There is a new reality various governments still dreaming of imposing 'windfall taxes' and other measures of this type on companies involved in the extraction of resources will have to face. So-called 'resource nationalism' is a constant threat mining companies have to live with. They are usually sitting ducks, since they cannot simply move their assets elsewhere. Usually a mine (or an oil field) involves very long range planning and a huge upfront capital commitment. As a result it often appears easy to blackmail mining companies. The calculation from the point of view of greedy politicians is that the companies will rather live with a much smaller profit than lose the entire value of their investment.
It becomes a bit more complicated when the investment necessary to build a big mine hasn't been undertaken yet. Ecuador has followed in the footsteps of a few other Latin American countries and has elected a distinctly left-wing government. Similar to Venezuela and Bolivia, the government immediately ripped up all agreements the previous government had made with regard to mining, as the resources of the country are held to belong to that mythical collective, 'the people'. All foreign-owned mine developments ground to a halt consequently. The government at first enacted a new mining law that simply made things impossible for miners. It then promised it would enact reforms that would once and for all clear up the legal fog in which mining has been mired since then and provide a more 'investor-friendly' framework, but it has so far failed to deliver.
Meanwhile, mining companies that were about to develop large projects were engaged in direct negotiations with the government in order to gain clarity on the status of their properties (actually, no longer 'their' properties, but those of the aforementioned 'people').
Now the putative developer of the biggest mining project in the country, Kinross Gold, has walked away after two years of fruitless negotiations, during which the government has played hardball with the company throughout. Specifically, the government would not back down from demanding a 70% 'windfall tax'.
Fruta del Norte (FDN), the project in question, is one of the biggest and best (in terms of grade) undeveloped gold projects in the world. The fact that Kinross nevertheless took the hard decision to abandon it speaks for itself (previously, Iamgold abandoned its large Quimsacocha project in Ecuador). The recent decline in the gold price has probably helped this decision along, but the new management at Kinross is on a mission to no longer invest in projects that do not promise to generate a decent return.
As the Financial Post reports:
“Kinross Gold Corp. has abandoned plans to develop the massive Fruta del Norte project in Ecuador after refusing to pay a 70% windfall profits tax demanded by the government.
It is a major disappointment for the company. Fruta del Norte was acquired for more than US$1-billion in 2008, and was expected to become one of the Toronto-based miner’s cornerstone operations. But more than two years of fruitless negotiations convinced Kinross that it was not going to get a deal that would generate good investor returns.
The Ecuadorian government played hardball with Kinross from the beginning, insisting on the monstrous windfall profits tax and never backing down. That was by far the biggest sticking point in the negotiations, chief executive Paul Rollinson said in an interview Monday. He is certain that walking away is the best move for shareholders. “It really was a tough decision, but I do think it was the right decision,” he said. “I’m not prepared to sign anything with a 70% windfall profits tax.”
The concession reverts to the government in early August – notably, the government prohibited Kinross from selling the property. In other words, the property never was the company's property, in spite of the fact that it was acquired for $1 billion. It has essentially been confiscated.
However, the shoe is now in the other foot. Now it is the government that can no longer hope to gain any revenue. The employment and other benefits Kinross would have provided will no longer materialize. These benefits would have been quite significant. Mining companies are extremely sensitized this days to the need to keep the locals happy. Many anti-mining NGOs tend to wage a propaganda war against mining companies, claiming that they bring only destitution to communities, but that is of course complete hogwash. In Ghana, whole villages are holding prayer meetings where they inter alia pray for the continued health of Anglogold-Ashanti and moreover also pray that it will hopefully find more gold. They now have employment, road, schools, hospitals, and so forth, all of which were and are provided by the company.
In Kinross' press release we find hints that it was engaged in similar activities in Ecuador. The press release also informs us of the theft:
“Any possible sale of the project is currently subject to the prior approval of the government, and the government has also indicated it will not support efforts by Kinross to solicit a potential new partner, or a buyer. As previously disclosed, when the current economic evaluation phase of the project expires on August 1, 2013, the La Zarza concession, which contains the entire FDN mineral resource, will revert to the government.
The Company intends to focus on assisting its employees and its local stakeholders during a transition period as it reduces its level of activities in Ecuador in the coming months. "I want to acknowledge our outstanding team in Ecuador for their dedicated efforts in establishing FDN as a model for responsible mining," Mr. Rollinson said. "I also want to thank our local stakeholders and the communities of Zamora-Chinchipe, including members of the Shuar Federation, who have partnered with us on a wide range of training, business development and community investment initiatives over the past several years as we worked together to advance this project," he added.
Kinross' decision to cease the development of FDN will result in a charge of approximately $720 million in the second quarter. Approximately $700 million of the charge is expected to be non-cash, reflecting the Company's entire net carrying value of the FDN project, and approximately $20 million represents accrued severance and closure costs.”
There is speculation that Ecuador could 'maybe' persuade the Chinese to come in as buyers and developers of the project, but that naively assumes that Chinese gold mining companies will be happy to agree to getting robbed instead of Kinross. Why would they? And if the government decides it should offer better conditions to the next would-be developer, it could have just as well offered those to Kinross. It seems to us the FDN resource will remain undeveloped for many years to come.
Naturally the stock of Kinross was sold down after the news hit, but one actually wonders why. Of course it is not exactly great news that a $720 million write-off will have to be taken, but on the other hand, developing FDN would have cost another $1.4 billion and once those costs had been sunk, who knows what the Ecuadorian government might have come up with next. You cannot trust socialists that they will respect property rights. Post war social democrats in Sweden argued e.g. that “the citizens should possess exactly that property which the parliamentarian majority of the day thinks they should possess, since “property” is but a “functional concept.” (according to Gerard Radnitzky in 'Is Democracy More Peaceful than Other Forms of Government?'). In fact, the Ecuadorian government's refusal to let Kinross sell FDN speaks for itself in this regard.
Clearly this is a case where it was better to simply take the loss, as bitter as it may be to lose such a great deposit. From the point of view of shareholders, proof that the new management takes a very tough-minded approach to the generation of returns should probably be considered to be worth much more than than FDN, especially at KGC's current share price.
KGC's already battered shares got whacked again after the FDN news were received – via StockCharts – click to enlarge.
Of course these days gold stocks get whacked on any and all news, simply because they are mired in a bear market. So this initial reaction may not necessarily be indicative of the market's ultimate assessment.
With lower commodity prices (gold is by far not the worst case in terms of price declines) governments elsewhere should take heed. What has just happened in Ecuador could become an example others will follow. The mining industry is under immense pressure from shareholders not to waste any more capital merely on the notion that companies should get bigger. Shareholders want to see returns, and a number of CEOs who have come to be seen as bad stewards of capital have been booted out over the past year or two. The new crop of managers has new priorities, and they do not include letting governments that cling to an outmoded and failed ideology grab the vast bulk of their expected profits.
Ecuador's socialist president Rafael Correa: overplayed his hand.
(Photo via globedia.com, author unknown)
We are happy to report that our funding target has been reached – once again, a hearty thank you to all contributors, your support is greatly appreciated!
As a result of us having gotten from A to B, the annoying graphic is hereby retired. However, be aware that the donations button continues to exist. It is actually perfectly legitimate to use it during the non-funding season as well; assorted advantages we have listed that often result from doing so are likewise persistent (i.e., increased happiness, children including you in their songs, potential obtaining of privileges in the hereafter, etc., etc.). Unfortunately we can't promise that it will make the gold price go up, but we're working on that.
Thank you for your support!
To donate Bitcoins, use this address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke
12 Responses to “The Limits of Resource Nationalism”
Most read in the last 20 days:
- The Baby Boomer Survival Guide (Part I)
The Yellow Machines Go Silent PARIS – What should you do if you are running out of time and money? This is the question we get from readers over 50… over 60… and sometimes over 70. We baby boomers were famously “na… na… na… live for today.” Now, it’s tomorrow. And many of us – often through no fault of our own – are having trouble making ends meet. At the Diary, we write about the world of money. About economic policy and how it affects you. But what if,...
- Refugee Crisis Blowback
A Sharp Turn in Swedish Politics When we recently discussed Europe's refugee crisis, we mentioned that a sizable political backlash was to be expected and that unfortunately, extreme nationalist parties were likely to be among the main beneficiaries. We also mentioned the situation of Sweden, where the mainstream political parties in an ongoing fit of political correctness bordering on lunacy have apparently decided to transform Sweden into a province of Mesopotamia. Leader of...
- Tell us Ron, What's the Plan, What's the “Austrian” Plan?
What? No Austrian Prescription? Bloomberg Reporters Cannot Believe It This is truly funny. Ahead of the FOMC decision, Ron Paul, who is well-known as an an implacable critic and enemy of the Fed and a fan of the Austrian School of Economics, was interviewed at Bloomberg as to “what the Fed should do”. What makes it so funny is that the Bloomberg reporters seemingly cannot believe that Austrian economists simply have no “prescriptions” for the Fed. They keep pushing Ron Paul for...
- US Stock Market: A Retest or Worse?
Gray Swans and Black Swans By Monday's close, the S&P 500 Index was closing in on the low established in the August swoon – such a retest was essentially our minimum expectation, as V-shaped rebounds are very rare. The question is now whether it will only be a retest, or if something worse is in the offing. No-one knows for sure of course, but we'll briefly discuss what we are looking at in this context. Image via NYTimes It is interesting that as the market...
- Climate Fanatics Run Into Public Relations Snag
Scientists Turn into Stalinists Last week, we happened to stumble across a press report about a group of climate scientists so eager to shut up their critics that they want to employ the State's police, courts and jailers for the purpose. Specifically, a group of academic (and presumably tenured) climate alarmists supporting the “CAWG” theory (CAWG=”catastrophic anthropogenic global warming”) have written a letter to president Obama, attorney-general Lynch and OSTP director...
- The Baby Boomer Survival Guide (Part II)
A Lehman Moment for Commodities? LONDON – Today, we continue our philosophical look at what you should do if you are running out of time and money. (You can catch up on Part I here.) Where do we begin? With how to add wealth? Or how to lose it? The way to lose it is simple. You buy something that is not worth the money you paid for it. You are instantly poorer, whether you know it or not. The pleasingly plump. Illustration by jdeer69 DJIA, daily...
- Swiss Parliament Shoots Down Socialist Utopia
No “Unconditional Basic Income” Similar to the minimum wage initiative pursued by Geneva-based socialists (which was rejected in a referendum - see “The Swiss Remain Sane” for details), another Utopian socialist dream has just floundered in Switzerland. As the European press reports, this time parliament has shot down a radical proposal forwarded by Socialist Party representative Andreas Gross. Photo via anti-kapitalismus.org Gross wanted the State to pay...