The Press Takes Notice of a Small Problem

We have previously discussed the plans announced by EU commission president JC Juncker to “rescue” the euro area economy by means of € 300 billion of state-directed spending (see Juncker’s Solution for details). Now the mainstream press is also beginning to wonder where the money for this ambitious spending plan is supposed to be coming from.

A report by Reuters contains a few points worth commenting on:

 

“New European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker is preparing a 300 billion euro ($375 billion) investment plan he will present as a cornerstone of efforts to revive an ailing economy. But history suggests the program risks becoming an exercise in financial engineering rather than a conduit for the new money the region needs to help boost output and create jobs.

A flagship project of the new European Union executive, the investment scheme is due to be unveiled before Christmas. It is still being finalized and few details have been made public. If all the money it promises is raised and spent, it could provide the 28-nation EU with roughly an additional 0.7 percent of GDP in investment per year over three years.

“It is significant,” said Carsten Brzeski, economist at ING bank in Frankfurt. “You would expect some kind of a multiplier effect from investment on jobs and purchasing power and it would increase the growth potential. The downside is that public investment can take years before it gets started.”

But even more than “when?”, the big question hanging over the plan is “how much?”. The 300 billion euros is an overall target for both the public and private money that the Commission hopes to mobilize. The Commission itself does not have any money and is funded through annual EU budgets that must be balanced. Of the region’s 28 governments, only Germany seems to have public finances strong enough to significantly increase investment. But in its drive to have a balanced budget, Berlin is not keen to spend more.

So the Commission plans to use what little public money is available to lure bigger private funds into projects that would otherwise seem too risky or with too low a rate of return.

“Our aim is to ‘crowd in’ private money for big infrastructure projects in the energy sector, transport, broadband or research and development. The private sector cannot take all the risks,” Commission Vice President Jyrki Katainen told Reuters.

 

(emphasis added)

First of all, the money can evidently not be raised by EU governments if they try to fulfill the obligations of the fiscal compact. To this we would note that the compact, if anything, suffers from still not being truly enforceable when it comes to larger member nations such as France and Italy. From our perspective, the attempt to impose some sort of fiscal discipline is praiseworthy in principle, but the actual approach to “austerity” and economic reform leaves a lot to be desired, to put it mildly.

Unfortunately the compact does not contain a specific clause with respect to spending – it merely refers to debt and deficits as a percentage of GDP. As a first measure, several countries have taken steps to artificially boost their GDP statistics by adding what seem highly subjective estimates of the value added by drug dealing, prostitution and other “black market” activities to the data. Worse though is that wherever possible, governments have avoided shrinking the State, and have instead imposed new burdens on the private sector, in many cases coupled with draconian enforcement. The additional taxes harm the economy, while the more drastic enforcement is obviously detrimental to liberty and peace, as it requires additional invasions of privacy, encourages snitching, and so forth.

 

1-EU government deficits

 EU government deficits (annual) as a percentage of GDP – click to enlarge.

2-EU-Government debtEU government debt as a percentage of GDP – click to enlarge.

A Plan that Will Consume Scarce Capital

Secondly, the belief in a “multiplier effect” once again runs into the problem that capital is both heterogeneous and scarce. If it is employed in state-directed investment projects, it must be removed from other employments. It is an apodictic certainty that in the vast majority of cases, it would be better employed in undertakings to which market participants have allocated it voluntarily. It seems obvious that investment projects planned by bureaucracies lack an important ingredient, namely the profit motive. They have therefore no reason to compare input costs to expected returns and to decide whether to undertake certain projects on that basis – and yet, the real capital to pursue these projects will have to be freed up elsewhere.

In the article excerpted above it is in fact admitted that the planned investment projects wouldn’t be touched by the private sector because they do not promise an adequate return. It really takes some doing for long-range investment projects to be so wasteful that they are seemingly not even able to produce a large enough illusory profit when the central bank’s administered interest rate stands almost at zero. Obviously, the private sector could and would gladly “take the risks” associated with these projects if they promised to produce profits in excess of the returns available in other investments. The fact that higher returns are available elsewhere is the market’s way of telling entrepreneurs that there are consumers wants the satisfaction of which is more urgent.

The lack of returns proves ipso facto that the proposed projects are destined to waste scarce capital. The so-called “multiplier effect” is an illusion – it is certainly possible for capital consumption to masquerade as “growth” for a while, but its true nature will eventually always be revealed.

As Mises noted to this:

 

Today the majority of the citizens look upon government as an agency dispensing benefits. The wage earners and the farmers expect to receive from the treasury more than they contribute to its revenues. The state is in their eyes a spender, not a taker. These popular tenets were rationalized and elevated to the rank of a quasi-economic doctrine by Lord Keynes and his disciples. Spending and unbalanced budgets are merely synonyms for capital consumption.

 

(emphasis added)

 

Conclusion:

In reality, these spending programs are simply slightly more elaborate and sophisticated versions of Keynesian ditch digging. They make precisely as much sense. If European politicians really want to help to spur economic growth, they must bid adieu to the notion that economies can be “jump-started” by spending on undertakings that are mainly characterized by their inability to produce a return. What is instead needed is a repeal of the ubiquitous red tape hampering entrepreneurs, lower taxes and less government involvement in the market economy.

Top-down investment decrees are bound to do more harm than good in the end. The urge of local governments in Spain to build a new airport in every two-bit town during the boom has left the landscape dotted with a number of large mute witnesses attesting to this.

 

European Commission President Juncker addresses a news conference at the European Commission headquarters in BrusselsJC Juncker: trying to spend money he doesn’t have on projects that everybody knows already won’t produce a return. It is not exactly the most brilliant plan ever conceived.

(Photo via Reuters)

 

Charts by: Euro-Stat

 

 

 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 


 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 12vB2LeWQNjWh59tyfWw23ySqJ9kTfJifA

   
 

2 Responses to “EU – Planning to Spend Money It Doesn’t Have”

  • No6:

    I disagree about the multiplier effect. It certainly does exist, it is just that the multiplier is some fraction of a whole number, less than 1. With Junkers’ brilliant plan the multiplier could easily be 1/10 or less.

    • worldend666:

      The problem is any multiplier effect will create dependencies which will vanish once the initial spending boost comes to an end. Temporary jobs will have been created which will need to be liquidated, creating civil unrest.

      Obviously it’s better only to create jobs to serve a recurring demand.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • Trade War Game On!
      Interesting Times Arrive “Things sure are getting exciting again, ain’t they?”  The remark was made by a colleague on Tuesday morning, as we stepped off the elevator to grab a cup of coffee.   Ancient Chinese curse alert... [PT]   “One moment markets are gorging on financial slop like fat pigs in mud.  The next they’re collectively vomiting on themselves. I’ll tell you one thing.  President Trump’s trade war with China won’t end well.  I mean, come...
  • The Dollar Cancer and the Gold Cure
      The Long Run is Here The dollar is failing. Millions of people can see at least some of the major signs, such as the collapse of interest rates, record high number of people not counted in the workforce, and debt rising from already-unpayable levels at an accelerating rate.   Total US credit market debt has hit a new high of $68.6 trillion at the end of 2017. That's up from $22.3 trillion a mere 20 years ago. It's a fairly good bet this isn't sustainable....
  • US Stock Market: Happy Days Are Here Again? Not so Fast...
      A “Typical” Correction? A Narrative Fail May Be in Store Obviously, assorted crash analogs have by now gone out of the window – we already noted that the market was late if it was to continue to mimic them, as the decline would have had to accelerate in the last week of March to remain in compliance with the “official time table”. Of course crashes are always very low probability events – but there are occasions when they have a higher probability than otherwise, and we will...
  • Rise of the Japanese Androids
      Good Intentions One of the unspoken delights in life is the rich satisfaction that comes with bearing witness to the spectacular failure of an offensive and unjust system. This week served up a lavish plate of delicious appetizers with both a style and refinement that’s ordinarily reserved for a competitive speed eating contest. What a remarkable time to be alive.   It seemed a good idea at first... [PT]   Many thrilling stories of doom and gloom were published...
  • Claudio Grass on Cryptocurrencies and Gold – An X22 Report Interview
       The Global Community is Unhappy With the Monetary System, Change is Coming Our friend Claudio Grass of Precious Metal Advisory Switzerland was recently interviewed by the X22 Report on cryptocurrencies and gold. He offers interesting perspectives on cryptocurrencies, bringing them into context with Hayek's idea of the denationalization of money. The connection is that they have originated in the market and exist in a framework of free competition, with users determining which of them...
  • No Revolution Just Yet - Precious Metals Supply and Demand Report
      Irredeemably Yours... Yuan Stops Rallying at the Wrong Moment The so-called petro-yuan was to revolutionize the world of irredeemable fiat paper currencies. Well, since its launch on March 26 — it has gone down. It was to be an enabler for oil companies who were desperate to sell oil for gold, but could not do so until the yuan oil contract.   After becoming progressively stronger over the past year, it looks as thought the 6.25 level in USDCNY is providing support for the...
  • Flight of the Bricks - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      The Lighthouse Moves Picture, if you will, a brick slowly falling off a cliff. The brick is printed with green ink, and engraved on it are the words “Federal Reserve Note” (FRN). A camera is mounted to the brick. The camera shows lots of things moving up. The cliff face is whizzing upwards at a blur. A black painted brick labeled “oil” is going up pretty fast, but not so fast as the cliff face. It is up 26% in a year. A special brick, a government data brick of sorts, labeled...
  • The “Turn of the Month Effect” Exists in 11 of 11 Countries
      A Well Known Seasonal Phenomenon in the US Market – Is There More to It? I already discussed the “turn-of-the-month effect” in a previous issues of Seasonal Insights, see e.g. this report from earlier this year. The term describes the fact that price gains in the stock market tend to cluster around the turn of the month. By contrast, the rest of the time around the middle of the month is typically less profitable for investors.   Due to continual monetary inflation in the...

Support Acting Man

Item Guides

Top10BestPro
j9TJzzN

The Review Insider

Austrian Theory and Investment

Archive

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

Mish Talk

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com

Diary of a Rogue Economist