Open Letter to Hugo Salinas Price

Dear Mr. Price:

I read your piece: “On the Use of Gold Coins as Money”.  I think you ask the right question.  This is the elephant in the room.  Why do gold and silver not circulate?

I love your analogy of the Swiss asserting that they will “allow” gold to have a monetary role, this being like “re-hydrating water.”  It is not within the power of foolish governments either to imbue water with wetness, or gold with moneyness.

Gold is already money.  It is the commodity with the tightest bid-ask spread.  It is the commodity with the highest ratio of inventories divided by annual mine production (stocks to flows).  And it is the commodity whose marginal utility does not decline.  These statements are as true for gold today as they were under the gold standard 100 years ago.

Let’s look at marginal utility.  I think you hit the nail on the head: people will pay in anything but gold, if it is possible to do so.  People prefer to keep gold, and this preference has nothing to do with the amount of gold they or anyone has.


What is the practical effect of this?  There are two things that individuals could theoretically do with their gold.  The first is that they could hoard it.  It does not produce a yield, and it does not finance production.  But if there is no other option available this is what people must do.

So long as people are taking gold from circulation to hoard it, then the circulation mechanism is broken.  An equilibrium is reached when all the gold is in private hoards.

People could also save gold.  They could buy bonds (or deposit it in a bank that will buy bonds). The enterprises that borrow the gold will use it to finance production.  Gold will continue to circulate.

You make a very important point that is underappreciated, if not lost, in the dialog today.  A piece of paper is a promise.  A gold coin is a tangible good.  I love your analogy to the engagement ring.  If a man gives a woman a contract that says the wedding will be on such-and-such date that is not equivalent to a gold ring!

You make the case that if people have no other means of making payment, they will pay in gold and silver.  You acknowledge this could take a long time.  Let me propose another way to go forward to the gold standard.

There is one thing that will motivate people to place their gold at risk, and give up possession (temporarily).

Interest – paid in gold.

Interest can lure the gold and silver out of hoards and to the twin tasks at hand: recapitalizing the financial system and financing production.  Then it is just a matter of time.  First bondholders and then suppliers are paid in gold.  Gold begins to circulate.

If one has a gold income then one is free to accept gold liabilities, such as leases and employee wages.  For the firs time since 1913, the monetary system would be on a good path.

But without interest, without the promise of a gain to tempt gold hoarders to part with their metal, they will, as you say, find any alternative currency with which to pay.  The world will continue on its inexorable march towards permanent gold backwardation.

That is what I think you and I are both working to try to prevent!



Keith Weiner

President, Gold Standard Institute USA

Weiner (dot) Keith (at) Gmail (dot) Com



Emigrate While You Can... Learn More



Dear Readers!

It is that time of the year again – our semi-annual funding drive begins today. Give us a little hand in offsetting the costs of running this blog, as advertising revenue alone is insufficient. You can help us reach our modest funding goal by donating either via paypal or bitcoin. Those of you who have made a ton of money based on some of the things we have said in these pages (we actually made a few good calls lately!), please feel free to up your donations accordingly (we are sorry if you have followed one of our bad calls. This is of course your own fault). Other than that, we can only repeat that donations to this site are apt to secure many benefits. These range from sound sleep, to children including you in their songs, to the potential of obtaining privileges in the afterlife (the latter cannot be guaranteed, but it seems highly likely). As always, we are greatly honored by your readership and hope that our special mixture of entertainment and education is adding a little value to your life!


Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke


6 Responses to “Open Letter to Hugo Salinas Price”

  • Ragnarok1958:

    Release elemental gold from ANY and ALL tax and regulation – period! – and it will see use as a currency again. Make gold itself a reference standard like the meter and gram – untouchable, unregulatable, placed by worldwide agreement out of the reach of political will – forever. That’s what it will take for gold to circulate freely again. The same could be done with silver, but do not attempt to define or regulate a ratio or value between the two. May the best metal (and the most “gold-like” managed fiat currency) win.


  • ManAboutDallas:

    The solution is ALREADY available, and the technology is READY to implement the solution: allow Demand Deposit Accounts ( what Joe Sixpack calls “chequing account” or “checking account” ) to be DEFINED as DDA denominated in gold or silver, or both. The now-ubiquitous Debit Card would be the means of access, and any transaction carried out in any fiat currency on Earth by using this Debit Card would be, ultimately, settled in gold or silver when presented to the “on-us” bank, just as EVERY ACH transaction is handled now in any allowable currency. A customer would have to make valid, verifiable deposits of gold and / or silver to the account, but once such deposits were accepted and cleared – just as deposits have to be accepted and cleared in currency – the Account could be “spent” for ANY TRANSACTION right down to the proverbial piece of “penny candy”, should the Account Holder wish to make such a purchase. The price of a piece of “penny candy” ( $.01 ) right now, in terms of gold, you ask ? It’s 0.00018015 grams of gold at the price, as of the moment I’m writing this, $55.51 per gram. Now, to our poor little punkin-seed two-decimal-place minds “0.00018015” looks weird. But it’s all in a day’s work for a computer – any computer – and the computer will happily compute one cent ( $.01 ) in terms of grams of gold down to any number of decimal places one might care to reach.

    The takeaway here : Gold and Silver are ready to be USED RIGHT NOW for day-to-day transactions in the REAL WORLD.

  • JasonEmery:

    I see your point, Keith. Just one question, who is to pay the interest on gold, in gold?

    Here’s how I see this playing out. I’m solidly in the ‘hyper inflation’ camp, although not as sure about the timing as John Williams (shadowstats), who thinks we are about a year away. With $12 trillion in liquid dollar assets out there in the Rest of the World (ROW), those assets will increasingly move into monetary metals. So far, the masters have managed the price higher in baby steps. However, I think all this talk about Germany and other countries repatriating their sovereign gold will be the last straw, and a parabolic rise in gold and perhaps other metals is close at hand.

    I’m also in the camp that believes that sovereign gold totals are way overstated, at least if you assume that ‘total gold’ is the same as gold in the vault, not just warehouse receipts. Therefore, I think that confiscation of gold (and probably silver, platinum, etc.) is a sure thing. Where I disagree with some is that it will be different than 1933, in that they will let the price go parabolic first, in order to get a high level of peaceful compliance. One ounce confiscated for $10,000? Also, I think they may only confiscate a portion, perhaps 80%, and small holders can keep all their 3 or 4 ounces.

    Regardless, it is probably safer to underweight gold, and just go with a basket of tangible goods, most of which won’t be confiscated.

    Once the banking system is recapitalized with gold (and silver ?), they can begin a transition to a pure gold standard. With modern debit and credit cards, there is more than enough metal to run the financial system. Let’s say you deposit a gold coin at a bank for a 5 year term. They agree to return your coin, plus five or ten grams of gold at the end of the term. Someone wants to buy a car, and they have a job, but not much savings. They sign a contract with the bank, and the bank credits the account of the auto dealer one ounce of gold. The car buyer instructs his employer to send one gram of gold per month to the bank.

  • GaryP:

    It is, as Zerobs says, an age old axiom that “bad money drives out good.”

    Good money will never be used in payment until there is no alternative, i.e. fiat money is viewed as worthless and not accepted by anyone. Why would you not pay with pieces of paper, if you can, and save your gold for the day when paper is no longer accepted. If you expect paper currency to be worthless someday, you are essentially getting what you buy with fiat for free!

    As long as our society believes that paper money has value, people will hoard gold and spend fiat.

    I, being a pessimist, disagree with the premise that this will ever change peacefully. Since our world economy, and all its governments, are built upon and dependent upon fiat currencies that can be created at will and inflated to eliminate debts ‘painlessly’ I do not think that this system will ever change voluntarily.

    The impossibility of continuing our current system of entitlements was never seriously discussed in the recent election, and outright denied by the winning side. Our current system of government cannot exist in a regime of stable prices using a currency that cannot be inflated at will.

    A hard currency, based on precious metals, may return some day to the US and perhaps the entire world economy (assuming that significant trade continues in a hard to visualize world where debt is not basis for growth). However, before we get there, much pain will occur.

    At the first sign of the collapse of the fiat regime, I expect a repeat of 1932’s confiscation of gold by our government. Making it illegal to own bullion will mean that only criminals can use it for transactions. That will mean that you must be able to defend, by force, yourself during the use of gold for transactions. Any involvement by the police will result in confiscation. Any use of gold, unless you are considered to dangerous to mess with, will mark you for robbery, a robbery you cannot even report, much less find justice for, unless you can impose that justice yourself.

    People may not turn in their gold but it will be only useful to stare at until a rational government returns. That may not occur for many decades. Ownership of gold was outlawed, last time, for over 50 years!

    US gold coins from 1932 valued at $6M, were just this year, confiscated by the federal government (without compensation) because since they should not have issued in 1932 (because the US government stopped issuing gold coins in 1932) they must have been stolen from the government! No need to prove they were not acquired legally, a simple assertion by the US Treasury was enough. The owners were required to prove a negative, a virtual impossibility (that the coins weren’t stolen) in the absence of any evidence that they had been stolen.

    With such a government as this, do you really think your hoard of gold is safe?

  • georgew:

    I like where you are going with this. One of the common fallacies of modern economics is to associate action with inanimate objects. It can be misleading.

    “Why do gold and silver not circulate?”
    Because they are inanimate objects that reside in someone’s list of assets.

    “So long as people are taking gold from circulation to hoard it, then the circulation mechanism is broken. An equilibrium is reached when all the gold is in private hoards.”
    There is no place where commodities/monies “circulate”. They are always part of somebody’s assets and are allocated to consumption, savings and hoarding. Since gold is hardly used for consumption purchases due to high transaction costs, most gold is either savings (future consumption) or hoarding (risk hedging). There is no way all gold can be in private hoards. As it approached this point, gold prices would rise until someone sells…unless you are implying a scenario where gold demand becomes perfectly elastic.

    “Gold begins to circulate.” More accurately, Gold’s use as a money increases, i.e., it is to purchase goods and to fund investments increases.

    Areas worth diving into:
    1. Decreasing transaction costs for using gold in consumption spending.
    2. Define the benefits of using gold, rather than fiat currency, to fund investment. Today, you have to pay someone to store your gold, i.e, warehouse costs. Meanwhile, the fraudulent FRB banks can pay you interest (almost zero with the FED malfeasance today) on your savings and create money substitutes very easy. The real assets money can buy are the same that someone borrowing in gold, but there are three benefits to using fiat money for the lender:
    A. There is high currency risk for the borrower. Gold long term will almost certainly go up in value, so it seems wiser to borrow in fiat and lend gold if long term…which drives the rates to below the fiat rate, i.e, zero.
    B. Per above, banks lend at a very low rate for fiat currency, which means gold would have to lend out at near that rate to be competitive and the warehouse costs are higher and have to be paid by someone.
    C. There is a higher transaction cost, per above. The borrower will take the gold and sell it, usually not directly to the seller of the resources, but a 3rd party, and then buy assets with it. This dealer usually wants a spread.

  • zerobs:

    Basically: bad money replaces good money. Until it gets TOO bad.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • factoryA Striking Chart
      The Economy and the Stock Market As long time readers know, we are always paying close attention to the manufacturing sector, which is far more important to the US economy than is generally believed. In terms of gross output it is the largest sector of the economy, and it should of course be obvious that saving, investment and production are the only ways to create wealth.   What's left of the Brooklyn Domino Sugar Refinery. Photo credit: Paul Raphaelson   Contrary...
  • trump-putin-1024Trump and Putin Narrowly Escape Assassination Attempt
      The Gloves are Coming Off First a little bit of recent history. Readers are probably aware that some questions about the occasionally malfunctioning Deep State android... no, wait, we'll start again. Questions have recently been raised about the health of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton by various “alt-right” tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy theorists, such as this one.   The monsters are normally hiding under Hillary's bed, but lately they have come out into the open...
  • historical-photos-pt9-pepsi-factory-baltimore-1956-aUS Economy - Curious Pattern in ISM Readings
      Head Fake Theory Confirmed? This is a brief update on our last overview of economic data. Although we briefly discussed employment as well, the overview was as usual mainly focused on manufacturing, which is the largest sector of the economy by gross output.   Pepsi factory in Baltimore, 1956 Photo via   Readers may recall that we have pointed out for some time that there was quite a large gap between the data reported in regional Fed manufacturing...
  • escobarA Convocation of Interventionists, Part 2
      Pleas for More Deficit Spending We continue with our Jackson Hole post mortem – including remarks that were made by economists and monetary bureaucrats shortly before and after the pow-wow and seem to be connected to the discussions there.   Assembled central planners (we're not sure if this picture was taken at the conference, but most of the people in it were there). Photo credit: Getty Images   We should preface the following with a Mises quote, as the...
  • swing-voterWhy the Fed Destroyed the Market Economy
      What Have You Done for Me Lately? Swing voters are a fickle bunch.  One election they vote Democrat.  The next they vote Republican. For they have no particular ideology or political philosophy to base their judgment upon.   The primacy of the wallet.   They don’t give a rip about questions of small government or big government.  Nor do they have any druthers about the welfare or warfare state. In effect, they really don’t care.  What’s important to the...
  • time-wastersHow is Real Wealth Created?
      An Abrupt Drop Let’s turn back to our regular beat: the U.S. economy and its capital markets. We’ve been warning that the Fed would never make any substantial increase to interest rates. Not willingly, at least.   Groping in the dark, Yellen-style   Each time Fed chief Janet Yellen opens her mouth, out comes a hint that more rate hikes might be coming. But each time, it turns out that the economy is not as robust as she had believed... and that a rate hike isn’t...
  • wallet-367975_960_720Janet Yellen’s Shame
      Playing Politics In honest capitalism, you do what you can to get other people to voluntarily give you money. This usually involves providing goods or services they think are worth the price. You may get a little wild and crazy from time to time, but you are always called to order by your customers.   In the market economy, consumers reign supreme. There is no such thing as a “lost” vote in the marketplace; every penny spent affects production. Mises noted: “Consumers...
  • warren-buffett-gold-coinGet Ready for a New Crisis – in Corporate Debt
      Imposter Dollar OUZILLY, France – We’re going back to basics here at the Diary. We’re getting everyone on the same page... learning together... connecting the dots... trying to figure out what is going on.   The new three dollar bill issued by the Apprehensive States of America.   We made a breakthrough when we identified the source of so many of today’s bizarre and grotesque trends. It’s the money – the new post-1971 dollar. This new dollar is green. You...
  • central bank HQs 2A Convocation of Interventionists – Part 1
      Modern Economics -  It's All About Central Planning We are hereby delivering a somewhat belated comment on the meeting of monetary central planners and their courtier economists at Jackson Hole. Luckily timing is not really an issue in this context.   Central bank headquarters: the Fed's Eccles building, the ECB's hideously expensive new tower in Frankfurt, and the BOJ's Tokyo HQ (judging from the people in the foreground, it may be a source of noxious fumes).   When...
  • silkroadHanjin Marooning in San Pedro Bay
      Global Trade Reversal Expansions and contractions in global trade have played out over long secular trends for thousands of years.  The Silk Road, for example, was established by the Han Dynasty of China in 130 BC, and allowed for continuous trade between East and West for nearly 1,600 years.  In addition to economic trade, the Silk Road was also a conduit for culture and knowledge among its network of civilizations.   A map of the main ancient Silk Road - click to...
  • 4-ip-and-non-def-capital-goods-ordersThe Economy, the Stock Market and the Fed
      John Hussman on Recent Developments We always look forward to John Hussman's weekly missive on the markets. Some people say that he is a “permabear”, but we don't think that is a fair characterization. He is rightly wary of the stock market's historically extremely high valuation and the loose monetary policy driving the surge in asset prices.   The S&P 500 Index and the NYSE advance-decline line. Most market internals weakened steadily until early February 2016, but...
  • SamuelsonJohn Maynard Keynes’ General Theory Eighty Years Later
      The “Scientific” Fig Leaf for Statism and Interventionism To the economic and political detriment of the Western world and those economies beyond which have adopted its precepts, 2016 marks the eightieth anniversary of the publication of one of, if not, the most influential economics books ever penned, John Maynard Keynes’ The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.   The mere fact that the book is lauded by TIME magazine on the cover should give everyone...

Austrian Theory and Investment

Support Acting Man

Own physical gold and silver outside a bank




Realtime Charts


Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from]


THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Buy Silver Now!
Buy Gold Now!