The Modified Davies Method Suggests the Time is Close

[Comment by PT: Readers not familiar with Frank’s MDM trading system should check out these previous articles on the topic: Modified Davies Method and Reader Question on the MDM. Technical analysis generally has the problem that the data of the past as such cannot really tell us anything about the future. However, data like market internals do tell us something about the degree of investors’ risk appetite, resp. risk aversion and how they are changing over time. Such information is often useful as an early warning indicator of impending trend changes. A side note: the MDM is solely focused on the Russell 2000 Index.]

Probably the most difficult thing to do in stock market investing is to identify a good time to sell. Many technical indicators have been devised to identify lows around the time they occur or soon thereafter, with a moderate degree of success, but to my knowledge that has not really happened for tops.

 

$RUTThe Russell 2000 Index (RUT) and the S&P small cap advance/decline line over the past year – click to enlarge.

 

My own Modified Davis Method does not do a very good job at this either. It does profit on the short side, but on balance just barely. In fact, were it not for the occasional severe bear market when my method will be short, or at most 50% long and thus leave significant funds at one’s disposal to invest near the beginning of the next bull market, it probably would not do any better than buy and hold over the long term.

But I have discovered a tendency which I think is nice to know, based on the length of the breadth divergence period preceding the signal to go short. Attached is a list of all of the short trades in the forward test, arranged by number of consecutive weeks of divergence in effect at the time of the signal.

It appears that the divergence must be in place for at least 13 weeks to have a good shot at a successful short. In particular, it also appears that there is a “sweet spot” from 41 to 79 weeks.

There, the probability of a profitable short trade has been 0.80. Over the entire period under consideration there were 5 shorts that resulted in double-digit profits, and 2 of them occurred in this interval. Beyond 79 weeks the probability of success declines significantly. Bear in mind that the method shorts at the 50% level, so these figures would be doubled if it shorted at the 100% level.

Overall there does not seem to be anything here that could be incorporated into the algorithm, and even if it could, that obviously could not be considered as part of the forward test. The only thing to do is to take every short as it comes, as one never knows for certain when “the big one” will begin.

At the last short signal (12/11/15), a divergence had been in effect for 31 weeks. At the time of writing, the figure is 33 weeks, and it will take a very strong market to end this condition. The current short position may not end profitably, but the next short may have a good chance of taking place in the above mentioned 41 to 79 week sweet spot.

 

List of all MDM short signals since 1969 and their results. Ordered by the duration of the breadth divergence preceding the signal (“sweet spot” periods underlined):

 

Short                                Consecutive weeks

Beg Date           Result         of divergence

========   ======   ==============

2002/05/10       9.82 %       1 week.

1991/11/22       -4.18 %       2 weeks.

2006/05/19       -0.14 %       3 weeks.

2007/07/27       -0.70 %       3 weeks.

2014/07/18       -0.99 %     3 weeks.

1976/04/15       -0.80 %     4 weeks.

2004/04/30      -0.76 %     4 weeks.

2005/08/26       -2.27 %     4 weeks.

2014/09/26       0.02 %     4 weeks.

1987/04/24       -1.73 %     5 weeks.

1996/06/21         2.39 %     5 weeks.

1978/10/20       0.77 %     6 weeks.

1995/10/27       -2.55 %     6 weeks.

1998/05/29       -0.15 %     7 weeks.

1983/08/12       1.29 %     8 weeks.

1989/10/13       2.39 %     8 weeks.

1986/07/25       1.06 %     9 weeks.

2006/07/14       -2.23 %     11 weeks.

1980/12/12       -2.54 %     12 weeks.

2015/08/07       1.72 %     13 weeks.

1998/07/24       8.59 %     15 weeks.

2007/10/19       4.27 %     15 weeks.

1972/06/09       1.72 %     19 weeks.

2002/09/20       0.54 %     20 weeks.

1976/08/20       -1.38 %     22 weeks.

1981/02/20       -2.80 %     22 weeks.

1962/04/27       8.53 %     25 weeks.

1979/03/02       -2.54 %     25 weeks.

1998/10/02       0.99 %     25 weeks.

1976/10/08       -1.15 %     29 weeks.

1987/10/09       14.00 %     29 weeks.

1986/12/26       -4.16 %     31 weeks.

2002/12/13       1.51 %     32 weeks.

1984/02/03       3.05 %     33 weeks.

2008/02/22       -1.32 %     33 weeks.

1979/05/11       -2.47 %     35 weeks.

1990/04/27       -2.40 %     36 weeks.

1981/07/02       7.27 %     41 weeks.

1999/02/12       -2.90 %     44 weeks.

1962/09/21       1.20 %     46 weeks.

1990/07/27       7.02 %     49 weeks.

1973/01/19       10.62 %   51 weeks.

2008/06/27       -0.87 %     51 weeks.

1966/05/06         7.95 %     52 weeks.

1979/10/12         0.40 %     57 weeks.

2008/09/26     11.87 %   64 weeks.

1982/01/08         4.57 %   68 weeks.

1984/10/05       -0.32 %   68 weeks.

1999/07/30         0.27 %   68 weeks.

2008/11/07         3.23 %   70 weeks.

1980/03/07         4.23 %   78 weeks.

1988/09/23         0.12 %   79 weeks.

1973/08/10       -0.60 %   80 weeks.

2009/01/16       -0.46 %   80 weeks.

1980/04/18       -2.57 %   84 weeks.

2009/02/13         6.16 %   84 weeks.

1982/05/28         2.64 %   88 weeks.

1973/11/02         6.02 %   92 weeks.

1991/07/05       -2.33 %   98 weeks.

2000/03/17         8.08 %   101 weeks.

1974/01/11       -2.24 %   102 weeks.

2009/07/02       -2.21 %   104 weeks.

2000/05/12       -2.25 %   109 weeks.

1974/03/29         4.55 %   113 weeks.

2000/07/28       -2.58 %   120 weeks.

1974/06/21      10.13 %   125 weeks.

2000/09/22     1.07 %   128 weeks.

2000/11/10     0.19 %   135 weeks.

1974/10/04     -5.90 %   140 weeks.

2000/12/15     -2.78 %   140 weeks.

2001/01/05     -2.44 %   143 weeks.

1968/02/09     -1.34 %   144 weeks.

1974/11/22       0.53 %   147 weeks.

2001/02/23     1.12 %   150 weeks.

1968/08/02     -3.37 %   169 weeks.

1969/02/20     0.43 %   198 weeks.

1969/06/06     6.18 %   213 weeks.

1969/11/21      15.93 %   237 weeks.

1970/06/26    -1.25 %   268 weeks.

1970/08/14     -4.64 %   275 weeks.

1970/10/23     -0.71 %   285 weeks.

 

Chart by: StockCharts

 

Frank Roellinger is a retired software engineer who worked for a major computer manufacturer for nearly 34 years. He has been an avid follower of markets for more than 30 years, with a strong preference for technical over fundamental analysis. After observing the results of many different ways to approach markets, he settled upon long-term trend following. He once hoped to develop a mathematically-based model of the stock market, but now sees little point in doing that, as his Modified Davis Method works as well as any other purely mechanical method that he thought he might ever find.

 

 
 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke

   
 

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • 21st Century Shoe-Shine Boys
      Anecdotal Flags are Waved   "If a shoeshine boy can predict where this market is going to go, then it's no place for a man with a lot of money to lose." - Joseph Kennedy   It is actually a true story as far as we know – Joseph Kennedy, by all accounts an extremely shrewd businessman and investor (despite the fact that he had graduated in economics*), really did get his shoes shined on Wall Street one fine morning, and the shoe-shine boy, one Pat Bologna, asked him if...
  • India: The Genie of Lawlessness is out of the Bottle
      Recapitulation (Part XVI, the Last) Since the announcement of demonetization of Indian currency on 8th November 2016, I have written a large number of articles. The issue is not so much that the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, is a tyrant and extremely simplistic in his thinking (which he is), or that demonetization and the new sales tax system were horribly ill-conceived (which they were). Time erases all tyrants from the map, and eventually from people’s...
  • Christopher Columbus and the Falsification of History
      Crazed Decision The Los Angeles City Council’s recent, crazed decision* to replace Christopher Columbus Day with one celebrating “indigenous peoples” can be traced to the falsification of history and denigration of European man which began in earnest in the 1960s throughout the educational establishment (from grade school through the universities), book publishing, and the print and electronic media.   Christopher Columbus at the Court of the Catholic Monarchs (a...
  • The Government Debt Paradox: Pick Your Poison
      Lasting Debt “Rule one: Never allow a crisis to go to waste,” said President Obama’s Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel in November of 2008.  “They are opportunities to do big things.”   Rahm Emanuel looks happy. He should be – he is the mayor of Chicago, which is best described as crisis incarnate. Or maybe the proper term is perma-crisis? Anyway, it undoubtedly looks like a giant opportunity from his perspective, a gift that keeps on giving, so to speak. [PT] Photo...
  • The Forking Paradise - Precious Metals Supply and Demand Report
      Forking Incentives A month ago, we wrote about the bitcoin fork. We described the fork:   Picture a bank, the old-fashioned kind. Call it Acme (sorry, we watched too much Coyote and Road Runner growing up). A group of disgruntled employees leave. They take a copy of the book of accounts. They set up a new bank across the street, Wile E Bank. To win customers, they say if you had an account at Acme Bank, you now have an account at Wile, with the same balance!   BCH, son...
  • The United States of Hubris
      Improving the World, One Death at a Time If anyone should have any questions about whether the United States of America is not the most aggressive, warlike, and terrorist nation on the face of the earth, its latest proposed action against the supposed rogue state of North Korea should allay any such doubts.   Throughout history, the problem with empires has always been the same: no matter how stable and invincible they appeared, eventually they ran into “imperial...
  • Long Term Statistics on AAPL
      Introductory Remarks by PT Below we present a recent article by the Mole discussing a number of technical statistics on the behavior of AAPL over time. Since the company has the largest market cap in the US stock market (~ USD 850 billion – a valuation that exceeds that of entire industries), it is the biggest component of capitalization-weighted big cap indexes and the ETFs based on them. It is also a component of the price-weighted DJIA. It is fair to say that the performance of...
  • Tragedy of the Speculations
      The Instability Problem Bitcoin is often promoted as the antidote to the madness of fiat irredeemable currencies. It is also promoted as their replacement. Bitcoin is promoted not only as money, but the future money, and our monetary future. In fact, it is not.   A tragedy... get the hankies out! :) [PT]   Why not? To answer, let us start with a look at the incentives offered by bitcoin. We saw a comment this week, which is apropos:   "Crypto is so...
  • Janet Yellen's 78-Month Plan for the National Monetary Policy of the United States
      Past the Point of No Return Adventures in depravity are nearly always confronted with the unpleasant reality that stopping the degeneracy is much more difficult than starting it.  This realization, and the unsettling feeling that comes with it, usually surfaces just after passing the point of no return.  That's when the cucumber has pickled over and the prospect of turning back is no longer an option.   Depravity and bedlam through the ages. The blue barge of perdition in the...
  • To Hell In A Bucket
      No-one Cares... “No one really cares about the U.S. federal debt,” remarked a colleague and Economic Prism reader earlier in the week.  “You keep writing about it as if anyone gives a lick.” We could tell he was just warming up.  So, we settled back into our chair and made ourselves comfortable.   The federal debtberg, which no-one cares about (yet). We have added the most recent bar manually, as the charts published by the Fed will only be updated at the end of the...
  • Despite 24/7 Trading: Bitcoin Investors are Taking off for the Weekend on Friday Already
      Crypto-Statistics In the last issue of Seasonal Insights I have discussed how the S&P 500 Index performs on individual days of the week. In this issue I will show an analysis of the average cumulative annual returns of bitcoin on individual days of the week.   Bitcoin, daily. While this is beside the point, we note the crypto-currency (and other “alt coins” as well) has minor performance issues lately. The white line indicates important lateral support, but this looks to...
  • Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Fundamental Developments There were big moves in the metals markets this week. The price of gold was up an additional $21 and that of silver $0.30. Will the dollar fall further?As always, we are interested in the fundamentals of supply and demand as measured by the basis. But first, here are the charts of the prices of gold and silver, and the gold-silver ratio.   Gold and silver prices in USD terms (as of last week Friday) - click to enlarge.   Next, this is a...

Support Acting Man

j9TJzzN

Austrian Theory and Investment

Archive

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com