A Rebound in Stocks Begins
Given that a very sharp downturn in so-called “risk assets” is well underway globally, but not yet fully confirmed by US big cap indexes, we are keeping an eye out for confirmation. This is to say, we are looking for events, market moves, positioning data, even newspaper headlines, that will either confirm or refute the notion that a larger scale bear market (as opposed to just a deep correction) has begun.
Haruhiko Kuroda will stimulate us back to Nirvana! Hurrah!
Photo credit: Yuya Shino / Reuters
Readers may recall an article we posted earlier this year, discussing historical examples of the stock market swooning in the seasonally strong month of January (see: “Stock Market Suffers Worst Start to the Year Ever” for details). When the market does something like this, it is more often than not sending a message worth heeding. Chart patterns of course never repeat in precisely the same manner, but such historical patterns are nevertheless often useful as rough guides.
As a reminder, here is a chart of the DJIA from 1961 to 1962. Both the distribution period preceding the sell-off, as well as the timing and pattern of the sell-off itself show many similarities to what has so far occurred in 2015 to 2016:
In keeping with this, we would now normally expect the market to rebound from the initial sell-off and retrace a portion of its losses over a period of several weeks before resuming the decline from a lower high. Last week the bond market delivered a technical signal on the daily chart, which based on well-known inter-market correlations suggests that such a rebound has likely begun.
Assuming that the positive correlation between treasury bond yields and the stock market (resp. the negative correlation between bond and stock prices) persists, the island reversal in bond yields last week is signaling the beginning of a short term relief rally. The bullish consensus in the bond market has recently become extremely stretched, so a rebound in yields would be quite normal – click to enlarge.
A certain degree of support for the idea has also emerged on the US economic data front: for instance, growth in retail sales exceeded expectations. More importantly though, initial unemployment claims, which traditionally are strongly negatively correlated with stock prices, fell sharply last week. In the process they have negated a recent short term uptrend that threatened to lead to a breakout to higher highs:
Crash Risk Still Remains High
There are of course a number of caveats to all of this: Neither the VIX nor put-call volume ratios have so far shown any signs of an emerging panic in the US stock market. If one looks at gold stocks, in spite of the sector being overbought and more than ripe for a pullback, numerous charts of individual gold stocks actually look as though they may have even more short term upside. Since the sector is currently negatively correlated with the broader stock market, this counts as a mildly negative factor for “risk”.
Moreover, as we have pointed out in a recent missive, once a market hovers close to major chart support – as is the case with the S&P 500 index and the DJIA at present – crash risk becomes higher than normal (see: “The Bubble Deflates and Crash Risk Rises” for the details). We would also point readers to John Hussman’s weekly market column, in which he echoes this sentiment:
“Given our focus on historically-informed, value-conscious, full-cycle investing, I generally don’t place much attention on short-term technical factors or specific patterns of price action. However, the current setup is one of the few exceptions. In a market return/risk classification that is already the most negative we identify, where a sustained period of speculation has given way increasing risk-aversion, the position of the market relative to very widely identified “support” (about the 1820 level on the S&P 500) is of particular note.
Often, well-recognized support levels become places where dip-buyers and swing-traders line up on the buy side, on the assumption that they’ll be rewarded if the market bounces from that support, and that they can quickly cut their losses immediately if the support level is broken. The problem here is that when too many speculators set their stop-loss points at the same level, and valuations are still elevated, there may be neither speculators nor value-conscious investors willing to bid for stock anywhere near those support levels once they break. The resulting gap between eager sellers at a high level and willing buyers at a much lower level is the essential element of market crashes, because every seller requires a buyer.
I’ve often observed that market crashes have historically emerged only after a familiar profile of market behavior that features a compressed market retreat of about 14% over 10-12 weeks, a rebound between 1/3 and 2/3 of that decline, a fresh retreat that slightly breaks that initial level of support, a one-day barn-burner advance, and then a collapse as the prior support level is broken. In the 1990’s, I called this pattern the lead-up to “five days of Armageddon” because historically, once rich valuations have been joined with poor market internals (what I used to call “trend uniformity”), the break of a widely-identified support level has often been followed by vertical market losses.
The present widely-followed “support” shelf for the S&P 500 is roughly 14% below the 2015 market peak, but most domestic and international indices have already broken corresponding support levels. Given the obscene valuations at the 2015 peak, my impression is that a run-of-the-mill completion of the current market cycle (neither an unusual nor worst-case scenario from a historical perspective) would comprise an additional market decline of roughly 40-50% from present levels. I certainly don’t expect that kind of market loss in one fell swoop. Rather, my immediate concern is that the first leg of this decline could be quite steep.
In other words, one shouldn’t get carried away by the market’s short term rebound potential. It exists, and it would clearly conform with “standard expectations”. We do assign a large probability to it. But the risk of a sudden and very sharp drop has definitely not gone away just yet.
Bear Market Confirmation from Japan?
Now we come to the what has prompted us to refer to “stimulus hopes” in the title of this post. With US markets closed for President’s Day on Monday, the mice came out to play everywhere else. Gold sold off sharply, and the Nikkei rallied by more than 1,000 points in a single trading day.
Normally people will be inclined to think that such a powerful reversal is a bullish sign. Unfortunately this isn’t the case – the opposite is true. Such rip-roaring one-day rallies are typically a hallmark of bear markets. Readers may recall that there have been a number of huge rallies in the DJIA a few years ago that broke records in terms of points recovered in the space of one to two trading days.
These notable moves occurred in September of 2008. After the SEC banned short selling of a large list of financial stocks in mid September, the DJIA rallied by more than 1,000 points in just two days. On the penultimate trading day of September it again rallied very strongly, recovering nearly 600 points in just one day. Then it crashed.
Record short term rallies in the DJIA before the October 2008 crash. Record one day rallies could incidentally also be observed in the three weeks preceding the 1987 crash and in April of 2000 – click to enlarge.
Note, we are not saying that a big one day rally means a crash is imminent. What we are saying is merely this: when such large short term rallies occur in the course of an initial wave of selling from a multi-year peak, they should be regarded as a bearish sign. This does not mean that a larger rebound cannot take shape over coming weeks. However, it does represent yet another warning.
This is especially so if one considers the headlines and circumstances accompanying the Nikkei’s surge on Monday. The Japanese government published yet another batch of terrible economic statistics. Specifically, the economy once again contracted in Q4 of 2015, for the fourth time in the past seven quarters. Here is how the rally in the Nikkei that started right after the release was explained in the mainstream press:
“Nikkei surges on stimulus hopes” wrote the Business Standard. Reuters reported: “Nikkei posts biggest daily gain in more than 4 months on oil bounce, stimulus hopes”. The Guardian noted along similar lines “Asian and European stock markets rally on stimulus hopes”. Countless similar headlines appeared all over the world.
Stimulus hopes? Seriously? Only a little while ago the press finally got around to noticing that the imposition of negative interest rates in Europe and Japan had backfired badly and was seemingly about to annihilate blind faith in central planners. We believe that absolutely nothing has changed on this front. The “stimulus” dog ain’t hunting anymore, even though we still come across declarations of faith such as this recent one by Deutsche Bank equity strategists, who asserted that “Only the Fed can Save Stocks Now”.
Well, no. It actually cannot – and neither can the BoJ or the ECB. It is a serious misconception to believe that central banks have “control” over what the stock market does next. There is a big difference between the ability to exert influence on the extent and duration of bubbles while they are underway and stopping a bear market from playing out.
People often end up losing a lot of money in bear markets because they believe that these things actually matter. Hopes are kept alive and as a result many people stay fully invested in the market at the worst possible time. Of course, in the aggregate these losses cannot be avoided anyway – after all, someone will always end up holding stocks. For every investor who manages to avoid further losses by selling, another investor steps up to the plate to take them instead.
We would assign a very high probability to a market rebound lasting several weeks, which would allow for oversold conditions to be relieved and recent positioning extremes in stock index futures to be mitigated. One must keep in mind though that nearby support levels will have to hold – if they are violated in the near term, the extant crash risk would likely materialize.
Regardless of the market’s near term gyrations though, the manner in which overseas markets have turned around on Monday should be seen as another medium term warning sign – not only on technical grounds, but also based on the faulty reasoning forwarded by market observers.
As we always stress, central banks definitely can goose stock prices even under the worst economic conditions, if they proceed to utterly destroy the currency they issue. This has e.g. most recently happened in Venezuela. However, our working assumption at this juncture remains that developed market central banks are highly unlikely to pursue such a course. After all, they all have “inflation targets” – and while they have obviously no control over price inflation either, we assume they will tighten policy should these targets be materially exceeded.
Pinning one’s hopes on “more stimulus” definitely strikes us as a mug’s game at the current juncture though.
Charts by: StockCharts, Acting Man
You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.
Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke
One Response to ““Stimulus Hopes” – a Dog that Ain’t Hunting no More”
Most read in the last 20 days:
- Gold - Ready to Spring Another Surprise
Sentiment Extremes Below is an update of a number of interesting data points related to the gold market. Whether “interesting” will become “meaningful” remains to be seen, as most of gold's fundamental drivers aren't yet bullishly aligned. One must keep in mind though that gold is very sensitive with respect to anticipating future developments in market liquidity and the reaction these will elicit from central banks. Often this involves very long lead times. Blackbeard's...
- Modi’s Great Leap Forward
India’s Currency Ban – Part VIII India’s Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, announced on 8th November 2016 that Rs 500 (~$7.50) and Rs 1,000 (~$15) banknotes would no longer be legal tender. Linked are Part-I, Part-II, Part-III, Part-IV, Part-V, Part-VI and Part-VII, which provide updates on the demonetization saga and how Modi is acting as a catalyst to hasten the rapid degradation of India and what remains of its institutions. India’s Pride and Joy Indians are...
- Global Recession and Other Visions for 2017
Conjuring Up Visions Today’s a day for considering new hopes, new dreams, and new hallucinations. The New Year is here, after all. Now is the time to turn over a new leaf and start afresh. Naturally, 2017 will be the year you get exactly what’s coming to you. Both good and bad. But what else will happen? Image of a recently discarded vision... Image by Michael Del Mundo Here we begin by closing our eyes and slowing our breath. We let our mind...
- The Great El Monte Public Pension Swindle
Nowhere City California There are places in Southern California where, although the sun always shines, they haven’t seen a ray of light for over 50-years. There’s a no man’s land of urban blight along Interstate 10, from East Los Angeles through the San Gabriel Valley, where cities you’ve never heard of and would never go to, are jumbled together like shipping containers on Terminal Island. El Monte, California, is one of those places. Advice dispensed on Interstate...
- A Trade Deal Trump Cannot Improve
Worst in Class BALTIMORE – People can believe whatever they want. But sooner or later, real life intervenes. We just like to see the looks on their faces when it does. By that measure, 2017 may be our best year ever. Rarely have so many people believed so many impossible things. Alice laughed. "There's no use trying," she said: "one can't believe impossible things." "I daresay you haven't had much practice," said the Queen. "When I was your age, I always did it for...
- Pope Francis Now International Monetary Guru
Neo-Marxist Pope Francis Argues for Global Central Bank As the new year dawns, it seems the current occupant of St. Peter’s Chair will take on a new function which is outside the purview of the office that the Divine Founder of his institution had clearly mandated. Neo-Papist transmogrification. We highly recommend the economic thought of one of Francis' storied predecessors, John Paul II, which we have written about on previous occasions. In “A Tale of Two Popes” and...
- Trump’s Trade Catastrophe?
“Trade Cheaters” It is worse than “voodoo economics,” says former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers. It is the “economic equivalent of creationism.” Wait a minute - Larry Summers is wrong about almost everything. Could he be right about this? Larry Summers, the man who is usually wrong about almost everything. As we have always argued, the economy is much safer when he sleeps, so his tendency to fall asleep on all sorts of occasions should definitely be welcomed....
- Where’s the Outrage?
Blind to Crony Socialism Whenever a failed CEO is fired with a cushy payoff, the outrage is swift and voluminous. The liberal press usually misrepresents this as a hypocritical “jobs for the boys” program within the capitalist class. In reality, the payoffs are almost always contractual obligations, often for deferred compensation, that the companies vigorously try to avoid. Believe me. I’ve been on both sides of this kind of dispute (except, of course, for the “failed”...
- Money Creation and the Boom-Bust Cycle
A Difference of Opinions In his various writings, Murray Rothbard argued that in a free market economy that operates on a gold standard, the creation of credit that is not fully backed up by gold (fractional-reserve banking) sets in motion the menace of the boom-bust cycle. In his The Case for 100 Percent Gold Dollar Rothbard wrote: I therefore advocate as the soundest monetary system and the only one fully compatible with the free market and with the absence of force or fraud...
- Silver’s Got Fundamentals - Precious Metals Supply-Demand Report
Supply-Demand Fundamentals Improve Noticeably Last week was another short week, due to the New Year holiday. We look forward to getting back to our regularly scheduled market action. Photo via thedailycoin.org The prices of both metals moved up again this week. Something very noticeable is occurring in the supply and demand fundamentals. We will give an update on that, but first, here’s the graph of the metals’ prices. Prices of gold and silver...
- Trump’s Plan to Close the Trade Deficit with China
Rags to Riches Jack Ma is an amiable fellow. Back in 1994, while visiting the United States he decided to give that newfangled internet thing a whirl. At a moment of peak inspiration, he executed his first search engine request by typing in the word beer. Jack Ma, founder and CEO of Alibaba, China's largest e-commerce firm. Once he was a school teacher, but it turned out that he had enormous entrepreneurial talent and that the world of wheelers, dealers, movers and...
- Side Notes, January 14 - Red Flags Over Goldman Sachs
Red Flags Over Goldman Sachs Just to prove that I am an even-handed insulter, here is a rant about my former employer, Goldman Sachs. The scandal at 1MDB, the Malaysian sovereign wealth fund from which it appears that billions were stolen by politicians all the way up to the Prime Minister, continues to unfold. The main players in the 1MDB scandal. Irony alert: apparently money siphoned off from 1MDB was used to inter alia finance Martin Scorcese's movie “The Wolf of...