Housing Bottom Pickers Cite Affordability, But Do They Really Know What It Means?
Affordability has recently been used as one of the strongest argument for a bullish housing outlook. In my opinion, it is just the reverse, affordability is one of the most negative headwinds facing housing today. Allow me to state my case.
Many indicators are meaningless on their own. For example, is 6% a high or a low interest rate for a 30 year fixed rate mortgage? The 6% number as such is totally meaningless. However, if one had been able to obtain it during the Volcker years when mortgage rates were oscillating around 13%, then 6% would be absolutely fantastic. On the other hand, if one is used to paying less than 4%, then 6% would appear to be prohibitively expensive.
Affordability in the broader sense is no different. It is not the present situation as such that determines bull or bear market in real estate, it is the coming change from the present situation.
There are three components that determine housing affordability: income, price and interest.
Affordability improves if incomes go up, prices come down and/or interest rates decline. It is a rather quite simple calculation on the face of it. Therefore, if housing has indeed bottomed and home prices are about to rise, the only way that affordability can remain the same is if incomes rise and/or interest rates decline.
Since there is no sign that wages are likely to go up a whole lot in the near future, the only way home prices can rise without affecting affordability is for interest rate to decline further. How much further would rates have to decline to raise prices? Bernanke has spent trillions in an effort to drive rates down to current levels, so how much more would Bernanke have to print in order for this to have a noticeable effect?
Home prices can also go up if affordability goes down, if buyers are willing and able to pay higher prices and qualify for a higher loan amounts. There is a very interesting piece of data that is worth watching in this context, from a recent DQNews press release: (this is pertaining to California):
„The typical mortgage payment that home buyers committed themselves to paying last month was $901. That was up slightly from January's $893, which was the lowest since $882 in February 1999. Adjusted for inflation, last month's typical payment was 59.8 percent below the 1989 peak of the prior real estate cycle, and 67.4 percent below the 2006 peak of the current cycle.“
This is the present situation: a $901 payment per month equals a $188,000 loan at 4%.
This was the situation at the February 1999 low: $882/month equaled a $136,000 loan at 6.34%, which was approximately the prevailing mortgage rate at the time.
In other words, over the last 13 years, California's home buyers/mortgage borrowers have increased their average loan amount by 38.2%, while the mortgage payment only increased by 2.15%.
One could conclude from this, all else equal, that if not for Greenspan's and Bernanke's monetary pumping and 'QE' operations and if mortgage rates had stayed at 6 3/4%, home prices in California would be just 2.15% higher today than they were in 1999, unadjusted for inflation.
I personally draw the conclusion that affordability has actually been pushed to its very limits. Any improvement would have to come from even lower interest rates. I further expect to see the current flurry of activity in housing to fizzle out over the next couple of months as there simply is no purchasing power to drive up prices.
Wages and salaries divided by CPI, a rough approximation of 'real wages' – these haven't really gone anywhere over the past few years, which seems unlikely to change in the near future.
Addendum: The „Dream“ Is Alive and Well, The Dowmpayment is Still MIA
by Pater Tenebrarum
A recent survey of putative home buyers by the Pulte Group had the following results:
„Among the top reasons renters indicate they have increased their interest in buying a home include:
lThey like being able to call themselves homeowners (49 percent)
lThey view it as a good financial investment (44 percent)
lThey need more space for their family/kids (36 percent)
The survey also revealed that deterrents – both real and perceived – still persist, preventing some renters from pursuing or achieving the dream of homeownership. The top three reasons indicated by current renters for not purchasing a home sooner include:
lNot enough money for down payment (54 percent)
lThe belief that renting is cheaper than buying (28 percent)
lUncertainty with employment status (23 percent)
"Clearly the dream of homeownership is alive and well in America, yet we still have a ways to go to ensure more renters are able to take that important step towards buying their first home," says Deborah Meyer, senior vice president of Pulte Group. "Homeownership is more attainable than ever with historically low mortgage rates and competitive pricing, as well as affordable new homes designed for first-time home buyers coming into the market.
"We are seeing a renewed sense of optimism, especially from young professionals and young families visiting our communities nationwide," continued Meyer. "In fact, in the first quarter of this year, sales and traffic for our Centex homes, which caters to the value-conscious and first-time buyer, saw a significant improvement over last year – yet another sign of an improving housing market."
[We have emphasised the single most important point above, ed.]
54% think they do not have enough money for down payment, which I take it to mean they live totally hand to mouth and have not a dime in savings, just credit card balances.
It is that time of the year again – our semi-annual funding drive begins today. Give us a little hand in offsetting the costs of running this blog, as advertising revenue alone is insufficient. You can help us reach our modest funding goal by donating either via paypal or bitcoin. Those of you who have made a ton of money based on some of the things we have said in these pages (we actually made a few good calls lately!), please feel free to up your donations accordingly (we are sorry if you have followed one of our bad calls. This is of course your own fault). Other than that, we can only repeat that donations to this site are apt to secure many benefits. These range from sound sleep, to children including you in their songs, to the potential of obtaining privileges in the afterlife (the latter cannot be guaranteed, but it seems highly likely). As always, we are greatly honored by your readership and hope that our special mixture of entertainment and education is adding a little value to your life!
Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke
One Response to “Understanding Affordability”
Most read in the last 20 days:
- A Date Which Will Live in Infamy
President Nixon’s Decision to Abandon the Gold Standard Franklin Delano Roosevelt called the Japanese “surprise” attack on the U.S. occupied territory of Hawaii and its naval base Pearl Harbor, “A Date Which Will Live in Infamy.” Similar words should be used for President Nixon’s draconian decision 45 years ago this month that removed America from the last vestiges of the gold standard. Nixon points out where numerous evil speculators were suspected to be...
- Insanity, Oddities and Dark Clouds in Credit-Land
Insanity Rules Bond markets are certainly displaying a lot of enthusiasm at the moment – and it doesn't matter which bonds one looks at, as the famous “hunt for yield” continues to obliterate interest returns across the board like a steamroller. Corporate and government debt have been soaring for years, but investor appetite for such debt has evidently grown even more. The perfect investment for modern times: interest-free risk! Illuustration by Howard...
- US Economy – Something is not Right
Another Strong Payrolls Report – is it Meaningful? This morning the punters in the casino were cheered up by yet another strong payrolls report, the second in a row. Leaving aside the fact that it will be revised out of all recognition when all is said and done, does it actually mean the economy is strong? Quo vadis, economy? Image credit: Paul Raphaelson As we usually point out at this juncture: apart from the problem that US labor force participation has...
- Trump's Tax Plan, Clinton Corruption and Mainstream Media Propaganda
Fake Money, Fake Capital OUZILLY, France – Little change in the markets on Monday. We are in the middle of vacation season. Who wants to think too much about the stock market? Not us! Yesterday, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump promised to reform the U.S. tax system. This should actually even appeal to supporters of Bernie Sanders: the lowest income groups will be completely exempt from income and capital gains taxes under Trump's plan. We expect to hear...
- The Great Stock Market Swindle
Short Circuited Feedback Loops Finding and filling gaps in the market is one avenue for entrepreneurial success. Obviously, the first to tap into an unmet consumer demand can unlock massive profits. But unless there’s some comparative advantage, competition will quickly commoditize the market and profit margins will decline to just above breakeven. Example of a “commoditized” market – hard-drive storage costs per GB. This is actually the essence of economic...
- Bank of England QE and the Imaginary “Brexit Shock”
Mark Carney, Wrecking Ball For reasons we cannot even begin to fathom, Mark Carney is considered a “superstar” among central bankers. Presumably this was one of the reasons why the British government helped him to execute a well-timed exit from the Bank of Canada by hiring him to head the Bank of England (well-timed because he disappeared from Canada with its bubble economy seemingly still intact, leaving his successor to take the blame). This is how Mark Carney is seen by...
- An Old Friend Returns
A Rare Apparition An old friend suddenly showed up out of the blue yesterday and I’m not talking about a contributor who had washed out and, after years of ‘working for the man’, decided to return for another whack at beating the market. Instead I am delighted to report that I am looking at a bona fide confirmed VIX sell signal which we haven’t seen for ages here. Hello, old friend. Professor X and Magneto staring each other down in the plastic...
- News from TINA Land
Distortions and Crazy Ideas We have come across a few articles recently that discuss some of the strategies investors are using or contemplating to use as a result of the market distortions caused by current central bank policies. Readers have no doubt noticed that numerous inter-market correlations seem to have been suspended lately, and that many things are happening that superficially seem to make little sense (e.g. falling junk bond yields while defaults are surging; the yen rising...
- The Fabian Society and the Gradual Rise of Statist Socialism
The “Third Way” “Stealth, intrigue, subversion, and the deception of never calling socialism by its right name” – George Bernard Shaw An emblem of the Fabian Society: a wolf in sheep's clothing The Brexit referendum has revealed the existence of a deep polarization in British politics. Apart from the public faces of the opposing campaigns, there were however also undisclosed parties with a vested interest which few people have heard about. And...
- Retail Snails
Second Half Recovery Dented by “Resurgent Consumer” We normally don't comment in real time on individual economic data releases. Generally we believe it makes more sense to occasionally look at a bigger picture overview, once at least some of the inevitable revisions have been made. The update we posted last week (“US Economy, Something is Not Right”) is an example. Eager consumers storming a store Photo credit: Daniel Acker / Bloomberg We'll make an...
- The Fed’s “Waterloo” Moment
Corrupt and Unsustainable James has been a big help. Trying to get him to sleep at night, we have been telling him fantastic and unbelievable bedtime stories – full of grotesque monsters... evil maniacs... and events that couldn’t possibly be true (catch up here and here). He turned his head until his gaze came to rest on the barred windows of the main building. Finally, he spoke; as far as I was aware these were the first words he had uttered in more than five years....
- Silver is in a Different World
The Lighthouse Problem Measured in gold, the price of the dollar hardly budged this week. It fell less than one tenth of a milligram, from 23.29 to 23.20mg. However, in silver terms, it’s a different story. The dollar became more valuable, rising from 1.58 to 1.61 grams. Who put that bobbing lighthouse there? Image credit: John Lund / Corbis Most people would say that gold went up $6 and silver went down 43 cents. We wonder, if they were on a sinking boat,...