Have all the “Supercycle” Gains been Wiped Out?

We have frequently come across articles lately that are purporting to show that commodity prices have in the meantime declined below the lows that obtained at the start of the last bull market. Yesterday Zerohedge e.g. posted a chart from Sean Corrigan’s True Sinews Report, which depicts the GSCI Excess Return Index. The following remark accompanied the chart:

 

“Returns from being long the commodity super-cycle have evaporated in the last 18 months – to 42 year lows.”

 

So are commodities as a group really at 42 year lows? Here is a little test: can you name even a single listed commodity that currently trades at a lower price than at any time since January 1974?

 

commgreschImage credit: Ian Berry / CNN

 

There is actually no need to check, because there isn’t one. So how can an entire commodity index, which presumably includes a whole range of commodities, have fallen to a 42 year low? Below is a chart that provides us with a hint. It shows the performance of the crude oil ETF USO since its introduction and compares it to the performance of WTIC crude.

 

1-USO-vs-WTIC Performance of WTIC (red line) vs. the crude oil ETF USO (black line) since mid 2006. USO has declined by nearly 31% more than the commodity the price of which it purports to reflect – click to enlarge.

 

In one sense, the remark accompanying the GSCI excess return index chart is entirely correct: Had one invested in commodities via this index, the nominal value of the investment would now be at a 42 year low. However, the same is not true of the commodities the index is composed of (although buying them directly wouldn’t have helped much, as we will explain below). The cause of the GSCI’s dismal performance is also the reason why USO has so vastly underperformed crude oil.

 

Futures Contracts vs. Spot Price

With a hat tip to commodities and seasonality expert Dimitri Speck, who first pointed this problem out to us, we will briefly explain what is going on here. Note that many popular commodity indexes in fact do not reflect actual underlying commodity prices.

This is due to the so-called “roll-over effect”. Normally, futures markets are in contango – this means that later delivery months will trade at a premium over nearer delivery months. The reason for this is that the futures market prices in storage and insurance costs, as well as opportunity costs (in terms of forgone interest that the money tied up in commodities would normally be expected to generate in alternative investments such as t-bills).

In bull markets the contango will often disappear for considerable stretches of time and turn into its opposite, namely so-called backwardation (i.e., later delivery months will trade at a discount to nearer months). Bull markets in commodities are usually characterized by near term supply tightness, or the perception that a supply shortfall exists or is imminent. Backwardation is the market’s way of “driving commodities out of storage” if you will. Conversely, contango will tend to go hand in hand with rising inventories and the expansion of storage facilities.

Given that most investable products, whether they are indexes referring to a basket of commodities or ETFs, invest in commodity futures rather than physical commodities, they are subject to the above mentioned “roll-over effect”. It is simply not practical for an open-ended ETF or an index fund to buy the underlying physical commodities. Adjustments to ETF holdings as a rule have to be made on a daily basis, whenever investors dissolve ETF units or create new ones.

In most standardized futures contracts, every third delivery month tends to be the “active” month in which most of the trading volume is concentrated. Thus, if e.g. USO currently holds front month WTIC futures, it will roll them to the next active futures contract shortly before expiration. Whenever crude oil is in contango, this will automatically produce a loss – and while this loss may seem fairly small on a single roll, it begins to add up after a while. Only when the market is in backwardation will the ETF gain relative to the spot price of the underlying commodity.

Many people are unaware that a number of popular commodity indexes are reflecting the roll-over effect as well – such as e.g. the well-known and widely quoted CRB Index. Thus, the CRB has recently broken to multi-decade lows:

 

2-CRB IndexThe CRB index has broken to levels well below the 1999-2001 double bottom that preceded the last boom – click to enlarge.

 

It is certainly true that commodities remain mired in a sharp downtrend and there is no evidence yet that it is over. However, the next chart shows where the spot prices of commodities really are. It still looks like a severe bear market, but it is a far cry from the devastation suggested by the CRB Index.

+

3-BLS spot price indexThe BLS spot price index of commodities – although they are down a lot from their highs, prices are in reality still 84% above their 2001 lows! – click to enlarge.

 

A few things need to be kept in mind here. First of all, a “spike low” like the one that occurred on occasion of the 2008 GFC is very rare in commodities. Usually commodities rise very sharply and quickly in bull markets and make spike highs. Once a bear market concludes, they will normally spend a long time trending sideways amid relatively minor fluctuations before they bottom out and reverse course again (this is so because commodity bull markets are driven by fear – namely the fear of shortages).

This means that the times when commodities are in contango will as a rule last much longer than the times when they are in backwardation. A commodity ETF or an investable index investing in futures contracts on the long side can therefore never be expected to be a successful long term investment, as it will almost certainly decline over the long term (absent extreme inflation events, i.e., hyperinflation).

Nor would it make much sense to invest in most commodities in physical form and store them in a warehouse, as the costs expressed by the futures contango, such as storage and insurance costs, would still have to be paid. Moreover, opportunity costs in the form of foregone interest returns would have to be borne as well.

 

Exceptions to the Rule

There are a few exceptions to the rule. For instance, most precious metals ETFs such as GLD and SLV do invest in physical bullion. However, this is only possible due to the special characteristics of precious metals. If one e.g. looks at gold as a currency rather than a commodity, it is worth noting that it is the 4th most liquid currency in the world. In London alone, some 580 tons of bullion have changed hands every single day in 2015.

Gold is especially suitable for a bullion ETF, as it is in fact mainly used for monetary or investment purposes. A quite sophisticated, efficient and not overly costly storage system exists (gold is also very dense, so it doesn’t take up much space). Ownership changes often merely need to be recorded, without actually having to move bullion physically around. However, even an ETF like GLD comes with costs. It charges very little for administration, storage and insurance (around 20 to 30 basis points p.a.), but this small cost does impact the value per unit year after year as well.

 

Conclusion

With the exception of monetary commodities such as gold and silver (the prices of which will tend to reflect changes in the fiat money supply over the long term, and which serve as systemic insurance and demonstrably preserve purchasing power much better than fiat money), commodities were never meant to be “investment assets”. They can never be more than a trade, resp. a short to medium term investment.

Moreover, as downtrends in commodities tend to last much longer than rallies and are often of almost similar intensity, anyone trying to make money in commodities should at least be able to go short as well.

 

Addendum – China’s Growing Woes

The most recent bout of weakness in commodities has apparently been triggered by a still evolving mini-crash in China’s stock market, which has been accompanied by a further noticeable weakening of the yuan. The Shanghai stock market had another bad hair day overnight, once again declining by slightly more than 7%:

 

4-SSECThe SSEC has been getting hammered since late 2015, losing some 600 points in approximately two weeks. The bulk of the losses has been recorded in just two trading days this year. The yuan has weakened concurrently and all indications are that this will continue – click to enlarge.

 

The long awaited bust in China finally seems to be well and truly underway (see also: Money and Credit in China for a recent comment on the situation).

 

Charts by: StockCharts, BarChart, BigCharts

 

 

 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 


 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke

   
 

One Response to “How Big is the Bust in Commodities Really?”

  • wrldtrst:

    Pater, very hard to look at an historical CRB chart becasue they re-balance and re-weight the index every few years. So CRB/CRY 2015 is not the same as CRB 1980 which is not the same as CRB 90’s which is not the same as….. you get the point. Probably over 10 revisions in the past couple of decades. I hate when they do that stuff. Makes charts worthless.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • How to Survive the Winter
      A Flawless Flock of Scoundrels One of the fringe benefits of living in a country that’s in dire need of a political, financial, and cultural reset, is the twisted amusement that comes with bearing witness to its unraveling.  Day by day we’re greeted with escalating madness.  Indeed, the great fiasco must be taken lightly, so as not to be demoralized by its enormity.   Symphony grotesque in Washington [PT]   Of particular note is the present cast of characters. ...
  • Credit Spreads: The Coming Resurrection of Polly
      Suspicion isn't Merely Asleep – It is in a Coma (or Dead) There is an old Monty Python skit about a parrot whose lack of movement and refusal to respond to prodding leads to an intense debate over what state it is in. Is it just sleeping, as the proprietor of the shop that sold it insists? A very tired parrot taking a really deep rest? Or is it actually dead, as the customer who bought it asserts, offering the fact that it was nailed to its perch as prima facie evidence that what...
  • The Strange Behavior of Gold Investors from Monday to Thursday
      Known and Unknown Anomalies Readers are undoubtedly aware of one or another stock market anomaly, such as e.g. the frequently observed weakness in stock markets in the summer months, which the well-known saying “sell in May and go away” refers to. Apart from such widely known anomalies, there are many others though, which most investors have never heard of. These anomalies can be particularly interesting and profitable for investors – and there are several in the precious metals...
  • Business Cycles and Inflation – Part I
      Incrementum Advisory Board Meeting Q4 2017 -  Special Guest Ben Hunt, Author and Editor of Epsilon Theory The quarterly meeting of the Incrementum Fund's Advisory Board took place on October 10 and we had the great pleasure to be joined by special guest Ben Hunt this time, who is probably known to many of our readers as the main author and editor of Epsilon Theory. He is also chief risk officer at investment management firm Salient Partners. As always, a transcript of the discussion is...
  • What President Trump and the West Can Learn from China
      Expensive Politics Instead of a demonstration of its overwhelming military might intended to intimidate tiny North Korea and pressure China to lean on its defiant communist neighbor, President Trump and the West should try to learn a few things from China.   President Trump meets President Xi. The POTUS reportedly had a very good time in China. [PT] Photo credit: AP   The President’s trip to the Far East came on the heels of the completion of China’s...
  • Business Cycles and Inflation, Part II
      Early Warning Signals in a Fragile System [ed note: here is Part 1; if you have missed it, best go there and start reading from the beginning] We recently received the following charts via email with a query whether they should worry stock market investors. They show two short term interest rates, namely the 2-year t-note yield and 3 month t-bill discount rate. Evidently the moves in short term rates over the past ~18 - 24 months were quite large, even if their absolute levels remain...
  • Is Fed Chair Nominee Jay Powell, Count Dracula?
      A Date with Dracula The gray hue of dawn quickly slipped to a bright clear sky as we set out last Saturday morning.  The season’s autumn tinge abounded around us as the distant mountain peaks, and their mighty rifts, grew closer.  The nighttime chill stubbornly lingered in the crisp air.   “Who lives in yonder castle?” Harker asked. “Pardon, Sire?” Up front in the driver's seat it was evidently hard to understand what was said over the racket made by the team of...
  • A Different Powelling - Precious Metals Supply and Demand Report
      New Chief Monetary Bureaucrat Goes from Good to Bad for Silver The prices of the metals ended all but unchanged last week, though they hit spike highs on Thursday. Particularly silver his $17.24 before falling back 43 cents, to close at $16.82.   Never drop silver carelessly, since it might land on your toes. If you are at loggerheads with gravity for some reason, only try to handle smaller-sized bars than the ones depicted above. The snapshot to the right shows the governor...
  • Heat Death of the Economic Universe
      Big Crunch or Big Chill Physicists say that the universe is expanding. However, they hotly debate (OK, pun intended as a foreshadowing device) if the rate of expansion is sufficient to overcome gravity—called escape velocity. It may seem like an arcane topic, but the consequences are dire either way.   OT – a little cosmology excursion from your editor: Observations so far suggest that the expansion of the universe is indeed accelerating – the “big crunch”, in...
  • Claudio Grass Interviews Mark Thornton
      Introduction Mark Thornton of the Mises Institute and our good friend Claudio Grass recently discussed a number of key issues, sharing their perspectives on important economic and geopolitical developments that are currently on the minds of many US and European citizens. A video of the interview can be found at the end of this post. Claudio provided us with a written summary of the interview which we present below – we have added a few remarks in brackets (we strongly recommend...
  • Inflation and Gold - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Reasons to Buy Gold The price of gold went up $19, and the price of silver 42 cents. The price action occurred on Monday, Wednesday and Friday though so far, only the first two price jumps reversed. We promise to take a look at the intraday action on Friday.   File under “reasons to buy gold”: A famous photograph by Henri Cartier-Bresson of a rather unruly queue in front of a bank in Shanghai in 1949 in the final days of Kuomintang rule. When it dawned on people that the...
  • Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      A Different Vantage Point The prices of the metals were up slightly this week. But in between, there was some exciting price action. Monday morning (as reckoned in Arizona), the prices of the metals spiked up, taking silver from under $16.90 to over $17.25. Then, in a series of waves, the price came back down to within pennies of last Friday’s close. The biggest occurred on Friday.   Silver ended slightly up on the week after a somewhat bigger rally was rudely interrupted...

Support Acting Man

Top10BestPro
j9TJzzN

Austrian Theory and Investment

Archive

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com