Apoplectic Ambrose Evans-Pritchard Sings from IMF Hymn Sheet

AEP, who thinks central banks should print us all to Nirvana lest the dreaded deflationary depression sinks our ship, is lately firmly in the grip of tapering paranoia (this is not a recognized clinical condition yet; give it time). First he feared publicly for emerging markets, several of which are on the cusp of balance of payments crises. Let's see: when the Fed's printing seemed to feed imbalances there, a consensus emerged that this was one of the negative effects these countries could do without. They themselves kept saying so, but their tune has of course changed in the meantime (even former vocal 'QE' critic China now 'warns' the Fed not to release the print button too soon).

Now AEP reports on the latest IMF report on the euro area, which kind of blames US 'QE' tapering in advance for the next round of expected problems there. If the IMF says so, it must be true, right?

 

“The report warned that the onset of a new tightening cycle in the UShad already led to major spill-over effects in the eurozone, pushing up bond yields across the board.

Early tapering by the Fed "could lead to additional, and unhelpful, pro-cyclical increases in borrowing costs within the euro area. This could further complicate the conduct of monetary policy and potentially damage area-wide demand and growth. Financial market stresses could also quickly reignite," it said.

The Fund said the European Central Bank must take countervailing action to prevent "a vicious circle setting in," ideally by cutting interests, introducing a negative deposit rate, and purchasing a targeted range of private assets.

It should launch "credit-easing" policies to alleviate the deepening lending crunch in Spain, Italy, and Portugal, where borrowing costs for firms are 200 to 300 basis points higher than in Germany, with small businesses struggling to raise any money at all. The IMF said the more the Fed tightens in the US, the more the European authorities need to offset this with other forms of stimulus.”

 

(emphasis added

Since AEP is wedded to Anglo-Saxon central banking socialism, he presumably approves of this sort of advice. He expresses worries about the growth rate of euro area M3, but the true money supply in the euro area has recently grown by 8% year-on-year, so money has been created at quite a fast clip over the past year.

Anyway, we tend to think that ignoring the economic analysis and advice issuing from the IMF is almost a duty. AEP further on the IMF report:

 

“There is a high risk of stagnation, especially in the periphery. Such an outcome could push the periphery toward a debt-deflation spiral," it said.

The report said that it may take years to unwind the colossal credit boom of the early EMU years. "Historically, almost all of the run-up in household debt tends to be reversed. But in the euro area, the reduction in debt-to-GDP ratios has barely started, and the boom was more pronounced.”

 

(emphasis added)

Someone should tell these people that one cannot have it both ways. Either there is going to be 'debt deleveraging', or not. Their recommendations all aim at keeping the unsound credit created during the 'colossal credit boom' well supported into eternity.

 

Carmen Reinhart: Getting Back Into the Good Graces of Statists

Carmen Reinhart at Harvard (she used to be the IMF's chief economist once, and therefore possesses essential establishment credentials galore) recently had a very public spat with Paul Krugman over a paper she co-wrote with Kenneth Rogoff on sovereign debt and the ways in which it impedes economic growth once it grows too large. Since Mr. Krugman wants the government to increase its deficit spending almost regardless of how high this spending already is (unless the president is a Republican, in which case deficit spending is bad and verging on 'fiscal insanity'), he relished the opportunity to lay into the paper and its authors following the discovery of a few spreadsheet errors.

The entire spat revolved around an utterly irrelevant question, since matters concerning economic theory cannot possibly be settled by invoking statistics. The proper question was always 'what does economic theory have to say on the topic', and not 'what do the statistics of economic history say'. That a number of world-famous and widely respected economists have skirted this essential aspect of the debate only confirms in what a cul-de-sac most of modern mainstream economics finds itself in.

Anyway, Mrs. Reinhart is sure to win over étatistes of all stripes with her latest admonishment to the Fed, which can be summarized as: keep printing!

 

“The Fed should continue with its current quantitative-easing program, given the prolonged US deleveraging cycle and downside risks to inflation and growth, warns Carmen Reinhart, economics professor at Harvard, as fears grow that the tapering of bond purchases, expected in September, will deepen the sell-off in emerging markets.

The Fed risks a substantial policy mistake if, as markets expect, it begins to taper its asset-purchase program in September, warns Carmen Reinhart – economics professor at Harvard and one of the world’s leading experts on debt cycles – citing the stubborn disrepair of US household and fiscal balance sheets, and headwinds to growth.

[…]

In an interview with Euromoney, Reinhart warns: “We still have a great degree of deleveraging to endure in the US, and the issues around the world, particularly in Europe, are far from resolved.” Asked about the relative emphasis of employment versus price stability in the Fed’s dual mandate, Reinhart says these objectives were “nowhere near conflict”. “At some point the Fed’s policy mandate will force it to consider a trade-off but I don’t see that yet,” she says. “Cyclically right now, where is the inflation?”

[…]

“Right now, a withdrawal of stimulus would be premature. Where you have weak inflation and poor unemployment, even though we have seen better economic news recently, you have a tepid recovery. “And in the area where the Fed has chosen to help, such as the housing, there has been a bit of a recovery but the Case-Shiller index [a benchmark gauge for US house prices] is still below its peak, so we are not there in terms of recovery.”

Asked whether the Fed should take into account the prospect of financial bubbles, triggered by its loose stance, in its policy calculations, Reinhart says there is no precedent of the US central bank conceiving of its mandate outside the objectives of employment and price stability. “Because of the recent crisis, people are understandably more bubble-conscious than before,” she says. “There is a consensus that the Fed should continue to focus on growth and employment as its target, and it does not have a history of pricking bubbles. I don’t see why this should be changed.”

 

(emphasis added)

 

The list of Fed 'policy mistakes' is longer than Methuselah's beard, that much is absolutely certain, but easing off the monetary gas pedal has never been one of them.

The inflation Mrs. Reinhart cannot see is right here:

 


 

US-TMS-2-since-2008US broad money supply TMS-2 since 2008 – via St. Louis Federal Reserve Research – click to enlarge.

 


 
We are of course aware that she is referring to the CPI, an indicator that purports to 'measure' one of the many effects of inflation, in this case on consumer goods prices in the aggregate. Apart from the impossibility of such a measurement, the biggest problem with this semantic confusion between inflation and its effects is that people keep talking about things that simply do not matter much in this context.

It cannot be said with any certainty how long it will take for CPI to show a concerning rise in prices. All one can be reasonably sure about in this respect is that considering the way in which it is calculated these days, the lag time is likely to be even longer than usual. However, it can be apodictically stated that monetary inflation has already influenced prices in the economy and in the process distorted relative prices. That is actually the crux of the problem.

So housing prices are still below their bubble peak and that is a problem? They are definitely well out of the reach of most first time buyers even so, as nearly every real estate expert will readily confirm. Why should the peak prices of an unsustainable bubble be the standard by which Mrs. Reinhart judges whether prices are at the 'right level'? We will only be 'there in terms of recovery' when the most extreme bubble prices for residential real estate in US history are reached once again? This is a truly bizarre thing to say.

Yes, it is true: the Fed has no history of pricking bubbles, except by mistake. It does however have a history of blowing them. That is not part of its mandate either, and yet it is doing it incessantly since it has been founded. Ultimately the idea that a handful of central planners should decide what the proper interest rate and proper height of the money supply for the economy should be is utterly preposterous.

In fact, it is  just as preposterous as Mrs. Reinhart's contention that she knows the 'right price' for houses. The planners and their apologists may well believe that they know better than the markets, but this idea flies into the face of sound economics.  The history of central banks specifically is a history of constant failure, at least from the point of view of the common man. The tiny group of special interests that actually profits from inflationary policy probably thinks otherwise, but no wider societal benefit can possibly accrue from it.

 


 

c.reinhartCarmen Reinhart shows us how high house prices need to be

(Photo via Yale News)

 


 

 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 


 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 12vB2LeWQNjWh59tyfWw23ySqJ9kTfJifA

   
 

3 Responses to “Tapering Paranoia: Print On, Dudes!”

  • ManAboutDallas:

    It’s definitely The End Of The Word As We Know It ( TEOTWAWKI ) when photos of Harvard professors have to come from “Yale News”.

  • Crysangle:

    AEP used to come in at an original angle many times and at least present ideas out of the ordinary , but he seems to have slowly taken on the mantra of monetary expansion – monetary expansion has been suggested for decades … do we need to hear another person repeat the idea ? I wonder if those that are able to judge what is coming down the pike are simply looking to protect their buts … during a financial crash it might always be argued that more printing was necessary , and commentators should know that even the FED will have its own self imposed limits (they are not looking for a political chaos for example) . I have noticed this with other economics writers too , there is always the gentle persuasion of a little inflation , a little printing , a little balance sheet repair and so on , and unfortunately when events become tight they end up voting for outright monetization . I expect that would be because the concept of an ‘uncontrolled’ monetary system is probably seen as some form of heresy that would question the foundations of the world as they understand it – and so it should . The alternative is to hope to satisfy the population with acceptable minimums of wealth … and hope that they don’t question the foundations of the world as they understand it . Personally I think the first choice is wiser but it also means conceding an introspective loss of power and wealth by those that benefit most from the current equation… a question of pride maybe , or greed .

    IMF : “But in the euro area, the reduction in debt-to-GDP ratios has barely started, and the boom was more pronounced.”

    They are interested in the ratio . The reduction in debt has not occurred because they insist on trying to prop up GDP via deficit while trying to extend and support debt levels . When GDP reduces to its true value there will be an increase in debt-to-GDP , then there will be write-offs on debt , the economies will re-adapt somehow and only when GDP increases again under stricter borrowing conditions or a different monetary framework will debt shrink by comparison. In the meantime it gives the politicians something to talk about and numbers to dress , and an excuse to reshape their countries (or not) according to some idea that no one has talked about yet because peace in Europe is at stake . I should think they rather appreciate their populations being tight on the hook – keeps them attentive and coming back for more .

  • FreemonSandlewould:

    True story: A friend of mine rented a flat in Washington DC from Ambrose. His impression was that the guy was a priggish twart.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • America Goes Full Imbecile
      Credit has a wicked way of magnifying a person’s defects.  Even the most cautious man, with unlimited credit, can make mistakes that in retrospect seem absurd.  But an average man, with unlimited credit, is preeminently disposed to going full imbecile.   Let us not forget about this important skill...  [PT]   Several weeks ago we came across a woeful tale of Mike Meru.  Somehow, this special fellow, while of apparent sound mine and worthy intent, racked up...
  • Retail Capitulation – Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Small Crowds, Shrinking Premiums The prices of gold and silver rose five bucks and 37 cents respectively last week. Is this the blast off to da moon for the silver rocket of halcyon days, in other words 2010-2011?   Various gold bars. Coin and bar premiums have been shrinking steadily (as have coin sales of the US Mint by the way), a sign that retail investors have lost interest in gold. There are even more signs of this actually, and this loss of interest stands in stark...
  • Credit Spreads: Polly is Twitching Again - in Europe
      Junk Bond Spread Breakout The famous dead parrot is coming back to life... in an unexpected place. With its QE operations, which included inter alia corporate bonds, the ECB has managed to suppress credit spreads in Europe to truly ludicrous levels. From there, the effect propagated through arbitrage to other developed markets. And yes, this does “support the economy” - mainly by triggering an avalanche of capital malinvestment and creating the associated boom conditions, while...
  • Gold Divergences Emerge
      Bad Hair Day Produces Positive Divergences On Friday the ongoing trade dispute between the US and China was apparently escalated by a notch to the next level, at least verbally. The Trump administration announced a list of tariffs that are supposed to come into force in three week's time and China clicked back by announcing retaliatory action. In effect, the US government said: take that China, we will now really hurt our own consumers!  - and China's mandarins replied: just you wait, we...
  • Industrial Commodities vs. Gold - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Oil is Different Last week, we showed a graph of rising open interest in crude oil futures. From this, we inferred — incorrectly as it turns out — that the basis must be rising. Why else, we asked, would market makers carry more and more oil?   Crude oil acts differently from gold – and so do all other industrial commodities. What makes them different is that the supply of industrial commodities held in storage as a rule suffices to satisfy industrial demand only for a...
  • Chasing the Wind
      Futility with Purpose Plebeians generally ignore the tact of their economic central planners.  They care more that their meatloaf is hot and their suds are cold, than about any plans being hatched in the capital city.  Nonetheless, the central planners know an angry mob, with torches and pitchforks, are only a few empty bellies away.  Hence, they must always stay on point.   Watch for those pitchfork bearers – they can get real nasty and then heads often roll quite literally....
  • Lift-Off Not (Yet) - Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Wrong-Way Event Last week we said something that turned out to be prescient:   This is not an environment for a Lift Off Event.   An unfortunate technical mishap interrupted the latest moon-flight of the gold rocket. Fear not true believers, a few positive tracks were left behind. [PT]   The price of gold didn’t move much Mon-Thu last week, though the price of silver did seem to be blasting off. Then on Friday, it reversed hard. We will provide a forensic...
  • Merger Mania and the Kings of Debt
      Another Early Warning Siren Goes Off Our friend Jonathan Tepper of research house Variant Perception (check out their blog to see some of their excellent work) recently pointed out to us that the volume of mergers and acquisitions has increased rather noticeably lately. Some color on this was provided in an article published by Reuters in late May, “Global M&A hits record $2 trillion in the year to date”, which inter alia contained the following chart illustrating the...
  • Cryptocurrency Technicals – Navigating the Bear Market
      A Purely Technical Market Long time readers may recall that we regard Bitcoin and other liquid big cap cryptocurrencies as secondary media of exchange from a monetary theory perspective for the time being. The wave of speculative demand that has propelled them to astonishing heights was triggered by market participants realizing that they have the potential to become money. The process of achieving more widespread adoption of these currencies as a means of payment and establishing...
  • The Fed's “Inflation Target” is Impoverishing American Workers
      Redefined Terms and Absurd Targets At one time, the Federal Reserve's sole mandate was to maintain stable prices and to “fight inflation.”  To the Fed, the financial press, and most everyone else “inflation” means rising prices instead of its original and true definition as an increase in the money supply.  Rising prices are a consequence – a very painful consequence – of money printing.   Fed Chair Jerome Powell apparently does not see the pernicious effects...

Support Acting Man

Item Guides

j9TJzzN

The Review Insider

Dog Blow

Austrian Theory and Investment

Archive

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

Mish Talk

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com