High Court Holds Up Berlusconi's Tax Fraud Conviction
Many regard Silvio Berlusconi and his antics as an embarrassment for Italy, but we always liked the man's great entertainment value. Moreover, he has always been a thorn in the side of the eurocratic socialistic elites, as he never really got on board with their program. The program we're referring to is of course 'austerity for everyone except the State'.
Unfortunately for Berlusconi, he has left himself open to attack and it was clear that the moment he was no longer Italy's prime minister he would get into trouble with the courts. As long as he held the reins of power, he was able to hide behind laws that were custom-made especially for him and guaranteed him immunity from serious prosecution. As to the concrete cases he is involved in, there are so many that one is tempted to think that in view of so much smoke there must be a fire somewhere. On the other hand, it is also possible that his enemies were simply throwing a lot of cr*p on the wall to see if any of it would stick (not that we think him entirely innocent – very few men reaching such pinnacles of power are).
Anyway, we have not followed these cases in detail and can therefore not provide a well founded opinion on them. However, it is crystal clear that it was primarily his political stance that led to his downfall. The EU's leading lights detested him and held him responsible for worsening the crisis (and cutting their summer vacations short in the process). Indeed, it was Berlusconi's dispute with his economy minister Giulio Tremonti that set off the chain of events that culminated with the installation of the quintessential EU technocrat Mario Monti as Italy's prime minister. Monti then promptly instituted the EU version of 'austerity', which consisted of 80% of tax hikes, 5% spending cuts and 15% financial repression measures (this is just a rough estimate for illustration purposes).
With the high court upholding Berlusconi's conviction, his political career is likely over, although he has little to worry about otherwise. However, his party rightly fears that losing its popular, if controversial, leader will be to its detriment and is fighting for his political survival. Moreover, the court has refused to order his expulsion from the senate pending a review. According to Bloomberg:
“Silvio Berlusconi’s conviction for tax fraud, upheld late yesterday by Italy’s top court, set up a Senate showdown over his potential expulsion from parliament.
The upper house’s committee for immunities is required to vote on whether to strip Berlusconi, a three-time premier and now a senator, of his seat. The debate, which may take weeks or months, threatens to stoke divisions in the ruling coalition, weakening Prime Minister Enrico Letta’s government.
“I am absolutely aware of the politically delicate moment,” Letta said today at a conference in Rome. “I hope that the collective interests prevail for the good of the country, the good of Italy, and not the partisan interests.”
The fight over Berlusconi’s fate moves to the political arena after the court, which confirmed his guilty verdict, left the sentence for his crime unresolved. Berlusconi was spared the immediate enforcement of a five-year ban on holding public office because the court said it required further judicial review. Berlusconi’s four-year jail sentence, which is temporarily suspended, is unlikely to land him in prison due to leniency guidelines.
“This legal matter could have significant political repercussions given that it is ultimately up to the Senate to vote on whether or not Berlusconi should be ineligible,”Wolfango Piccoli, an analyst with Teneo Intelligence, wrote today in a research report.
The Senate committee is required to consider the case due to a law passed in December under former Prime Minister Mario Monti. It will hold a preliminary vote prior to a final vote in the full Senate, which could be a secret ballot, the head of the committee, Dario Stefano, told Ansa news agency yesterday.
“I think the law must be applied, and from what I understand there is no margin for discretion,” Letta said.
The divide is deepening within the ruling coalition between lawmakers loyal to Berlusconi, 76, and those who, like Letta, have traditionally opposed him. Renato Brunetta, chief whip of Berlusconi’s People of Liberty party in the lower house, said the ruling put democracy in Italy in question, and vowed to rally around the ex-premier. Giuseppe Civati, a lawmaker with Letta’s Democratic Party, said it was time to plan “an exit strategy” from the alliance with Berlusconi.
Yesterday’s ruling was “completely groundless” and “irresponsible,” Berlusconi said in a video message. His party will “stay in the field” and seek a majority from Italians, the former premier said, without giving details.
A law introduced under Monti, which Letta thinks leaves no room for discretion? That's quite convenient. In the meantime Berlusconi's party colleagues have come up with a new idea: and are threatening to resign en masse unless they get their way.
“Former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi’s party is preparing a push for a pardon of its leader’s tax-fraud conviction and will consider a mass resignation from parliament in protest.
“It was a strong possibility, but it will be in the hands of the chief whips,” Lucio Malan, a senator with Berlusconi’s People of Liberty party, said late yesterday about his colleagues’ discussion of a pardon request in a party meeting in Rome. Of a resignation, he said in an interview, “If we decide together to do it, then I’m ready.”
A group resignation by Berlusconi’s allies, who together represent the second-biggest bloc in the ruling parliamentary coalition, would bring down Prime Minister Enrico Letta’s government. President Giorgio Napolitano, who as head of state holds the power to grant pardons, said Aug. 1 in a statement that the justice system deserves trust and respect.”
This doesn't sound like president Napolitano is very eager to overrule the judges by means of a pardon. So the danger of the coalition government falling apart remains at the very least elevated, even though it cannot be said to be imminent (it is not imminent due to the court's decision to leave the expulsion issue to further 'review').
Incidentally, the markets were completely unperturbed; neither government bond yields nor the MIB reacted to the verdict or the threats. We conclude that in spite of the bluster, even Berlusconi's own party is probably beginning to accept that the Cavaliere's career will draw to a close. It's either that, or market participants are underestimating the potential for renewed political upheaval.
Preparing for Succession
One reason why the Cavaliere's troubles may no longer be considered a major problem is his age. He's 76 years old, so he's not exactly a spring chicken anymore, although he sure remains quite energetic for his age. As , Berlusconi's plan A is to convince both Letta and Napolitano that letting him off the hook is in their own best interest – since no-one in Italy's political establishment wants early elections (Berlusconi himself on the other hand presumably wouldn't mind elections). He does however also have a plan B, namely to anoint his 47 year old daughter Marina as his successor. Incidentally she is 20 years older than Uncle Silvio's new girlfriend.
“Still, if worse comes to worst, Berlusconi already has a successor lined up — his daughter Marina. In recent days, Marina has been a part of all high-level party meetings, a noticeable change from the past. Indeed, Berlusconi used to be fond of saying that he didn't want his daughter to have to suffer as he has. Now, according to various Italian media outlets, Berlusconi has confided in a select few that his daughter should stand in the upcoming election. Berlusconi-owned "Il Giornale" has also predicted that Marina would perhaps throw her hat into the ring in her father's place.
Marina is Berlusconi's oldest daughter from his first marriage and has always been her father's favorite. Despite having dropped out of university, Marina was installed as the chief executive of her father's media company at the tender age of 30, making her — according to Forbes– the most influential woman in Italy.”
While we doubt that Marina will come close to her father in terms of entertainment value, this means there may be some sort of continuity in terms of the underlying political philosophy (Berlusconi may also try to keep calling the shots from behind the scenes). Regardless of whether various eurocrats detested Berlusconi as a person, their real beef is probably with his political views. After all, Berlusconi is inter alia on record for saying that Italy should rather ditch the euro than becoming an economic protectorate of Brussels that remains mired in an economic downward spiral. He's the only mainstream EU politician heading something more substantial than a protest movement voicing such heretical thoughts.
The Nature of the Problem
The NYT meanwhile correctly notes that Italy has far worse problems than its flawed political leaders, but manages to at least partly misdiagnose the situation. We read there:
On the center-left, the problem is not a flawed leader, but no real leaders, and no real program either. Most of the best-known leaders are former Communists far too eager to prove their capitalist orthodoxy by unquestioning adherence to the ascetic doctrines favored by German bankers.
This has not made them popular with Italian voters. Nor has it helped the Italian economy emerge from what is now a double-dip recession. Unemployment is stuck around 12 percent, and growth has been minuscule for most of the past decade.
With such obvious weaknesses on both sides of the spectrum, the real winner of February’s elections was “none of the above.” The patched-together government that finally emerged in April is an ungainly coalition with few achievements to its credit so far.
What Italy desperately needs is wholesale political renewal producing capable leaders who can rally popular support for overdue structural economic reforms. Should such leaders emerge, their first responsibility would be to lead a credible challenge to the dead-end austerity demands of Italy’s European partners.”
The idea that Italy's former communists, now 'social democrats' (wolves in sheep's clothes, basically) want to prove their new-found 'capitalist orthodoxy' by adhering to the 'ascetic doctrines of German bankers' is laughable. Austerity as practiced in euro-land so far has absolutely nothing to do with 'capitalism' or 'capitalist orthodoxy'. Quite to the contrary, the policy has put pressure on the free market by imposing a plethora of new taxes while the size and scope of government continues to grow unabated. The data on spending and debt ratios speak for themselves: the program may be called 'austerity', thereby giving the false impression that it involves genuine cutbacks in government spending, but that is clearly disputed by the facts.
It is true that this particular program needs to be challenged and genuine economic reform needs to be implemented. Unfortunately the NYT fails to use its editorial to spell out what these reforms should consist of, but its focus on the misleading 'austerity' meme indicates to us that it holds that even more government spending is called for (as far as we know, all the prominent economics columnists working for the NYT hold this position). Just to make abundantly clear that Italy's government has not cut spending even by a single euro, here are the data:
To be fair, the NYT editorial does mention 'structural reform', which is indeed what is required. Interestingly, it was an Italian, euro-land's current chief monetary bureaucrat, who has forwarded what has up to this point been one of the best ideas to emanate from EU institutions in this regard: in a recent ECB press conference, Mario Draghi stated that the crisis countries should use the breathing space provided by the calm in financial markets to cut both government spending and taxes, while continuing to implement economic reform. That is precisely what should be done. The biggest problem in Europe is clearly that the burden of government has grown way too large. Keep in mind that both government spending and taxation burden the economy. The widespread belief that government spending must somehow be a good thing is based on the a number of misconceptions.
First and foremost there is the misguided idea that it is 'spending' that grows the economy. Secondly there is the failure to recognize that every red cent the government spends is one cent less the private sector has at its disposal. Thirdly it is overlooked that spending by the State, even if 'well intentioned', cannot properly account for opportunity costs and thus wastes scarce capital. Lastly, it creates competition for scarce resources with the genuine creators of wealth. Unfortunately there are only very few people in the European political landscape who actually understand these fundamental principles.
Here is a map of Europe as seen through Silvio Berlusconi's eyes:
Europe according to Berlusconi, by Yanko Tsvetkov
Charts by: BigCharts, Eurostat / Martin Masse
Emigrate While You Can... Learn More
Dear readers - we want to once again thank all of you who have supported us with donations.
To donate Bitcoins, use this address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke
Thank you for your support!
Most read in the last 20 days:
- Why Do We Let Other People Tell Us What to Do?
Lame Theories of Government We have been disappointed with political ideas and theories of government. They are nothing but scams, justifications, and puffery. One tries to put something over on the common man… the other claims it was for his own good… and the third pretends that he’d be lost without it. Most are not really “theories” at all… but prescriptions, blueprints for creating the kind of government the “theorist” would like to have. Not surprisingly, it is a...
- Gold and Gold Stocks – Back to Tricky, but Interesting Signals Emerge
A Relentless Short Term Decline When we last discussed the gold sector, we noted that with gold approaching its 200 day moving average, a pullback had to be expected soon. In the meantime, a bit more than just a pullback has happened, as a severe sell-off started after the October FOMC announcement. Photo via genius.com However, as you will see below, this has most likely merely reset the clock a bit in terms of anticipating a medium term trend change (even if...
- Gold and Gold Stocks – It Gets Even More Interesting
Technical Backdrop If only we could get a dime for every bearish article on gold that has been published over the past two weeks...but one can't have everything. When a market is down 83% like the HUI gold mining index is, we are generally more interested in trying to find out when it might turn around, since it is a good bet that it is “oversold”. Of course, it if makes it to 90% down, it will still be a harrowing experience in the short term. We like these catastrophes because...
- The Long, Cold Winter Ahead
Not Immune Cold winds of deflation gust across the autumn economic landscape. Global trade languishes and commodities rust away like abandoned scrap metal with a visible dusting of frost. The economic optimism that embellished markets heading into 2015 have cooled as the year moves through its final stretch. Photo credit: David Byrne If you recall, the popular storyline since late last year has been that the U.S. economy is moderately improving while the...
- The Greatest Racket of All Time
The Successes of the Global War on Terror One would think that the so-called “Global War on Terror”, which has been given fresh impetus by the Paris attacks, must be going swimmingly. What else could explain the great enthusiasm with which it is pursued? It may be recalled that it started in earnest after the WTC attack – also a declaration of war, as it was put at the time. As is often the case when Islamist fundamentalists strike, the actual attackers immolated themselves on...
- How Do People Destroy Their Capital?
There is no Santa Claus I have written previously about the interest rate, which is falling under the planning of the Federal Reserve. The flip side of falling interest rates is the rising price of bonds. Bonds are in an endless, ferocious bull market. Why do I call it ferocious? Perhaps voracious is a better word, as it is gobbling up capital like the Cookie Monster jamming tollhouses into his maw. There are several mechanisms by which this occurs, let’s look at one...
- Junk Bonds Under Pressure
While the Stock Market is Partying ... There are seemingly always “good reasons” why troubles in a sector of the credit markets are supposed to be ignored – or so people are telling us, every single time. Readers may recall how the developing problems in the sub-prime sector of the mortgage credit market were greeted by officials and countless market observers in the beginning in 2007. Photo credit: Getty Images At first it was assumed that the most highly...
- US Economy – Not Getting Better
An Update in Light of Recent Data Releases Since our last updates on the manufacturing sector of the US economy (in chronological order: “Is the US Economy Close to a Bust?” and “More Ominous Data Points”), new data have been released and our friend Michael Pollaro has mailed us updated versions of his charts, so we decided to provide another update. So far, there is no sign that the emerging downtrend in manufacturing activity is stopping or reversing. The recent manufacturing...
- Angry Belgian Muslims and the Price of Welfare Statism
Ill-Tempered Mohammedans in the Socialist Paradise In the wake of recent revelations about the identities of the morons involved in the horrific Paris attacks (happily, most of them shuffled off the mortal coil as well, thereby improving the aggregate degree of moral clarity and intelligence in the world), a friend pointed us to an article at Unz Review that asks: “Why Does Belgium Have Such Angry Muslims?” Our instinctive, immediate reaction was to argue that the bland, boring...
- The Next Level of John Law Type Central Planning Madness
Cries for Going Totally Crazy are Intensifying What are the basic requirements for becoming the chief economist of the IMF? Judging from what we have seen so far, the person concerned has to be a died-in-the-wool statist and fully agree with the (neo-) Keynesian faith, i.e., he or she has to support more of the same hoary inflationism that has never worked in recorded history anywhere. In other words, to qualify for that fat 100% tax-free salary (ironically paid for by assorted tax serfs),...