Analysts Continue to Worry About Gold – Why?

As we remarked in a recent update, it is absolutely astonishing how much ink is being spilled on gold by mainstream analysts and the mainstream financial press since it has entered a downtrend. You'd think gold's 2013 downturn was the best thing since the invention of sliced bread, and there's almost nothing else worth talking about. Is it because they finally got something right about gold after being wrong for basically 12 years running? Yesterday we were once again greeted with a headline dedicated to gold at Marketwatch: “How low will gold go in 2014? Consensus forecast says down 14.5%”. The article fails to mention that 'consensus' opinions about markets almost always turn out to be wrong, but that is not what makes it so fascinating to us. Rather, we wonder why this is being repeated every day; after all, it's not as if we hadn't received the message over and over again by now. 

The always pragmatic Jeff Gundlach has recently advised investorsnot to sell their gold” and has been “scratching his head over the giddiness with which many analysts greet declines in gold. It’s just another asset, after all.”

We can possibly clear that question up for him. We believe that many analysts rightly suspect that if gold were to begin to rise again, then all the assets on which they are currently bullish and have recommended to their clients are likely to decline. However, the main problem is precisely that gold is not “just another asset”. Rather, as Bill Buckler, the editor of the 'Privateer' used to say, it is “the political metal”. Even Alan Greenspan understood that, in another life, long ago. In his famous essay on gold and economic freedom published in 1966, he stated that gold stands as a “protector of  property rights”:

 

“In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value. If there were, the government would have to make its holding illegal, as was done in the case of gold. If everyone decided, for example, to convert all his bank deposits to silver or copper or any other good, and thereafter declined to accept checks as payment for goods, bank deposits would lose their purchasing power and government-created bank credit would be worthless as a claim on goods. The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves.

This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists' tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights. If one grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists' antagonism toward the gold standard.”

 

(emphasis added)

Banks are members of a cartel that is in an intimate fascist embrace with the State. Officially, central banking has been introduced in order to be able to employ a 'scientific monetary policy' designed to 'avert depressions and the business cycle'.  This is without a doubt one of the most ridiculous excuses ever made up by rent-seeking parasites. Just consider that not long after it became operational, the Fed presided over one of the worst economic collapses in history, or consider that since its founding a century ago, the money of the United States has lost some 97% of its purchasing power, whereas its purchasing power remained largely unchanged over the preceding century. Is there any organization that has failed more spectacularly and completely to attain its official aims?

Of course the official explanation for establishing the banking cartel has nothing to do with the true reason, which is more in keeping with Alan Greenspan's interpretation. Essentially the central bank-led banking cartel is the result of an agreement between bankers and the State the aim of which was and remains to create revenue streams for both of them that are obtained by political rather than economic means. Thus the door was opened for applying the 'inflation tax', and in addition, a bailout mechanism was created which allows banks to inflate money and credit willy nilly without having fear bank runs when they have overextended themselves (which happens with unwavering regularity). That's it, in a nutshell. We should also point out that the idea that there can be a 'scientific monetary policy' is utter hokum. There may indeed be numerous economists who believe in this 'scientism' as Hayek referred to it, but that cannot alter the fact that central economic planning is unworkable and will always produce sub-optimal results, regardless of the intentions and abilities of the planners. The market cannot be successfully substituted by planning. 

Anyway, the etatiste mainstream's hatred of gold is therefore easily explained. Greenspan did it in the 1960s, and many others did it well before him. As Mises remarked regarding gold in the 'Theory of Money and Credit' in 1912:

 

“The excellence of the gold standard is to be seen in the fact that it renders the determination of the monetary units purchasing power independent of the policies of governments and political parties.”

[…]

The gold standard did not collapse. Governments abolished it in order to pave the way for inflation. The whole grim apparatus of oppression and coercion, policemen, customs guards, penal courts, prisons, in some countries even executioners, had to be put into action in order to destroy the gold standard.”

[…]

The classical or orthodox gold standard alone is a truly effective check on the power of the government to inflate the currency. Without such a check all other constitutional safeguards can be rendered vain.”

 

(emphasis added)

There is really not much more to say. The arguments forwarded by supporters of the fiat money system are nothing but elaborate sophistry.

 

Gold Stocks Still Acting Well

Meanwhile, after breaking out over a minor resistance level on Monday, the gold sector has continued to act fairly well. There has certainly been no spectacular advance yet, but the breakout was defended, in spite of gold itself weakening somewhat in the meantime:

 


 

HUI-dailyThe HUI has managed to establish a toehold above the initial line of resistance (blue dotted line) – if it manages to overcome the red secondary resistance line as well, it will greatly increase the probability of a bigger rally – click to enlarge.

 


 

Gold itself is struggling with its declining 50 day moving average, and will soon face stiff lateral resistance if it continues to rise. Trading volume is weak, which is likely reflecting a great deal of uncertainty. However, there still is an MACD buy signal operative, so the recent rally deserves the benefit of the doubt:

 


 

Gold, daily annotNear term support and resistance in gold. The 50 day moving average still provides resistance as well – click to enlarge.

 


 

The next chart shows the gold price in terms of the South African Rand. It has just reached a lateral resistance level and to us it looks quite likely that it will break through, as this is the third time it is tackling this resistance, and there are bullish divergences between price and momentum indicators in evidence:

 


 

Gold in RandGold in Rand terms. A breakout seems likely – click to enlarge.

 


 

If a breakout occurs in Rand-denominated gold, the dollar gold price is likely to follow suit. Obviously, such a breakout would be very good news for gold miners based in South Africa, most of which are marginal producers and therefore highly leveraged to the Rand gold price (HMY, DRD, AU and SBGL). Their share prices are quite depressed and have traditionally tended to be strong early on in rallies. In later stages of gold rallies, the Rand often strengthens and they cease to benefit from higher gold prices. So they are usually in a 'sweet spot' early on.

 

Gold and the 'Taper'

It is widely assumed that the Fed's 'QE' tapering must be bad for gold. In fact, most of the bearish mainstream analysis rests on this assumption. Superficially, this seems to make sense, as 'tapering' will slow down money supply growth. However, one must ask then: why did gold not rally during the vast money supply expansion on occasion of 'QE Inf'? And why should it decline upon tapering, when it declined already beforehand?

In reality, the tapering exercise is likely to prove bullish for gold and bearish for those assets that have recently benefited the most from 'QE' (i.e., risk assets like stocks and high yield bonds). Gold is a good asset to own when a liquidity crisis threatens, as it will almost immediately begin to discount the future measures central banks are likely to take to stem the crisis. To our mind there can be little doubt that 'QE tapering' will indeed eventually provoke a liquidity crisis, complete with a major deflation scare evidenced by a sizable decline in risk asset prices. Not to get overly technical about it, the market for one thing believes that 'QE' is helping stocks (based on the strong correlation to date), and secondly, rising asset prices will reverse course once the source of monetary inflation that drives their price appreciation dries up. Given that inflationary lending by commercial banks is nigh non-existent at present, 'QE' is that source.

 

A Blast from the Past

Many readers probably have come across this tidbit already, but for those who haven't, here is an interesting excerpt from an article published by the New York Times:

 

 

Two years ago gold bugs ran wild as the price of gold rose nearly six times. But since cresting two years ago it has steadily declined, almost by half, putting the gold bugs in flight.  The most recent advisory from a leading Wall Street firm suggests that the price will continue to drift downward, and may ultimately settle 40% below current levels.

 The rout says a lot about consumer confidence in the worldwide recovery. The sharply reduced rates of inflation combined with resurgence of other, more economically productive investments, such as stocks, real estate, and bank savings have combined to eliminate gold's allure.

 Although the American economy has reduced its rapid rate of recovery, it is still on a firm expansionary course. The fear that dominated two years ago has largely vanished, replaced by a recovery that has turned the gold speculators' dreams into a nightmare.”

 

(emphasis added)

This reads exactly like what much of the mainstream press has written about gold over the past several weeks. A more perfect reflection of the current conventional wisdom is hardly imaginable as Peter Schiff has pointed out.

There is only one problem – this article wasn't written today, or at anytime in the past few weeks. Rather, it appeared in the August 29, 1976 edition of The New York Times. Gold had just gone through a vicious correction, losing almost 50% of its value in a span of a little over 18 months. Unbeknown to the authors of the article, it had actually bottomed exactly four trading days before the article was published, and embarking on a rally that would eventually see it rise by nearly  800% from said low over the next three years.

The reason for mentioning this is not to assert that exactly the same thing is going to happen again these days – we don't know the future after all. It is merely meant to demonstrate how utterly misguided the conventional wisdom often is, especially in connection with financial assets. Every word of this article reflects today's conventional wisdom as much as it reflected the general opinion in 1976. If the NYT wants to publish an article about gold today, it actually doesn't even need to write anything new: it could simply copy/paste this 1976 article. No-one would notice.

 

Conclusion:

There are a number of good reasons why so many love to hate gold. We rather suspect though that this tends to cloud their judgment. They certainly have no better handle on the future than we do, and their forecasts need to be taken with a big grain of salt. Once there is such a broad consensus about a trend, the trend is usually close to reversing.

 

 

Charts by: StockCharts


 
 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 
 

 
 

Dear Readers!

It is that time of the year again – our semi-annual funding drive begins today. Give us a little hand in offsetting the costs of running this blog, as advertising revenue alone is insufficient. You can help us reach our modest funding goal by donating either via paypal or bitcoin. Those of you who have made a ton of money based on some of the things we have said in these pages (we actually made a few good calls lately!), please feel free to up your donations accordingly (we are sorry if you have followed one of our bad calls. This is of course your own fault). Other than that, we can only repeat that donations to this site are apt to secure many benefits. These range from sound sleep, to children including you in their songs, to the potential of obtaining privileges in the afterlife (the latter cannot be guaranteed, but it seems highly likely). As always, we are greatly honored by your readership and hope that our special mixture of entertainment and education is adding a little value to your life!

   

Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke

   
 

2 Responses to “The Mainstream Loves to Hate Gold”

  • Vess:

    Hey, I hate gold too. Hate to be invested in it, that is. Gold only preserves your capital – it doesn’t grow it. It’s not really an investment – it’s just money. It might be the safest form of money but keeping your money in the form of gold still means that you are just keeping your money; you aren’t investing your capital. Unfortunately, at the moment all possible investment opportunities seem incredibly risky and overvalued to me, which is why I am forced not to invest but to keep my money. I hate it, but I don’t have much of a choice.

    My own technical analysis suggests that the gold/dollar exchange rate has bottomed. (Strictly speaking, it bottomed in June the last year, but there was no way to determine it with sufficient confidence back then.) However, there is one thing that bothers me.

    The real interest rate is no longer negative. The yield of the 10-year Treasury is 2.827%, while the CPI is only 2.3458%. Yes, I know that the CPI is doctored to understate inflation and that it is a silly way of measuring inflation anyway – but that’s what everybody uses. If being invested in bonds provides a small but positive income after inflation why would one want to not be invested at all and keep their money (in gold or in any other form)? Historically, gold doesn’t fare well when the real interest rate is positive…

    • No6:

      I think we will have to wait until the Fed does a U turn and increases QE before Gold really takes off.
      Gold may fall a bit more yet but at least you can still get hold of physical. It won’t be long before that becomes very much more difficult.
      Once Gold does start to move I think a currency crisis will not be far away.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • factoryA Striking Chart
      The Economy and the Stock Market As long time readers know, we are always paying close attention to the manufacturing sector, which is far more important to the US economy than is generally believed. In terms of gross output it is the largest sector of the economy, and it should of course be obvious that saving, investment and production are the only ways to create wealth.   What's left of the Brooklyn Domino Sugar Refinery. Photo credit: Paul Raphaelson   Contrary...
  • trump-putin-1024Trump and Putin Narrowly Escape Assassination Attempt
      The Gloves are Coming Off First a little bit of recent history. Readers are probably aware that some questions about the occasionally malfunctioning Deep State android... no, wait, we'll start again. Questions have recently been raised about the health of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton by various “alt-right” tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy theorists, such as this one.   The monsters are normally hiding under Hillary's bed, but lately they have come out into the open...
  • swing-voterWhy the Fed Destroyed the Market Economy
      What Have You Done for Me Lately? Swing voters are a fickle bunch.  One election they vote Democrat.  The next they vote Republican. For they have no particular ideology or political philosophy to base their judgment upon.   The primacy of the wallet.   They don’t give a rip about questions of small government or big government.  Nor do they have any druthers about the welfare or warfare state. In effect, they really don’t care.  What’s important to the...
  • trump-mapDonald’s Electoral Struggle
      Wicked and Terrible After touting her pro-labor union record, the Wicked Witch of Chappaqua rhetorically asked, “why am I not 50 points ahead?”  Her chief rival bluntly responded: “because you’re terrible.”*  No truer words have been uttered by any of the candidates about one of their opponents since the start of this extraordinary presidential campaign!   Electoral map (note that the coloration may no longer be applicable...)   That Hillary Clinton is...
  • wallet-367975_960_720Janet Yellen’s Shame
      Playing Politics In honest capitalism, you do what you can to get other people to voluntarily give you money. This usually involves providing goods or services they think are worth the price. You may get a little wild and crazy from time to time, but you are always called to order by your customers.   In the market economy, consumers reign supreme. There is no such thing as a “lost” vote in the marketplace; every penny spent affects production. Mises noted: “Consumers...
  • warren-buffett-gold-coinGet Ready for a New Crisis – in Corporate Debt
      Imposter Dollar OUZILLY, France – We’re going back to basics here at the Diary. We’re getting everyone on the same page... learning together... connecting the dots... trying to figure out what is going on.   The new three dollar bill issued by the Apprehensive States of America.   We made a breakthrough when we identified the source of so many of today’s bizarre and grotesque trends. It’s the money – the new post-1971 dollar. This new dollar is green. You...
  • 4-ip-and-non-def-capital-goods-ordersThe Economy, the Stock Market and the Fed
      John Hussman on Recent Developments We always look forward to John Hussman's weekly missive on the markets. Some people say that he is a “permabear”, but we don't think that is a fair characterization. He is rightly wary of the stock market's historically extremely high valuation and the loose monetary policy driving the surge in asset prices.   The S&P 500 Index and the NYSE advance-decline line. Most market internals weakened steadily until early February 2016, but...
  • silkroadHanjin Marooning in San Pedro Bay
      Global Trade Reversal Expansions and contractions in global trade have played out over long secular trends for thousands of years.  The Silk Road, for example, was established by the Han Dynasty of China in 130 BC, and allowed for continuous trade between East and West for nearly 1,600 years.  In addition to economic trade, the Silk Road was also a conduit for culture and knowledge among its network of civilizations.   A map of the main ancient Silk Road - click to...
  • voltaireGreat Causes, a Sea of Debt and the 2017 Recession
      Great Cause NORMANDY, FRANCE – We continue our work with the bomb squad. Myth disposal is dangerous work: People love their myths more than they love life itself. They may kill for money. But they die for their religions, their governments, their clans... and their ideas.   Famous French hippie and author Voltaire. He wears the same sardonic grin in every painting, whether he's depicted at a young or an old age, doesn't matter. His real name was François-Marie Arouet; he...
  • wilsonand-morganThe Donald Versus Killary: War or Peace?
      War: A Warning from the Past Although history does not exactly repeat itself, it does provide parallels and sometimes quite ominous ones.  Such is the case with the current U.S. Presidential election and the one which occurred one hundred years earlier.   The Donald probably has the better slogan...   The dominating question which hung over the 1916 campaign was whether the country would remain neutral in regard to the horrific slaughter which was taking place on the...
  • hittite-leftoversA Rift in the Space-Time Continuum
      Weird and Unnatural NORMANDY, France – First, a quick look at the markets. The Dow bounced on Monday, recovering 239 points of the nearly 400 it lost on Friday. Why the comeback?   FOMC member Lael Brainard: her comments on Monday were touted as the “reason” for the stock market recovering half of Friday's losses. We suspect the real reason is the triple witching on Friday... Photo via twitter.com   The financial press has a ready answer: “Stocks gain...
  • ukraine-mapCrimea: Digging For The Truth
      Renewed Escalation This summer witnessed a renewed escalation between Russia and Ukraine after Russian President Vladimir Putin accused Ukraine of sending saboteurs to attack Russian troops, targeting “critical infrastructure”. Kiev denied the allegations and claimed Russia’s “fantasy” was nothing but a false pretense to launch a “new invasion”.   August 10: Russian president Putin announces that there was an altercation involving a group of Ukrainian saboteurs at...

Austrian Theory and Investment

Support Acting Man

Own physical gold and silver outside a bank

Archive

j9TJzzN

350x200

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com