There Is No Choice

We have previously pointed out that there is actually no choice at all for the US electorate at the upcoming presidential election. This is because in terms of the policies they support, it is nigh impossible to differentiate between the two candidates. We were not just making an unsupported assertion – we offered proof, by showing a video in which they speak for themselves. If one cannot rely on their own words to represent what they stand for, what should one rely on?

Of course it has often been that way in the past too, but usually one only finds out for sure after the election, not already before it. However, the Obamney – clones are so glaringly similar that this time there can be no doubt about it from the very outset. Anyone who actually votes in this election (except if they log a protest vote for a write-in candidate) is basically wasting his time. Not only that, they are announcing that they are gullible and that they meekly support the status quo. As George Carlin once said, 'they lose the right to complain'.

Carlin suggested that if as an alternative to voting on election day, he were to stay at home and masturbate, he 'would at least have something to show for it at the end'. And that was actually quite a few years ago, we wonder what he would have to say about the 'choice' voters are presented with today. Evidently though, Carlin had come to the conclusion that democracy was for Old Greeks.

Allen Keyes on Obama/Romney

What prompted us to write this post was that a friend pointed us to the following video in which Allan Keyes discusses the very same problem. He says a number of interesting things:





Allen Keyes on the misfortune of having to choose between Obama and Romney



Just to make that clear: we were hitherto only aware of Alan Keyes in passing and are not saying that we would endorse his political views in toto. In fact, a cursory examination of some other material we have come across suggests that we would have a number of differences with him. However, what he says in the video above is in  our opinion both true and important.

He makes inter alia the point that if one can no longer differentiate between candidates based on their political program, one is theoretically reduced to judging them on the basis of personal sympathy or antipathy. However, unless one actually knows them personally, such a judgment is necessarily based on nothing but superficial impressions – in fact it is not possible to come to an informed decision.

To our mind the most interesting and important observation is however the following: Keyes suggests that if e.g. Mitt Romney were to be elected,  he would have it very easy to pursue the very agenda currently associated with Obama – there would be little push-back from conservatives. They would likely cheer on the very policies they hated when Obama proposed or implemented them, if Romney were to propose them if he comes to power. At the very least their protest would probably be extremely muted.

Think back in this context to Bush the Second and the PATRIOT act, the warrant-less wiretapping scandal, the torture allegations and his wars. Left-liberals were manning the barricades against many of these policies when Bush introduced them. Many of them were convinced that if they voted for Obama, many, or even all of these policies would be repealed (that was certainly part of the whole 'hope and change' shtick). They have for the most part mutely watched for four years while there was not only no repeal, but an intensification of every Bush era rape of the Bill of Rights. Occasionally one of Obama's supporters took notice, such as Rachel Maddow e.g. did when the president talked about instituting presidential powers that sound like something from a dystopian science fiction novel (essentially he argued in favor of the president becoming the nation's personal 'pre-crime' division):

Rachel Maddow is shocked that her hero proposes authoritarian laws that sound even worse than anything Bush ever did or proposed.


We are merely astonished that she seems so surprised by this. This is precisely how the ruling elites operate. In order to cement unpopular policies, they use the guy who is officially widely thought to be against them. Keyes has essentially hit on the establishment's very modus operandi in directing history in modern times.

The NDAA's provisions for military detention of mere 'suspects' were e.g. an Obama administration brainchild. Most Republicans were fine with it. There were only a few exceptions, such as Rand Paul, who delivered a notable and excellent speech against them (to no avail of course).

Rand Paul in one of his best moment, embedding was not possible.



Our point is, regardless of who you vote for, you can firmly depend on being disappointed in the areas that actually count. The whole idea that the democratic system such as it is allows voters to alter a nation's course by simply voting for a different  batch of politicians is profoundly mistaken. In reality, the ruling elites use the apparent differences as a slick political ploy: namely to implement whatever agenda they have already decided upon without arousing the anger of the hoi-polloi too much.

One must very carefully parse everything one sees or hears on the 'approved' news media these days. More often than not things are not what they seem, and it only becomes clear after some time in what direction they are about to be taken. Often we are confronted with seemingly diametrically opposed opinions on how to tackle a burning problem. Later a 'compromise' will suddenly and 'unexpectedly' make its entrance, consisting of the very policies the elites wanted to introduce in the first place. Upon hearing of the 'compromise', everybody nods sagely and agrees that this is what should be done, not realizing that they were duped from the very beginning.

A good recent example is actually provided by the euro area crisis. Although it appears at times as though the eurocracy's control over events may be lost, it evidently hasn't happened yet.

Consider though what has happened: decisive steps have been taken to protect the banks on the backs of tax payers and to take the EU closer to the point where it becomes a giant socialistic superstate/transfer union. Which as it were is precisely what Romano Prodi predicted back in 2001 already – namely that the EU's political elite would just wait for a sufficiently dire crisis to implement all the measures it couldn't yet put into place at the time the euro was introduced.

When looking at the countries making up the euro area, one quickly notices that voters in them are likewise faced with the 'no choice' dilemma.  It matters not one whit who they vote for, the centralization agenda continues exactly as before every time.

Occasionally a referendum is held to decide whether there is sufficient popular support for things like e.g. the Lisbon treaty. In cases where the vote is unfavorable for the centralization agenda, the  referendum is simply repeated until the desired outcome has been obtained. Of course it's all just a coincidence, right?

Right,  and we have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale.



Readers interested in obtaining this nice little bridge should e-mail us their offers.

(Photo source unknown)





Emigrate While You Can... Learn More




Dear readers - we want to once again thank all of you who have supported us with donations.


To donate Bitcoins, use this address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke


Thank you for your support!

11 Responses to “A Few Remarks on Elections”

  • snowmane:

    Romney was my last choice for President. Nevertheless, he is much better than Obama. Like W., you have the choice between a train and a plane on your trip to socialism. But more people are awake today than ever in my lifetime. I went from a Carter liberal to a Regan conservative in 1980. The alternative media didn’t develop until the 90’s yet I was able to know exactly how to read between the lines. There are millions of people who do the same. They didn’t get America here overnight and we won’t change that quickly. All this will end because the system they have built cannot be sustained. All this will come crashing down.

  • Jaesun:

    Does it matter who heads the mafia? Can government solve any societal problems? In order to solve America’s problems government would have to dissolve itself since government is the root cause of our problems.

    It seems that the actual purpose of government is to usurp individual liberties, increase government’s power, condition the people to submit to government rule, (through agency’s abuses like the TSA) and usher in a New World Order. That purpose will be supported by both of the current presidential candidates.

    Before voting ask yourself, Does my vote actual matter, or has the election outcome already been decided? The content of the following video clip could help you answer that question. The relevant section is between minute 1:48 to 4:30, but the entire content helps explain our current situation.

  • Lonesome:

    Unbelievable…the author is full of shiite! I would bet the farm you voted for the train wreck and chief, four years ago.
    No one would have ever thought any president could be worse then J Carter. SURPRISE!

    And you proclaim there is no difference between the two.
    How about for openers, one is a socialist and one is a capitalist. Do you really believe Romney won’t roll up his sleeves and get to work on our nations problems. What has obama done for four years, besides spending money…we akll know that answer. The fool has campaigned, played golf, and partied with the libs on the view and JAYZ AND BOUNCEY.
    Only a fool would quote Carlin and tell the world you are wasting your time to vote!

  • Belmont Boy:

    “Occasionally a referendum is held to decide whether there is sufficient popular support for things like e.g. the Lisbon treaty. In cases where the vote is unfavorable for the centralization agenda, the referendum is simply repeated until the desired outcome has been obtained.”

    Indeed. And not just in Europe. Remember TARP. Congress voted it down. Then, several days later, they passed it. A sufficient number of members had, evidently, received offers they couldn’t refuse.

  • boatman:

    either will be remembered as the worst pres. ever…………being in office when the japan+western world debt/credit bomb blows.

    but anyone better than the current obozo.

    so i’ll vote mittens.

    obozo wins and it costs me 2 supremes+idiot foriegn policy and idiot EPA….. to be rid of the worst of the two parties for 20 years.

    human nature changes not one iota……..and we reset n start over.

    anyone not holding gold/silver is toast.

  • FreemonSandlewould:

    I know it all the rage style to make proclamations that there is no difference…..coke and pepsi etc etc ad infinitum.

    The practical engineer in me calls bull shiet on this. Romney is by far the lesser of 2 evils. If by nothing other than competence.

    A vote for a 3rd party candidate is a vote for Obama. Do not do it.

    I admit we’ll limp through with Romney but that’s better than going down for the count in a ditch beside the road.

    So the choice is a full on collapse or a Romney limp through. I’ll take limp through please.

    • jimmyjames:

      I admit we’ll limp through with Romney but that’s better than going down for the count in a ditch beside the road.

      So the choice is a full on collapse or a Romney limp through. I’ll take limp through please.


      If Romney gets in and starts trade wars like he promised-the ditch is exactly where you will end up and you wont have any legs left to limp along on-
      Not that Obama is any better or his ditch any shallower-

    • JasonEmery:

      “Romney is by far the lesser of 2 evils.” “So the choice is a full on collapse or a Romney limp through.”

      You apparently think you are much smarter, in terms of monetary policy, than Ludwick von Mises. Please state your credentials, including links to your publications, so we can evaluate your writings.

      Unless you think Romney can successfully lead to the invention of a time machine, and go back to 1971 and prevent the cutting of the last link between the dollar and gold, you are horribly wrong. There is no escaping an economic calamity, roughly proportional to the size of the preceding bubble.

      The problem with Obama or Romney, as opposed to Ron Paul, is the first two will kick the can down the road until we go over the final cliff. Paul knows that we desperately need to cut spending by over a trillion, PER YEAR, IMMEDIATELY. And restructure our debt.

    • Toolate:

      Why would you vote for “the lesser of two evils”? Vote for who you want to be president. Obama and Romney are essentially both trying to feed you a crap sandwich. Sure Obama says that his CrapLoaf on sawdust bread is the best, but Romney swears that his CrapLoaf on stale rye is what you really want. No matter who wins you lose. Vote 3rd party and say I refuse to eat the CrapLoaf that you are trying to feed me. A Vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Ron Paul. Vote you for the right man. Later on when Obama or Romney burns this country to the ground atleast you can say you didn’t vote for them.

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • MponengGold and Gold Stocks – It Gets Even More Interesting
      Technical Backdrop If only we could get a dime for every bearish article on gold that has been published over the past two weeks...but one can't have everything. When a market is down 83% like the HUI gold mining index is, we are generally more interested in trying to find out when it might turn around, since it is a good bet that it is “oversold”. Of course, it if makes it to 90% down, it will still be a harrowing experience in the short term. We like these catastrophes because...
  • resultThe Greatest Racket of All Time
      The Successes of the Global War on Terror One would think that the so-called “Global War on Terror”, which has been given fresh impetus by the Paris attacks, must be going swimmingly. What else could explain the great enthusiasm with which it is pursued? It may be recalled that it started in earnest after the WTC attack – also a declaration of war, as it was put at the time. As is often the case when Islamist fundamentalists strike, the actual attackers immolated themselves on...
  • winterThe Long, Cold Winter Ahead
      Not Immune Cold winds of deflation gust across the autumn economic landscape.  Global trade languishes and commodities rust away like abandoned scrap metal with a visible dusting of frost.  The economic optimism that embellished markets heading into 2015 have cooled as the year moves through its final stretch.   Photo credit: David Byrne   If you recall, the popular storyline since late last year has been that the U.S. economy is moderately improving while the...
  • santaHow Do People Destroy Their Capital?
      There is no Santa Claus I have written previously about the interest rate, which is falling under the planning of the Federal Reserve. The flip side of falling interest rates is the rising price of bonds. Bonds are in an endless, ferocious bull market. Why do I call it ferocious? Perhaps voracious is a better word, as it is gobbling up capital like the Cookie Monster jamming tollhouses into his maw. There are several mechanisms by which this occurs, let’s look at one...
  • oil rigJunk Bonds Under Pressure
      While the Stock Market is Partying ... There are seemingly always “good reasons” why troubles in a sector of the credit markets are supposed to be ignored – or so people are telling us, every single time. Readers may recall how the developing problems in the sub-prime sector of the mortgage credit market were greeted by officials and countless market observers in the beginning in 2007.   Photo credit: Getty Images   At first it was assumed that the most highly...
  • I'll have TurkeyThe Plane Incident in Syria
      A Strange Event The topic of the SU-24 Russian plane shot down by Turkey over the weekend in Syria has been discussed all over the media ad nauseam by now, but we want to add a few observations and suggestions of our own. Some have perhaps not received the attention they possibly deserve.   Image of Russian jet shortly after it was hit by a Turkish missile. Luckily someone was promptly at hand to make a qualitatively acceptable video of the incident. As is well known, cameramen...
  • Young-European-Jihadists-ChappatteAngry Belgian Muslims and the Price of Welfare Statism
      Ill-Tempered Mohammedans in the Socialist Paradise In the wake of recent revelations about the identities of the morons involved in the horrific Paris attacks (happily, most of them shuffled off the mortal coil as well, thereby improving the aggregate degree of moral clarity and intelligence in the world), a friend pointed us to an article at Unz Review that asks: “Why Does Belgium Have Such Angry Muslims?” Our instinctive, immediate reaction was to argue that the bland, boring...
  • Chart-intraday averageCan Investors Trust the New Gold Fixing?
      Statistical Analysis of the New Gold Fixing   Since 20 March 2015 a new gold price fixing organized by the London Bullion Market Association has been in operation. It has replaced the previous price determination process, which was in place for more than a century and became subject to criticism as it was highly vulnerable to manipulation. Has manipulation now ceased?   Gold fixing at N.M. Rothchild and Sons offices in London. The first fixing took place there on 12 September...
  • King and CEOGiant “Green Energy” Boondoggle Flops in Spain
      $29 billion Vaporized As is well-known, Spain is one of the countries in the euro area's periphery that has been thoroughly bankrupted by its decision to join the euro area and enjoy an artificial credit expansion-induced boom as its interest rates initially collapsed. This was aided and abetted by the ECB, which sat idly by as the euro area's true money supply exploded into the blue yonder with annualized growth rates ranging from 6% to 18% during the boom years.   Tower at...
  • BN-GO061_WAJ_Mo_J_20150121165559US Money Supply Growth Finally Begins to Crack
      Breaking Below the Shelf In our recent missive on junk bonds, we inter alia discussed the fact that the growth rate of the narrow money supply aggregate M1 had declined rather noticeably from its peak in 2011. Here is a link to the chart. As we wrote:   “We also have confirmation of a tightening monetary backdrop from the narrow money supply aggregate M1, the annualized growth rate of which has been immersed in a relentless downtrend since peaking at nearly 25% in 2011....

Support Acting Man




Own physical gold and silver outside a bank

Realtime Charts


Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from]



USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from]


THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Buy Silver Now!
Buy Gold Now!