Cash is Only for Criminals

We always try to keep an eye on the pronouncements of establishment-approved intellectuals, especially economists and pundits connected with the welfare and warfare rackets. The ruling elite regularly employs them to launch trial balloons concerning its plans. Today's intellectuals are mainly concerned with promoting establishment propaganda, often engaging in fake 'pro and con' debates, with the 'compromise solutions' that are then offered revealing what the real goal was in the first place. As Hans-Hermann Hoppe points out:

 

“[…] insofar as today's intellectual output is at all relevant and comprehensible, it is viciously statist. There are exceptions, but if practically all intellectuals are employed in the multiple branches of the State, then it should hardly come as a surprise that most of their ever-more voluminous output will, either by commission or omission, be statist propaganda.”

 

For instance, there is now a movement underway to decriminalize drugs. As the Daily Bell recently noted, the effort has recently been expanding to include all 'entertainment drugs', even 'hard' ones. While this is as it should be (what people want to ingest should be none of the State's business), there has to be an ulterior motive driving this promotion. One guess we have come up with is that the goal is to disempower the currently active criminal drug cartels and transform their illicit and untaxed profits into taxed profits that are earned by large pharmaceutical companies and/or other licensed enterprises. Very likely obtaining a license will eventually become so onerous that only big business can afford to actually pursue this opportunity, in keeping with the current state-capitalistic system. This is only one of the possibilities though. There are other goals that may be pursued, such as the 'panem et circenses' aspect. According to the definition of the term at wikipedia:

 

“In the case of politics, the phrase is used to describe the creation of public approval, not through exemplary or excellent public service or public policy, but through diversion; distraction; or the mere satisfaction of the immediate, shallow requirements of a populace, as an offered 'palliative'.”

 

Or putting it into context with modern times: grant the serfs a little bit of liberty in one area, while concurrently taking away a number of liberties in others. One of the liberties that has been under heavy attack in recent years is financial privacy. We encourage readers to check out this article at Casey's about FATCA's ugly step-child GATCA. After reading this, remember the IMF's proposal for a giant wealth grab in developed nations to 'fix' the insolvency of governments. It all fits very neatly.

And here comes Harvard economist Kenneth Rogoff, promoting the idea that cash currency needs to be made illegal, in, where else, the Financial Times. Readers may recall that we have previously discussed this topic in the context of Sweden (see: “Sweden Discusses Cash Ban”), where cash has almost disappeared by now and politicians and banks are actively promoting its complete abolition.

As we have argued at the time, it is an erosion of liberty under the cover of increasing 'safety' – a well-worn étatiste tactic. Not surprisingly, Rogoff is inter alia making the argument that 'mainly criminals' use cash, especially drug barons. This fits neatly with everything else discussed above: there is quite a drive underway to destroy all vestiges of financial privacy, and numerous promotions have been launched to make the idea palatable to the hoi-polloi. The 'inequality' debate belongs with these promotions just as this latest attempt to implant the meme that cash is somehow inherently evil.

 

2014-06-05_141921A pile of cash confiscated from a Mexican drug kingpin. See? What more proof do you need? Only criminals use cash!

(Photo via dict.mil / Author unknown)

 

We Need to Abolish Cash to Enable Better Central Planning

However, this is not the only argument Rogoff drags up. Similar to many other Chicago School monetarists, he is actually a “left-fringe” (Hoppe) statist, who is merely occasionally masquerading as a supporter of the free market. Monetarists are all for central banking, the very cancer that lies at the heart of the current state-capitalistic, anti-free market system. Rogoff wants to “kill two birds with one stone”. He writes:

 

“Has the time come to consider phasing out anonymous paper currency, starting with large-denomination notes? Getting rid of physical currency and replacing it with electronic money would kill two birds with one stone.

First, it would eliminate the zero bound on policy interest rates that has handcuffed central banks since the financial crisis. At present, if central banks try setting rates too far below zero, people will start bailing out into cash. Second, phasing out currency would address the concern that a significant fraction, particularly of large-denomination notes, appears to be used to facilitate tax evasion and illegal activity.

 

(emphasis added)

In other words, when central planners decide to expand their war on savers further, and outright theft in nominal as well as merely in real terms is to be implemented, the average citizen must not have any opportunity to save his hard-earned money from the insane designs of these 'wise men'.

And evidently, the best way to persuade J6P to agree is by pointing out that cash currency is the sole preserve of 'tax evaders and other criminals'. So are there any arguments against the idea? Why, yes, chiefly among them the fact that the State may lose its 'seignorage' income!

 

“Yes, there are some important arguments in favour of the status quo. These include a likely loss of seigniorage revenue – the profit central banks make by printing money – even if anonymous paper currency is replaced with purportedly anonymous electronic government currency. Even though central bank “profits” are turned over to national treasuries, the ability to skim off expenses without having to beg can help insulate central banks from political pressures. But the real costs to governments would be much less than the loss of seigniorage revenues might indicate, because they would gain revenue by making tax evasion more difficult. There would also be savings from crime reduction.”

 

The great advantage would of course be – even though Rogoff doesn't mention it – that just about any onerous tax rates could then be imposed. Currently governments that impose too high tax rates are faced with the fact that a lot of economic activity promptly disappears into the 'shadow economy', as this is often the only way people can maintain a reasonable living standard. Thus cash is actually a natural brake against government greed. Rogoff has no problem with removing it. But wait, it gets even better – he even mentions marijuana outright, confirming once again that pot legalization is indeed an elite promotion:

 

“Another issue is that society may want to preserve the right for individuals to make anonymous payments in certain activities, even if it is desirable to strip away the cloak of anonymity from those engaged in tax evasion and crime. Anonymity, for example, facilitates experimentation at the fringes of society with activities that might ultimately become legal (buying marijuana, for instance).”

 

Does anyone believe even for a second he would have said this five or ten years ago? But he soon returns to his major point: namely, how without cash, central bankers can better implement their kooky theories and enable theft on a grand scale. He approvingly cites Willem Buiter in this context. Readers may remember that Buiter in turn became conspicuous during the crisis by promoting the ideas of complete monetary cranks like Silvio Gesell:

 

The idea of finding creative ways to get around the zero bound on interest rates has been championed for more than a decade by Willem Buiter, a former UK Monetary Policy Committee member. Phasing out paper currency is by far the simplest. With electronic payments mechanisms becoming increasingly prevalent even in small transactions, and with the supply of paper currency overwhelmingly top-heavy with large-denomination notes, the case for keeping the currency status quo has weakened.”

 

(emphasis added)

“Getting around the zero bound” of course means the imposition of penalty rates on all cash and savings deposits in order to force people to spend. This idea is based on extremely bad economic theory. It is held that economic growth is the result of 'spending' and consumption. This is patently not the case, in fact, it is the functional equivalent of trying to keep warm by burning the furniture.

Moreover, there can be no such thing as a 'negative interest rate' in real life. The originary interest rate must always be positive, lest people would never consume. There is no such thing as 'negative time preference'. What these Gesellian ideas promoted by Buiter (and now Rogoff) ultimately amount to is expropriation. 

 

gesellSilvio Gesell, a veritable monetary crank. Keynes approved of his loopy ideas (natch), and so do Willem Buiter and now evidently also Kenneth Rogoff.

(Photo via Wikimedia Commons)

 

Another excerpt:

 

“True, it is likely that a significant share – perhaps half – of dollars and euros circulates internationally. Some portion of this is surely abetting illegal activity and tax evasion. (In arresting Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán, the Mexican drug lord, two months ago, authorities found a room containing more than $200m, and this was not a first.) Then again, dollars and euros, including large-denomination notes, are also used for legal purposes. Even so, there still appears to be a very large share circulating in domestic underground economies, estimated to be at least 7-8 per cent of gross domestic product for the US and considerably higher for Europe.”

 

(emphasis added)

After skilfully reminding us that mainly criminals use cash (while grudgingly admitting that 'some' cash may actually be employed in perfectly legal ways), Rogoff comes back to the crux of his jeremiad: the State must be enabled not only to engage in more effective central panning but also to more effectively tax the citizenry into oblivion, by cutting off all routes to escape (not to mention that at some point in the future, this may make it even possible to simply 'erase' the finances of undesirables at the push of a button).

So what about Europe's large 'shadow economy' (we happen to believe that Rogoff underestimates the size of the US shadow economy and that the official estimates of the size and importance of Europe's shadow economies are probably also far too low). Europe's economy would very likely implode without cash. Living standards would definitely plummet, as being able to afford handymen, cleaning personnel, etc. at 'official' rates that include the onerous tax burden would become the exclusive preserve of a small moneyed elite. 

But an even more pernicious effect is precisely that people could no longer get their money out of the banking system. There could no longer be any bank runs – people would be forced to entrust their money to fractionally reserved banks whether they want to or not. One would no longer be able to remove oneself from what is an inherently insolvent system. After all, only a small proportion of the demand deposit liabilities of fractionally reserved banks is actually backed with standard money. The vast majority consists of fiduciary media, which are money in the broader sense, but are at the same time only imaginary numbers in accounts. The banks could not possibly pay out but a fraction of the sight deposits on their books, in spite of the contractual promise that all of this money is available on demand.

 

A Possible Consolation

The economy always finds ways to circumvent dictatorial edicts. In that sense there may be a silver lining to all of this. Abolishing cash may well hasten the demise of the current monetary system, as the shadow economy would quickly adopt alternative media of exchange. Very likely precious metals, bit coins and other non-state forms of money would be increasingly employed. If government scrip were abolished, we may well see gold and silver coins begin to circulate again.

 

gold coinsThe money the free market would likely adopt in the absence of government coercion, and which the 'shadow economy' may well adopt if cash currency were to be abolished.

(Photo source unknown)

 

 
 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 
 

 
 

Dear Readers!

It is that time of the year again – our semi-annual funding drive begins today. Give us a little hand in offsetting the costs of running this blog, as advertising revenue alone is insufficient. You can help us reach our modest funding goal by donating either via paypal or bitcoin. Those of you who have made a ton of money based on some of the things we have said in these pages (we actually made a few good calls lately!), please feel free to up your donations accordingly (we are sorry if you have followed one of our bad calls. This is of course your own fault). Other than that, we can only repeat that donations to this site are apt to secure many benefits. These range from sound sleep, to children including you in their songs, to the potential of obtaining privileges in the afterlife (the latter cannot be guaranteed, but it seems highly likely). As always, we are greatly honored by your readership and hope that our special mixture of entertainment and education is adding a little value to your life!

   

Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke

   
 

8 Responses to “Meet Kenneth Rogoff, Unreconstructed Statist”

  • Kreditanstalt:

    I suspect Ken Rogoff is neither an “unreconstructed statist” nor a “closet goldbug”. When I was entering chess tournaments as a teenager, Rogoff was obtaining his International Master and, later, Grandmaster titles. He’s a very strong player, needless to say…so he probably can calculate that 1+1=2 and is confident that there are models, mathematics and formulae to solve any quantifiable human or social problem.

    He’s like Bernanke: a policy-wonk.

  • roger:

    “Very likely precious metals, bit coins and other non-state forms of money would be increasingly employed.”

    I guess at this point it will be greatly helpful to us if you elaborate your views on bitcoins. Its origins are indeed from the free-market. However, it is not without its problems:

    1. While bitcoin itself is limited in quantity, digital currencies are not. We can see this from the rise of smallcoin, litecoin, etc.
    2. Low barrier of entry. Many with proper knowledge on networking can create these kinds of currencies themselves. Essentially this is related to problem no. 1.
    3. The value backing it. Mayans once used cocoa beans as money, cocoa beans definitely have value to them. Same with gold. This weakness is analogous to fiat currencies, in that in fiat currencies people put their trust on governments and in the case of bitcoins, people do on P2P network — a better option, but still problematic.

    If somehow the weakness on the low barrier of entry can be eliminated naturally, e.g. market eventually decides only bitcoin will be used and others are garbage, then we are getting closer but problem no.3 still remains.

  • BK:

    Pater,

    It is interesting you mentioned bitcoin as an “alternative” to future non-cash dollars. To me it seems that bitcoin is really a wet dream of any monetarist statist. It is purely digital, and it is perfectly traceable – all owners and transactions are known and recorded. All government needs is to take control over the servers, adopt the algorithm, and re-name it into USD!

    Actually, I am starting to suspect that the whole bitcoin enterprise may be a brilliantly crafted experiment of the very same elites you are rightfully criticizing in the post.

    My other thought – the digitalization of the currencies is only possible if all the major powers are on board. Otherwise, the black/gray economies of the participating countries will quickly adopt paper currencies of non-participating countries as a mean of exchange.

  • aboczek:

    Surely any attempt to deprive citizens of the use of one money substitute (ie, fiat currency) would result in the rise of another one. What exactly that would be is up to the market—perhaps this is just the thing to renew the public’s interest in real money. Is Ken Rogoff a secret gold bug?

  • Tony 3916874:

    There is little doubt in my mind that individaul liberty has been compromised over the last 50 years and the situation has deteriorated at an accelerated pace since year 2000.

    Re:
    “Today’s intellectuals are mainly concerned with promoting establishment propaganda, often engaging in fake ‘pro and con’ debates, with the ‘compromise solutions’ that are then offered revealing what the real goal was in the first place.”

    A point nicely illustrated. Thank you. I think an earlier case I commented on regarding a book by Thomas Piketty is another example. Anyone (as per L.S) who thinks that modern technology is being used in an efficient way is way off base imho. It’s only being used to bludgeon the majority of the population into sub standard living roles by the few… little else, and there are many opportunities to use it better by private individuals just accessing a real market. Typical multinational corporations are usually full of slack when it comes to it.

    How do you suggest the multi national corporate entity is subdued from crushing individual freedoms? An more extreme case would be the nation and people of Bolivia, should corporations have the freedom of movement to confisticate the indiduals right to collect the rainwater off their own roofs (for example) ?

    In my mind there will always be a strong case for national states and national rights, and these days that includes access to universal health care, sorry if we have any more primative peoples on board who believe otherwise. Just like the water supply, it’s my strong belief that it must be state controlled, or have firm controls in place, in the national interest. It should not just be at the mercy at the feckless whim of an unconcerned wealthy person who want to see a temporary better return on his investment.

    The so called “electronic” fast markets we have today are destructive for most individuals. Surely most can see through that pile of crapola?? Well, it kinda proves my argument then doesn’t it.

    • Then it is your opinion that we should be forced to labor for a particular industry, health care in this case, so that some utopian idea can be pushed forward? Very few places have truly socialized medicine on demand. There is plenty of taking people’s labor and giving them what the state decides they should have. There used to be a great medical system in the US, affordable and available to all, as there were plenty of charities that backed hospitals. Today, these institutions are run by blood sucking bureaucrats. If they were eliminated, the hospitals would then be run by blood sucking government bureaucrats. You might take one look at the VA and see what we would get from that?

      • Tony 3916874:

        I acknowledge your point about healthcare in the USA, I lived there during the 80’s and 90’s and was pleasently surprised how cheap it was (for a whole family) and the quality of the healthcare too. Something has gone very wrong since then. If I remember correctly my employer did also chip in, so the idea of a common need of healthcare is not particularly rare.

  • I am glad to see comments on this idea, as it is foreign to the concept of freedom for the common man worldwide. In fact the story of bondage in Genesis arises when Pharaoh gathered up all the money, a story as old as history.

    There are few conditions as reasons to launch an all out revolution, but the outlawing of the possession of ones own money in any amount has to be near the top of the list. The banks, who have created credit out of nothing, gaining legal title to almost everything on Earth, would then be able to control your property without ever having to produce evidence they could make payment for what they supposedly provided. The only thing that could happen was your money moved from one bank to another. It would be nice to have your own charter, in order to buy at will with nothing ever emitted from your treasury other than IOU’s to other banks. Everyone should have one.

    We have already lost the Pay on Demand feature on bank money. If I give someone a check drawn on my good account, which they appear at my bank for satisfaction of such demand, the bank will often discount that liability with a fee. It is their liability. Are all banking liabilities one sided? Banking is what I call a system of double liabilities, liability to and liability for. Maybe that is confusing, but there is really nothing but liabilities created when a bank loan is effected. A law disabling the capacity of the customer to request the banking system to deliver on their liability while being able to enforce the lien created is a pathway to substantiating fraud. A bank loan is effectively constructive fraud, as the funds really don’t exist, except on the Ponzi known as double entry accounting. Banks become liable to each other and as long as one doesn’t step too far out of line, they have a system of debt imposed on the population that can never be removed. Should the bank fail, the depositors themselves become liable for their own bailout. The elimination of cash would in effect allow the banking system to be totally insolvent without question as to this insolvency ever being raised.

    The Central Bank and its commercial banking tentacles are the backbone to the Corporate State, a pretty word for fascism. All the rules are on one side of the table, the only enforceable liabilities against the non-banking public. Should it all be nationalized, the enforcement and tyranny only becomes greater.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • factoryA Striking Chart
      The Economy and the Stock Market As long time readers know, we are always paying close attention to the manufacturing sector, which is far more important to the US economy than is generally believed. In terms of gross output it is the largest sector of the economy, and it should of course be obvious that saving, investment and production are the only ways to create wealth.   What's left of the Brooklyn Domino Sugar Refinery. Photo credit: Paul Raphaelson   Contrary...
  • trump-putin-1024Trump and Putin Narrowly Escape Assassination Attempt
      The Gloves are Coming Off First a little bit of recent history. Readers are probably aware that some questions about the occasionally malfunctioning Deep State android... no, wait, we'll start again. Questions have recently been raised about the health of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton by various “alt-right” tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy theorists, such as this one.   The monsters are normally hiding under Hillary's bed, but lately they have come out into the open...
  • swing-voterWhy the Fed Destroyed the Market Economy
      What Have You Done for Me Lately? Swing voters are a fickle bunch.  One election they vote Democrat.  The next they vote Republican. For they have no particular ideology or political philosophy to base their judgment upon.   The primacy of the wallet.   They don’t give a rip about questions of small government or big government.  Nor do they have any druthers about the welfare or warfare state. In effect, they really don’t care.  What’s important to the...
  • wallet-367975_960_720Janet Yellen’s Shame
      Playing Politics In honest capitalism, you do what you can to get other people to voluntarily give you money. This usually involves providing goods or services they think are worth the price. You may get a little wild and crazy from time to time, but you are always called to order by your customers.   In the market economy, consumers reign supreme. There is no such thing as a “lost” vote in the marketplace; every penny spent affects production. Mises noted: “Consumers...
  • trump-mapDonald’s Electoral Struggle
      Wicked and Terrible After touting her pro-labor union record, the Wicked Witch of Chappaqua rhetorically asked, “why am I not 50 points ahead?”  Her chief rival bluntly responded: “because you’re terrible.”*  No truer words have been uttered by any of the candidates about one of their opponents since the start of this extraordinary presidential campaign!   Electoral map (note that the coloration may no longer be applicable...)   That Hillary Clinton is...
  • warren-buffett-gold-coinGet Ready for a New Crisis – in Corporate Debt
      Imposter Dollar OUZILLY, France – We’re going back to basics here at the Diary. We’re getting everyone on the same page... learning together... connecting the dots... trying to figure out what is going on.   The new three dollar bill issued by the Apprehensive States of America.   We made a breakthrough when we identified the source of so many of today’s bizarre and grotesque trends. It’s the money – the new post-1971 dollar. This new dollar is green. You...
  • 4-ip-and-non-def-capital-goods-ordersThe Economy, the Stock Market and the Fed
      John Hussman on Recent Developments We always look forward to John Hussman's weekly missive on the markets. Some people say that he is a “permabear”, but we don't think that is a fair characterization. He is rightly wary of the stock market's historically extremely high valuation and the loose monetary policy driving the surge in asset prices.   The S&P 500 Index and the NYSE advance-decline line. Most market internals weakened steadily until early February 2016, but...
  • silkroadHanjin Marooning in San Pedro Bay
      Global Trade Reversal Expansions and contractions in global trade have played out over long secular trends for thousands of years.  The Silk Road, for example, was established by the Han Dynasty of China in 130 BC, and allowed for continuous trade between East and West for nearly 1,600 years.  In addition to economic trade, the Silk Road was also a conduit for culture and knowledge among its network of civilizations.   A map of the main ancient Silk Road - click to...
  • voltaireGreat Causes, a Sea of Debt and the 2017 Recession
      Great Cause NORMANDY, FRANCE – We continue our work with the bomb squad. Myth disposal is dangerous work: People love their myths more than they love life itself. They may kill for money. But they die for their religions, their governments, their clans... and their ideas.   Famous French hippie and author Voltaire. He wears the same sardonic grin in every painting, whether he's depicted at a young or an old age, doesn't matter. His real name was François-Marie Arouet; he...
  • wilsonand-morganThe Donald Versus Killary: War or Peace?
      War: A Warning from the Past Although history does not exactly repeat itself, it does provide parallels and sometimes quite ominous ones.  Such is the case with the current U.S. Presidential election and the one which occurred one hundred years earlier.   The Donald probably has the better slogan...   The dominating question which hung over the 1916 campaign was whether the country would remain neutral in regard to the horrific slaughter which was taking place on the...
  • hittite-leftoversA Rift in the Space-Time Continuum
      Weird and Unnatural NORMANDY, France – First, a quick look at the markets. The Dow bounced on Monday, recovering 239 points of the nearly 400 it lost on Friday. Why the comeback?   FOMC member Lael Brainard: her comments on Monday were touted as the “reason” for the stock market recovering half of Friday's losses. We suspect the real reason is the triple witching on Friday... Photo via twitter.com   The financial press has a ready answer: “Stocks gain...
  • ukraine-mapCrimea: Digging For The Truth
      Renewed Escalation This summer witnessed a renewed escalation between Russia and Ukraine after Russian President Vladimir Putin accused Ukraine of sending saboteurs to attack Russian troops, targeting “critical infrastructure”. Kiev denied the allegations and claimed Russia’s “fantasy” was nothing but a false pretense to launch a “new invasion”.   August 10: Russian president Putin announces that there was an altercation involving a group of Ukrainian saboteurs at...

Austrian Theory and Investment

Support Acting Man

Own physical gold and silver outside a bank

Archive

j9TJzzN

350x200

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com