The Mortgage Deal – Brilliant
There are many reports on the mortgage deal. Here is a brief version: 'l'.
Dick Bove, a respectable bank analyst, was visibly angry about the moral issues when he appeared on CNBC shortly after the agreement was announced. Rick Santelli, the lone person on CNBC with a sense of reason, was also incensed.
What is the mortgage deal?
It is $26-40 billion that the banks will have to set aside for miscellaneous give-aways to borrowers who decided not to make their mortgage payments.
What is the rationale?
Banks supposedly defrauded borrowers because during the foreclosure process, they signed affidavits without proper documentation. In simpler terms, they did not cross the 't's and failed to dot the 'i's.
Why is this a big deal?
Because of the robo signing scandal, borrowers that may be years behind with their payments can at present not be foreclosed upon. This results not only in a non-performing asset for the banks, it is an asset that continues to deteriorate without them being able to put a stop to the process. Since the banks are indeed guilty of sloppy foreclosure procedures, they need to somehow put this issue behind them so they can foreclose and stop the bleeding.
What is the most important element of this settlement?
We will find out the details later, but I have to assume that it must include some safe harbor rule under which the banks can resume foreclosure proceedings. With this settlement, the banks found the safe harbor at no cost.
Why is this mortgage deal brilliant?
Attorney generals vs. big bad banks, that is not even a fair fight. The big bad banks have now put to rest a big mistake that has haunted them for years. Here is how it works:
Borrower A purchased a house for $500,000. Big Bad Bank (BBB) financed the purchase with no down payment from Borrower A. The house is now worth $350,000. Borrower A has not made a mortgage payment for two years. The BBB is sitting on a loss of $150,000 plus lost of interest plus foreclosure cost plus disposition expenses yet to come.
Prior to the settlement, this scenario was simply going to continue, with Borrower A not only staying at the house for free, but the bank's equity continuing to be eroded by having to pick up insurance and property taxes, plus 'owning' the physical deterioration of the underlying asset. At this point, the BBB should already have written down the loan, at least to the $350,000 level using a current appraisal.
With the settlement, the attorney generals made headlines that incensed Bove and Santelli and most taxpayers. The banks are the ones cheering and Borrower A should start looking for housing alternatives.
Step 1 – in this example, I am going to be generous. The BBB is going to reduce the principal of Borrower A's mortgage by $50,000, from $500,000 to $450,000. There is no cash given to Borrower A, but he now owes less. Furthermore, the monthly payment is now also reduced. I am going to be super generous and also throw in a new interest rate from whatever it was at thze time the loan was made to the current prevailing conforming loan rate of around 4%. Bottom line, the loan balance has been reduced by $50,000 and the monthly payment reduced by many hundreds of dollars for poor Borrower A.
Step 2 – while most would consider that a fantastic bargain for Borrower A, he is still faced with an over-encumbered property. Should he accept the deal and start making payments? Most would realize by now that Borrower A is still better off by not paying, by dragging the foreclosure process out for as long as is possible, while saving up to re-enter the market in three years (the penalty period for having a foreclosure on one's credit report).
Step 3 – the BBB is now placed in a no lose situation. Firstly, the $50,000 principal reduction has already been written down long ago. It is now just a paper entry with no effect to the bottom line. It is free money. Secondly, if Borrower A starts to make payments on the $450,000 loan, say at 4%, the BBB is in essense receiving interest on $450,000 with an asset that had previously been written down to $350,000 or less. Under this scenario, the BBB actually can book a gain. Finally, if Borrower A decides to continue defaulting, the BBB can now foreclose and put an end to the robo signing nightmare. A win-win scenario for the bank.
How is this going to impact the real estate market?
Foreclosures are finally going to become REOs. It will take years for the market to absorb this inventory.
How is this going to impact the economy?
There are over five million households with no housing cost, simply by dint of not paying their mortgage. This is going to come to an end. These subsidized households are either going to accept the settlement and start making payments, or will soon be foreclosed upon and evicted. They would have to start paying rent somewhere. One wonders what that is going to do to consumer spending.
Moral of the story: the big bad banks always win.
After writing this post, I was reminded by a friend that the mortgage debt relief act is due to expire this year.
I must therefore assume that any principal reduction is going to taxable unless they change the law. It is a mess.
We are happy to report that our funding target has been reached – once again, a hearty thank you to all contributors, your support is greatly appreciated!
As a result of us having gotten from A to B, the annoying graphic is hereby retired. However, be aware that the donations button continues to exist. It is actually perfectly legitimate to use it during the non-funding season as well; assorted advantages we have listed that often result from doing so are likewise persistent (i.e., increased happiness, children including you in their songs, potential obtaining of privileges in the hereafter, etc., etc.). Unfortunately we can't promise that it will make the gold price go up, but we're working on that.
Thank you for your support!
To donate Bitcoins, use this address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke
2 Responses to “The Mortgage Deal – Brilliant”
Most read in the last 20 days:
- The Baby Boomer Survival Guide (Part I)
The Yellow Machines Go Silent PARIS – What should you do if you are running out of time and money? This is the question we get from readers over 50… over 60… and sometimes over 70. We baby boomers were famously “na… na… na… live for today.” Now, it’s tomorrow. And many of us – often through no fault of our own – are having trouble making ends meet. At the Diary, we write about the world of money. About economic policy and how it affects you. But what if,...
- Faith in Central Banks Dwindles
Even Bloomberg Notices that Something is Amiss As anyone who hasn't been in a coma knows, assorted central bank interventions have failed to achieve their stated goals over the past several years. A recent article at Bloomberg focuses on their failure to reach their “inflation” targets. Of course, this particular failure is actually reason to celebrate, as it means that consumers have at least been spared an even sharper decline in their real incomes than has been underway in spite...
- EU Moloch in a Fresh Bid to Inflate
Brussels Alters Capital Requirements to “Spur Lending” Saints preserve us, the central planners in Brussels are giving birth to new inflationist ideas. Apparently the 2008 crisis wasn't enough of a wake-up call. It should be clear by now even to the densest observers that a fractionally reserved banking system that flagrantly over-trades its capital is prone to collapse when the tide is going out. 2008 was really nothing but a brief reminder of this fact. The political and...
- Tell us Ron, What's the Plan, What's the “Austrian” Plan?
What? No Austrian Prescription? Bloomberg Reporters Cannot Believe It This is truly funny. Ahead of the FOMC decision, Ron Paul, who is well-known as an an implacable critic and enemy of the Fed and a fan of the Austrian School of Economics, was interviewed at Bloomberg as to “what the Fed should do”. What makes it so funny is that the Bloomberg reporters seemingly cannot believe that Austrian economists simply have no “prescriptions” for the Fed. They keep pushing Ron Paul for...
- Refugee Crisis Blowback
A Sharp Turn in Swedish Politics When we recently discussed Europe's refugee crisis, we mentioned that a sizable political backlash was to be expected and that unfortunately, extreme nationalist parties were likely to be among the main beneficiaries. We also mentioned the situation of Sweden, where the mainstream political parties in an ongoing fit of political correctness bordering on lunacy have apparently decided to transform Sweden into a province of Mesopotamia. Leader of...
- The Baby Boomer Survival Guide (Part II)
A Lehman Moment for Commodities? LONDON – Today, we continue our philosophical look at what you should do if you are running out of time and money. (You can catch up on Part I here.) Where do we begin? With how to add wealth? Or how to lose it? The way to lose it is simple. You buy something that is not worth the money you paid for it. You are instantly poorer, whether you know it or not. The pleasingly plump. Illustration by jdeer69 DJIA, daily...
- US Stock Market: A Retest or Worse?
Gray Swans and Black Swans By Monday's close, the S&P 500 Index was closing in on the low established in the August swoon – such a retest was essentially our minimum expectation, as V-shaped rebounds are very rare. The question is now whether it will only be a retest, or if something worse is in the offing. No-one knows for sure of course, but we'll briefly discuss what we are looking at in this context. Image via NYTimes It is interesting that as the market...