The Mortgage Deal – Brilliant

There are many reports on the mortgage deal.  Here is a brief version: 'Holdout States Lured Back to Mortgage Deal'.

Dick Bove, a respectable bank analyst, was visibly angry about the moral issues when he appeared on CNBC shortly after the agreement was announced.  Rick Santelli, the lone person on CNBC with a sense of reason, was also incensed.

What is the mortgage deal?

It is $26-40 billion that the banks will have to set aside for miscellaneous give-aways to borrowers who decided not to make their mortgage payments.

What is the rationale?

Banks supposedly defrauded borrowers because during the foreclosure process, they signed affidavits without proper documentation. In simpler terms, they did not cross the 't's and failed to dot the 'i's.

Why is this a big deal?

Because of the robo signing scandal, borrowers that may be years behind with their payments can at present not be foreclosed upon. This results not only in a non-performing asset for the banks, it is an asset that continues to deteriorate without them being able to put a stop to the process. Since the banks are indeed guilty of sloppy foreclosure procedures, they need to somehow put this issue behind them so they can foreclose and stop the bleeding.

What is the most important element of this settlement?

We will find out the details later, but I have to assume that it must include some safe harbor rule under which the banks can resume foreclosure proceedings. With this settlement, the banks found the safe harbor at no cost.

Why is this mortgage deal brilliant?

Attorney generals vs. big bad banks, that is not even a fair fight. The big bad banks have now put to rest a big mistake that has haunted them for years. Here is how it works:

Borrower A purchased a house for $500,000. Big Bad Bank (BBB)  financed the purchase with no down payment from Borrower A.  The house is now worth $350,000. Borrower A has not made a mortgage payment for two years. The BBB is sitting on a loss of $150,000 plus lost of interest plus foreclosure cost plus disposition expenses yet to come.


Prior to the settlement, this scenario was simply going to continue, with Borrower A not only staying at the house for free, but the bank's equity continuing to be eroded by having to pick up insurance and property taxes, plus 'owning' the physical deterioration of the underlying asset. At this point, the BBB should already have written down the loan, at least to the $350,000 level using a current appraisal.


With the settlement, the attorney generals made headlines that incensed Bove and Santelli and most taxpayers. The banks are the ones cheering and Borrower A should start looking for housing alternatives.


Step 1 – in this example, I am going to be generous.  The BBB is going to reduce the principal of Borrower A's mortgage by $50,000, from $500,000 to $450,000.  There is no cash given to Borrower A, but he now owes less. Furthermore, the monthly payment is now also reduced. I am going to be super generous and also throw in a new interest rate from whatever it was at thze time the loan was made to the current prevailing conforming loan rate of around 4%. Bottom line, the loan balance has been reduced by $50,000 and the monthly payment reduced by many hundreds of dollars for poor Borrower A.


Step 2 – while most would consider that a fantastic bargain for Borrower A, he is still faced with an over-encumbered property. Should he accept the deal and start making payments? Most would realize by now that Borrower A is still better off by not paying, by dragging the foreclosure process out for as long as is possible, while saving up to re-enter the market in three years (the penalty period for having a foreclosure on one's credit report).


Step 3 – the BBB is now placed in a no lose situation. Firstly, the $50,000 principal reduction has already been written down long ago. It is now just a paper entry with no effect to the bottom line. It is free money. Secondly, if Borrower A starts to make payments on the $450,000 loan, say at 4%, the BBB is in essense receiving interest on $450,000 with an asset that had previously been written down to $350,000 or less. Under this scenario, the BBB actually can book a gain. Finally, if Borrower A decides to continue defaulting, the BBB can now foreclose and put an end to the robo signing nightmare. A win-win scenario for the bank.


How is this going to impact the real estate market?


Foreclosures are finally going to become REOs. It will take years for the market to absorb this inventory.


How is this going to impact the economy?


There are over five million households with no housing cost, simply by dint of  not paying their mortgage. This is going to come to an end. These subsidized households are either going to accept the settlement and start making payments, or will soon be foreclosed upon and evicted. They would have to start paying rent somewhere. One wonders what that is going to do to consumer spending.


Moral of the story: the big bad banks always win.

 

Addendum:

After writing this post, I was reminded by a friend that the mortgage debt relief act is due to expire this year.

 

See:

The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act and Debt Cancellation


I must therefore assume that any principal reduction is going to taxable unless they change the law. It is a mess.


 

 
 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke

   
 

2 Responses to “The Mortgage Deal – Brilliant”

  • davidh:

    As I understand it, the consent decree forgives past perjuries (robosigning), it does not do any thing to authorize new perjuries. There is still the obstacle to foreclosures because perjury can still be prosecuted as a felony.

    The path you explain, that gets around the need for manufacturing chain of title, is to do a loan modification or perhaps a refi that would establish a new loan. That assumes the homeowner is dumb enough to do a refi to a $450k loan on a house with $350k value.

    All the homeowner that is that far underwater is to sit tight, and make no mortgage payments. The lender still can not foreclose because the chain of title is messed up. Is an involuntary refi possible? That would be truly a miracle.

  • Andyc:

    Ramsey

    The most important thing to come out of this deal is that they are off the hook as far as charges of fraud are concerned and that the money to pay this so called settlement will come from the taxpayers

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/housing-settlement-be-taxpayer-funded-confirming-big-five-banks-are-beyond-law

    “In simpler terms, they did not cross the ‘t’s and failed to dot the ‘i’s.”

    Are you kidding?

    I suppose someone could write an article or an academic paper explaining how we are “better off” economically NOT prosecuting these scoundrels as that would cost us even MORE money seeing as we would all collectively have to pay their legal fees, any and all fines and judgements against them and one would assume serve their jail sentences for them but I’m not up to write such a tale.

    Knock yourself out if your up to it.

    http://blog.chron.com/lorensteffy/2011/12/guess-whos-paying-to-defend-fannie-and-freddie-execs/

    They did a lot more than not cross I’s and dot T’s

    : )

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • 21st Century Shoe-Shine Boys
      Anecdotal Flags are Waved   "If a shoeshine boy can predict where this market is going to go, then it's no place for a man with a lot of money to lose." - Joseph Kennedy   It is actually a true story as far as we know – Joseph Kennedy, by all accounts an extremely shrewd businessman and investor (despite the fact that he had graduated in economics*), really did get his shoes shined on Wall Street one fine morning, and the shoe-shine boy, one Pat Bologna, asked him if...
  • India: The Genie of Lawlessness is out of the Bottle
      Recapitulation (Part XVI, the Last) Since the announcement of demonetization of Indian currency on 8th November 2016, I have written a large number of articles. The issue is not so much that the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, is a tyrant and extremely simplistic in his thinking (which he is), or that demonetization and the new sales tax system were horribly ill-conceived (which they were). Time erases all tyrants from the map, and eventually from people’s...
  • Christopher Columbus and the Falsification of History
      Crazed Decision The Los Angeles City Council’s recent, crazed decision* to replace Christopher Columbus Day with one celebrating “indigenous peoples” can be traced to the falsification of history and denigration of European man which began in earnest in the 1960s throughout the educational establishment (from grade school through the universities), book publishing, and the print and electronic media.   Christopher Columbus at the Court of the Catholic Monarchs (a...
  • The Government Debt Paradox: Pick Your Poison
      Lasting Debt “Rule one: Never allow a crisis to go to waste,” said President Obama’s Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel in November of 2008.  “They are opportunities to do big things.”   Rahm Emanuel looks happy. He should be – he is the mayor of Chicago, which is best described as crisis incarnate. Or maybe the proper term is perma-crisis? Anyway, it undoubtedly looks like a giant opportunity from his perspective, a gift that keeps on giving, so to speak. [PT] Photo...
  • The Forking Paradise - Precious Metals Supply and Demand Report
      Forking Incentives A month ago, we wrote about the bitcoin fork. We described the fork:   Picture a bank, the old-fashioned kind. Call it Acme (sorry, we watched too much Coyote and Road Runner growing up). A group of disgruntled employees leave. They take a copy of the book of accounts. They set up a new bank across the street, Wile E Bank. To win customers, they say if you had an account at Acme Bank, you now have an account at Wile, with the same balance!   BCH, son...
  • The United States of Hubris
      Improving the World, One Death at a Time If anyone should have any questions about whether the United States of America is not the most aggressive, warlike, and terrorist nation on the face of the earth, its latest proposed action against the supposed rogue state of North Korea should allay any such doubts.   Throughout history, the problem with empires has always been the same: no matter how stable and invincible they appeared, eventually they ran into “imperial...
  • Long Term Statistics on AAPL
      Introductory Remarks by PT Below we present a recent article by the Mole discussing a number of technical statistics on the behavior of AAPL over time. Since the company has the largest market cap in the US stock market (~ USD 850 billion – a valuation that exceeds that of entire industries), it is the biggest component of capitalization-weighted big cap indexes and the ETFs based on them. It is also a component of the price-weighted DJIA. It is fair to say that the performance of...
  • Tragedy of the Speculations
      The Instability Problem Bitcoin is often promoted as the antidote to the madness of fiat irredeemable currencies. It is also promoted as their replacement. Bitcoin is promoted not only as money, but the future money, and our monetary future. In fact, it is not.   A tragedy... get the hankies out! :) [PT]   Why not? To answer, let us start with a look at the incentives offered by bitcoin. We saw a comment this week, which is apropos:   "Crypto is so...
  • Janet Yellen's 78-Month Plan for the National Monetary Policy of the United States
      Past the Point of No Return Adventures in depravity are nearly always confronted with the unpleasant reality that stopping the degeneracy is much more difficult than starting it.  This realization, and the unsettling feeling that comes with it, usually surfaces just after passing the point of no return.  That's when the cucumber has pickled over and the prospect of turning back is no longer an option.   Depravity and bedlam through the ages. The blue barge of perdition in the...
  • To Hell In A Bucket
      No-one Cares... “No one really cares about the U.S. federal debt,” remarked a colleague and Economic Prism reader earlier in the week.  “You keep writing about it as if anyone gives a lick.” We could tell he was just warming up.  So, we settled back into our chair and made ourselves comfortable.   The federal debtberg, which no-one cares about (yet). We have added the most recent bar manually, as the charts published by the Fed will only be updated at the end of the...
  • Despite 24/7 Trading: Bitcoin Investors are Taking off for the Weekend on Friday Already
      Crypto-Statistics In the last issue of Seasonal Insights I have discussed how the S&P 500 Index performs on individual days of the week. In this issue I will show an analysis of the average cumulative annual returns of bitcoin on individual days of the week.   Bitcoin, daily. While this is beside the point, we note the crypto-currency (and other “alt coins” as well) has minor performance issues lately. The white line indicates important lateral support, but this looks to...
  • Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Fundamental Developments There were big moves in the metals markets this week. The price of gold was up an additional $21 and that of silver $0.30. Will the dollar fall further?As always, we are interested in the fundamentals of supply and demand as measured by the basis. But first, here are the charts of the prices of gold and silver, and the gold-silver ratio.   Gold and silver prices in USD terms (as of last week Friday) - click to enlarge.   Next, this is a...

Support Acting Man

j9TJzzN

Austrian Theory and Investment

Archive

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com