Thank God It’s the “Lucky Country”, and Good Thing it’s not a Bubble …
We have previously written about the many extant housing bubbles in the world, which are a result of the incessant monetary pumping by central banks (see: “A Tale of Two Bubbles” for details). Recently Australia’s big banks published a study in which they strenuously deny that one of the biggest housing bubbles the world has ever seen is actually a bubble. This is no surprise, because when – not if – this bubble implodes, Australia’s financial system will be in major trouble and the “big four” Australian banks are going to have a front-row seat. As “The Australian” reports, the “banks are dispelling housing bubble fears”. Not surprisingly, their arguments sound eerily similar to those of the NRA in the US shortly before the demise of the significantly less enormous US housing bubble.
“Amid fears that record low rates are laying the ground for problems, the Australian Bankers’ Association will today release a report arguing there is “insufficient evidence” of a speculative bubble, adding that the banks have not added to the price surge by relaxing lending standards.
After assessing the past 25 years, the paper, “Key truths on housing in Australia”, finds that the biggest driver of prices is mortgage rates falling below 5 per cent, and plays down the impact of foreign buyers. It also backs a Reserve Bank study this week that shows the highest debt loads are held by wealthy, less risky borrowers.
But the ABA does concede that houses are expensive relative to rents and “current rates of return may be economically viable only if expectations of further price gains are fulfilled”.
Also, prices have become more expensive relative to purchasing capacity and buyers should view “with a critical eye” claims that the structural housing shortage is massively driving the market. The major banks have repeatedly dismissed a bubble in their most lucrative asset class, and the ABA says it is important to “get the facts on the table” and not just focus on the recent bull market, particularly in Sydney.
“House prices in Australia are currently in a period of strong growth. (But) there is insufficient evidence to conclude that house prices are unsustainably overvalued or that Australia is currently experiencing a speculative ‘bubble’,” the report says.
Since the market stirred to life in mid-2012, Sydney is up 35 per cent — far outpacing the 23 per cent increase in the patchy broader market, including capital cities like Perth that have begun going backwards, according to CoreLogic RP Data.”
Anecdotal proof that there is “insufficient evidence of a bubble” in Australia’s housing market: this shack on Edith Street in Sidney sold for $980,000 in May of 2014. The cottage has been uninhabited for 20 years. The walls that have not disintegrated are covered in graffiti and the house is littered with rubbish. The backyard features the remnants of an outdoor toilet, with rubbish strewn about amid patches of weed, which are the only vegetation. Size of the property: 278 sqm. (~2,992 sqft.)
Photo credit: Attila Szivasi
Let’s take a look at some of that “insufficient bubble evidence”, shall we? We will start with a piece of anecdotal evidence. Below is a picture of a shack that was sold in Sidney for $980,000 in May of 2014 – when prices were actually not yet quite as elevated as they are today:
We have a picture of the inside of this magnificent palace as well:
It’s amazing what a million dollars gets you in Sidney …
Photo credit: Attila Szivasi
Here is a chart showing the development of median house prices in Sidney and Melbourne since 1996:
Of course, house prices as such are not really telling us much. For instance, in hyper-inflationary economies like those of Argentina and Iran, property prices are rising at a much faster pace. However, Australia’s CPI inflation rate has oscillated between 1.2% and 5% over the past decade, so the increase in house prices has far exceeded the official decline in the purchasing power of the RBA’s fiat confetti. In fact, between 2001 and 2011, Sydney land prices rose 512 per cent faster than inflation while the city’s population grew only by 16 percent. Moreover, wage growth in Australia is in a steep downtrend, making the growing lack of affordability stand out like a sore thumb:
Australia’s banking regulator seems a tad more worried about the explosion in house prices than the banks – even though this lone voice of official caution still fails to call a spade a spade, because, you know, they don’t know what a bubble is and how to spot one (as we all know, it is really difficult for government bureaucrats to identify bubbles. Apparently nefarious unseen forces are somehow keeping them from looking at charts):
“The head of the banking regulator doesn’t know if the housing market is in a bubble, but says it certainly looks risky. With house prices rising much more quickly than incomes, and household debt still high, the property market could pose a risk to the economy, Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority chairman Wayne Byres said.
“If you look at the conditions we are in at present, where we have very low interest rates, very high household debt, subdued income growth, rising unemployment, very high house prices, a very competitive financial market in terms of house lending … there’s a lot of potential for risk,” he told a federal parliament economics committee.
“Risk is probably higher than it might otherwise be and that is why all of the agencies are paying particular attention to it at the moment.”
But Mr Byres stopped short of saying Australia was in a housing bubble. “I don’t know what a bubble is and I don’t quite know you spot it … If these things were easy to spot and define, almost by definition regulators could deal with them,” he said.
We want to make two points about this: firstly, the fact that “all the agencies are paying particular attention to it at the moment” is completely irrelevant. It will achieve precisely nothing. The RBA is cutting interest rates to the bone, Australia’s credit and money supply continues to soar, and so more and more gasoline is poured on the fire. The bubble will keep growing, regardless of how much bureaucratic “attention” it receives. It will keep growing until either the trend in rates reverses, or it becomes so massively overextended that it simply can no longer be sustained regardless of the height of interest rates. It is already far too late for anyone to do anything about it.
Secondly, the idea that “regulators could deal with bubbles” if only they could learn how to read and interpret a chart is equally ludicrous. In a fractionally reserved banking system backstopped by a central bank, booms and busts of increasing frequency and amplitude are absolutely certain to occur. The only way to stop this from happening would be to return to a sound money system. There is not even the slightest chance that anyone in power will advocate a return to sound money in the framework of today’s welfare/warfare statism.
As we noted above, it is a good thing that Australia is the “lucky country”, because it sure looks like a lot of luck will eventually be required.
Crazy Political Ideas and Reckless Monetary Policy
The growing problem of housing affordability – which as we have previously pointed out practically forces young people into life-long debt slavery – obviously cries out for insane political “solutions”. Instead of thinking about how to rein in the bubble (which has become practically impossible, because it would fatally impair the banking system), politicians are looking for ways to light an even bigger fire under it. Thus Australia’s treasurer John Hockey has come up with the brilliant idea to make it easier for Australians dip into their superannuation retirement funds to scrape the money for overprices houses together:
“Treasurer Joe Hockey has suggested allowing Australians to repeatedly dip into their super over the course of their lives to pay for things such as job retraining or buying their first homes.
But the radical idea – which represents a significant rethink of the role and nature of the superannuation system – threatens to inflame tensions with the super industry, and has been quickly slammed by Labor and some economists.
“We are prepared to look at a diverse range of proposals to help young Australians buy their first home,” Mr Hockey said on Saturday.
John Daley from the Grattan Institute said allowing first-home buyers to access super to pay for their first homes would only help to push up house prices – making it even harder for first-home buyers to afford a home.
Saul Eslake, the chief economist of Bank of America Merrill Lynch, said the best way to help young first home buyers was to increase housing supply because that would drive prices down.”
The housing supply is actually going to increase markedly over the next several years. The next chart shows residential house and unit (apartment) construction approvals. The latter have increased quite a bit:
This market reaction to soaring prices is quite normal, and to be welcomed from the point of view of first-time home buyers. It is however dangerous for the many people who have been and are buying houses on credit for investment purposes, and with that it is dangerous for the banks as well. As the chart below shows, credit-financed speculation in Australia’s housing market is raging:
The central bank is undoubtedly aware of the risks, which explains why it has instituted an A$ 350 billion emergency lending facility for the banks, the so-called “committed liquidity facility”. Australian banks get a lot of wholesale funding from overseas, and got into quite a bit of trouble when those funding sources dried up in the 2008 crisis. Guess what the banks are turning into “liquid and marketable assets” to “give to the RBA” in case of an emergency? That’s right, mortgages!
The problem with such a backstop is that it introduces an added element of moral hazard (the entire monetary system is one big case of moral hazard of course, but this is making it even worse). The RBA insists of course that it will get all Walter-Bagehoty should the banks actually need to avail themselves of this backstop – they may be “illiquid”, but must still be “solvent” and assets they offer to pawn with the central bank must be of “high quality”. Readers may recall what happened to the ECB’s asset eligibility criteria in the course of the euro area’s debt crisis. They went out of the window real fast. Commercial bankers know of course that the central bank will relent under crisis conditions. We don’t think that the managers of Australia’s big banks are spending much time and effort on hoping that their assets will be “good enough” for the RBA once push comes to shove. They know full well they are “too big to fail”.
Meanwhile, the easy money policy practiced all over the world has had similar effects in Australia as elsewhere. Below we show a chart of the narrow money supply measure M1 (currency and demand deposits), which mirrors the debt growth in the economy. It is certainly not too big a surprise that there is such a huge housing bubble:
At the same time consumer credit has gone through the roof:
Due to the demise of the boom in commodity prices, the central bank has decided to continue to cut interest rates – even though it is aware that this will increase the risk the housing bubble poses for Australia’s economy. As one market observer remarked in early March:
“Governor Glenn Stevens’s effort to revive business investment with cheap finance is adding fuel to the country’s biggest property market. Home sellers may get a further boost, with 18 of 29 economists forecasting a 25-basis-point cash rate reduction on Tuesday.”
Elsewhere we read that given the expired commodities boom, “the RBA’s hands are tied as property prices go through the roof”, followed by this astonishing (to us, anyway) statement below the headline:
“The Reserve Bank is struggling to manage the two-speed economy while the government fails to lift productivity and cut unemployment.”
This reflects the widespread belief that central banks and governments should “manage the economy”. In fact, both should simply leave the economy alone. It is precisely because of their repeated failed attempts to “manage” the economy that the economy is in trouble in the first place. If government management of the economy were such a great idea, the Soviet Union would have thrived; after all, the government managed and planned every aspect of the economy there, with the sole exception of 2% of the arable land that farmers were allowed to use for themselves.
Recent Developments – Blow-Off Frenzy Underway
There are anecdotal signs that the allegedly non-existing housing bubble in Australia is actually entering its final, frenzied blow-off stage – which usually takes place shortly before a downturn begins. The following was reported from a recent auction where developers were bidding for various properties:
“1 Stansell Street, Gladesville, is described by the agents as “a rare find”. The four bedroom, single story brick home sits on 714.5m2 in a mixed use zone between an unit block and service station, which in real estate speak made it “only moments from all major shops and roads”. It currently rents for $800 per week.
The Professionals Ermington described it as a “highly sought after opportunity” and were proved correct Saturday when it sold for $2.85 million – a staggering $1.1 million above the reserve. Agent Paul Tassone told Domain.com.au that around 300 watched in disbelief as 28 registered bidders chased the property.
“The buyer was a developer who plans to rent it out before eventually redeveloping the site,” he said. Domain reports a clearance rate of 84% among the 628 auctions in Sydney on Saturday. Among the other properties that suggest the market is a long way from cooling were:
A duplex in Moore Street, Coogee, went for $1.43 million – $530,000 above the reserve.
A 4-br house on Belmont Road, Mosman, which will be rebuilt as two homes, sold for $2.235 million – $685,000 above reserve.
A 1-br worker’s cottage in Little Bloomfield Street, Surry Hills, bought by a first home buyer for $840,000 – $90,000 above reserve.”
Here is what the $2.85 million “rare find” looks like:
Screenshot via Nwes Corp Australia
As a developer attending the auction in which this house was sold remarked:
“I have never seen anything like it – it was like the Easter Show, and more unusual.”
Low, or rather non-existent, interest rates have fired up housing bubbles in various European countries as well, but in Germany or Austria one could probably buy between 5 to 10 similar houses for the same amount of money – in spite of the price increases that have occurred in these countries in recent years.
As always, it is impossible to say when exactly the boom will actually stumble. Even though numerous warning signs are noticeable, the continued provision of easy money by the central bank and political intervention could well serve to drive the bubble to even crazier levels. The day will come though when everybody involved will come to rue the heady days of easy credit and every increasing prices.
Here we see Mr. Ron Matasin in the quasi-ruin of the living room of his house, which he wisely sold for a staggering A$ 1.9 million in May of 2014. A list of other, even more uninhabitable shacks that were selling for similar prices at the time can be found here.
Photo credit: David Swift
Charts by: Tradingeconomics, CSLA, David Scutt
It is that time of the year again – our semi-annual funding drive begins today. Give us a little hand in offsetting the costs of running this blog, as advertising revenue alone is insufficient. You can help us reach our modest funding goal by donating either via paypal or bitcoin. Those of you who have made a ton of money based on some of the things we have said in these pages (we actually made a few good calls lately!), please feel free to up your donations accordingly (we are sorry if you have followed one of our bad calls. This is of course your own fault). Other than that, we can only repeat that donations to this site are apt to secure many benefits. These range from sound sleep, to children including you in their songs, to the potential of obtaining privileges in the afterlife (the latter cannot be guaranteed, but it seems highly likely). As always, we are greatly honored by your readership and hope that our special mixture of entertainment and education is adding a little value to your life!
Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke
3 Responses to “Australia’s Bubble Trouble”
Most read in the last 20 days:
- A Striking Chart
The Economy and the Stock Market As long time readers know, we are always paying close attention to the manufacturing sector, which is far more important to the US economy than is generally believed. In terms of gross output it is the largest sector of the economy, and it should of course be obvious that saving, investment and production are the only ways to create wealth. What's left of the Brooklyn Domino Sugar Refinery. Photo credit: Paul Raphaelson Contrary...
- Trump and Putin Narrowly Escape Assassination Attempt
The Gloves are Coming Off First a little bit of recent history. Readers are probably aware that some questions about the occasionally malfunctioning Deep State android... no, wait, we'll start again. Questions have recently been raised about the health of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton by various “alt-right” tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy theorists, such as this one. The monsters are normally hiding under Hillary's bed, but lately they have come out into the open...
- US Economy - Curious Pattern in ISM Readings
Head Fake Theory Confirmed? This is a brief update on our last overview of economic data. Although we briefly discussed employment as well, the overview was as usual mainly focused on manufacturing, which is the largest sector of the economy by gross output. Pepsi factory in Baltimore, 1956 Photo via pinterest.com Readers may recall that we have pointed out for some time that there was quite a large gap between the data reported in regional Fed manufacturing...
- Why the Fed Destroyed the Market Economy
What Have You Done for Me Lately? Swing voters are a fickle bunch. One election they vote Democrat. The next they vote Republican. For they have no particular ideology or political philosophy to base their judgment upon. The primacy of the wallet. They don’t give a rip about questions of small government or big government. Nor do they have any druthers about the welfare or warfare state. In effect, they really don’t care. What’s important to the...
- How is Real Wealth Created?
An Abrupt Drop Let’s turn back to our regular beat: the U.S. economy and its capital markets. We’ve been warning that the Fed would never make any substantial increase to interest rates. Not willingly, at least. Groping in the dark, Yellen-style Each time Fed chief Janet Yellen opens her mouth, out comes a hint that more rate hikes might be coming. But each time, it turns out that the economy is not as robust as she had believed... and that a rate hike isn’t...
- Janet Yellen’s Shame
Playing Politics In honest capitalism, you do what you can to get other people to voluntarily give you money. This usually involves providing goods or services they think are worth the price. You may get a little wild and crazy from time to time, but you are always called to order by your customers. In the market economy, consumers reign supreme. There is no such thing as a “lost” vote in the marketplace; every penny spent affects production. Mises noted: “Consumers...
- Donald’s Electoral Struggle
Wicked and Terrible After touting her pro-labor union record, the Wicked Witch of Chappaqua rhetorically asked, “why am I not 50 points ahead?” Her chief rival bluntly responded: “because you’re terrible.”* No truer words have been uttered by any of the candidates about one of their opponents since the start of this extraordinary presidential campaign! Electoral map (note that the coloration may no longer be applicable...) That Hillary Clinton is...
- Get Ready for a New Crisis – in Corporate Debt
Imposter Dollar OUZILLY, France – We’re going back to basics here at the Diary. We’re getting everyone on the same page... learning together... connecting the dots... trying to figure out what is going on. The new three dollar bill issued by the Apprehensive States of America. We made a breakthrough when we identified the source of so many of today’s bizarre and grotesque trends. It’s the money – the new post-1971 dollar. This new dollar is green. You...
- The Economy, the Stock Market and the Fed
John Hussman on Recent Developments We always look forward to John Hussman's weekly missive on the markets. Some people say that he is a “permabear”, but we don't think that is a fair characterization. He is rightly wary of the stock market's historically extremely high valuation and the loose monetary policy driving the surge in asset prices. The S&P 500 Index and the NYSE advance-decline line. Most market internals weakened steadily until early February 2016, but...
- Hanjin Marooning in San Pedro Bay
Global Trade Reversal Expansions and contractions in global trade have played out over long secular trends for thousands of years. The Silk Road, for example, was established by the Han Dynasty of China in 130 BC, and allowed for continuous trade between East and West for nearly 1,600 years. In addition to economic trade, the Silk Road was also a conduit for culture and knowledge among its network of civilizations. A map of the main ancient Silk Road - click to...
- Great Causes, a Sea of Debt and the 2017 Recession
Great Cause NORMANDY, FRANCE – We continue our work with the bomb squad. Myth disposal is dangerous work: People love their myths more than they love life itself. They may kill for money. But they die for their religions, their governments, their clans... and their ideas. Famous French hippie and author Voltaire. He wears the same sardonic grin in every painting, whether he's depicted at a young or an old age, doesn't matter. His real name was François-Marie Arouet; he...
- The Donald Versus Killary: War or Peace?
War: A Warning from the Past Although history does not exactly repeat itself, it does provide parallels and sometimes quite ominous ones. Such is the case with the current U.S. Presidential election and the one which occurred one hundred years earlier. The Donald probably has the better slogan... The dominating question which hung over the 1916 campaign was whether the country would remain neutral in regard to the horrific slaughter which was taking place on the...