The Facts About Prohibition
Back in the 1930s, after FDR ended alcohol prohibition, a certain Harry Anslinger, the former head of the 'US Prohibition Bureau' and newly appointed chief of the 'Federal Narcotics Bureau' that was created in 1930, became very concerned for the future of his job and that of his bureaucracy. There was a budget squeeze, alcohol was suddenly legal again, and there was seemingly not much to do anymore for the man whom a biographer referred to as “a cross between William Jennings Bryan and Jerry Falwell”.
Presto, the 'devil weed' was born. Up until that time, no-one had bothered much about marijuana, in fact, only very few people even knew it existed. Only about 2% of the population was using it. Moreover, to those who came into contact with cannabis and its users, it was quite obvious that it was completely harmless.
Anslinger started a campaign of demonization and lies that would have made Goebbels proud. The fact that most of the users at the time were African-Americans and Mexicans was exploited by the racist Anslinger to influence popular opinion. Here are a few of the things he said, a mixture of racism, scaremongering and lies that tells one all one needs to know about the man's character:
“Reefer makes darkies think they're as good as white men”.
“… the primary reason to outlaw marijuana is its effect on the degenerate races”
“There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the US, and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others.”
“Marijuana is an addictive drug which produces in its users insanity, criminality, and death.”
“Marihuana leads to pacifism and communist brainwashing”
“You smoke a joint and you’re likely to kill your brother.”
“Marijuana is the most violence-causing drug in the history of mankind.”
So much for the mindset of the Ur-marijuana prohibitionist. The principal witness at the 1937 Congressional hearing which preceded prohibition was, you guessed it, Harry Anslinger. His evidence consisted of news-clippings of lurid tabloid stories he himself had helped originate. One legal observer called the hearing “an almost comical example of dereliction of legislative responsibility”. It was this legislation that was responsible for one day filling US prisons to the brim with people sentenced for committing victimless crimes. But Anslinger's bureaucracy sure began to prosper beyond his wildest imaginings.
Anslinger was helped in his endeavor by William Randolph Hearst, who owned vast timber plantations and wanted to destroy the competition of hemp-based paper. Like Anslinger, Hearst was a racist. He is said to have especially hated Mexicans, who were known to like marijuana. Later chemical giant Du Pont also chipped in to the propaganda campaign, for similar reasons: hemp was to be suppressed as a competitor to its artificial fibers.
Dr. William C. Woodward, Legislative Council of the American Medical Association, was the only person arguing against prohibition at the hearings, as he saw no medical reasons that could justify it.
But yellow journalism ultimately won the day (Congressmen in support of Anslinger confronted Woodward with lurid newspaper clippings as well. It's in the paper so it must be true!). The people responsible for prohibition all pursued their personal interests. Their motives were not pure, on the contrary, they were the lowest motives imaginable. They didn't care one whit about anybody's health. It was all about gaining power and money by political means.
Poster of one of the propaganda films that helped turn popular opinion against hemp
The end results speak for themselves. Today there exists a vast prison-industrial complex, huge and costly bureaucracies charged with enforcing prohibition (and failing to succeed in eradicating drug use with a consistency that is truly remarkable), and criminal cartels that make so much money that it has been speculated that their cash was instrumental in keeping the tottering US banking system afloat in the 2008 crisis. They represent a powerful block of vested interests that has kept prohibition going for more than seven decades.
With this, marijuana prohibition has already lasted a little longer than that other major mistake in 20th century social engineering, communism. The criminal element in the form of drug cartels and the criminalization of users have done orders of magnitude more harm to society than the drug itself ever could. In fact, cannabis is unlikely to be doing any harm whatsoever (note that studies that say otherwise are invariably funded by one of the interest groups that want prohibition to continue).
Rather it has proven to be helpful as a symptomatic treatment for a number of health conditions that are untreatable otherwise. That the violence of the drug cartels and the incarceration of users are inflicting untold harm is on the other hand beyond doubt. With the move toward full-scale legalization gathering pace after two US states have legalized marijuana use both for medical and recreational purposes, the drug cartels of Mexico are beginning to feel the pinch.
Cartels in Trouble – Who Could Have Known?
From a libertarian standpoint, the main argument is of course that it is none of the State's business what people choose to ingest. However, those pushing for legalization have also forwarded a number of utilitarian arguments that cannot be refuted. One is that the so-called 'war on drugs' is a huge waste of effort and resources, due to the fact that it cannot be 'won'. Those pursuing it of course don't even want to 'win' it, as that would cost them their job. They can obviously not admit that they are not even interested in 'winning the war', so they continue to insist on the fiction that it somehow all makes sense, in spite of the mountains of evidence proving otherwise.
One of the utilitarian arguments concerns the drug cartels: take the source of their income away, and they will falter. After all, prohibition is precisely what creates their income, as it keeps prices artificially high. At the same time, prohibition has obviously completely failed to destroy the market for illegal drugs as such. Given that the percentage of marijuana users has risen about ten-fold (if not more) since the drug was originally made illegal, it seems likely that it has actually increased the weed's popularity.
To no-one's surprise, the argument regarding the drug cartels is already proven by evidence that has recently emerged. The East Bay Express reports:
“For the first time in generations, farmers in central Mexico have stopped planting marijuana.
Due to ample supplies up north, courtesy of medical and recreational cannabis legalization, cartel farmers can’t make any money off pot anymore, they told the Washington Post this week. The price for a pound of Mexican marijuana has plummeted 75 percent from $100 per kilogram to less than $25.
"'It’s not worth it anymore,'" said 50 year-old Rodrigo Silla, a lifelong cannabis farmer. He also told the Post he couldn’t remember the last time his family and others stopped growing mota. “'I wish the Americans would stop with this legalization.'”
For several years we have been writing about how researchers think that domestic cannabis legalization will seriously hurt Mexican drug cartels — who have murdered something like 60,000 people in the last decade.
We've reported on how California cannabis has cut Mexican cartels out of the Golden State. That garbage goes east now. Researchers estimate legalization would cost the cartels billions, and a think tank in Mexico said that legalization in just one US state would cut cartels out of the US pot industry. Those days appears to have arrived.
“Farmers in the storied “Golden Triangle” region of Mexico’s Sinaloa state, which has produced the country’s most notorious gangsters and biggest marijuana harvests, say they are no longer planting the crop. … increasingly, they’re unable to compete with U.S. marijuana growers. With cannabis legalized or allowed for medical use in 20 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, more and more of the American market is supplied with highly potent marijuana grown in American garages and converted warehouses — some licensed, others not. Mexican trafficking groups have also set up vast outdoor plantations on public land, especially in California, contributing to the fall in marijuana prices.
So now we have both the DEA and cartel farmers both screaming bloody murder about legalization — sounds like we're on the right track.”
The next logical step will be to decriminalize illegal drug use altogether. While it is undoubtedly true that a number of illegal drugs (especially opiates) are contrary to cannabis actually dangerous, it should still be none of the State's business what people want to ingest.
Besides, without going into too many details here, there are also utilitarian arguments supporting a decriminalization of so-called 'hard' drugs. Just a few brief remarks in this context: after Germany's reunification, medical statistics that were thought to be long lost were rediscovered in Leipzig. Upon studying them, researchers found out that the percentage of opiate addicts in the population had remained roughly the same throughout the period of time covered by the country's statistics (beginning in the 1870s), regardless of whether the drugs could be obtained legally or not. Criminalization of drug use had not altered drug use one whit – it had only created a lot of crime (in the case of addictive opiates, not only crimes perpetrated by drug cartels, but also drug-related crime by users desperate to finance their habits).
Incidentally, wherever decriminalization has been tried (several European nations such as Switzerland, the Netherlands and Portugal have been trailblazers), it has proved a smashing success. A great many people who once were living in squalor in the streets, panhandling and prostituting themselves and in constant danger of dying of an overdose or catching illnesses associated with illegal drug use, have been fully reintegrated into society (see this report on Portugal for instance, or this one on the Swiss experience).
Drug prohibition never made any sense, and still doesn't. The system has become self-perpetuating and only serves the interests of bureaucrats and criminals to the detriment of society at large. Wherever prohibition has been repealed, overwhelmingly positive effects did not take long to become manifest.
Res ipsa loquitur.
A propaganda flyer produced by Anslinger's Narcotics Bureau.
Deadly harvest: in Mexico the drug cartels fight each other, killing members and innocent bystanders alike by the dozen. Lately they are doing so with weapons provided by the US government via operation 'Fast and Spurious'.
You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.
Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke
Most read in the last 20 days:
- Gold Sector: Positioning and Sentiment
A Case of Botched Timing, But... When last we wrote about the gold sector in mid February, we discussed historical patterns in the HUI following breaches of its 200-day moving average from below. Given that we expected such a breach to occur relatively soon, the post turned out to be rather ill-timed. Luckily we always advise readers that we are not exactly Nostradamus (occasionally our timing is a bit better). Below is a chart of the HUI Index depicting the action since the January...
- India: The next Pakistan?
India’s Rapid Degradation This is Part XI of a series of articles (the most recent of which is linked here) in which I have provided regular updates on what started as the demonetization of 86% of India's currency. The story of demonetization and the ensuing developments were merely a vehicle for me to explore Indian institutions, culture and society. The Modimobile is making the rounds amid a flower shower. [PT] Photo credit: PTI Photo Tribal cultures face...
- The Long Run Economics of Debt Based Stimulus
Onward vs. Upward Something both unwanted and unexpected has tormented western economies in the 21st century. Gross domestic product (GDP) has moderated onward while government debt has spiked upward. Orthodox economists continue to be flummoxed by what has transpired. What happened to the miracle? The Keynesian wet dream of an unfettered fiat debt money system has been realized, and debt has been duly expanded at every opportunity. Although the fat lady has so far only...
- Welcome to Totalitarian America, President Trump!
Trump vs. the Deep State If there had been any doubt that the land of the free and home of the brave is now a totalitarian society, the revelations that its Chief Executive Officer has been spied upon while campaigning for that office and during his brief tenure as president should now be allayed. Image adapted from the cover of “Deep State #5” - depicting an assassin from the future President Trump joins the very crowded list of opponents of the American...
- March to Default
Style Over Substance “May you live in interesting times,” says the ancient Chinese curse. No doubt about it, we live in interesting times. Hardly a day goes by that we’re not aghast and astounded by a series of grotesque caricatures of the world as at devolves towards vulgarity. Just this week, for instance, U.S. Representative Maxine Waters tweeted, “Get ready for impeachment.” Well, Maxine Waters is obviously right – impeaching the president is an urgent...
- Boosting Stock Market Returns With A Simple Trick
Systematic Trading Based on Statistics Trading methods based on statistics represent an unusual approach for many investors. Evaluation of a security's fundamental merits is not of concern, even though it can of course be done additionally. Rather, the only important criterion consists of typical price patterns determined by statistical examination of past trends. Fundamental considerations such as the valuation of stocks are not really relevant to the statistics-based trading...
- Searching for Truth
Heresy or Truth? RANCHO SANTANA, NICARAGUA – In the fifth century, Christian scholars counted 88 different heresies. Arianism. Eutychianism. Nestorianism. If there was a way to “offend” God, they had a name for it. One group of “heretics” argued that there was no such thing as “original sin.” Another denied the trinity. And another claimed Jesus was not divine. Which one had the truth? Depiction of the first Council of Ephesus in 431 AD, convened by Emperor...
- Why the 21st Century Sucks - Turtles All the Way Down
A Truly Sucky Century BALTIMORE – What an awful century! Worst we’ve ever seen. Household incomes are down. Employment is down, with 7 million people in the U.S. of working age without jobs. Productivity growth is down. GDP growth is down – to only about 0.5% per capita last year. Even life expectancies are down. Drug overdoses are up. Suicides are up. One out of every eight children lives in a family getting food stamps. One of out every eight adults takes psychoactive drugs...
- Gold and the Fed's Looming Rate Hike in March
Long Term Technical Backdrop Constructive After a challenging Q4 in 2016 in the context of rising bond yields and a stronger US dollar, gold seems to be getting its shine back in Q1. The technical picture is beginning to look a little more constructive and the “reflation trade”, spurred on further by expectations of higher infrastructure spending and tax cuts in the US, has thus far also benefited gold. From a technical perspective, there are indications that the low at $1045.40,...
- The Unstable Empire – A Campfire Tale
Campfire Tale Caesar: The Ides of March are come. Soothsayer: Ay, Caesar, but not gone. — Julius Caesar, Shakespeare GRANADA, NICARAGUA – Today, we stop the horses and circle the wagons. For 19 years, we have been rolling along, exploring, discovering. We began with the assumption that we didn’t “know” anything - so we kept our eyes open. Now we know even less. Famous people who knew nothing and were not shy to admit it: Sergeant Schultz...
- Off the Beaten Path in Mesoamerica
Greeted by Rooster There’s an endearing quality to a steadfast rooster call at the crack of dawn when overheard from a warm country farmhouse. There’s a reassuring charm that comes with the committed gallinaceous greeting of daybreak that’s particularly suited to a rural ambiance. The allure of a morning cock-a-doodle-doo somehow falls flat in all other settings. Good morning everyone! Before meteorological forecasts were available on TV and smart phones, people...
- Why Silver Went Down – Precious Metals Supply and Demand
Rumor-Mongering vs. Data The question on the lips of everyone who plans to exchange his metal for dollars—widely thought to be money—is why did silver go down? The price of silver in dollar terms dropped from about 18 bucks to about 17, or about 5 percent. Reportedly silver was already assassinated in the late 19th century... so last week they must have assassinated its corpse. [PT] Illustration taken from 'Coin's Financial School' The facile answer is...