Mrs. Merkel's CDU/CSU Trounces Rivals
Political scientists in Germany call it the '' – as German news magazine Der Spiegel writes:
“Germans like their quiet. Should a couple raise their voices such that they can be heard in the courtyard of a city apartment building, it is a sure bet that before long, the phrase "Ruhe da!" ("Quiet!") will come ringing out of an open window. Even in big metropolises like Berlin, most flat seekers yearn for silence and tranquility, far removed from the chaotic noise emanating from the busy streets.
Angela Merkel, more than any other politician on the campaign trail this year, has understood her flock's desire for calm.
The chancellor has even gone so far as to directly appeal to the electorate's longing for quiet. As Reuters correspondent Alexandra Hudson noted in a recent article, the election manifesto for Merkel's party includes the assertion: "One in two Germans feels troubled by noise" and suggests that her party would seek to improve the situation.
[…] a chancellor who prefers to wait before making decisions and a leader who is sometimes difficult to pin down. It has also helped propel her popularity to dizzying heights. Her followers have taken to affectionately calling her "Angie." The German press has dubbed her "Mutti," the word children in Germany use to address their mothers.”
Not even the Economist managed to derail Merkel with its recent cover promising 'One Merkel Rule' for all of Europe:
In spite of its well-earned and powerful reputation as a reliable contrary indicator, not even the Economist was able to derail Mrs. Merkel with this cover story
Angela Merkel delivered the biggest victory for her party since Helmuth Kohl's post-reunification heyday, and only barely missed attaining an absolute majority of parliamentary seats (although her party only gathered 42% of the vote, up a respectable 8.2% from the last election according to initial estimates, parties that fail to take the 5% hurdle won't get any seats).
And herein lies the problem. You may be wondering why we are claiming that 'socialism was the real winner', given that a nominally conservative party clearly won the election. We explain the reason below.
Sole Voice in Favor of Free Market Capitalism Gone
It would be an exaggeration to equate the FDP with classical liberalism, but as far as German politics goes, it is the party that comes closest to its ideals. It definitely was the sole advocate of free market capitalism in the German political landscape. While it has always been a small party, it was a famed 'kingmaker' through most of the post WW 2 era, managing to influence both social democratic and nominally conservative governments by entering into coalitions with them.
For the first time in the post war period, the FDP failed to garner enough votes to climb above the 5 percent hurdle mentioned above and so won't even be in opposition in parliament. In fact, the result attained by the anti-euro party AfD was slightly better than that of the FDP, which lost more than two thirds of its electoral support. Here are the initial estimates by Germany's two large public broadcasters regarding the distribution of votes:
Both the conservatives and the social democrats gain, the FDP crashes into oblivion, the AfD proves to be the biggest force in terms of new parties, but fails to cross the 5% hurdle as well – click to enlarge.
Although the socialist party gained about 3%, leftist-authoritarian movements overall have lost some support, as the Greens and 'Die Linke' ('the Left', the 'democratic' successor party of the former communist East German SED) have together lost more than the SPD gained.
And yet, the new parliament will now consist only of leftists parties and the nominally conservative bloc. We say 'nominally', because Germany's conservatives are really a left-wing party too, at least from our perspective. What does one call a party that recently came out in favor of minimum wages in spite of their well-known destructive economic effects? There is therefore a very good chance that a grand coalition with the SPD will be the result of this election outcome, although the latter is allegedly extremely reluctant. It is rightly fearing that as the junior partner in such a coalition, it will lose support (the FDP's fate is a stark warning in this respect). On the other hand, the SPD has always ruled out a coalition with 'Die Linke', since that would likely prove even more poisonous for it, and it does crave power. The main alternative to a grand coalition will be new elections.
The Historic Role of Free Market Capitalism in Germany
It should be noted though that not only has the FDP hit the skids, but the parties of the left have together still garnered a larger percentage of the vote than the conservatives. So what does Germany's relationship with the free market actually consist of? The best analysis is still the one written by the late Professor Hans Sennholz in the 1960's:
“[…]it may come as a shock to libertarians to learn that the "miracle" of Germany's revival was not the result of a conscious rejection of socialism, but was rather an accident of political and social conditions. There is evidence, too, that the current market economy of Germany is in grave danger of being destroyed by the very people who built it up.
In 1947, when millions of Germans were starving and living in incredible poverty, and when the full threat of the Morgenthau Plan was upon it, there certainly was no general demand for the free market. Rather, the popular majority was for what its principal advocate, a socialist party leader by the name of Dr. Agartz, called the "new kind of socialism." This called for the ownership and operation of the tools of production by workers under the supervision of government. It amounted to politically controlled producers' cooperatives.
But economic control is not possible without political power, and the "new kind of socialism" had to be deferred. Throughout the postwar period the German political parties concentrated on attacking the occupation powers for the severity of their controls. To libertarians in this country the German call for freedom sounded like a demand for a free market. This was not so. What most Germans meant by freedom was liberation from foreign occupation and, above all, freedom to impose their own controls.”
As Professor Sennholz noted, resistance against the occupation automatically meant resistance to American New Deal policies and British socialism. So the extent to which a free market was adopted was for one thing out of sheer necessity – there was 'nothing left for the socialists to redistribute or ration' after the war – and for another due to resistance to the political philosophy embodied by the occupying forces, which at the time was thoroughly socialistic. As a result of the success of the market economy, Sennholz noted that classical liberal thought finally managed to get a little bit of recognition in Germany. We wonder what he would have said about today's Germany?
“Professor Wilhelm Röpke of Geneva became the intellectual spokesman of the new era. It was mainly through him that the German public became aware of the fundamental changes of policy. His interpretation of the economic comeback as the inevitable outcome of capitalist policies found increasing acceptance. Today there exists a German school of political and economic thought for freedom and free enterprise which has its roots in the writings of Professors Röpke, Eucken and others.”
However, readers will surely be surprised to learn how Professor Sennholz characterized Ludwig Erhard, the father of the so-called 'social market economy', who is today widely regarded as a paragon of the free market. As Sennholz wrote:
“Secretary of Economy, Ludwig Erhard, the world famous inventor of "Professor Erhard's social market economy," is about to introduce a new economic bill of his liking, one that would give him power to regulate prices wherever he deems them "unreasonable." The bill is to replace a similar provision in the German Police Order which the Bundestag recently revoked against the ardent opposition of Professor Erhard. This brilliant politician, who certainly is no champion of capitalism, stubbornly clings to foreign exchange control, the most formidable means of government control over the economy.
It appears logical to Professor Erhard to threaten businessmen with severe penalties for "unjustified" price increases and simultaneously to raise the price of agricultural products by way of government restrictions on imports.”
In short, even the conservative politician whom most Germans would today regard as a supporter of the free market par excellence was in reality 'no champion of capitalism'. The same holds for the conservative party as a whole, especially its modern-day incarnation.
This is why we say, the real winner of Germany's election is socialism. We can expect the EU 'centralization and harmonization' project to be pursued with fresh vigor, and both the regimentation of the economy and taxation are set to continue to increase across Europe – presumably until there is once again 'nothing left to redistribute or ration'.
Chart by: Der Spiegel
We are happy to report that our funding target has been reached – once again, a hearty thank you to all contributors, your support is greatly appreciated!
As a result of us having gotten from A to B, the annoying graphic is hereby retired. However, be aware that the donations button continues to exist. It is actually perfectly legitimate to use it during the non-funding season as well; assorted advantages we have listed that often result from doing so are likewise persistent (i.e., increased happiness, children including you in their songs, potential obtaining of privileges in the hereafter, etc., etc.). Unfortunately we can't promise that it will make the gold price go up, but we're working on that.
Thank you for your support!
To donate Bitcoins, use this address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke
One Response to “Germany Elects Mama – The Real Winner is Socialism”
Most read in the last 20 days:
- The Baby Boomer Survival Guide (Part I)
The Yellow Machines Go Silent PARIS – What should you do if you are running out of time and money? This is the question we get from readers over 50… over 60… and sometimes over 70. We baby boomers were famously “na… na… na… live for today.” Now, it’s tomorrow. And many of us – often through no fault of our own – are having trouble making ends meet. At the Diary, we write about the world of money. About economic policy and how it affects you. But what if,...
- Refugee Crisis Blowback
A Sharp Turn in Swedish Politics When we recently discussed Europe's refugee crisis, we mentioned that a sizable political backlash was to be expected and that unfortunately, extreme nationalist parties were likely to be among the main beneficiaries. We also mentioned the situation of Sweden, where the mainstream political parties in an ongoing fit of political correctness bordering on lunacy have apparently decided to transform Sweden into a province of Mesopotamia. Leader of...
- Tell us Ron, What's the Plan, What's the “Austrian” Plan?
What? No Austrian Prescription? Bloomberg Reporters Cannot Believe It This is truly funny. Ahead of the FOMC decision, Ron Paul, who is well-known as an an implacable critic and enemy of the Fed and a fan of the Austrian School of Economics, was interviewed at Bloomberg as to “what the Fed should do”. What makes it so funny is that the Bloomberg reporters seemingly cannot believe that Austrian economists simply have no “prescriptions” for the Fed. They keep pushing Ron Paul for...
- US Stock Market: A Retest or Worse?
Gray Swans and Black Swans By Monday's close, the S&P 500 Index was closing in on the low established in the August swoon – such a retest was essentially our minimum expectation, as V-shaped rebounds are very rare. The question is now whether it will only be a retest, or if something worse is in the offing. No-one knows for sure of course, but we'll briefly discuss what we are looking at in this context. Image via NYTimes It is interesting that as the market...
- Climate Fanatics Run Into Public Relations Snag
Scientists Turn into Stalinists Last week, we happened to stumble across a press report about a group of climate scientists so eager to shut up their critics that they want to employ the State's police, courts and jailers for the purpose. Specifically, a group of academic (and presumably tenured) climate alarmists supporting the “CAWG” theory (CAWG=”catastrophic anthropogenic global warming”) have written a letter to president Obama, attorney-general Lynch and OSTP director...
- The Baby Boomer Survival Guide (Part II)
A Lehman Moment for Commodities? LONDON – Today, we continue our philosophical look at what you should do if you are running out of time and money. (You can catch up on Part I here.) Where do we begin? With how to add wealth? Or how to lose it? The way to lose it is simple. You buy something that is not worth the money you paid for it. You are instantly poorer, whether you know it or not. The pleasingly plump. Illustration by jdeer69 DJIA, daily...
- Swiss Parliament Shoots Down Socialist Utopia
No “Unconditional Basic Income” Similar to the minimum wage initiative pursued by Geneva-based socialists (which was rejected in a referendum - see “The Swiss Remain Sane” for details), another Utopian socialist dream has just floundered in Switzerland. As the European press reports, this time parliament has shot down a radical proposal forwarded by Socialist Party representative Andreas Gross. Photo via anti-kapitalismus.org Gross wanted the State to pay...