A Rebound in Stocks Begins
Given that a very sharp downturn in so-called “risk assets” is well underway globally, but not yet fully confirmed by US big cap indexes, we are keeping an eye out for confirmation. This is to say, we are looking for events, market moves, positioning data, even newspaper headlines, that will either confirm or refute the notion that a larger scale bear market (as opposed to just a deep correction) has begun.
Haruhiko Kuroda will stimulate us back to Nirvana! Hurrah!
Photo credit: Yuya Shino / Reuters
Readers may recall an article we posted earlier this year, discussing historical examples of the stock market swooning in the seasonally strong month of January (see: “Stock Market Suffers Worst Start to the Year Ever” for details). When the market does something like this, it is more often than not sending a message worth heeding. Chart patterns of course never repeat in precisely the same manner, but such historical patterns are nevertheless often useful as rough guides.
As a reminder, here is a chart of the DJIA from 1961 to 1962. Both the distribution period preceding the sell-off, as well as the timing and pattern of the sell-off itself show many similarities to what has so far occurred in 2015 to 2016:
In keeping with this, we would now normally expect the market to rebound from the initial sell-off and retrace a portion of its losses over a period of several weeks before resuming the decline from a lower high. Last week the bond market delivered a technical signal on the daily chart, which based on well-known inter-market correlations suggests that such a rebound has likely begun.
Assuming that the positive correlation between treasury bond yields and the stock market (resp. the negative correlation between bond and stock prices) persists, the island reversal in bond yields last week is signaling the beginning of a short term relief rally. The bullish consensus in the bond market has recently become extremely stretched, so a rebound in yields would be quite normal – click to enlarge.
A certain degree of support for the idea has also emerged on the US economic data front: for instance, growth in retail sales exceeded expectations. More importantly though, initial unemployment claims, which traditionally are strongly negatively correlated with stock prices, fell sharply last week. In the process they have negated a recent short term uptrend that threatened to lead to a breakout to higher highs:
Crash Risk Still Remains High
There are of course a number of caveats to all of this: Neither the VIX nor put-call volume ratios have so far shown any signs of an emerging panic in the US stock market. If one looks at gold stocks, in spite of the sector being overbought and more than ripe for a pullback, numerous charts of individual gold stocks actually look as though they may have even more short term upside. Since the sector is currently negatively correlated with the broader stock market, this counts as a mildly negative factor for “risk”.
Moreover, as we have pointed out in a recent missive, once a market hovers close to major chart support – as is the case with the S&P 500 index and the DJIA at present – crash risk becomes higher than normal (see: “The Bubble Deflates and Crash Risk Rises” for the details). We would also point readers to John Hussman’s weekly market column, in which he echoes this sentiment:
“Given our focus on historically-informed, value-conscious, full-cycle investing, I generally don’t place much attention on short-term technical factors or specific patterns of price action. However, the current setup is one of the few exceptions. In a market return/risk classification that is already the most negative we identify, where a sustained period of speculation has given way increasing risk-aversion, the position of the market relative to very widely identified “support” (about the 1820 level on the S&P 500) is of particular note.
Often, well-recognized support levels become places where dip-buyers and swing-traders line up on the buy side, on the assumption that they’ll be rewarded if the market bounces from that support, and that they can quickly cut their losses immediately if the support level is broken. The problem here is that when too many speculators set their stop-loss points at the same level, and valuations are still elevated, there may be neither speculators nor value-conscious investors willing to bid for stock anywhere near those support levels once they break. The resulting gap between eager sellers at a high level and willing buyers at a much lower level is the essential element of market crashes, because every seller requires a buyer.
I’ve often observed that market crashes have historically emerged only after a familiar profile of market behavior that features a compressed market retreat of about 14% over 10-12 weeks, a rebound between 1/3 and 2/3 of that decline, a fresh retreat that slightly breaks that initial level of support, a one-day barn-burner advance, and then a collapse as the prior support level is broken. In the 1990’s, I called this pattern the lead-up to “five days of Armageddon” because historically, once rich valuations have been joined with poor market internals (what I used to call “trend uniformity”), the break of a widely-identified support level has often been followed by vertical market losses.
The present widely-followed “support” shelf for the S&P 500 is roughly 14% below the 2015 market peak, but most domestic and international indices have already broken corresponding support levels. Given the obscene valuations at the 2015 peak, my impression is that a run-of-the-mill completion of the current market cycle (neither an unusual nor worst-case scenario from a historical perspective) would comprise an additional market decline of roughly 40-50% from present levels. I certainly don’t expect that kind of market loss in one fell swoop. Rather, my immediate concern is that the first leg of this decline could be quite steep.
In other words, one shouldn’t get carried away by the market’s short term rebound potential. It exists, and it would clearly conform with “standard expectations”. We do assign a large probability to it. But the risk of a sudden and very sharp drop has definitely not gone away just yet.
Bear Market Confirmation from Japan?
Now we come to the what has prompted us to refer to “stimulus hopes” in the title of this post. With US markets closed for President’s Day on Monday, the mice came out to play everywhere else. Gold sold off sharply, and the Nikkei rallied by more than 1,000 points in a single trading day.
Normally people will be inclined to think that such a powerful reversal is a bullish sign. Unfortunately this isn’t the case – the opposite is true. Such rip-roaring one-day rallies are typically a hallmark of bear markets. Readers may recall that there have been a number of huge rallies in the DJIA a few years ago that broke records in terms of points recovered in the space of one to two trading days.
These notable moves occurred in September of 2008. After the SEC banned short selling of a large list of financial stocks in mid September, the DJIA rallied by more than 1,000 points in just two days. On the penultimate trading day of September it again rallied very strongly, recovering nearly 600 points in just one day. Then it crashed.
Record short term rallies in the DJIA before the October 2008 crash. Record one day rallies could incidentally also be observed in the three weeks preceding the 1987 crash and in April of 2000 – click to enlarge.
Note, we are not saying that a big one day rally means a crash is imminent. What we are saying is merely this: when such large short term rallies occur in the course of an initial wave of selling from a multi-year peak, they should be regarded as a bearish sign. This does not mean that a larger rebound cannot take shape over coming weeks. However, it does represent yet another warning.
This is especially so if one considers the headlines and circumstances accompanying the Nikkei’s surge on Monday. The Japanese government published yet another batch of terrible economic statistics. Specifically, the economy once again contracted in Q4 of 2015, for the fourth time in the past seven quarters. Here is how the rally in the Nikkei that started right after the release was explained in the mainstream press:
“Nikkei surges on stimulus hopes” wrote the Business Standard. Reuters reported: “Nikkei posts biggest daily gain in more than 4 months on oil bounce, stimulus hopes”. The Guardian noted along similar lines “Asian and European stock markets rally on stimulus hopes”. Countless similar headlines appeared all over the world.
Stimulus hopes? Seriously? Only a little while ago the press finally got around to noticing that the imposition of negative interest rates in Europe and Japan had backfired badly and was seemingly about to annihilate blind faith in central planners. We believe that absolutely nothing has changed on this front. The “stimulus” dog ain’t hunting anymore, even though we still come across declarations of faith such as this recent one by Deutsche Bank equity strategists, who asserted that “Only the Fed can Save Stocks Now”.
Well, no. It actually cannot – and neither can the BoJ or the ECB. It is a serious misconception to believe that central banks have “control” over what the stock market does next. There is a big difference between the ability to exert influence on the extent and duration of bubbles while they are underway and stopping a bear market from playing out.
People often end up losing a lot of money in bear markets because they believe that these things actually matter. Hopes are kept alive and as a result many people stay fully invested in the market at the worst possible time. Of course, in the aggregate these losses cannot be avoided anyway – after all, someone will always end up holding stocks. For every investor who manages to avoid further losses by selling, another investor steps up to the plate to take them instead.
We would assign a very high probability to a market rebound lasting several weeks, which would allow for oversold conditions to be relieved and recent positioning extremes in stock index futures to be mitigated. One must keep in mind though that nearby support levels will have to hold – if they are violated in the near term, the extant crash risk would likely materialize.
Regardless of the market’s near term gyrations though, the manner in which overseas markets have turned around on Monday should be seen as another medium term warning sign – not only on technical grounds, but also based on the faulty reasoning forwarded by market observers.
As we always stress, central banks definitely can goose stock prices even under the worst economic conditions, if they proceed to utterly destroy the currency they issue. This has e.g. most recently happened in Venezuela. However, our working assumption at this juncture remains that developed market central banks are highly unlikely to pursue such a course. After all, they all have “inflation targets” – and while they have obviously no control over price inflation either, we assume they will tighten policy should these targets be materially exceeded.
Pinning one’s hopes on “more stimulus” definitely strikes us as a mug’s game at the current juncture though.
Charts by: StockCharts, Acting Man
It is that time of the year again – our semi-annual funding drive begins today. Give us a little hand in offsetting the costs of running this blog, as advertising revenue alone is insufficient. You can help us reach our modest funding goal by donating either via paypal or bitcoin. Those of you who have made a ton of money based on some of the things we have said in these pages (we actually made a few good calls lately!), please feel free to up your donations accordingly (we are sorry if you have followed one of our bad calls. This is of course your own fault). Other than that, we can only repeat that donations to this site are apt to secure many benefits. These range from sound sleep, to children including you in their songs, to the potential of obtaining privileges in the afterlife (the latter cannot be guaranteed, but it seems highly likely). As always, we are greatly honored by your readership and hope that our special mixture of entertainment and education is adding a little value to your life!
Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke
One Response to ““Stimulus Hopes” – a Dog that Ain’t Hunting no More”
Most read in the last 20 days:
- Gold Price Skyrockets in India after Currency Ban – Part III
When Money Dies In part-I of the dispatch we talked about what happened during the first two days after Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi banned Rs 500 and Rs 1000 banknotes, comprising of 88% of the monetary value of cash in circulation. In part-II, we talked about the scenes, chaos, desperation, and massive loss of productive capacity that this ban had led to over the next few days. Indian prime minister Narendra Modi – another finger-wagger, as can be seen in this...
- Gold Price Skyrockets in India after Currency Ban – Part II
Chaos in the Wake of the Ban Here is a link to Part 1, about what happened in the first two days after India's government made Rs 500 (~$7.50) and Rs 1,000 (~$15) banknotes illegal. They can now only be converted to Rs 100 (~$1.50) or lower denomination notes, at bank branches or post offices. Banks were closed the first day after the decision. What follows is the crux of what has happened over the subsequent four days. India's prime minister Nahendra Modi, author of the...
- Gold Price Skyrockets in India after Currency Ban – Part IV
A Market Gripped by Fear The Indian Prime Minister announced on 8th November 2016 that Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 banknotes would no longer be legal tender. Linked are Part-I, Part-II and Part-III updates on the rapidly encroaching police state. The economic and social mess that Modi has created is unprecedented. It will go down in history as an epitome of naivety and arrogance due to Modi’s self-centered desire to increase tax-collection at any cost. Indian jewelry...
- A Note on Gold and India – What is Driving the Gold Price?
Hidden Motives It is well-known that India's government wants to coerce its population into “modernizing” its financial behavior and abandoning its traditions. The recent ban on large-denomination banknotes was not only meant to fight corruption. Obviously, this very bad Indian has way too much cash. Just look at him, he looks suspicious! Photo via thenewsminute.com In fact, as our friend Jayant Bhandari has pointed out, fresh avenues for corruption ...
- Will Trump Do What Reagan Couldn’t?
Depravity and Degeneration BALTIMORE – Finally, it’s over. We were both delighted and appalled by the news. A smile spread over our face... and our steps lightened... as we looked ahead to four years without Hillary Clinton’s know-it-all mug in the news. Praise be! This mug will be largely missing from the airwaves and the intertubes in coming years. And your caption scribbler PT won't have to look for a fall-out shelter! We thank the Lord and the American public for...
- India's Currency Debacle – An Interview with Jayant Bhandari
A Major Crisis Last week Jayant Bhandari related the story of the overnight ban of certain banknotes in India under cover of “stamping out corruption” (see Gold Price Skyrockets In India after Currency Ban Part 1 and Part 2 for the details). Banned 500 rupee banknotes The problem is inter alia that the sudden ban of these banknotes has hit the Indian economy quite hard, given that 97% of all transactions in the country are cash-based. Not only that, it has...
- Inflation Expectations Rise Sharply
Mini-Panic Over Inflation After Trump's Election Victory We have witnessed truly astonishing short term market conniptions following the Donald Trump's election victory. In this post we want to focus on one aspect that seems to be exercising people quite a bit at present, namely the recent surge in inflation expectations reflected in the markets. Will we have to get those WIN buttons out again? A 1970s “whip inflation now” button. The only thing that was actually needed...
- There Are Two Types of Credit — One of Them Leads to Booms and Busts
Stumped by the Bust In the slump of a cycle, businesses that were thriving begin to experience difficulties or go under. They do so not because of firm-specific entrepreneurial errors but rather in tandem with whole sectors of the economy. People who were wealthy yesterday have become poor today. Factories that were busy yesterday are shut down today, and workers are out of jobs. What has caused the bust? The modern-day economic orthodoxy continues to be unable to provide...
- Will the Swamp Swallow Trump?
Permanently Skewed TRUMP HOTEL, New York – Trump’s rambling army – professionals, amateurs, camp followers, and profiteers – is marching south, down the I-95 corridor. There, on the banks of the Potomac, it will fight its next big battle. Lieutenants in Trump's army: Bannon, Flynn & Sessions Photo credit: Drew Angerer / AFP Here at the Diary, we do not like to get involved in politics. But this is a special time in the history of our planet – a...
- Gold Bull Market Remains Intact – Long Term Fundamentals Outweigh Short Term Market Gyrations
A Strong First Half of the Year, Followed by Another Retreat In early 2016 gold had a big bull run. The precious metal rose close to 25% this year, pushed higher in a summer rally that peaked on July 10th. Gold experienced a bumpy ride over the remainder of the summer though, as investors became increasingly concerned about a potential rate hike by the Federal Reserve. Uncertainty returned to gold market and has intensified further since then. Initially, gold rallied sharply...
- Too Early for “Inflation Bets”?
The Trump Trade After 35 years of waiting... so many false signals... so often deceived... so often disappointed... bond bears gathered on rooftops as though awaiting the Second Coming. Many times, investors have said to themselves, “This is it! This is the end of the Great Bull Market in Bonds!” The long bond's long cycle – red rectangles indicate when the post 1980 bull market was held to be “over” or “over for sure” or “100% over”, etc. We have...
- All Aboard! Trump’s Express Train to the Future
Free Money! BALTIMORE – Last week, the Dow punched up above 19,000 – a new all-time record. And on Monday, the Dow, the S&P 500, the Nasdaq, and the small-cap Russell 2000 each hit new all-time highs. The last time that happened was on the last day of December 1999. Ironically, two events that were almost universally expected to trigger large stock market declines were followed by quite rapid and strong gains. Would the market have fallen if Hillary Clinton had won...