EU Curbs Unsolicited Ratings of Sovereign Debt
They've gone and done it – in what appears to be a clear violation of the right to free speech, credit rating agencies will henceforth no longer be allowed to rate the debt of bankrupt EU sovereigns as they please – instead they will only be allowed to change such ratings three times a year and otherwise will first have to go begging to regulators if they want to issue a ratings change outside of these fixed points in time.
We do believe that the business model of the rating agencies is seriously flawed (Egan-Jones excepted, for obvious reasons), as issuers of debt are paying for the ratings, which represents a clear conflict of interest. The mortgage debt crisis has starkly revealed these flaws. No such conflict of interest exists however when it comes to their ratings of sovereign issuers, as those are unsolicited and paid for by no-one.
In other words, the EU is trying to shoot the messenger, leaving investors in the lurch in the process. It would do better to simply get its unruly members to stop their overspending and get their finances in order.
The Bloomberg article on this overbearing bureaucratic activity is not without ironies:
“On sovereign debt ratings, lawmakers and officials agreed that each credit rating firm must pick three days a year when they would be allowed to give so-called unsolicited assessments of governments’ creditworthiness, according to Jean-Paul Gauzes, a lawmaker involved in the talks. Ratings firms may get a chance to issue unsolicited ratings — those that haven’t been requested and paid for by a client — outside those dates if they can justify it to regulators.
“Credit rating agencies will have to be more transparent when rating sovereign states, respect timing rules on sovereign ratings and justify the timing of publication of unsolicited ratings,” Barnier said. “They will have to follow stricter rules which will make them more accountable for mistakes.”
Lawmakers had to overcome “perverse” resistance from national governments to the curbs, Gauzes said.”
When Gauzes talks about a 'perverse resistance' by national governments to this vile abridgment of free speech, it shows that he doesn't know a thing about markets. The ratings actually help most governments to market their debt – in normal times, they are a seal of quality that attracts investors. Even those who have seen their ratings decline of course want to see them getting raised again at the earliest opportunity – and not just 'three times a year'. Besides, the rating agencies are anyway usually light years behind the market's own assessment, so it is not quite clear what the EU even hopes to achieve with this.
The bonds of overstretched debtors will still get mauled anyway. In fact, by reducing the frequency of ratings actions, they will only induce all the more market speculation about what those actions will be when they are finally published, which is likely to increase, not decrease market volatility. One can always rest assured that such interventions will have a plethora of unintended consequences. One of them will very likely be that investors will increasingly flock to the bonds of countries where no such curbs on the ratings process exist and shun the bonds of those countries where they are now in force.
After the useless ban on CDS trading, another 'Michel Barnier special'. Can someone please ship this guy off to North Korea? He'd fit right in there.
We are happy to report that our funding target has been reached – once again, a hearty thank you to all contributors, your support is greatly appreciated!
As a result of us having gotten from A to B, the annoying graphic is hereby retired. However, be aware that the donations button continues to exist. It is actually perfectly legitimate to use it during the non-funding season as well; assorted advantages we have listed that often result from doing so are likewise persistent (i.e., increased happiness, children including you in their songs, potential obtaining of privileges in the hereafter, etc., etc.). Unfortunately we can't promise that it will make the gold price go up, but we're working on that.
Thank you for your support!
To donate Bitcoins, use this address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke
One Response to “Shooting the Messenger”
Most read in the last 20 days:
- The Baby Boomer Survival Guide (Part I)
The Yellow Machines Go Silent PARIS – What should you do if you are running out of time and money? This is the question we get from readers over 50… over 60… and sometimes over 70. We baby boomers were famously “na… na… na… live for today.” Now, it’s tomorrow. And many of us – often through no fault of our own – are having trouble making ends meet. At the Diary, we write about the world of money. About economic policy and how it affects you. But what if,...
- Refugee Crisis Blowback
A Sharp Turn in Swedish Politics When we recently discussed Europe's refugee crisis, we mentioned that a sizable political backlash was to be expected and that unfortunately, extreme nationalist parties were likely to be among the main beneficiaries. We also mentioned the situation of Sweden, where the mainstream political parties in an ongoing fit of political correctness bordering on lunacy have apparently decided to transform Sweden into a province of Mesopotamia. Leader of...
- Tell us Ron, What's the Plan, What's the “Austrian” Plan?
What? No Austrian Prescription? Bloomberg Reporters Cannot Believe It This is truly funny. Ahead of the FOMC decision, Ron Paul, who is well-known as an an implacable critic and enemy of the Fed and a fan of the Austrian School of Economics, was interviewed at Bloomberg as to “what the Fed should do”. What makes it so funny is that the Bloomberg reporters seemingly cannot believe that Austrian economists simply have no “prescriptions” for the Fed. They keep pushing Ron Paul for...
- US Stock Market: A Retest or Worse?
Gray Swans and Black Swans By Monday's close, the S&P 500 Index was closing in on the low established in the August swoon – such a retest was essentially our minimum expectation, as V-shaped rebounds are very rare. The question is now whether it will only be a retest, or if something worse is in the offing. No-one knows for sure of course, but we'll briefly discuss what we are looking at in this context. Image via NYTimes It is interesting that as the market...
- The Baby Boomer Survival Guide (Part II)
A Lehman Moment for Commodities? LONDON – Today, we continue our philosophical look at what you should do if you are running out of time and money. (You can catch up on Part I here.) Where do we begin? With how to add wealth? Or how to lose it? The way to lose it is simple. You buy something that is not worth the money you paid for it. You are instantly poorer, whether you know it or not. The pleasingly plump. Illustration by jdeer69 DJIA, daily...
- Climate Fanatics Run Into Public Relations Snag
Scientists Turn into Stalinists Last week, we happened to stumble across a press report about a group of climate scientists so eager to shut up their critics that they want to employ the State's police, courts and jailers for the purpose. Specifically, a group of academic (and presumably tenured) climate alarmists supporting the “CAWG” theory (CAWG=”catastrophic anthropogenic global warming”) have written a letter to president Obama, attorney-general Lynch and OSTP director...
- EU Moloch in a Fresh Bid to Inflate
Brussels Alters Capital Requirements to “Spur Lending” Saints preserve us, the central planners in Brussels are giving birth to new inflationist ideas. Apparently the 2008 crisis wasn't enough of a wake-up call. It should be clear by now even to the densest observers that a fractionally reserved banking system that flagrantly over-trades its capital is prone to collapse when the tide is going out. 2008 was really nothing but a brief reminder of this fact. The political and...