The Economics of Large Pools of Property Assets

Selling real estate is usually quite simple.  First you determine the highest and best use of the product.  Then you focus on who would be the most suitable buyer of the product. Finally, you proceed to market the product to the most suitable buyers.

For spot REOs [REO = 'real estate owned', the euphemism for properties repossessed in foreclosures, ed.], which are primarily all single family, condos and some 1-4 family units, the pecking order of potential buyers could not be simpler:

 

  1. Owner occupants.
  2. Small investors who own no more than a handful of units.
  3. Large investors who own multiple units in one market.
  4. Large investors who own multiple units in multiple markets.
  5. Mega bulk investors.

 

For some strange reason, our government is comtemplating bypassing all the more suitable buyers listed above in favor of the worst buyers possible. There can be no explanation for this aside from stupidity and/or corruption.

 

The logic behind this is simple. Economies of scale so to speak tend to work in reverse when it comes to spot REOs. At each level of the pecking order, the expenses one incurs are higher rather than lower. For example, an owner occupant or small investor may purchase a property that requires minor repairs and budget nothing but 'sweat equity' for these items.  A large local investor may have a crew or an inexpensive contractor for these repairs.  A mega bulk investor has to contract a local manager, who then gives the job to sub-contractors to have the work performed.

Spot REOs are in various places all over the map. The houses in the best locations are usually gobbled up at top prices immediately. The second tier ones may require a few rounds of price reductions and re-appraisals to move them off the books. Then there are the junk units that may not be marketable at all for one reason or another. When an asset manager is burdened with hundreds of properties to sell, the junk properties usually are set aside, resulting in a growing 'dead pool' as time passes.

If there are to be bulk sales, these are certainly properties that should be included in the pools. However, for a mega bulk buyer, there may be no discount that is steep enough to justify buying them.  For example, if a bulk investor buys 1,000 apartment units in five completely run down projects, then those are five projects where investors can hire a team for each site and bring the respective property back to the standards associated with its highest and best use. If there are 1,000 different locations spread all over a region, then we are looking at 1,000 different projects – logisitically an entirely different proposition.  These properties may be located in, say, Atlanta and may only have a price tag of $20-30 million, certainly not low enough to whet the appetite of  a big investor, not to mention a mega bulk investor.

The GSEs reportedly carry an inventory of approximately 200,000 in REOs on their books. If those were divided into $1 billion pools at an average price of $100,000 per property, that would require 20 pools consisting of 10,000 properties per pool. Unlike the purchase of loans or securities, buying such a pool involves taking ownership of properties and assuming liabilities that one may be eager to assume.

Do you have any idea what it takes to assemble a pool of 10,000 REOs and prepare the required due diligence packages? If the GSEs were able to miraculously conduct one of these billion dollar bulk sales every quarter, it would still take 5 years to liquidate their existing REO inventory.

 

An Alternative Proposal to Mega Bulk Sales

Location, location, location. The metro areas that have somewhat stabilized do not need mega bulk sales in any form. The metro areas that have excessive REO inventories usually have large supply/demand imbalances where a bulk sale may tend to exacerbate the problems.  Just imagine the poor homeowners struggling with an already underwater mortgage, only to find out that their newest neighbor is some hedge fund who bought the same house at a discount of 30%-40% – or most likely more.  Imagine the poor little investor with negative cash flow trying to compete against the hedge fund for a tenant in such a down market.

How much of a discount is required in order for a mega bulk buyer to offset all the inefficiencies associated with a bulk purchase and still generate a reasonable internal rate of return? It is a near certainty that mega bulk buyers would demand a very big discount, combined with some sort of below market financing and some form of indemnification.

Here are a few alternatives that illustrate how incredibly stupid the mega bulk sales idea is.  For the purpose of this illustration, I am going to make the assumption that a bulk buyer is going purchase at 70% of the most recent appraisal and is happy with 70% financing at the prevailing rates available to an owner occupant.  This assumption is generously conservative – in reality I cannot picture any mega bulk buyer willing to pay so much for the GSE inventory.

 

Alternative 1, target the owner users:

Sales price set at the most recent appraisal.

Nothing down financing at prevailing rates for owner users.

No points, no fees, no closing costs. They are all factored into the loan.

A minimum credit score of, say, 650.

Buyer must show they have been paying rent for the past six months at or above the project PITI (principal, interest, tax and insurance).

This alternative would open the door to a great many buyers. They are not going to hurt the market because they are paying full price. They are not going to hurt the other properties listed for sale,  because they would not be buyers if a down payment were required. They would have already demonstrated that they can afford the monthly payment in the form of rent. As owners, they would most likely improve the property, which a tenant would not do.

In comparison to a bulk sale, an owner user is paying 30% more, offering the GSE a big cushion on top of all the aforementioned benefits.

 

Alterative 2, target small investors:

Sales price set at the most recent appraisal.

20% down payment. Financing at prevailing rates for owner users.

No qualifications needed, the downpayment is the security.

This alternative would open the door to all the local investors that may currently have a tough time with financing. Based on the Federal Reserve's analysis, these properties are supposed to generate an 8% cap rate or even better return. With a 20% down payment, the property should generate a copious cash flow for the buyer. These buyers are not going to hurt the market because they would be paying full price.  They would be more likely to take care of the property with the pride of ownership, much better than what can be expected of an impersonal hedge fund owner who is at several removes via a few layers of asset and property management staff.

In comparison to a bulk sale, a small investor is paying 30% more and is putting up 20% cash.

There are numerous other ideas to correctly market REOs but just the two alternatives mentioned above should put a big dent in any inventory.  If the properties are not selling at a satisfactory pace, there are many follow up steps that could be implemented. I will discuss those in a future post.

In conclusion, any mega bulk sales by the GSEs would certainly be a big loss for taxpayers.  If the mega bulk buyers think they are going to rip off the country the same way their predecessors did during the RTC giveaway, they may be in for a big surprise.  They may eventually find themselves holding cans of worms all over the most undesirable markets. 

As for the real estate market, I have no idea what mega bulks would do to the already depressed metro areas. They could prove to be very destabilizing. Maybe they would be the last straw that breaks the camel's back.

 


 

 

 
 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 
 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke

   
 

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • What Do “Think Tanks” Think About?
      “Russiagate” WEST RIVER, MARYLAND – We’re back at our post – watching... reading... trying to connect the dots. And we begin by asking: What do “think tanks” think about? The answer in a minute. First, there is a dust-up in the Washington, D.C., area. “Russiagate,” it is called. As near as we can make out, some people think the Trump team had or has illegal or inappropriate contacts with the Russian government.   It's all very obvious, if one looks...
  • Parabolic Coin
      The Crypto-Bubble - A Speculator's Dream in Cyberspace When writing an article about the recent move in bitcoin, one should probably not begin by preparing the chart images. Chances are one will have to do it all over again. It is a bit like ordering a cup of coffee in Weimar Germany in early November 1923. One had to pay for it right away, as a cup costing one wheelbarrow of Reichsmark may well end up costing two wheelbarrows of Reichsmark half an hour later. These days the question is...
  • In Gold We Trust, 2017
      The 11th Annual In Gold We Trust Report This year's Incrementum In Gold We Trust report by our good friends Ronald Stoeferle and Mark Valek appears about one month earlier than usual (we already mentioned in our most recent gold update that it would become available soon). As always, the report is extremely comprehensive, discussing everything from fundamentals pertaining to gold, to technical analysis to statistical studies on the behavior of gold under different economic...
  • Quantitative Easing Explained
      [Ed. note: This article was originally posted in November of 2010 - we have decided to republish it with updated charts, as it has proved to be very useful as a reference - the mechanics of QE are less well understood than they should be, and this article explains them in detail.]   Printing Money We have noticed that lately, numerous attempts have been made to explain the mechanics of quantitative easing.  They range from the truly funny as in this by now 'viral' You Tube...
  • The Three Headed Debt Monster That’s Going to Ravage the Economy
      Mass Infusions of New Credit   “The bank is something more than men, I tell you.  It’s the monster.  Men made it, but they can’t control it.” – John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath   Something strange and somewhat senseless happened this week. On Tuesday, the price of gold jumped over $13 per ounce.  This, in itself, is nothing too remarkable.  However, at precisely the same time gold was jumping, the yield on the 10-Year Treasury note was slip sliding down...
  • Recession Watch Fall 2017
      One Ear to the Ground, One Eye to the Future Treasury yields are attempting to say something.  But what it is exactly is open to interpretation.  What’s more, only the most curious care to ponder it. Like Southern California’s obligatory June Gloom, what Treasury yields may appear to be foreshadowing can be somewhat misleading.   Behold, the risk-free tide...   Are investors anticipating deflation or inflation?  Are yields adjusting to some other market or...
  • Stocks, Bonds, Euro, and Gold Go Up – Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      Driven by Credit The jobs report was disappointing. The prices of gold, and even more so silver, took off. In three hours, they gained $18 and 39 cents. Before we try to read into the connection, it is worth pausing to consider how another market responded. We don’t often discuss the stock market (and we have not been calling for an imminent stock market collapse as many others have).   NYSE margin debt has reached new record highs this year, dwarfing previous peak...
  • Jayant Bhandari on Gold, Submerging Markets and Arbitrage
      Maurice Jackson Interviews Jayant Bhandari We are happy to present another interview conducted by Maurice Jackson of Proven and Probable with our friend and frequent contributor Jayant Bhandari, a specialist on gold mining investment, the world's most outspoken emerging market contrarian, host of the highly regarded annual Capitalism and Morality conference in London and consultant to institutional investors.   As soon as Jayant touches down in London, he is accosted by...
  • Monetary Madness and Rabbit Consumption
      Down the Rabbit Hole “The hurrier I go, the behinder I get,” is oft attributed to the White Rabbit from Lewis Carroll’s, Alice in Wonderland.  Where this axiom appears within the text of the story is a mystery.  But we suspect the White Rabbit must utter it about the time Alice follows him down the rabbit hole.   Pick a rabbit to follow...   No doubt, today’s wage earner knows what it means to work harder, faster, and better, while slip sliding behind. ...
  • Mexicans and Chinese Aren’t “Stealing Our Jobs”
      Tremendous Flop GUALFIN, ARGENTINA – Now comes a report from the Financial Times that tells us the nation’s No. 1 industry – home building – has been backing up for a quarter of a century. According to the newspaper, U.S. home builders “started work on the same number of houses in the past year as they did a quarter of a century ago, even though there are 36% more people working as residential builders now than then.”   Moat contractors have been particularly bad....
  • The Anatomy of Brown’s Gold Bottom – Precious Metals Supply and Demand
      The Socialist Politician-Bureaucrat with the Worst Timing Ever As most in the gold community know, the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown announced on 7 May, 1999 that HM Treasury planned to sell gold. The dollar began to rise, from about 110mg gold to 120mg on 6 July, the day of the first sale. This translates into dollarish as: gold went down, from $282 to $258. It makes sense, as the UK was selling a lot of gold... or does it?   Former UK chancellor of the...
  • Donald Trump is an Economic Ignoramus on Trade
      Upholding a Well-Worn Tradition Not surprisingly, Donald Trump has followed in the infamous footsteps of his presidential predecessors in the transition from candidate to chief executive.  Invariably, every candidate for the presidency makes a whole host of promises, the vast majority of which are horrible and typically only exacerbate the problems they attempt to resolve.   With respect to trade, Donald Trump has adopted a position that is essentially indistinguishable...

Support Acting Man

Austrian Theory and Investment

Own physical gold and silver outside a bank

Archive

j9TJzzN

350x200

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com