Have all the “Supercycle” Gains been Wiped Out?

We have frequently come across articles lately that are purporting to show that commodity prices have in the meantime declined below the lows that obtained at the start of the last bull market. Yesterday Zerohedge e.g. posted a chart from Sean Corrigan’s True Sinews Report, which depicts the GSCI Excess Return Index. The following remark accompanied the chart:

 

“Returns from being long the commodity super-cycle have evaporated in the last 18 months – to 42 year lows.”

 

So are commodities as a group really at 42 year lows? Here is a little test: can you name even a single listed commodity that currently trades at a lower price than at any time since January 1974?

 

commgreschImage credit: Ian Berry / CNN

 

There is actually no need to check, because there isn’t one. So how can an entire commodity index, which presumably includes a whole range of commodities, have fallen to a 42 year low? Below is a chart that provides us with a hint. It shows the performance of the crude oil ETF USO since its introduction and compares it to the performance of WTIC crude.

 

1-USO-vs-WTIC Performance of WTIC (red line) vs. the crude oil ETF USO (black line) since mid 2006. USO has declined by nearly 31% more than the commodity the price of which it purports to reflect – click to enlarge.

 

In one sense, the remark accompanying the GSCI excess return index chart is entirely correct: Had one invested in commodities via this index, the nominal value of the investment would now be at a 42 year low. However, the same is not true of the commodities the index is composed of (although buying them directly wouldn’t have helped much, as we will explain below). The cause of the GSCI’s dismal performance is also the reason why USO has so vastly underperformed crude oil.

 

Futures Contracts vs. Spot Price

With a hat tip to commodities and seasonality expert Dimitri Speck, who first pointed this problem out to us, we will briefly explain what is going on here. Note that many popular commodity indexes in fact do not reflect actual underlying commodity prices.

This is due to the so-called “roll-over effect”. Normally, futures markets are in contango – this means that later delivery months will trade at a premium over nearer delivery months. The reason for this is that the futures market prices in storage and insurance costs, as well as opportunity costs (in terms of forgone interest that the money tied up in commodities would normally be expected to generate in alternative investments such as t-bills).

In bull markets the contango will often disappear for considerable stretches of time and turn into its opposite, namely so-called backwardation (i.e., later delivery months will trade at a discount to nearer months). Bull markets in commodities are usually characterized by near term supply tightness, or the perception that a supply shortfall exists or is imminent. Backwardation is the market’s way of “driving commodities out of storage” if you will. Conversely, contango will tend to go hand in hand with rising inventories and the expansion of storage facilities.

Given that most investable products, whether they are indexes referring to a basket of commodities or ETFs, invest in commodity futures rather than physical commodities, they are subject to the above mentioned “roll-over effect”. It is simply not practical for an open-ended ETF or an index fund to buy the underlying physical commodities. Adjustments to ETF holdings as a rule have to be made on a daily basis, whenever investors dissolve ETF units or create new ones.

In most standardized futures contracts, every third delivery month tends to be the “active” month in which most of the trading volume is concentrated. Thus, if e.g. USO currently holds front month WTIC futures, it will roll them to the next active futures contract shortly before expiration. Whenever crude oil is in contango, this will automatically produce a loss – and while this loss may seem fairly small on a single roll, it begins to add up after a while. Only when the market is in backwardation will the ETF gain relative to the spot price of the underlying commodity.

Many people are unaware that a number of popular commodity indexes are reflecting the roll-over effect as well – such as e.g. the well-known and widely quoted CRB Index. Thus, the CRB has recently broken to multi-decade lows:

 

2-CRB IndexThe CRB index has broken to levels well below the 1999-2001 double bottom that preceded the last boom – click to enlarge.

 

It is certainly true that commodities remain mired in a sharp downtrend and there is no evidence yet that it is over. However, the next chart shows where the spot prices of commodities really are. It still looks like a severe bear market, but it is a far cry from the devastation suggested by the CRB Index.

+

3-BLS spot price indexThe BLS spot price index of commodities – although they are down a lot from their highs, prices are in reality still 84% above their 2001 lows! – click to enlarge.

 

A few things need to be kept in mind here. First of all, a “spike low” like the one that occurred on occasion of the 2008 GFC is very rare in commodities. Usually commodities rise very sharply and quickly in bull markets and make spike highs. Once a bear market concludes, they will normally spend a long time trending sideways amid relatively minor fluctuations before they bottom out and reverse course again (this is so because commodity bull markets are driven by fear – namely the fear of shortages).

This means that the times when commodities are in contango will as a rule last much longer than the times when they are in backwardation. A commodity ETF or an investable index investing in futures contracts on the long side can therefore never be expected to be a successful long term investment, as it will almost certainly decline over the long term (absent extreme inflation events, i.e., hyperinflation).

Nor would it make much sense to invest in most commodities in physical form and store them in a warehouse, as the costs expressed by the futures contango, such as storage and insurance costs, would still have to be paid. Moreover, opportunity costs in the form of foregone interest returns would have to be borne as well.

 

Exceptions to the Rule

There are a few exceptions to the rule. For instance, most precious metals ETFs such as GLD and SLV do invest in physical bullion. However, this is only possible due to the special characteristics of precious metals. If one e.g. looks at gold as a currency rather than a commodity, it is worth noting that it is the 4th most liquid currency in the world. In London alone, some 580 tons of bullion have changed hands every single day in 2015.

Gold is especially suitable for a bullion ETF, as it is in fact mainly used for monetary or investment purposes. A quite sophisticated, efficient and not overly costly storage system exists (gold is also very dense, so it doesn’t take up much space). Ownership changes often merely need to be recorded, without actually having to move bullion physically around. However, even an ETF like GLD comes with costs. It charges very little for administration, storage and insurance (around 20 to 30 basis points p.a.), but this small cost does impact the value per unit year after year as well.

 

Conclusion

With the exception of monetary commodities such as gold and silver (the prices of which will tend to reflect changes in the fiat money supply over the long term, and which serve as systemic insurance and demonstrably preserve purchasing power much better than fiat money), commodities were never meant to be “investment assets”. They can never be more than a trade, resp. a short to medium term investment.

Moreover, as downtrends in commodities tend to last much longer than rallies and are often of almost similar intensity, anyone trying to make money in commodities should at least be able to go short as well.

 

Addendum – China’s Growing Woes

The most recent bout of weakness in commodities has apparently been triggered by a still evolving mini-crash in China’s stock market, which has been accompanied by a further noticeable weakening of the yuan. The Shanghai stock market had another bad hair day overnight, once again declining by slightly more than 7%:

 

4-SSECThe SSEC has been getting hammered since late 2015, losing some 600 points in approximately two weeks. The bulk of the losses has been recorded in just two trading days this year. The yuan has weakened concurrently and all indications are that this will continue – click to enlarge.

 

The long awaited bust in China finally seems to be well and truly underway (see also: Money and Credit in China for a recent comment on the situation).

 

Charts by: StockCharts, BarChart, BigCharts

 

 
 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 
 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke

   
 

One Response to “How Big is the Bust in Commodities Really?”

  • wrldtrst:

    Pater, very hard to look at an historical CRB chart becasue they re-balance and re-weight the index every few years. So CRB/CRY 2015 is not the same as CRB 1980 which is not the same as CRB 90’s which is not the same as….. you get the point. Probably over 10 revisions in the past couple of decades. I hate when they do that stuff. Makes charts worthless.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • Modi’s Great Leap Forward
      India’s Currency Ban – Part VIII India’s Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, announced on 8th November 2016 that Rs 500 (~$7.50) and Rs 1,000 (~$15) banknotes would no longer be legal tender. Linked are Part-I, Part-II, Part-III, Part-IV, Part-V, Part-VI and Part-VII, which provide updates on the demonetization saga and how Modi is acting as a catalyst to hasten the rapid degradation of India and what remains of its institutions.   India’s Pride and Joy   Indians are...
  • Global Recession and Other Visions for 2017
      Conjuring Up Visions Today’s a day for considering new hopes, new dreams, and new hallucinations.  The New Year is here, after all.  Now is the time to turn over a new leaf and start afresh. Naturally, 2017 will be the year you get exactly what’s coming to you. Both good and bad.  But what else will happen?   Image of a recently discarded vision... Image by Michael Del Mundo   Here we begin by closing our eyes and slowing our breath.  We let our mind...
  • US Financial Markets – Alarm Bells are Ringing
      A Shift in Expectations When discussing the outlook for so-called “risk assets”, i.e., mainly stocks and corporate bonds (particularly low-grade bonds) and their counterparts on the “safe haven” end of the spectrum (such as gold and government bonds with strong ratings), one has to consider different time frames and the indicators applicable to these time frames. Since Donald Trump's election victory, there have been sizable moves in stocks, gold and treasury bonds, as the election...
  • The Great El Monte Public Pension Swindle
      Nowhere City California There are places in Southern California where, although the sun always shines, they haven’t seen a ray of light for over 50-years.  There’s a no man’s land of urban blight along Interstate 10, from East Los Angeles through the San Gabriel Valley, where cities you’ve never heard of and would never go to, are jumbled together like shipping containers on Terminal Island.  El Monte, California, is one of those places.   Advice dispensed on Interstate...
  • A Trade Deal Trump Cannot Improve
      Worst in Class BALTIMORE – People can believe whatever they want. But sooner or later, real life intervenes. We just like to see the looks on their faces when it does. By that measure, 2017 may be our best year ever. Rarely have so many people believed so many impossible things.   Alice laughed. "There's no use trying," she said: "one can't believe impossible things." "I daresay you haven't had much practice," said the Queen. "When I was your age, I always did it for...
  • Pope Francis Now International Monetary Guru
      Neo-Marxist Pope Francis Argues for Global Central Bank As the new year dawns, it seems the current occupant of St. Peter’s Chair will take on a new function which is outside the purview of the office that the Divine Founder of his institution had clearly mandated.   Neo-Papist transmogrification. We highly recommend the economic thought of one of Francis' storied predecessors, John Paul II, which we have written about on previous occasions. In “A Tale of Two Popes” and...
  • Where’s the Outrage?
      Blind to Crony Socialism Whenever a failed CEO is fired with a cushy payoff, the outrage is swift and voluminous.  The liberal press usually misrepresents this as a hypocritical “jobs for the boys” program within the capitalist class.  In reality, the payoffs are almost always contractual obligations, often for deferred compensation, that the companies vigorously try to avoid.  Believe me.  I’ve been on both sides of this kind of dispute (except, of course, for the “failed”...
  • Trump’s Trade Catastrophe?
      “Trade Cheaters” It is worse than “voodoo economics,” says former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers. It is the “economic equivalent of creationism.” Wait a minute -  Larry Summers is wrong about almost everything. Could he be right about this?   Larry Summers, the man who is usually wrong about almost everything. As we have always argued, the economy is much safer when he sleeps, so his tendency to fall asleep on all sorts of occasions should definitely be welcomed....
  • Money Creation and the Boom-Bust Cycle
      A Difference of Opinions In his various writings, Murray Rothbard argued that in a free market economy that operates on a gold standard, the creation of credit that is not fully backed up by gold (fractional-reserve banking) sets in motion the menace of the boom-bust cycle. In his The Case for 100 Percent Gold Dollar Rothbard wrote:   I therefore advocate as the soundest monetary system and the only one fully compatible with the free market and with the absence of force or fraud...
  • Trump’s Plan to Close the Trade Deficit with China
      Rags to Riches Jack Ma is an amiable fellow.  Back in 1994, while visiting the United States he decided to give that newfangled internet thing a whirl.  At a moment of peak inspiration, he executed his first search engine request by typing in the word beer.   Jack Ma, founder and CEO of Alibaba, China's largest e-commerce firm. Once he was a school teacher, but it turned out that he had enormous entrepreneurial talent and that the world of wheelers, dealers, movers and...
  • Side Notes, January 14 - Red Flags Over Goldman Sachs
      Red Flags Over Goldman Sachs Just to prove that I am an even-handed insulter, here is a rant about my former employer, Goldman Sachs. The scandal at 1MDB, the Malaysian sovereign wealth fund from which it appears that billions were stolen by politicians all the way up to the Prime Minister, continues to unfold.   The main players in the 1MDB scandal. Irony alert: apparently money siphoned off from 1MDB was used to inter alia finance Martin Scorcese's movie “The Wolf of...
  • Silver’s Got Fundamentals - Precious Metals Supply-Demand Report
      Supply-Demand Fundamentals Improve Noticeably Last week was another short week, due to the New Year holiday. We look forward to getting back to our regularly scheduled market action.   Photo via thedailycoin.org   The prices of both metals moved up again this week. Something very noticeable is occurring in the supply and demand fundamentals. We will give an update on that, but first, here’s the graph of the metals’ prices.   Prices of gold and silver...

Austrian Theory and Investment

Support Acting Man

Own physical gold and silver outside a bank

Archive

j9TJzzN

350x200

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com