Apoplectic Ambrose Evans-Pritchard Sings from IMF Hymn Sheet

AEP, who thinks central banks should print us all to Nirvana lest the dreaded deflationary depression sinks our ship, is lately firmly in the grip of tapering paranoia (this is not a recognized clinical condition yet; give it time). First he feared publicly for emerging markets, several of which are on the cusp of balance of payments crises. Let's see: when the Fed's printing seemed to feed imbalances there, a consensus emerged that this was one of the negative effects these countries could do without. They themselves kept saying so, but their tune has of course changed in the meantime (even former vocal 'QE' critic China now 'warns' the Fed not to release the print button too soon).

Now AEP reports on the latest IMF report on the euro area, which kind of blames US 'QE' tapering in advance for the next round of expected problems there. If the IMF says so, it must be true, right?

 

“The report warned that the onset of a new tightening cycle in the UShad already led to major spill-over effects in the eurozone, pushing up bond yields across the board.

Early tapering by the Fed "could lead to additional, and unhelpful, pro-cyclical increases in borrowing costs within the euro area. This could further complicate the conduct of monetary policy and potentially damage area-wide demand and growth. Financial market stresses could also quickly reignite," it said.

The Fund said the European Central Bank must take countervailing action to prevent "a vicious circle setting in," ideally by cutting interests, introducing a negative deposit rate, and purchasing a targeted range of private assets.

It should launch "credit-easing" policies to alleviate the deepening lending crunch in Spain, Italy, and Portugal, where borrowing costs for firms are 200 to 300 basis points higher than in Germany, with small businesses struggling to raise any money at all. The IMF said the more the Fed tightens in the US, the more the European authorities need to offset this with other forms of stimulus.”

 

(emphasis added

Since AEP is wedded to Anglo-Saxon central banking socialism, he presumably approves of this sort of advice. He expresses worries about the growth rate of euro area M3, but the true money supply in the euro area has recently grown by 8% year-on-year, so money has been created at quite a fast clip over the past year.

Anyway, we tend to think that ignoring the economic analysis and advice issuing from the IMF is almost a duty. AEP further on the IMF report:

 

“There is a high risk of stagnation, especially in the periphery. Such an outcome could push the periphery toward a debt-deflation spiral," it said.

The report said that it may take years to unwind the colossal credit boom of the early EMU years. "Historically, almost all of the run-up in household debt tends to be reversed. But in the euro area, the reduction in debt-to-GDP ratios has barely started, and the boom was more pronounced.”

 

(emphasis added)

Someone should tell these people that one cannot have it both ways. Either there is going to be 'debt deleveraging', or not. Their recommendations all aim at keeping the unsound credit created during the 'colossal credit boom' well supported into eternity.

 

Carmen Reinhart: Getting Back Into the Good Graces of Statists

Carmen Reinhart at Harvard (she used to be the IMF's chief economist once, and therefore possesses essential establishment credentials galore) recently had a very public spat with Paul Krugman over a paper she co-wrote with Kenneth Rogoff on sovereign debt and the ways in which it impedes economic growth once it grows too large. Since Mr. Krugman wants the government to increase its deficit spending almost regardless of how high this spending already is (unless the president is a Republican, in which case deficit spending is bad and verging on 'fiscal insanity'), he relished the opportunity to lay into the paper and its authors following the discovery of a few spreadsheet errors.

The entire spat revolved around an utterly irrelevant question, since matters concerning economic theory cannot possibly be settled by invoking statistics. The proper question was always 'what does economic theory have to say on the topic', and not 'what do the statistics of economic history say'. That a number of world-famous and widely respected economists have skirted this essential aspect of the debate only confirms in what a cul-de-sac most of modern mainstream economics finds itself in.

Anyway, Mrs. Reinhart is sure to win over étatistes of all stripes with her latest admonishment to the Fed, which can be summarized as: keep printing!

 

“The Fed should continue with its current quantitative-easing program, given the prolonged US deleveraging cycle and downside risks to inflation and growth, warns Carmen Reinhart, economics professor at Harvard, as fears grow that the tapering of bond purchases, expected in September, will deepen the sell-off in emerging markets.

The Fed risks a substantial policy mistake if, as markets expect, it begins to taper its asset-purchase program in September, warns Carmen Reinhart – economics professor at Harvard and one of the world’s leading experts on debt cycles – citing the stubborn disrepair of US household and fiscal balance sheets, and headwinds to growth.

[…]

In an interview with Euromoney, Reinhart warns: “We still have a great degree of deleveraging to endure in the US, and the issues around the world, particularly in Europe, are far from resolved.” Asked about the relative emphasis of employment versus price stability in the Fed’s dual mandate, Reinhart says these objectives were “nowhere near conflict”. “At some point the Fed’s policy mandate will force it to consider a trade-off but I don’t see that yet,” she says. “Cyclically right now, where is the inflation?”

[…]

“Right now, a withdrawal of stimulus would be premature. Where you have weak inflation and poor unemployment, even though we have seen better economic news recently, you have a tepid recovery. “And in the area where the Fed has chosen to help, such as the housing, there has been a bit of a recovery but the Case-Shiller index [a benchmark gauge for US house prices] is still below its peak, so we are not there in terms of recovery.”

Asked whether the Fed should take into account the prospect of financial bubbles, triggered by its loose stance, in its policy calculations, Reinhart says there is no precedent of the US central bank conceiving of its mandate outside the objectives of employment and price stability. “Because of the recent crisis, people are understandably more bubble-conscious than before,” she says. “There is a consensus that the Fed should continue to focus on growth and employment as its target, and it does not have a history of pricking bubbles. I don’t see why this should be changed.”

 

(emphasis added)

 

The list of Fed 'policy mistakes' is longer than Methuselah's beard, that much is absolutely certain, but easing off the monetary gas pedal has never been one of them.

The inflation Mrs. Reinhart cannot see is right here:

 


 

US-TMS-2-since-2008US broad money supply TMS-2 since 2008 – via St. Louis Federal Reserve Research – click to enlarge.

 


 
We are of course aware that she is referring to the CPI, an indicator that purports to 'measure' one of the many effects of inflation, in this case on consumer goods prices in the aggregate. Apart from the impossibility of such a measurement, the biggest problem with this semantic confusion between inflation and its effects is that people keep talking about things that simply do not matter much in this context.

It cannot be said with any certainty how long it will take for CPI to show a concerning rise in prices. All one can be reasonably sure about in this respect is that considering the way in which it is calculated these days, the lag time is likely to be even longer than usual. However, it can be apodictically stated that monetary inflation has already influenced prices in the economy and in the process distorted relative prices. That is actually the crux of the problem.

So housing prices are still below their bubble peak and that is a problem? They are definitely well out of the reach of most first time buyers even so, as nearly every real estate expert will readily confirm. Why should the peak prices of an unsustainable bubble be the standard by which Mrs. Reinhart judges whether prices are at the 'right level'? We will only be 'there in terms of recovery' when the most extreme bubble prices for residential real estate in US history are reached once again? This is a truly bizarre thing to say.

Yes, it is true: the Fed has no history of pricking bubbles, except by mistake. It does however have a history of blowing them. That is not part of its mandate either, and yet it is doing it incessantly since it has been founded. Ultimately the idea that a handful of central planners should decide what the proper interest rate and proper height of the money supply for the economy should be is utterly preposterous.

In fact, it is  just as preposterous as Mrs. Reinhart's contention that she knows the 'right price' for houses. The planners and their apologists may well believe that they know better than the markets, but this idea flies into the face of sound economics.  The history of central banks specifically is a history of constant failure, at least from the point of view of the common man. The tiny group of special interests that actually profits from inflationary policy probably thinks otherwise, but no wider societal benefit can possibly accrue from it.

 


 

c.reinhartCarmen Reinhart shows us how high house prices need to be

(Photo via Yale News)

 


 
 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke

   
 

3 Responses to “Tapering Paranoia: Print On, Dudes!”

  • ManAboutDallas:

    It’s definitely The End Of The Word As We Know It ( TEOTWAWKI ) when photos of Harvard professors have to come from “Yale News”.

  • Crysangle:

    AEP used to come in at an original angle many times and at least present ideas out of the ordinary , but he seems to have slowly taken on the mantra of monetary expansion – monetary expansion has been suggested for decades … do we need to hear another person repeat the idea ? I wonder if those that are able to judge what is coming down the pike are simply looking to protect their buts … during a financial crash it might always be argued that more printing was necessary , and commentators should know that even the FED will have its own self imposed limits (they are not looking for a political chaos for example) . I have noticed this with other economics writers too , there is always the gentle persuasion of a little inflation , a little printing , a little balance sheet repair and so on , and unfortunately when events become tight they end up voting for outright monetization . I expect that would be because the concept of an ‘uncontrolled’ monetary system is probably seen as some form of heresy that would question the foundations of the world as they understand it – and so it should . The alternative is to hope to satisfy the population with acceptable minimums of wealth … and hope that they don’t question the foundations of the world as they understand it . Personally I think the first choice is wiser but it also means conceding an introspective loss of power and wealth by those that benefit most from the current equation… a question of pride maybe , or greed .

    IMF : “But in the euro area, the reduction in debt-to-GDP ratios has barely started, and the boom was more pronounced.”

    They are interested in the ratio . The reduction in debt has not occurred because they insist on trying to prop up GDP via deficit while trying to extend and support debt levels . When GDP reduces to its true value there will be an increase in debt-to-GDP , then there will be write-offs on debt , the economies will re-adapt somehow and only when GDP increases again under stricter borrowing conditions or a different monetary framework will debt shrink by comparison. In the meantime it gives the politicians something to talk about and numbers to dress , and an excuse to reshape their countries (or not) according to some idea that no one has talked about yet because peace in Europe is at stake . I should think they rather appreciate their populations being tight on the hook – keeps them attentive and coming back for more .

  • FreemonSandlewould:

    True story: A friend of mine rented a flat in Washington DC from Ambrose. His impression was that the guy was a priggish twart.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • Canada: Risks of a Parliamentary Democracy
      A Vulnerable System Parliamentary democracy is vulnerable to the extremely dangerous possibility that someone with very little voter support can rise to the top layer of government. All one apparently has to do is to be enough of a populist to get elected by ghetto dwellers.   Economist and philosopher Hans-Hermann Hoppe dissects democracy in his book Democracy, the God that Failed, which shines a light on the system's grave deficiencies with respect to guarding liberty. As...
  • Federal Reserve President Kashkari’s Masterful Distractions
      The True Believer How is it that seemingly intelligent people, of apparent sound mind and rational thought, can stray so far off the beam?  How come there are certain professions that reward their practitioners for their failures? The central banking and monetary policy vocation rings the bell on both accounts.  Today we offer a brief case study in this regard.   Minneapolis Fed president Neel Kashkari attacking a block of wood with great zeal. [PT] Photo credit: Linda Davidson...
  • Thoughtful Disagreement with Ted Butler
      Too Big to Fail?   Dear Mr. Butler, in your article of 2 October, entitled Thoughtful Disagreement, you say:   “Someone will come up with the thoughtful disagreement that makes the body of my premise invalid or the price of silver will validate the premise by exploding.”   Ted Butler – we first became aware of Mr. Butler in 1998, and as far as we know, he has been making the bullish case for silver ever since. Back in the late 90s this was actually a...
  • Donald Trump: Warmonger-in-Chief
      Cryptic Pronouncements If a world conflagration, God forbid, should break out during the Trump Administration, its genesis will not be too hard to discover: the thin-skinned, immature, shallow, doofus who currently resides in the Oval Office!   The commander-in-chief - a potential source of radiation?   This past week, the Donald has continued his bellicose talk with both veiled and explicit threats against purported American adversaries throughout the world.  In...
  • The Donald Can’t Stop It
      Divine Powers The Dow’s march onward and upward toward 30,000 continues without a pause.  New all-time highs are notched practically every day.  Despite Thursday’s 31-point pullback, the Dow is up over 15.5 percent year-to-date.  What a remarkable time to be alive.   The DJIA keeps surging... but it is running on fumes (US money supply growth is disappearing rapidly). The president loves this and has decided to “own” the market by gushing about its record run. During...
  • Precious Metals Supply and Demand Report
      Fat-Boy Waves The prices of the metals dropped $17 and $0.35, and the gold-silver ratio rose to 77.  A look at the chart of either metal shows that a downtrend in prices (i.e. uptrend in the dollar) that began in mid-April reversed in mid-July. Then the prices began rising (i.e. dollar began falling). But that move ended September 8.   Stars of the most popular global market sitcoms, widely suspected of being “gold wave-makers”. From left to right: Auntie Janet...
  • On the Marc Faber Controversy
      Il n'y a rien à défendre - by Vidocq   Dr. Marc Faber, author of the Gloom, Boom and Doom Report Photo credit: Michael Wildi / RDB     Il n'y a rien à défendre - There is nothing to defend Personne n'a lu ce qui a été écrit. - Nobody read what was written. Personne n'a pensé avant d'agir, comme la plupart des gens de nos jours. - No one thought before acting, like most people nowadays. L'homme que tu pends est l'homme que tu as fait, pas l'homme que...
  • 1987, 1997, 2007... Just How Crash-Prone are Years Ending in 7?
      Bad Reputation Years ending in 7, such as the current year 2017, have a bad reputation among stock market participants. Large price declines tend to occur quite frequently in these years.   Sliding down the steep slope of the cursed year. [PT]   Just think of 1987, the year in which the largest one-day decline in the US stock market in history took place:  the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged by 22.61 percent in a single trading day. Or recall the year 2007,...
  • Stocks Up and Yields Down – Precious Metals Supply & Demand
      Where the Good Things Go Many gold bugs make an implicit assumption. Gold is good, therefore it will go up. This is tempting but wrong (ignoring that gold does not go anywhere, it’s the dollar that goes down). One error is in thinking that now you have discovered a truth, everyone else will see it quickly. And there is a subtler error. The error is to think good things must go up. Sometimes they do, but why?   Since putting in a secular low at the turn of the millennium,...
  • The 2017 Incrementum Gold Chart Book
      A Big Reference Chart Collection Our friends at Incrementum have created a special treat for gold aficionados, based on the 2017 “In Gold We Trust Report”. Not everybody has the time to read a 160 page report, even if it would be quite worthwhile to do so. As we always mention when it is published, it is a highly useful reference work, even if one doesn't get around to reading all of it (and selective reading is always possible, aided by the table of contents at the...
  • Tales From a Late Stage Bull Market
      Pro-Growth Occurrences An endearing quality of a late stage bull market is that it expands the universe of what’s possible.  Somehow, rising stock prices make the impossible, possible.  They also push the limits of the normal into the paranormal.   This happens almost every time Bigfoot is in front of a camera. [PT] Cartoon by Gary Larson   Last week, for instance, there was a Bigfoot sighting near Avocado Lake in Fresno County, California.  But it wasn’t just...
  • The Falling Productivity of Debt
      Discounting the Present Value of Future Income Last week, we discussed the ongoing fall of dividend, and especially earnings, yields. This Report is not a stock letter, and we make no stock market predictions. We talk about this phenomenon to make a different point. The discount rate has fallen to a very low level indeed.   We add this chart to provide a slightly different perspective to the discussion that follows below (and the question raised at the end of the article)....

Support Acting Man

Top10BestPro
j9TJzzN

Austrian Theory and Investment

Archive

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com