” has so far only had a small effect on credit and money supply expansion (although the latter has begun to slow down), it makes it less likely that the correction can be arrested and reversed by reigniting yet another round of bubble activities.
Regional Data vs. the ISM
It is also worth noting that the improvement in data was confined to the national ISM. The same cannot be said of any other relevant data series. Here is a comparison of the combined regional Fed manufacturing survey data with the data reported by ISM. First the headline numbers:
As can be seen, the regional surveys have actually been leading the ISM numbers in the last recession. It is definitely possible that the same thing is happening again. Here is a comparison of new orders:
Next up the employment figures – here the correlation is much closer, but the regional survey numbers are still weaker than the ISM data at present:
Finally, here is a chart comparing ISM new orders to total business sales (manufacturing sales). Business sales have only been updated to December, but even if the change rate in their decline should have slowed a bit in the meantime, there would still be a large gap between the two series – and in this case too, business sales have actually been leading ISM new orders in the last two recessions:
All these data continue to suggest that a recession remains highly likely. What will it take for final confirmation? Among other things, an even stronger decline in ISM new orders (likely below the 48 level as Steve Saville has suggested), a downturn in real non-residential private investment and a rise in initial unemployment claims above the most recent interim peak (according to John Hussman, a rise above 320,000 would do the trick).
To this it must be kept in mind though that the fundamental backdrop of the current cycle is slightly different from that of previous cycles, as the Fed has directly boosted the money supply during much of the recovery period, with commercial bank credit expansion playing second fiddle. Moreover, a lot of the credit that has been extended to businesses by banks was used for financial engineering purposes (share buybacks, LBOs, and even dividend payments!) rather than capital investment.
However, quite a bit of malinvestment has taken place anyway, as evidenced by the boom-bust sequence in the oil patch and the absurd valuations attained by tech “unicorns” (we believe many of these will crash and burn and take the earnings of a great many tech companies down with them).
Effects on the Production Structure
Lastly, below is our own boom-bust indicator, which compares the industrial production indexes for capital goods and consumer goods. As can be seen here, during boom periods, investment and factors of production are drawn toward the capital goods industries, and the production of capital goods rises strongly vs. that of consumer goods. Since booms driven by credit created from thin air cannot be properly funded by the economy’s pool of real savings, they prove unsustainable in the long term.
The economy will over time tie up too many final goods (or the economy’s “free capital” in the terminology of Richard von Strigl) relative to the amount it releases. Saving, investment and consumption schedules are no longer properly aligned, and the production structure becomes distorted: too many goods are produced for which demand is lower than expected (see oil), while not enough is invested in the production of goods that would have been demanded more urgently. Generally, the structure of production will be lengthened beyond the point that can be sustained with existing real savings. This is the result of the distortion of relative prices caused by the expansion of credit and money ex nihilo, which falsifies economic calculation and leads businessmen astray.
As consumption hasn’t been sufficiently lowered – as it normally would have been if sufficient savings had actually been accumulated – bottlenecks will eventually appear. If investment and consumption don’t “add up”, the over-consumption must still be funded somehow – and it is ultimately funded by the consumption of capital. Often this will greatly impair the middle stages of the production structure, in which capital maintenance will tend to be neglected while malinvestment in higher stages and over-consumption take place concurrently.
However, this cannot be kept up indefinitely, although the day of reckoning can certainly be greatly delayed by continuing the expansion of credit. Eventually though, consumer goods will become scarce relative to demand, and the price movements that have characterized the boom will begin to reverse, while upward pressure on previously suppressed market interest rates will begin to emerge (see junk bonds). The concrete sequence and the details of the phenomena attending the boom and bust periods differ from case to case, depending on contingent circumstances. However, what remains a feature of all types of historical business cycles is that in the end, the production structure has to be realigned to properly reflect reality.
Malinvested capital must be re-purposed and/or liquidated, which usually involves a shortening of production time by eliminating stages of production that cannot be sustained at the given level of savings, with factors of production re-directed toward the lower stages (consumer goods production), away from the higher stages (capital goods production). This rearrangement takes time and certainly feels uncomfortable – it’s not as if one could simply flip a switch after all – and is known as the bust period, or recession.
Photo credit: Julien Chabot
While we can still not proclaim with certainty that a recession is imminent, recent data releases have so far done nothing to lower the relatively high probability of a recession emerging in the US. Depending on upcoming developments this assessment could change again, but for the time being we remain on red alert.
Keep in mind that the growth rate of the broad true money supply, while much lower than at the peaks of 2011 – 2012, remains at a historically high level (more than 8% in terms of TMS-2). This tends to support bubble activities, but there is a limit to what loose monetary policy can achieve with respect to misdirecting scarce resources (a misdirection that masquerades as “economic growth”). The problem is precisely that capital is scarce – no new capital can be conjured into being by the actions of a central bank.
Charts by Michael Pollaro, St. Louis Federal Reserve Research
It is that time of the year again – our semi-annual funding drive begins today. Give us a little hand in offsetting the costs of running this blog, as advertising revenue alone is insufficient. You can help us reach our modest funding goal by donating either via paypal or bitcoin. Those of you who have made a ton of money based on some of the things we have said in these pages (we actually made a few good calls lately!), please feel free to up your donations accordingly (we are sorry if you have followed one of our bad calls. This is of course your own fault). Other than that, we can only repeat that donations to this site are apt to secure many benefits. These range from sound sleep, to children including you in their songs, to the potential of obtaining privileges in the afterlife (the latter cannot be guaranteed, but it seems highly likely). As always, we are greatly honored by your readership and hope that our special mixture of entertainment and education is adding a little value to your life!
Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke
Most read in the last 20 days:
- A Striking Chart
The Economy and the Stock Market As long time readers know, we are always paying close attention to the manufacturing sector, which is far more important to the US economy than is generally believed. In terms of gross output it is the largest sector of the economy, and it should of course be obvious that saving, investment and production are the only ways to create wealth. What's left of the Brooklyn Domino Sugar Refinery. Photo credit: Paul Raphaelson Contrary...
- Trump and Putin Narrowly Escape Assassination Attempt
The Gloves are Coming Off First a little bit of recent history. Readers are probably aware that some questions about the occasionally malfunctioning Deep State android... no, wait, we'll start again. Questions have recently been raised about the health of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton by various “alt-right” tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy theorists, such as this one. The monsters are normally hiding under Hillary's bed, but lately they have come out into the open...
- US Economy - Curious Pattern in ISM Readings
Head Fake Theory Confirmed? This is a brief update on our last overview of economic data. Although we briefly discussed employment as well, the overview was as usual mainly focused on manufacturing, which is the largest sector of the economy by gross output. Pepsi factory in Baltimore, 1956 Photo via pinterest.com Readers may recall that we have pointed out for some time that there was quite a large gap between the data reported in regional Fed manufacturing...
- A Convocation of Interventionists, Part 2
Pleas for More Deficit Spending We continue with our Jackson Hole post mortem – including remarks that were made by economists and monetary bureaucrats shortly before and after the pow-wow and seem to be connected to the discussions there. Assembled central planners (we're not sure if this picture was taken at the conference, but most of the people in it were there). Photo credit: Getty Images We should preface the following with a Mises quote, as the...
- Why the Fed Destroyed the Market Economy
What Have You Done for Me Lately? Swing voters are a fickle bunch. One election they vote Democrat. The next they vote Republican. For they have no particular ideology or political philosophy to base their judgment upon. The primacy of the wallet. They don’t give a rip about questions of small government or big government. Nor do they have any druthers about the welfare or warfare state. In effect, they really don’t care. What’s important to the...
- How is Real Wealth Created?
An Abrupt Drop Let’s turn back to our regular beat: the U.S. economy and its capital markets. We’ve been warning that the Fed would never make any substantial increase to interest rates. Not willingly, at least. Groping in the dark, Yellen-style Each time Fed chief Janet Yellen opens her mouth, out comes a hint that more rate hikes might be coming. But each time, it turns out that the economy is not as robust as she had believed... and that a rate hike isn’t...
- Janet Yellen’s Shame
Playing Politics In honest capitalism, you do what you can to get other people to voluntarily give you money. This usually involves providing goods or services they think are worth the price. You may get a little wild and crazy from time to time, but you are always called to order by your customers. In the market economy, consumers reign supreme. There is no such thing as a “lost” vote in the marketplace; every penny spent affects production. Mises noted: “Consumers...
- Get Ready for a New Crisis – in Corporate Debt
Imposter Dollar OUZILLY, France – We’re going back to basics here at the Diary. We’re getting everyone on the same page... learning together... connecting the dots... trying to figure out what is going on. The new three dollar bill issued by the Apprehensive States of America. We made a breakthrough when we identified the source of so many of today’s bizarre and grotesque trends. It’s the money – the new post-1971 dollar. This new dollar is green. You...
- A Convocation of Interventionists – Part 1
Modern Economics - It's All About Central Planning We are hereby delivering a somewhat belated comment on the meeting of monetary central planners and their courtier economists at Jackson Hole. Luckily timing is not really an issue in this context. Central bank headquarters: the Fed's Eccles building, the ECB's hideously expensive new tower in Frankfurt, and the BOJ's Tokyo HQ (judging from the people in the foreground, it may be a source of noxious fumes). When...
- Hanjin Marooning in San Pedro Bay
Global Trade Reversal Expansions and contractions in global trade have played out over long secular trends for thousands of years. The Silk Road, for example, was established by the Han Dynasty of China in 130 BC, and allowed for continuous trade between East and West for nearly 1,600 years. In addition to economic trade, the Silk Road was also a conduit for culture and knowledge among its network of civilizations. A map of the main ancient Silk Road - click to...
- The Economy, the Stock Market and the Fed
John Hussman on Recent Developments We always look forward to John Hussman's weekly missive on the markets. Some people say that he is a “permabear”, but we don't think that is a fair characterization. He is rightly wary of the stock market's historically extremely high valuation and the loose monetary policy driving the surge in asset prices. The S&P 500 Index and the NYSE advance-decline line. Most market internals weakened steadily until early February 2016, but...
- John Maynard Keynes’ General Theory Eighty Years Later
The “Scientific” Fig Leaf for Statism and Interventionism To the economic and political detriment of the Western world and those economies beyond which have adopted its precepts, 2016 marks the eightieth anniversary of the publication of one of, if not, the most influential economics books ever penned, John Maynard Keynes’ The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. The mere fact that the book is lauded by TIME magazine on the cover should give everyone...