It has been almost a decade since the birth of subprime mortgage loans. It has been six years since the bursting of the real estate bubble. It has been over three years since the GSEs were placed under conservatorship. It seems forever since policy makers launched HAMP, QE1, QE2, HARP, tax credits, carry forward loss deductions for builders, fiscal stimulus plans and a great many foreclosure prevention road blocks.
The interventionists seem to have decided that none of the interventions to date have worked to their satisfaction. More interventions are therefore needed. At the moment the next round falls into two categories: massive refinancing and the REO to rentals plan, which includes bulk sales to investors. These policies will likely be supported by some type of QE3 from the Fed.
The nation has no leadership in housing. Not only is there no housing policy, no one is working on a plan. Real estate financing has been nationalized and survives only because the Federal Reserve is throwing endless amounts of money at it and the Treasury is guaranteeing all the debt. No one has any idea how the conservatorship of the GSEs is going to be terminated.
At a time when tough decisions need to be made with regards to 90% of real estate financing (GSEs & FHA combined), the country is operating in a vacuum. This vacuum is quite vulnerable to manipulation by special interest groups whose motives have little to do with the health of the overall real estate market. All the upcoming events pertaining to the GSEs are mainly force fed by a few bureaucrats for the enrichment of a few fat cats.
Instead of wasting time analyzing the latest ideas, this post takes a look at the people behind the ideas. I'd like to know who is going to fix the GSEs, real estate financing and the real estate crisis. I have no clue what the precise consequences of this mess may turn out to be. As taxpayers we can only helplessly wait to see how much it is all going to cost.
Here is the cast of clueless characters:
The Executive Branch
With regards to fixing the GSEs, the buck stops here. Obama needs to provide leadership and find the people to execute his vision, assuming he has one. Starting with his chief of staff, Daley just resigned after one year on the job. His replacement is Jack Lew, a budget guy.
It is doubtful that Daley spent much time thinking about real estate last year. It is equally doubtful that Jack Lew will be working on anything in the upcoming months aside from Obama's re-election campaign.
Next in line in the administration is Tim Geithner. He is reported to have been working on his personal exit plan for quite some time. He is the point man for GSE reform. He has not done anything in the last three years, and I don't think we should expect anything other than a resignation announcement from him in the near future.
Starting with the past leadership, there were Richard Syron and Daniel Mudd, the last CEOs at the helm of Freddie and Fannie when they were taken down. They are now both being sued by the SEC for understating the subprime loans held by the firms. Not that Syron and Mudd should not be sued, but they serve as a warning to any future CEOs who may actually have good intentions. These are examples of what can happen if things turn out bad.
Thinking with his feet, David Moffett was the first to leave, after trying out Freddie's CEO job for just six months back in 2009. I think that is what they call a "thanks, but no thanks". Halderman then took over the helm and he too decided to take a hike last October after just two years, along with chairman of the board Koskinen. I think Halderman is still acting as CEO until the next sucker can be found to take the job.
Over at Fannie, Michael Williams has been with the company for over 20 years, the last three as CEO. On the eve of the implementation of all these grand plans, Williams resigned. He is only 54, certainly not of retirement age. I think that is what they call "throwing the towel".
Incidentally, Halderman and Williams are at the receiving end of compensation for two years of work totaling $17 million.
Conclusion: There is no-one running Fannie or Freddie.
The FHFA (Federal Housing Finance Agency)
Supervising Freddie and Fannie is the FHFA, with acting director Edward DeMarco at the helm. DeMarco has been in this acting capacity since August 2009, over 2 years ago. Here is an example of how much he has accomplished. This is the (pdf) posted on their website.
It is still shows James Lockhart as the director, along with his photo. The "Message From the Director" is still signed by Lockhart. It would not be as pathetic if Lockhart had not gone over to the 'other side'. He is now with Wilbur Ross, one of the top sharks circling the GSE carcass.
So here we have the three agencies, Freddie, Fannie and FHFA with no management at a time when strong leadership is desperately needed. If there was ever an ideal time to consolidate these duplicating agencies, this is it.
The Legislative Branch
Congress is busy condemning how much these GSEs pay their executives. Conservatives are complaining that the GSEs are doing too little and spending too much money. Liberals are complaining that they are doing too little and not spending enough. There is plenty of blame, but nothing constructive. Senator Corker is the only one we hear from once in a while on the subject of GSEs. His plan is at best sophomoric, if it can be called a plan at all. Personally, I do not know who on Capitol Hill or the Senate is actually responsible for the GSEs. Can you name them? Fortunately, we know Barney Frank is going to be gone. Who is going to be his replacement, Maxine Waters? Now if that does not scare you, you are fearless.
The Federal Reserve
Finally, we have the Bernank and the merry pranksters at the Federal Reserve. I think it is best to let their wisdom speak for itself.
First, a few quotes from Ben Bernanke himself:
(July, 2005) "We’ve never had a decline in house prices on a nationwide basis. So, what I think what is more likely is that house prices will slow, maybe stabilize, might slow consumption spending a bit. I don’t think it’s gonna drive the economy too far from its full employment path, though."
(October 20, 2005) "House prices have risen by nearly 25 percent over the past two years. Although speculative activity has increased in some areas, at a national level these price increases largely reflect strong economic fundamentals."
(February 15, 2006) "Housing markets are cooling a bit. Our expectation is that the decline in activity or the slowing in activity will be moderate, that house prices will probably continue to rise."
(February 15, 2007) "Despite the ongoing adjustments in the housing sector, overall economic prospects for households remain good. Household finances appear generally solid, and delinquency rates on most types of consumer loans and residential mortgages remain low."
(March 28, 2007) "At this juncture, however, the impact on the broader economy and financial markets of the problems in the subprime market seems likely to be contained. In particular, mortgages to prime borrowers and fixed-rate mortgages to all classes of borrowers continue to perform well, with low rates of delinquency."
(May 17, 2007) "All that said, given the fundamental factors in place that should support the demand for housing, we believe the effect of the troubles in the subprime sector on the broader housing market will likely be limited, and we do not expect significant spillovers from the subprime market to the rest of the economy or to the financial system. The vast majority of mortgages, including even subprime mortgages, continue to perform well. Past gains in house prices have left most homeowners with significant amounts of home equity, and growth in jobs and incomes should help keep the financial obligations of most households manageable."
From the recently released 2006 FOMC transcript:
Bies, cont. " However… let me just say that the bottom line is that overall mortgage credit quality is still very, very strong. "
Bies, Oct. '06: "We are also seeing in a small way increased predatory activity with loans…"
Yellen, Oct. '06: "Of course, housing is a relatively small sector of the economy, and its decline should be self-correcting."
Stern, Oct. '06: "The housing situation notwithstanding, I remain somewhat more optimistic about our prospects for real growth…"
Mishkin, Sept. '06: "The excesses in the housing sector seem to be unwinding in an acceptable way… I'm actually quite positive."
Warsh, Sept. '06: "Capital markets are probably more profitable and more robust at this moment… than they have perhaps ever been."
Geithner, cont. "If we see a more-pronounced actual decline in housing prices, will that have greater damage on confidence and spending?"
Geithner, Sept. '06: "We just don’t see troubling signs yet of collateral damage, and we are not expecting much."
Guynn, stepping down from the FOMC: "I’m counting on all of you to protect the buying power of my hard-earned retirement savings."
Lacker, Sept. '06: "I’m still fairly skeptical of large indirect spillover effects on employment or consumption.”
Minehan, cont. "So it is hard actually for me to see that residential investment will be that hard hit that long."
Minehan, Sept. 06: "Buyers should recognize housing [is] more affordable & resume purchases, perhaps w/out further major price declines."
Yellen, cont. "Houses [in Boise]… are now being dressed up to look occupied… so as not to discourage potential buyers."
Yellen, Sept. '06: "The speed of the falloff in housing activity and the deceleration in house prices continue to surprise us…"
Fed staff, Sept. '06: "We are not projecting large declines nationwide in house prices."
Fed staff, Aug. '06: "We forecast single-family starts will bottom out at annual rate of 1.43m units." [Actual low (so far): 445k in '09]
Bies, cont. "…rather than being a drain going forward and that will also get the growth rate more positive."
Bies, June '06: "So I really believe that the drop in housing is actually on net going to make liquidity available for other sectors…"
Geithner, June '06: "We see a pretty healthy adjustment process under way… The world economy still looks pretty robust to us."
Guynn, June '06: "…Of greater concern to me, however, is the inflation outlook."
Guynn, June '06: "We are getting reports that builders are now making concessions… even throwing in a free Mini Cooper – [LAUGHTER]."
Fed staff report, June '06: "We have not seen—and don’t expect—a broad deterioration in mortgage credit quality."
Bernanke, March 2006: "Again, I think we are unlikely to see growth being derailed by the housing market."
In conclusion, I think the occupancy rate will skyrocket in 2012:
Occupy Wall Street.
Occupy the Fed.
Occupy the White House.
Occupy vacant REOs.
Dear readers, we are greatly honored by your readership and sincerely hope that our special mixture of entertainment and education continues to add a little value to your lives. As you can probably guess, our blog is not really a giant commercial enterprise, for that its readership is too exclusive and small. Nevertheless, running it involves not only time and effort, but also monetary costs. We are therefore starting another fundraising drive. You can help us reach our funding goal by either donating directly via Paypal or via Bitcoin.
Thank you for your support!Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke
6 Responses to “Occupy Everything”
Most read in the last 20 days:
- The Stock Market in Trouble - How Bad Can it Get?
A Look at the Broader Market's Internals We have previously discussed the stock market's deteriorating internals, and in light of recent market weakness want to take a brief look at the broader market in the form if the NYSE Index (NYA). First it has to be noted that a majority of the stocks in the NYA are already in bearish trends. The chart below shows the NYA and the percentage of stocks above their 200 day and 50 day moving averages, which is 39.16% and 33.77% respectively. When...
- Gold Stocks – Update on a Tricky Situation
It's Never Easy... Readers may recall that in one of our recent updates on the gold sector – which we believe is at an interesting juncture that may at the very least provide a good trading opportunity – we presented the chart of the 1992-1993 low in order to illustrate how extremely tricky the sector can be in the vicinity of turning points. Specifically, the sector made every imaginable move in late 1992 to convince market participants that a durable rally was nigh impossible....
- Gold Stocks: A Playable Rally May Be Beginning as Junk Bonds Crater
Gold Stocks Jump and Retrace 50% Last week we discussed the potential for a rally in the gold sector (see: “Gold Stocks at an Interesting Juncture” for details). Gold stocks jumped early in the week and then retraced almost precisely 50% of the initial move higher, in the process closing a gap that was left behind on Wednesday. Image credit: dreamstime.com Interestingly, for the first time in many months, there were three up days in a row prior to the...
- A new Multi-Year High in Buying by Gold Sector Insiders
Latest Data from INK Show A Huge Surge in Insider Buying As our friends at INK Research in Canada have pointed out to us, insiders at gold companies have made use of the recent sell-off in the sector to load up on shares to an extent not seen in many years. Image source: bidness etc The INK insider buy/sell indicator for gold stocks has peaked just one day after China's initial devaluation announcement at nearly 1,200%: INK's gold insider sentiment...
- Is Crude Oil Close to a Low?
Panicky Headlines Everybody knows that there is a never-ending glut in crude oil, right? Who knew about it a year ago? Not everybody, that much is certain. The problem with what everybody knows is of course that it is often not worth knowing. Photo credit: Alamy Today a friend pointed two articles out to us that have been published yesterday and today. Their headlines say it all. The Wall Street Journal writes “No End in Sight for Oil Glut” - and proceeds to...
- The Stock Market's Panic Potential
The Odds Favor a “Warning Shot” Scenario - but there is a “But” As regular readers have probably noticed, we have upped the frequency of our “caution is advised” posts on the stock market in recent weeks in light of the market's increasingly deteriorating internals. Although one never knows when exactly such warning signs may begin to matter, it is always a good bet that they eventually will. Last week the market delivered a little wake-up call to the hitherto rather...
- The Donald and China, or The Fallacy of Protectionism
Not Every Populist Topic is Worth Exploiting For reasons that will forever remain a mystery to us, mercantilism and protectionism actually hold enormous popular appeal. The best explanation we can come up with for this phenomenon is that the support for such policies is based on a mixture of economic ignorance and relentless propaganda by vested interests over the past, say, four centuries. Still, it is almost comical that people are so vociferously clamoring for policies that can actually...
- Real Wealth and Phantom Wealth – Secular Boom and Bust
The Things that Produce Real Wealth vs. Phantom Wealth Our friend Michael Pollaro, the keeper of long-term data on the true money supply and author at Forbes as well as occasionally a guest author on this site, recently sent us the following chart of a relationship he keeps a close eye on. It depicts the annual change rate in new orders for non-defense capital goods and compares this series to the Wilshire total market index. Photo via...
- Jackson Hole – Meeting of the Physics Envy Brigade
Planners Meet to Discuss the Impossible The Jackson Hole pow-wow takes place this weekend. A more revolting get-together of actual and armchair central planners (i.e., the advisors to the planners, many of whom see themselves as planners-in-waiting) could hardly be imagined. One has to wonder how much more damage they will be allowed to inflict before someone finally says “enough!”. The parlous state of the global economy and the series of booms and busts we have experienced over the...
- The Stock Market After the Mini Crash
A Post Mortem – the Influence of Black Box Systems Here is a brief update on the recent market action and what we think one should watch out for now. First of all, we already noted in our last market update that something about the recent “mini crash” was quite unusual. For one thing, it started to get serious in an options expiration week, which happens only rarely. One rather scary precedent is actually the 1987 crash: on that occasion the market declined sharply during expiration...