Equity Fund Flows
Marketwatch recently reported a few interesting data points. The first one comes courtesy of Charles Biderman's TrimTabs, which keeps an eye on various gauges of market liquidity and other factors influencing supply and demand for stocks (such as buybacks). So far in 2013, retail investors have apparently put almost as much money into equity mutual funds as in 2000, which continues to be the record year for inflows (it was incidentally also one of the worst possible times ever to buy stocks). However, 2013 isn't over yet. So far this year, $277 billion have flowed into stock funds. There are interesting timing choices visible on the chart showing the monthly breakdown of these inflows. Apart from the record inflow in January, the biggest inflows have been recorded in July, September and October – pretty much at a time when prices were at their maximum distance from the 2009 low, ie. at the current cyclical bull market's beginning (at the time of the low, there were near record high outflows).
So far, 2013 is the biggest year for equity fund inflows since 2000. After nearly 5years of rising prices, retail investors are finally gathering up their courage …
In order to illustrate when retail investors think it safe and when it is decidedly unsafe to buy stocks, we have annotated a chart of the S&P 500 chart below:
The wall of cash into U.S.-listed mutual funds and ETFs (including those that invest overseas) has hit $277 billion, and that’s with just over two months to go in the year, according to TrimTabs Investment Research. That’s the most for one year since $324 billion for all of 2000, which of course is the year the last tech bubble burst.
About one-sixth of that money has been invested this month. TrimTabs says the net $45.5 billion through Oct. 25 is the fifth-highest monthly inflow on record. (The two biggest monthly numbers also came this year: $66.3 billion in January and $55.3 billion in July).”
Consider the following: The SPX only bottomed in March of 2009 – mainly because bank stocks and other financial stocks got clobbered after having been artificially supported by a shorting ban during the 2008 down wave for a little while. Investors at that point realized that the banking system was essentially insolvent, and the Fed's interventions had not yet been supplemented with what proved to be the decisive game changer: a legal method allowing the banks to pretend that they were actually fine, which came with the suspension of mark-to-market accounting in April of 2009.
However, the types of stocks that normally capture the imagination of traders the most, namely big cap technology stocks, had mostly bottomed in 2008 already – right at the point when equity mutual fund outflows reached their record highs.
For instance, in the month when retail investors really bailed out en masse, Amazon was selling below $40. Today, when they deem it safe to wade back in, it is selling at $360. Google was trading at $250 when outflows reached their peak. Now it trades north of $1,000. PCLN was selling for less than $50 at the peak of the outflows in late 2008 – it can be bought for the bargain price of $1,070 today.
There is no need to show all the charts, so we will only present the most egregious one (of a travel agency…which actually has us shaking our head in disbelief)- it should suffice to get the drift.
We actually suspect that these fund inflows are going to grow further and that 2013 will become the record year for equity fund inflows before it is over. We are also bound to see a few more displays of post IPO trading related insanity, especially with the much anticipated Twitter IPO coming soon.
One reason to believe that inflows will continue to grow – barring a surprise financial accident – is that the broad US money supply TMS-2 has grown so much over the past few years that it seems pretty certain that retail investors are going to be tempted to shift some more of the money they have still parked in savings accounts (and earning almost no interest) into equity mutual funds. Of course it must be remembered that the amount of deposit money outstanding does not change on account of such transactions – there is no such thing as 'money on the sidelines' – when retail investors are buying, someone else must be selling to them.
It is a good bet that this 'someone else' is better informed than they are, but it is unknowable at this point when exactly the distribution phase will be over.
Valuation and Corporate Debt
Another tidbit of information that caught our eye can be found in a recent article by Brett Arends, also at Marketwatch. Apart from pointing out that perennial bears like Nouriel Roubini and David Rosenberg have turned bullish, he makes a few interesting points about valuations and corporate debt. In terms of at least one measure of valuation, this is now the second most expensive market ever – the only exception, once again, is the valuation peak of the year 2000. The measure is the combined value of corporate equity plus debt net of cash divided by revenues. In other words, the enterprise value to sales ratio. This what the chart looks like:
Ratio of enterprise values to sales. The highest value ever, except for the 2000 mania peak
Can this measure become more extreme? Sure it can. Does it make sense to buy at such valuations? Not if your time horizon is measured in years rather than in days, weeks or months. Note that with CAPE (Shiller P/E) at about 24, or 50% above its long term average and close to several well known historical peaks (again, the main exception is, you guessed it, the top of the 2000 mania), long term return prospects are likely terrible. The market's value relative to the cost of asset replacement (known as Tobin's Q) is also 50% above its long term average. Note that 'long term average' values are a good distance above the valuations seen at secular bear market lows. Once the market turns, it is not likely that it will simply revert to the mean – it is probably going to revert to the other extreme (possibly by a combination of price adjustments and rising earnings, which would be the optimistic case).
Lastly, we found this remark on corporate debt noteworthy. Arends writes:
“In some ways, the outlook may be even worse than it was in the late 1990s. That’s because there is one enormous difference between then and now. Debt.
The plunge in interest rates that prevailed from 2009 through 2012 sparked a tsunami of new bonds as corporations rushed to borrow. In the past three years, non-financial corporations have borrowed more than $1 trillion, taking their total liabilities above $14 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve. To put that in context, they now owe more than twice as much as they did when Greenspan issued his famous warning in 1996. They have used some of that money to buy back stocks, reducing their overall share count (until they issue new stock to their honchos, of course).”
We already mentioned in the context of the rise in margin debt that increasing debt actually helps stocks on the way up – it is the same with this increase in corporate debt, to the extent that the funds are invested in buybacks. The problems inherent in amassing such huge debt loads only become acute when the cycle turns – then unproductive debt tends to propel a vicious cycle.
Mr Arends also helpfully mentions that “the claim that everybody hates this market is total nonsense”, supporting his view with the mutual fund flow data we discuss above. He is actually saying something quite funny in this context:
“There is an enduring myth out there that “everybody hates this bull market.” If that were true, naturally it would be a bullish indicator, as it would imply there were a lot more people to jump on board.
But it’s not true. It is based on a fundamental misreading of the Internet. Every time someone wants to say that everyone hates this bull market, he links to a few bearish commentators. But thanks to the Internet, any and every opinion is “out there” somewhere. I can find flat-earthers, Aryan Nation nuts, people who think the moon is made of cheese, people who are bullish, people who are bearish, and people who think the universe is about to be swallowed by a giant space frog.
What really matters is not what someone somewhere can be found saying, but what the majority of investors are actually doing. According to the Investment Company Institute, the mutual fund industry’s trade group, John and Jane Q. Public are bullish, not bearish.”
We leave you with two weekly charts of the NYSE index (NYA) and the Nasdaq composite (COMPQ), with their recent price/summation index divergences highlighted. It is also worth noting that the Nasdaq's weekly RSI is approaching the 80 level (it is at 76.08), which is a fairly rare occurrence (but it does not constitute a divergence). As our friend B.A. has pointed out to us, similar breadth divergences were also in evidence in 2007, and at the time, the initial appearance of these divergences did not immediately result in a price peak being recorded.
Instead the market corrected briefly and then surged again, producing another set of price/breadth divergences in the process. It has just done the same thing again, but we would note that there is a big difference in the monetary backdrop: in 2007, money TMS-2 growth had declined to about 2.4% year-on-year, while it is currently around 8% (not as brisk as one would expect in view of $85 billion in 'QE' per month, but recently actually re-accelerating a bit).
So there is reason to suspect that the various extremes we have documented in these pages will be eclipsed by even greater extremes unless some unexpected left-of-field event shatters the current complacency. However, keep in mind that we are not dealing with certainties here, either way. For instance, the market sometimes discounts future monetary developments in advance (as e.g. happened in 1995 when it foresaw accelerated money and credit growth). So the possibility that the recent proliferation of warning signs will suffice to produce a turning point cannot be dismissed. As we have previously pointed out, the only thing that is certain is that risk is currently very high.
NYA and NYSI are diverging … – click to enlarge.
And so are Nasdaq Composite and NASI, with the weekly RSI at an overly generous 76 – click to enlarge.
We'll go eat some moon-cheese, and then we'll grab a few gold coins and look for a place to hide from the giant space-frog that is about to swallow the universe.
Charts by BigCharts, StockCharts, Marketwatch / TrimTabs, Marketwatch / FactSet
It is that time of the year again – our semi-annual funding drive begins today. Give us a little hand in offsetting the costs of running this blog, as advertising revenue alone is insufficient. You can help us reach our modest funding goal by donating either via paypal or bitcoin. Those of you who have made a ton of money based on some of the things we have said in these pages (we actually made a few good calls lately!), please feel free to up your donations accordingly (we are sorry if you have followed one of our bad calls. This is of course your own fault). Other than that, we can only repeat that donations to this site are apt to secure many benefits. These range from sound sleep, to children including you in their songs, to the potential of obtaining privileges in the afterlife (the latter cannot be guaranteed, but it seems highly likely). As always, we are greatly honored by your readership and hope that our special mixture of entertainment and education is adding a little value to your life!
Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke
3 Responses to “Party Like It’s 2000 – Before the Giant Space-Frog Strikes”
Most read in the last 20 days:
- A Striking Chart
The Economy and the Stock Market As long time readers know, we are always paying close attention to the manufacturing sector, which is far more important to the US economy than is generally believed. In terms of gross output it is the largest sector of the economy, and it should of course be obvious that saving, investment and production are the only ways to create wealth. What's left of the Brooklyn Domino Sugar Refinery. Photo credit: Paul Raphaelson Contrary...
- Trump and Putin Narrowly Escape Assassination Attempt
The Gloves are Coming Off First a little bit of recent history. Readers are probably aware that some questions about the occasionally malfunctioning Deep State android... no, wait, we'll start again. Questions have recently been raised about the health of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton by various “alt-right” tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy theorists, such as this one. The monsters are normally hiding under Hillary's bed, but lately they have come out into the open...
- US Economy - Curious Pattern in ISM Readings
Head Fake Theory Confirmed? This is a brief update on our last overview of economic data. Although we briefly discussed employment as well, the overview was as usual mainly focused on manufacturing, which is the largest sector of the economy by gross output. Pepsi factory in Baltimore, 1956 Photo via pinterest.com Readers may recall that we have pointed out for some time that there was quite a large gap between the data reported in regional Fed manufacturing...
- Why the Fed Destroyed the Market Economy
What Have You Done for Me Lately? Swing voters are a fickle bunch. One election they vote Democrat. The next they vote Republican. For they have no particular ideology or political philosophy to base their judgment upon. The primacy of the wallet. They don’t give a rip about questions of small government or big government. Nor do they have any druthers about the welfare or warfare state. In effect, they really don’t care. What’s important to the...
- How is Real Wealth Created?
An Abrupt Drop Let’s turn back to our regular beat: the U.S. economy and its capital markets. We’ve been warning that the Fed would never make any substantial increase to interest rates. Not willingly, at least. Groping in the dark, Yellen-style Each time Fed chief Janet Yellen opens her mouth, out comes a hint that more rate hikes might be coming. But each time, it turns out that the economy is not as robust as she had believed... and that a rate hike isn’t...
- Janet Yellen’s Shame
Playing Politics In honest capitalism, you do what you can to get other people to voluntarily give you money. This usually involves providing goods or services they think are worth the price. You may get a little wild and crazy from time to time, but you are always called to order by your customers. In the market economy, consumers reign supreme. There is no such thing as a “lost” vote in the marketplace; every penny spent affects production. Mises noted: “Consumers...
- Get Ready for a New Crisis – in Corporate Debt
Imposter Dollar OUZILLY, France – We’re going back to basics here at the Diary. We’re getting everyone on the same page... learning together... connecting the dots... trying to figure out what is going on. The new three dollar bill issued by the Apprehensive States of America. We made a breakthrough when we identified the source of so many of today’s bizarre and grotesque trends. It’s the money – the new post-1971 dollar. This new dollar is green. You...
- The Economy, the Stock Market and the Fed
John Hussman on Recent Developments We always look forward to John Hussman's weekly missive on the markets. Some people say that he is a “permabear”, but we don't think that is a fair characterization. He is rightly wary of the stock market's historically extremely high valuation and the loose monetary policy driving the surge in asset prices. The S&P 500 Index and the NYSE advance-decline line. Most market internals weakened steadily until early February 2016, but...
- Hanjin Marooning in San Pedro Bay
Global Trade Reversal Expansions and contractions in global trade have played out over long secular trends for thousands of years. The Silk Road, for example, was established by the Han Dynasty of China in 130 BC, and allowed for continuous trade between East and West for nearly 1,600 years. In addition to economic trade, the Silk Road was also a conduit for culture and knowledge among its network of civilizations. A map of the main ancient Silk Road - click to...
- Great Causes, a Sea of Debt and the 2017 Recession
Great Cause NORMANDY, FRANCE – We continue our work with the bomb squad. Myth disposal is dangerous work: People love their myths more than they love life itself. They may kill for money. But they die for their religions, their governments, their clans... and their ideas. Famous French hippie and author Voltaire. He wears the same sardonic grin in every painting, whether he's depicted at a young or an old age, doesn't matter. His real name was François-Marie Arouet; he...
- The Donald Versus Killary: War or Peace?
War: A Warning from the Past Although history does not exactly repeat itself, it does provide parallels and sometimes quite ominous ones. Such is the case with the current U.S. Presidential election and the one which occurred one hundred years earlier. The Donald probably has the better slogan... The dominating question which hung over the 1916 campaign was whether the country would remain neutral in regard to the horrific slaughter which was taking place on the...
- A Rift in the Space-Time Continuum
Weird and Unnatural NORMANDY, France – First, a quick look at the markets. The Dow bounced on Monday, recovering 239 points of the nearly 400 it lost on Friday. Why the comeback? FOMC member Lael Brainard: her comments on Monday were touted as the “reason” for the stock market recovering half of Friday's losses. We suspect the real reason is the triple witching on Friday... Photo via twitter.com The financial press has a ready answer: “Stocks gain...