Cash is Only for Criminals

We always try to keep an eye on the pronouncements of establishment-approved intellectuals, especially economists and pundits connected with the welfare and warfare rackets. The ruling elite regularly employs them to launch trial balloons concerning its plans. Today's intellectuals are mainly concerned with promoting establishment propaganda, often engaging in fake 'pro and con' debates, with the 'compromise solutions' that are then offered revealing what the real goal was in the first place. As Hans-Hermann Hoppe points out:

 

“[…] insofar as today's intellectual output is at all relevant and comprehensible, it is viciously statist. There are exceptions, but if practically all intellectuals are employed in the multiple branches of the State, then it should hardly come as a surprise that most of their ever-more voluminous output will, either by commission or omission, be statist propaganda.”

 

For instance, there is now a movement underway to decriminalize drugs. As the Daily Bell recently noted, the effort has recently been expanding to include all 'entertainment drugs', even 'hard' ones. While this is as it should be (what people want to ingest should be none of the State's business), there has to be an ulterior motive driving this promotion. One guess we have come up with is that the goal is to disempower the currently active criminal drug cartels and transform their illicit and untaxed profits into taxed profits that are earned by large pharmaceutical companies and/or other licensed enterprises. Very likely obtaining a license will eventually become so onerous that only big business can afford to actually pursue this opportunity, in keeping with the current state-capitalistic system. This is only one of the possibilities though. There are other goals that may be pursued, such as the 'panem et circenses' aspect. According to the definition of the term at wikipedia:

 

“In the case of politics, the phrase is used to describe the creation of public approval, not through exemplary or excellent public service or public policy, but through diversion; distraction; or the mere satisfaction of the immediate, shallow requirements of a populace, as an offered 'palliative'.”

 

Or putting it into context with modern times: grant the serfs a little bit of liberty in one area, while concurrently taking away a number of liberties in others. One of the liberties that has been under heavy attack in recent years is financial privacy. We encourage readers to check out this article at Casey's about FATCA's ugly step-child GATCA. After reading this, remember the IMF's proposal for a giant wealth grab in developed nations to 'fix' the insolvency of governments. It all fits very neatly.

And here comes Harvard economist Kenneth Rogoff, promoting the idea that cash currency needs to be made illegal, in, where else, the Financial Times. Readers may recall that we have previously discussed this topic in the context of Sweden (see: “Sweden Discusses Cash Ban”), where cash has almost disappeared by now and politicians and banks are actively promoting its complete abolition.

As we have argued at the time, it is an erosion of liberty under the cover of increasing 'safety' – a well-worn étatiste tactic. Not surprisingly, Rogoff is inter alia making the argument that 'mainly criminals' use cash, especially drug barons. This fits neatly with everything else discussed above: there is quite a drive underway to destroy all vestiges of financial privacy, and numerous promotions have been launched to make the idea palatable to the hoi-polloi. The 'inequality' debate belongs with these promotions just as this latest attempt to implant the meme that cash is somehow inherently evil.

 

2014-06-05_141921A pile of cash confiscated from a Mexican drug kingpin. See? What more proof do you need? Only criminals use cash!

(Photo via dict.mil / Author unknown)

 

We Need to Abolish Cash to Enable Better Central Planning

However, this is not the only argument Rogoff drags up. Similar to many other Chicago School monetarists, he is actually a “left-fringe” (Hoppe) statist, who is merely occasionally masquerading as a supporter of the free market. Monetarists are all for central banking, the very cancer that lies at the heart of the current state-capitalistic, anti-free market system. Rogoff wants to “kill two birds with one stone”. He writes:

 

“Has the time come to consider phasing out anonymous paper currency, starting with large-denomination notes? Getting rid of physical currency and replacing it with electronic money would kill two birds with one stone.

First, it would eliminate the zero bound on policy interest rates that has handcuffed central banks since the financial crisis. At present, if central banks try setting rates too far below zero, people will start bailing out into cash. Second, phasing out currency would address the concern that a significant fraction, particularly of large-denomination notes, appears to be used to facilitate tax evasion and illegal activity.

 

(emphasis added)

In other words, when central planners decide to expand their war on savers further, and outright theft in nominal as well as merely in real terms is to be implemented, the average citizen must not have any opportunity to save his hard-earned money from the insane designs of these 'wise men'.

And evidently, the best way to persuade J6P to agree is by pointing out that cash currency is the sole preserve of 'tax evaders and other criminals'. So are there any arguments against the idea? Why, yes, chiefly among them the fact that the State may lose its 'seignorage' income!

 

“Yes, there are some important arguments in favour of the status quo. These include a likely loss of seigniorage revenue – the profit central banks make by printing money – even if anonymous paper currency is replaced with purportedly anonymous electronic government currency. Even though central bank “profits” are turned over to national treasuries, the ability to skim off expenses without having to beg can help insulate central banks from political pressures. But the real costs to governments would be much less than the loss of seigniorage revenues might indicate, because they would gain revenue by making tax evasion more difficult. There would also be savings from crime reduction.”

 

The great advantage would of course be – even though Rogoff doesn't mention it – that just about any onerous tax rates could then be imposed. Currently governments that impose too high tax rates are faced with the fact that a lot of economic activity promptly disappears into the 'shadow economy', as this is often the only way people can maintain a reasonable living standard. Thus cash is actually a natural brake against government greed. Rogoff has no problem with removing it. But wait, it gets even better – he even mentions marijuana outright, confirming once again that pot legalization is indeed an elite promotion:

 

“Another issue is that society may want to preserve the right for individuals to make anonymous payments in certain activities, even if it is desirable to strip away the cloak of anonymity from those engaged in tax evasion and crime. Anonymity, for example, facilitates experimentation at the fringes of society with activities that might ultimately become legal (buying marijuana, for instance).”

 

Does anyone believe even for a second he would have said this five or ten years ago? But he soon returns to his major point: namely, how without cash, central bankers can better implement their kooky theories and enable theft on a grand scale. He approvingly cites Willem Buiter in this context. Readers may remember that Buiter in turn became conspicuous during the crisis by promoting the ideas of complete monetary cranks like Silvio Gesell:

 

The idea of finding creative ways to get around the zero bound on interest rates has been championed for more than a decade by Willem Buiter, a former UK Monetary Policy Committee member. Phasing out paper currency is by far the simplest. With electronic payments mechanisms becoming increasingly prevalent even in small transactions, and with the supply of paper currency overwhelmingly top-heavy with large-denomination notes, the case for keeping the currency status quo has weakened.”

 

(emphasis added)

“Getting around the zero bound” of course means the imposition of penalty rates on all cash and savings deposits in order to force people to spend. This idea is based on extremely bad economic theory. It is held that economic growth is the result of 'spending' and consumption. This is patently not the case, in fact, it is the functional equivalent of trying to keep warm by burning the furniture.

Moreover, there can be no such thing as a 'negative interest rate' in real life. The originary interest rate must always be positive, lest people would never consume. There is no such thing as 'negative time preference'. What these Gesellian ideas promoted by Buiter (and now Rogoff) ultimately amount to is expropriation. 

 

gesellSilvio Gesell, a veritable monetary crank. Keynes approved of his loopy ideas (natch), and so do Willem Buiter and now evidently also Kenneth Rogoff.

(Photo via Wikimedia Commons)

 

Another excerpt:

 

“True, it is likely that a significant share – perhaps half – of dollars and euros circulates internationally. Some portion of this is surely abetting illegal activity and tax evasion. (In arresting Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán, the Mexican drug lord, two months ago, authorities found a room containing more than $200m, and this was not a first.) Then again, dollars and euros, including large-denomination notes, are also used for legal purposes. Even so, there still appears to be a very large share circulating in domestic underground economies, estimated to be at least 7-8 per cent of gross domestic product for the US and considerably higher for Europe.”

 

(emphasis added)

After skilfully reminding us that mainly criminals use cash (while grudgingly admitting that 'some' cash may actually be employed in perfectly legal ways), Rogoff comes back to the crux of his jeremiad: the State must be enabled not only to engage in more effective central panning but also to more effectively tax the citizenry into oblivion, by cutting off all routes to escape (not to mention that at some point in the future, this may make it even possible to simply 'erase' the finances of undesirables at the push of a button).

So what about Europe's large 'shadow economy' (we happen to believe that Rogoff underestimates the size of the US shadow economy and that the official estimates of the size and importance of Europe's shadow economies are probably also far too low). Europe's economy would very likely implode without cash. Living standards would definitely plummet, as being able to afford handymen, cleaning personnel, etc. at 'official' rates that include the onerous tax burden would become the exclusive preserve of a small moneyed elite. 

But an even more pernicious effect is precisely that people could no longer get their money out of the banking system. There could no longer be any bank runs – people would be forced to entrust their money to fractionally reserved banks whether they want to or not. One would no longer be able to remove oneself from what is an inherently insolvent system. After all, only a small proportion of the demand deposit liabilities of fractionally reserved banks is actually backed with standard money. The vast majority consists of fiduciary media, which are money in the broader sense, but are at the same time only imaginary numbers in accounts. The banks could not possibly pay out but a fraction of the sight deposits on their books, in spite of the contractual promise that all of this money is available on demand.

 

A Possible Consolation

The economy always finds ways to circumvent dictatorial edicts. In that sense there may be a silver lining to all of this. Abolishing cash may well hasten the demise of the current monetary system, as the shadow economy would quickly adopt alternative media of exchange. Very likely precious metals, bit coins and other non-state forms of money would be increasingly employed. If government scrip were abolished, we may well see gold and silver coins begin to circulate again.

 

gold coinsThe money the free market would likely adopt in the absence of government coercion, and which the 'shadow economy' may well adopt if cash currency were to be abolished.

(Photo source unknown)

 

 
 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 
 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke

   
 

8 Responses to “Meet Kenneth Rogoff, Unreconstructed Statist”

  • Kreditanstalt:

    I suspect Ken Rogoff is neither an “unreconstructed statist” nor a “closet goldbug”. When I was entering chess tournaments as a teenager, Rogoff was obtaining his International Master and, later, Grandmaster titles. He’s a very strong player, needless to say…so he probably can calculate that 1+1=2 and is confident that there are models, mathematics and formulae to solve any quantifiable human or social problem.

    He’s like Bernanke: a policy-wonk.

  • roger:

    “Very likely precious metals, bit coins and other non-state forms of money would be increasingly employed.”

    I guess at this point it will be greatly helpful to us if you elaborate your views on bitcoins. Its origins are indeed from the free-market. However, it is not without its problems:

    1. While bitcoin itself is limited in quantity, digital currencies are not. We can see this from the rise of smallcoin, litecoin, etc.
    2. Low barrier of entry. Many with proper knowledge on networking can create these kinds of currencies themselves. Essentially this is related to problem no. 1.
    3. The value backing it. Mayans once used cocoa beans as money, cocoa beans definitely have value to them. Same with gold. This weakness is analogous to fiat currencies, in that in fiat currencies people put their trust on governments and in the case of bitcoins, people do on P2P network — a better option, but still problematic.

    If somehow the weakness on the low barrier of entry can be eliminated naturally, e.g. market eventually decides only bitcoin will be used and others are garbage, then we are getting closer but problem no.3 still remains.

  • BK:

    Pater,

    It is interesting you mentioned bitcoin as an “alternative” to future non-cash dollars. To me it seems that bitcoin is really a wet dream of any monetarist statist. It is purely digital, and it is perfectly traceable – all owners and transactions are known and recorded. All government needs is to take control over the servers, adopt the algorithm, and re-name it into USD!

    Actually, I am starting to suspect that the whole bitcoin enterprise may be a brilliantly crafted experiment of the very same elites you are rightfully criticizing in the post.

    My other thought – the digitalization of the currencies is only possible if all the major powers are on board. Otherwise, the black/gray economies of the participating countries will quickly adopt paper currencies of non-participating countries as a mean of exchange.

  • aboczek:

    Surely any attempt to deprive citizens of the use of one money substitute (ie, fiat currency) would result in the rise of another one. What exactly that would be is up to the market—perhaps this is just the thing to renew the public’s interest in real money. Is Ken Rogoff a secret gold bug?

  • Tony 3916874:

    There is little doubt in my mind that individaul liberty has been compromised over the last 50 years and the situation has deteriorated at an accelerated pace since year 2000.

    Re:
    “Today’s intellectuals are mainly concerned with promoting establishment propaganda, often engaging in fake ‘pro and con’ debates, with the ‘compromise solutions’ that are then offered revealing what the real goal was in the first place.”

    A point nicely illustrated. Thank you. I think an earlier case I commented on regarding a book by Thomas Piketty is another example. Anyone (as per L.S) who thinks that modern technology is being used in an efficient way is way off base imho. It’s only being used to bludgeon the majority of the population into sub standard living roles by the few… little else, and there are many opportunities to use it better by private individuals just accessing a real market. Typical multinational corporations are usually full of slack when it comes to it.

    How do you suggest the multi national corporate entity is subdued from crushing individual freedoms? An more extreme case would be the nation and people of Bolivia, should corporations have the freedom of movement to confisticate the indiduals right to collect the rainwater off their own roofs (for example) ?

    In my mind there will always be a strong case for national states and national rights, and these days that includes access to universal health care, sorry if we have any more primative peoples on board who believe otherwise. Just like the water supply, it’s my strong belief that it must be state controlled, or have firm controls in place, in the national interest. It should not just be at the mercy at the feckless whim of an unconcerned wealthy person who want to see a temporary better return on his investment.

    The so called “electronic” fast markets we have today are destructive for most individuals. Surely most can see through that pile of crapola?? Well, it kinda proves my argument then doesn’t it.

    • Then it is your opinion that we should be forced to labor for a particular industry, health care in this case, so that some utopian idea can be pushed forward? Very few places have truly socialized medicine on demand. There is plenty of taking people’s labor and giving them what the state decides they should have. There used to be a great medical system in the US, affordable and available to all, as there were plenty of charities that backed hospitals. Today, these institutions are run by blood sucking bureaucrats. If they were eliminated, the hospitals would then be run by blood sucking government bureaucrats. You might take one look at the VA and see what we would get from that?

      • Tony 3916874:

        I acknowledge your point about healthcare in the USA, I lived there during the 80’s and 90’s and was pleasently surprised how cheap it was (for a whole family) and the quality of the healthcare too. Something has gone very wrong since then. If I remember correctly my employer did also chip in, so the idea of a common need of healthcare is not particularly rare.

  • I am glad to see comments on this idea, as it is foreign to the concept of freedom for the common man worldwide. In fact the story of bondage in Genesis arises when Pharaoh gathered up all the money, a story as old as history.

    There are few conditions as reasons to launch an all out revolution, but the outlawing of the possession of ones own money in any amount has to be near the top of the list. The banks, who have created credit out of nothing, gaining legal title to almost everything on Earth, would then be able to control your property without ever having to produce evidence they could make payment for what they supposedly provided. The only thing that could happen was your money moved from one bank to another. It would be nice to have your own charter, in order to buy at will with nothing ever emitted from your treasury other than IOU’s to other banks. Everyone should have one.

    We have already lost the Pay on Demand feature on bank money. If I give someone a check drawn on my good account, which they appear at my bank for satisfaction of such demand, the bank will often discount that liability with a fee. It is their liability. Are all banking liabilities one sided? Banking is what I call a system of double liabilities, liability to and liability for. Maybe that is confusing, but there is really nothing but liabilities created when a bank loan is effected. A law disabling the capacity of the customer to request the banking system to deliver on their liability while being able to enforce the lien created is a pathway to substantiating fraud. A bank loan is effectively constructive fraud, as the funds really don’t exist, except on the Ponzi known as double entry accounting. Banks become liable to each other and as long as one doesn’t step too far out of line, they have a system of debt imposed on the population that can never be removed. Should the bank fail, the depositors themselves become liable for their own bailout. The elimination of cash would in effect allow the banking system to be totally insolvent without question as to this insolvency ever being raised.

    The Central Bank and its commercial banking tentacles are the backbone to the Corporate State, a pretty word for fascism. All the rules are on one side of the table, the only enforceable liabilities against the non-banking public. Should it all be nationalized, the enforcement and tyranny only becomes greater.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • How to Stick It to Your Banker, the Federal Reserve, and the Whole Doggone Fiat Money System
      Bernanke Redux Somehow, former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke found time from his busy hedge fund advisory duties last week to tell his ex-employer how to do its job.  Namely, he recommended to his former cohorts at the Fed how much they should reduce the Fed’s balance sheet by.  In other words, he told them how to go about cleaning up his mess.   Praise the Lord! The Hero is back to tell us what to do! Why, oh why have you ever left, oh greatest central planner of all...
  • India: Why its Attempt to Go Digital Will Fail
      India Reverts to its Irrational, Tribal Normal (Part XIII) Over the three years in which Narendra Modi has been in power, his support base has continued to increase. Indian institutions — including the courts and the media — now toe his line. The President, otherwise a ceremonial rubber-stamp post, but the last obstacle keeping Modi from implementing a police state, comes up for re-election by a vote of the legislative houses in July 2017.  No one should be surprised if a Hindu...
  • Moving Closer to the Precipice
      Money Supply and Credit Growth Continue to Falter The decline in the growth rate of the broad US money supply measure TMS-2 that started last November continues, but the momentum of the decline has slowed last month (TMS = “true money supply”).  The data were recently updated to the end of April, as of which the year-on-year growth rate of TMS-2 is clocking in at 6.05%, a slight decrease from the 6.12% growth rate recorded at the end of March. It remains the slowest y/y growth since...
  • What is the Buffet Indicator Saying About Gold?
      Chugging along in Nosebleed Territory Last Friday, both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq composite indexes closed at record highs in the US, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average only a whisker away from its peak set in March. What has often been called the “most hated bull market in history” thus far continues  to chug along in defiance of its detractors.   Can current stock market valuations tell us something about the future trend in gold prices? Yes, they actually...
  • The 21st Century Has Been a Big, Fat Flop
      Seeming Contradiction CACHI, ARGENTINA – Here at the Diary we have fun ridiculing the pretensions, absurdities, and hypocrisies of the ruling classes. But there is a serious side to it, too. Mockery makes us laugh. And laughing helps us wiggle free from the kudzu of fake news.   Is it real? Is it real? Is it real? Above you can see what the problem with reality is, or potentially is, in a 6-phase research undertaking that has landed its protagonist in a very disagreeable...
  • A Cloud Hangs Over the Oil Sector
      Endangered Recovery As we noted in a recent corporate debt update on occasion of the troubles Neiman-Marcus finds itself in (see “Cracks in Ponzi Finance Land”), problems are set to emerge among high-yield borrowers in the US retail sector this year. This happens just as similar problems among low-rated borrowers in the oil sector were mitigated by the rally in oil prices since early 2016. The recovery in the oil sector seems increasingly endangered though.   Too many oil...
  • Will Gold or Silver Pay the Higher Interest Rate?
      The Wrong Approach This question is no longer moot. As the world moves inexorably towards the use of metallic money, interest on gold and silver will return with it. This raises an important question. Which interest rate will be higher?   It’s instructive to explore a wrong, but popular, view. I call it the purchasing power paradigm. In this view, the value of money — its purchasing power —is 1/P (where P is the price level). Inflation is the rate of decline of...
  • Rising Oil Prices Don't Cause Inflation
      Correlation vs. Causation A very good visual correlation between the yearly percentage change in the consumer price index (CPI) and the yearly percentage change in the price of oil seems to provide support to the popular thinking that future changes in price inflation in the US are likely to be set by the yearly growth rate in the price of oil (see first chart below).   Gushing forth... a Union Oil Co. oil well sometime early in the 20th century   But is it valid to...
  • Warnings from Mount Vesuvius
      When Mount Vesuvius Blew   “Injustice, swift, erect, and unconfin’d, Sweeps the wide earth, and tramples o’er mankind” – Homer, The Iliad   Everything was just the way it was supposed to be in Pompeii on August 24, 79 A.D.  The gods had bestowed wealth and abundance upon the inhabitants of this Roman trading town.  Things were near perfect.   Frescoes in the so-called “Villa of the Mysteries” in Pompeii, presumed to depict scenes from a...
  • A Bumper Under that Silver Elevator – Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      The Problem with Mining If you can believe the screaming headline, one of the gurus behind one of the gold newsletters is going all-in to gold, buying a million dollars of mining shares. If (1) gold is set to explode to the upside, and (2) mining shares are geared to the gold price, then he stands to get seriously rich(er).   As this book attests to, some people have a very cynical view of mining...  We would say there is a time for everything. For instance, when gold went ...
  • Silver Elevator Keeps Going Down – Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Frexit Threat Macronized The dollar moved strongly, and is now over 25mg gold and 1.9g silver. This was a holiday-shortened week, due to the Early May bank holiday in the UK. The lateral entrant wakes up, preparing to march on, avenge the disinherited and let loose with fresh rounds of heavy philosophizing... we can't wait! [PT]   The big news as we write this, Macron beat Le Pen in the French election. We suppose this means markets can continue to do what they wanted...
  • The Knives Come Out for Trump
      A Minor Derailment GUALFIN, ARGENTINA – Yesterday, stocks fell. And volatility shot up.   When too many people have too many knives out at once, accidental cubism may result   Reports Bloomberg:   The Dow Jones Industrial Average tumbled more than 370 points, Treasuries rallied the most since July and volatility spiked higher as the turmoil surrounding the Trump administration roiled financial markets around the globe. Major U.S. stock indexes...

Support Acting Man

Austrian Theory and Investment

Own physical gold and silver outside a bank

Archive

j9TJzzN

350x200

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com