The Modified Davies Method Suggests the Time is Close

[Comment by PT: Readers not familiar with Frank’s MDM trading system should check out these previous articles on the topic: Modified Davies Method and Reader Question on the MDM. Technical analysis generally has the problem that the data of the past as such cannot really tell us anything about the future. However, data like market internals do tell us something about the degree of investors’ risk appetite, resp. risk aversion and how they are changing over time. Such information is often useful as an early warning indicator of impending trend changes. A side note: the MDM is solely focused on the Russell 2000 Index.]

Probably the most difficult thing to do in stock market investing is to identify a good time to sell. Many technical indicators have been devised to identify lows around the time they occur or soon thereafter, with a moderate degree of success, but to my knowledge that has not really happened for tops.

 

$RUTThe Russell 2000 Index (RUT) and the S&P small cap advance/decline line over the past year – click to enlarge.

 

My own Modified Davis Method does not do a very good job at this either. It does profit on the short side, but on balance just barely. In fact, were it not for the occasional severe bear market when my method will be short, or at most 50% long and thus leave significant funds at one’s disposal to invest near the beginning of the next bull market, it probably would not do any better than buy and hold over the long term.

But I have discovered a tendency which I think is nice to know, based on the length of the breadth divergence period preceding the signal to go short. Attached is a list of all of the short trades in the forward test, arranged by number of consecutive weeks of divergence in effect at the time of the signal.

It appears that the divergence must be in place for at least 13 weeks to have a good shot at a successful short. In particular, it also appears that there is a “sweet spot” from 41 to 79 weeks.

There, the probability of a profitable short trade has been 0.80. Over the entire period under consideration there were 5 shorts that resulted in double-digit profits, and 2 of them occurred in this interval. Beyond 79 weeks the probability of success declines significantly. Bear in mind that the method shorts at the 50% level, so these figures would be doubled if it shorted at the 100% level.

Overall there does not seem to be anything here that could be incorporated into the algorithm, and even if it could, that obviously could not be considered as part of the forward test. The only thing to do is to take every short as it comes, as one never knows for certain when “the big one” will begin.

At the last short signal (12/11/15), a divergence had been in effect for 31 weeks. At the time of writing, the figure is 33 weeks, and it will take a very strong market to end this condition. The current short position may not end profitably, but the next short may have a good chance of taking place in the above mentioned 41 to 79 week sweet spot.

 

List of all MDM short signals since 1969 and their results. Ordered by the duration of the breadth divergence preceding the signal (“sweet spot” periods underlined):

 

Short                                Consecutive weeks

Beg Date           Result         of divergence

========   ======   ==============

2002/05/10       9.82 %       1 week.

1991/11/22       -4.18 %       2 weeks.

2006/05/19       -0.14 %       3 weeks.

2007/07/27       -0.70 %       3 weeks.

2014/07/18       -0.99 %     3 weeks.

1976/04/15       -0.80 %     4 weeks.

2004/04/30      -0.76 %     4 weeks.

2005/08/26       -2.27 %     4 weeks.

2014/09/26       0.02 %     4 weeks.

1987/04/24       -1.73 %     5 weeks.

1996/06/21         2.39 %     5 weeks.

1978/10/20       0.77 %     6 weeks.

1995/10/27       -2.55 %     6 weeks.

1998/05/29       -0.15 %     7 weeks.

1983/08/12       1.29 %     8 weeks.

1989/10/13       2.39 %     8 weeks.

1986/07/25       1.06 %     9 weeks.

2006/07/14       -2.23 %     11 weeks.

1980/12/12       -2.54 %     12 weeks.

2015/08/07       1.72 %     13 weeks.

1998/07/24       8.59 %     15 weeks.

2007/10/19       4.27 %     15 weeks.

1972/06/09       1.72 %     19 weeks.

2002/09/20       0.54 %     20 weeks.

1976/08/20       -1.38 %     22 weeks.

1981/02/20       -2.80 %     22 weeks.

1962/04/27       8.53 %     25 weeks.

1979/03/02       -2.54 %     25 weeks.

1998/10/02       0.99 %     25 weeks.

1976/10/08       -1.15 %     29 weeks.

1987/10/09       14.00 %     29 weeks.

1986/12/26       -4.16 %     31 weeks.

2002/12/13       1.51 %     32 weeks.

1984/02/03       3.05 %     33 weeks.

2008/02/22       -1.32 %     33 weeks.

1979/05/11       -2.47 %     35 weeks.

1990/04/27       -2.40 %     36 weeks.

1981/07/02       7.27 %     41 weeks.

1999/02/12       -2.90 %     44 weeks.

1962/09/21       1.20 %     46 weeks.

1990/07/27       7.02 %     49 weeks.

1973/01/19       10.62 %   51 weeks.

2008/06/27       -0.87 %     51 weeks.

1966/05/06         7.95 %     52 weeks.

1979/10/12         0.40 %     57 weeks.

2008/09/26     11.87 %   64 weeks.

1982/01/08         4.57 %   68 weeks.

1984/10/05       -0.32 %   68 weeks.

1999/07/30         0.27 %   68 weeks.

2008/11/07         3.23 %   70 weeks.

1980/03/07         4.23 %   78 weeks.

1988/09/23         0.12 %   79 weeks.

1973/08/10       -0.60 %   80 weeks.

2009/01/16       -0.46 %   80 weeks.

1980/04/18       -2.57 %   84 weeks.

2009/02/13         6.16 %   84 weeks.

1982/05/28         2.64 %   88 weeks.

1973/11/02         6.02 %   92 weeks.

1991/07/05       -2.33 %   98 weeks.

2000/03/17         8.08 %   101 weeks.

1974/01/11       -2.24 %   102 weeks.

2009/07/02       -2.21 %   104 weeks.

2000/05/12       -2.25 %   109 weeks.

1974/03/29         4.55 %   113 weeks.

2000/07/28       -2.58 %   120 weeks.

1974/06/21      10.13 %   125 weeks.

2000/09/22     1.07 %   128 weeks.

2000/11/10     0.19 %   135 weeks.

1974/10/04     -5.90 %   140 weeks.

2000/12/15     -2.78 %   140 weeks.

2001/01/05     -2.44 %   143 weeks.

1968/02/09     -1.34 %   144 weeks.

1974/11/22       0.53 %   147 weeks.

2001/02/23     1.12 %   150 weeks.

1968/08/02     -3.37 %   169 weeks.

1969/02/20     0.43 %   198 weeks.

1969/06/06     6.18 %   213 weeks.

1969/11/21      15.93 %   237 weeks.

1970/06/26    -1.25 %   268 weeks.

1970/08/14     -4.64 %   275 weeks.

1970/10/23     -0.71 %   285 weeks.

 

Chart by: StockCharts

 

Frank Roellinger is a retired software engineer who worked for a major computer manufacturer for nearly 34 years. He has been an avid follower of markets for more than 30 years, with a strong preference for technical over fundamental analysis. After observing the results of many different ways to approach markets, he settled upon long-term trend following. He once hoped to develop a mathematically-based model of the stock market, but now sees little point in doing that, as his Modified Davis Method works as well as any other purely mechanical method that he thought he might ever find.

 

 

 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 


 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke

   
 

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • How to Survive the Winter
      A Flawless Flock of Scoundrels One of the fringe benefits of living in a country that’s in dire need of a political, financial, and cultural reset, is the twisted amusement that comes with bearing witness to its unraveling.  Day by day we’re greeted with escalating madness.  Indeed, the great fiasco must be taken lightly, so as not to be demoralized by its enormity.   Symphony grotesque in Washington [PT]   Of particular note is the present cast of characters. ...
  • Credit Spreads: The Coming Resurrection of Polly
      Suspicion isn't Merely Asleep – It is in a Coma (or Dead) There is an old Monty Python skit about a parrot whose lack of movement and refusal to respond to prodding leads to an intense debate over what state it is in. Is it just sleeping, as the proprietor of the shop that sold it insists? A very tired parrot taking a really deep rest? Or is it actually dead, as the customer who bought it asserts, offering the fact that it was nailed to its perch as prima facie evidence that what...
  • The Strange Behavior of Gold Investors from Monday to Thursday
      Known and Unknown Anomalies Readers are undoubtedly aware of one or another stock market anomaly, such as e.g. the frequently observed weakness in stock markets in the summer months, which the well-known saying “sell in May and go away” refers to. Apart from such widely known anomalies, there are many others though, which most investors have never heard of. These anomalies can be particularly interesting and profitable for investors – and there are several in the precious metals...
  • A Falling Rate of Discount and the Consumption of Capital
      Net Present Value Warren Buffet famously proposed the analogy of a machine that produces one dollar per year in perpetuity. He asks how much would you pay for this machine? Clearly it is worth something more than $1.00. And it’s equally clear that it’s not worth $1,000. The value is somewhere in between. But where?   We are not sure why Warren Buffett invoked a money printing machine of all things – another interesting way of looking at the concept is by e.g....
  • Business Cycles and Inflation – Part I
      Incrementum Advisory Board Meeting Q4 2017 -  Special Guest Ben Hunt, Author and Editor of Epsilon Theory The quarterly meeting of the Incrementum Fund's Advisory Board took place on October 10 and we had the great pleasure to be joined by special guest Ben Hunt this time, who is probably known to many of our readers as the main author and editor of Epsilon Theory. He is also chief risk officer at investment management firm Salient Partners. As always, a transcript of the discussion is...
  • What President Trump and the West Can Learn from China
      Expensive Politics Instead of a demonstration of its overwhelming military might intended to intimidate tiny North Korea and pressure China to lean on its defiant communist neighbor, President Trump and the West should try to learn a few things from China.   President Trump meets President Xi. The POTUS reportedly had a very good time in China. [PT] Photo credit: AP   The President’s trip to the Far East came on the heels of the completion of China’s...
  • Is Fed Chair Nominee Jay Powell, Count Dracula?
      A Date with Dracula The gray hue of dawn quickly slipped to a bright clear sky as we set out last Saturday morning.  The season’s autumn tinge abounded around us as the distant mountain peaks, and their mighty rifts, grew closer.  The nighttime chill stubbornly lingered in the crisp air.   “Who lives in yonder castle?” Harker asked. “Pardon, Sire?” Up front in the driver's seat it was evidently hard to understand what was said over the racket made by the team of...
  • A Different Powelling - Precious Metals Supply and Demand Report
      New Chief Monetary Bureaucrat Goes from Good to Bad for Silver The prices of the metals ended all but unchanged last week, though they hit spike highs on Thursday. Particularly silver his $17.24 before falling back 43 cents, to close at $16.82.   Never drop silver carelessly, since it might land on your toes. If you are at loggerheads with gravity for some reason, only try to handle smaller-sized bars than the ones depicted above. The snapshot to the right shows the governor...
  • Business Cycles and Inflation, Part II
      Early Warning Signals in a Fragile System [ed note: here is Part 1; if you have missed it, best go there and start reading from the beginning] We recently received the following charts via email with a query whether they should worry stock market investors. They show two short term interest rates, namely the 2-year t-note yield and 3 month t-bill discount rate. Evidently the moves in short term rates over the past ~18 - 24 months were quite large, even if their absolute levels remain...
  • Heat Death of the Economic Universe
      Big Crunch or Big Chill Physicists say that the universe is expanding. However, they hotly debate (OK, pun intended as a foreshadowing device) if the rate of expansion is sufficient to overcome gravity—called escape velocity. It may seem like an arcane topic, but the consequences are dire either way.   OT – a little cosmology excursion from your editor: Observations so far suggest that the expansion of the universe is indeed accelerating – the “big crunch”, in...
  • Claudio Grass Interviews Mark Thornton
      Introduction Mark Thornton of the Mises Institute and our good friend Claudio Grass recently discussed a number of key issues, sharing their perspectives on important economic and geopolitical developments that are currently on the minds of many US and European citizens. A video of the interview can be found at the end of this post. Claudio provided us with a written summary of the interview which we present below – we have added a few remarks in brackets (we strongly recommend...
  • Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      A Different Vantage Point The prices of the metals were up slightly this week. But in between, there was some exciting price action. Monday morning (as reckoned in Arizona), the prices of the metals spiked up, taking silver from under $16.90 to over $17.25. Then, in a series of waves, the price came back down to within pennies of last Friday’s close. The biggest occurred on Friday.   Silver ended slightly up on the week after a somewhat bigger rally was rudely interrupted...

Support Acting Man

Top10BestPro
j9TJzzN

Austrian Theory and Investment

Archive

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com