The Economics of Large Pools of Property Assets

Selling real estate is usually quite simple.  First you determine the highest and best use of the product.  Then you focus on who would be the most suitable buyer of the product. Finally, you proceed to market the product to the most suitable buyers.

For spot REOs [REO = 'real estate owned', the euphemism for properties repossessed in foreclosures, ed.], which are primarily all single family, condos and some 1-4 family units, the pecking order of potential buyers could not be simpler:

 

  1. Owner occupants.
  2. Small investors who own no more than a handful of units.
  3. Large investors who own multiple units in one market.
  4. Large investors who own multiple units in multiple markets.
  5. Mega bulk investors.

 

For some strange reason, our government is comtemplating bypassing all the more suitable buyers listed above in favor of the worst buyers possible. There can be no explanation for this aside from stupidity and/or corruption.

 

The logic behind this is simple. Economies of scale so to speak tend to work in reverse when it comes to spot REOs. At each level of the pecking order, the expenses one incurs are higher rather than lower. For example, an owner occupant or small investor may purchase a property that requires minor repairs and budget nothing but 'sweat equity' for these items.  A large local investor may have a crew or an inexpensive contractor for these repairs.  A mega bulk investor has to contract a local manager, who then gives the job to sub-contractors to have the work performed.

Spot REOs are in various places all over the map. The houses in the best locations are usually gobbled up at top prices immediately. The second tier ones may require a few rounds of price reductions and re-appraisals to move them off the books. Then there are the junk units that may not be marketable at all for one reason or another. When an asset manager is burdened with hundreds of properties to sell, the junk properties usually are set aside, resulting in a growing 'dead pool' as time passes.

If there are to be bulk sales, these are certainly properties that should be included in the pools. However, for a mega bulk buyer, there may be no discount that is steep enough to justify buying them.  For example, if a bulk investor buys 1,000 apartment units in five completely run down projects, then those are five projects where investors can hire a team for each site and bring the respective property back to the standards associated with its highest and best use. If there are 1,000 different locations spread all over a region, then we are looking at 1,000 different projects – logisitically an entirely different proposition.  These properties may be located in, say, Atlanta and may only have a price tag of $20-30 million, certainly not low enough to whet the appetite of  a big investor, not to mention a mega bulk investor.

The GSEs reportedly carry an inventory of approximately 200,000 in REOs on their books. If those were divided into $1 billion pools at an average price of $100,000 per property, that would require 20 pools consisting of 10,000 properties per pool. Unlike the purchase of loans or securities, buying such a pool involves taking ownership of properties and assuming liabilities that one may be eager to assume.

Do you have any idea what it takes to assemble a pool of 10,000 REOs and prepare the required due diligence packages? If the GSEs were able to miraculously conduct one of these billion dollar bulk sales every quarter, it would still take 5 years to liquidate their existing REO inventory.

 

An Alternative Proposal to Mega Bulk Sales

Location, location, location. The metro areas that have somewhat stabilized do not need mega bulk sales in any form. The metro areas that have excessive REO inventories usually have large supply/demand imbalances where a bulk sale may tend to exacerbate the problems.  Just imagine the poor homeowners struggling with an already underwater mortgage, only to find out that their newest neighbor is some hedge fund who bought the same house at a discount of 30%-40% – or most likely more.  Imagine the poor little investor with negative cash flow trying to compete against the hedge fund for a tenant in such a down market.

How much of a discount is required in order for a mega bulk buyer to offset all the inefficiencies associated with a bulk purchase and still generate a reasonable internal rate of return? It is a near certainty that mega bulk buyers would demand a very big discount, combined with some sort of below market financing and some form of indemnification.

Here are a few alternatives that illustrate how incredibly stupid the mega bulk sales idea is.  For the purpose of this illustration, I am going to make the assumption that a bulk buyer is going purchase at 70% of the most recent appraisal and is happy with 70% financing at the prevailing rates available to an owner occupant.  This assumption is generously conservative – in reality I cannot picture any mega bulk buyer willing to pay so much for the GSE inventory.

 

Alternative 1, target the owner users:

Sales price set at the most recent appraisal.

Nothing down financing at prevailing rates for owner users.

No points, no fees, no closing costs. They are all factored into the loan.

A minimum credit score of, say, 650.

Buyer must show they have been paying rent for the past six months at or above the project PITI (principal, interest, tax and insurance).

This alternative would open the door to a great many buyers. They are not going to hurt the market because they are paying full price. They are not going to hurt the other properties listed for sale,  because they would not be buyers if a down payment were required. They would have already demonstrated that they can afford the monthly payment in the form of rent. As owners, they would most likely improve the property, which a tenant would not do.

In comparison to a bulk sale, an owner user is paying 30% more, offering the GSE a big cushion on top of all the aforementioned benefits.

 

Alterative 2, target small investors:

Sales price set at the most recent appraisal.

20% down payment. Financing at prevailing rates for owner users.

No qualifications needed, the downpayment is the security.

This alternative would open the door to all the local investors that may currently have a tough time with financing. Based on the Federal Reserve's analysis, these properties are supposed to generate an 8% cap rate or even better return. With a 20% down payment, the property should generate a copious cash flow for the buyer. These buyers are not going to hurt the market because they would be paying full price.  They would be more likely to take care of the property with the pride of ownership, much better than what can be expected of an impersonal hedge fund owner who is at several removes via a few layers of asset and property management staff.

In comparison to a bulk sale, a small investor is paying 30% more and is putting up 20% cash.

There are numerous other ideas to correctly market REOs but just the two alternatives mentioned above should put a big dent in any inventory.  If the properties are not selling at a satisfactory pace, there are many follow up steps that could be implemented. I will discuss those in a future post.

In conclusion, any mega bulk sales by the GSEs would certainly be a big loss for taxpayers.  If the mega bulk buyers think they are going to rip off the country the same way their predecessors did during the RTC giveaway, they may be in for a big surprise.  They may eventually find themselves holding cans of worms all over the most undesirable markets. 

As for the real estate market, I have no idea what mega bulks would do to the already depressed metro areas. They could prove to be very destabilizing. Maybe they would be the last straw that breaks the camel's back.

 


 

 

 
 

Emigrate While You Can... Learn More

 
 

 
 

Dear Readers!

It is that time of the year again – our semi-annual funding drive begins today. Give us a little hand in offsetting the costs of running this blog, as advertising revenue alone is insufficient. You can help us reach our modest funding goal by donating either via paypal or bitcoin. Those of you who have made a ton of money based on some of the things we have said in these pages (we actually made a few good calls lately!), please feel free to up your donations accordingly (we are sorry if you have followed one of our bad calls. This is of course your own fault). Other than that, we can only repeat that donations to this site are apt to secure many benefits. These range from sound sleep, to children including you in their songs, to the potential of obtaining privileges in the afterlife (the latter cannot be guaranteed, but it seems highly likely). As always, we are greatly honored by your readership and hope that our special mixture of entertainment and education is adding a little value to your life!

   

Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke

   
 

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • Perfect-InvestmentInsanity, Oddities and Dark Clouds in Credit-Land
      Insanity Rules Bond markets are certainly displaying a lot of enthusiasm at the moment – and it doesn't matter which bonds one looks at, as the famous “hunt for yield” continues to obliterate interest returns across the board like a steamroller. Corporate and government debt have been soaring for years, but investor appetite for such debt has evidently grown even more.   The perfect investment for modern times: interest-free risk! Illuustration by Howard...
  • TMS-2 fast versionA Date Which Will Live in Infamy
      President Nixon’s Decision to Abandon the Gold Standard Franklin Delano Roosevelt called the Japanese “surprise” attack on the U.S. occupied territory of Hawaii and its naval base Pearl Harbor, “A Date Which Will Live in Infamy.”  Similar words should be used for President Nixon’s draconian decision 45 years ago this month that removed America from the last vestiges of the gold standard.   Nixon points out where numerous evil speculators were suspected to be...
  • Factories, new vs oldUS Economy – Something is not Right
      Another Strong Payrolls Report – is it Meaningful? This morning the punters in the casino were cheered up by yet another strong payrolls report, the second in a row. Leaving aside the fact that it will be revised out of all recognition when all is said and done, does it actually mean the economy is strong?   Quo vadis, economy? Image credit: Paul Raphaelson   As we usually point out at this juncture: apart from the problem that US labor force participation has...
  • CorporateMediacontrolTrump's Tax Plan, Clinton Corruption and Mainstream Media Propaganda
      Fake Money, Fake Capital OUZILLY, France – Little change in the markets on Monday. We are in the middle of vacation season. Who wants to think too much about the stock market? Not us! Yesterday, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump promised to reform the U.S. tax system.   This should actually even appeal to supporters of Bernie Sanders: the lowest income groups will be completely exempt from income and capital gains taxes under Trump's plan. We expect to hear...
  • mania1The Great Stock Market Swindle
      Short Circuited Feedback Loops Finding and filling gaps in the market is one avenue for entrepreneurial success.  Obviously, the first to tap into an unmet consumer demand can unlock massive profits.  But unless there’s some comparative advantage, competition will quickly commoditize the market and profit margins will decline to just above breakeven.   Example of a “commoditized” market – hard-drive storage costs per GB. This is actually the essence of economic...
  • Mark Carney starts work as Bank of England governor in Dave Simonds cartoonBank of England QE and the Imaginary “Brexit Shock”
      Mark Carney, Wrecking Ball For reasons we cannot even begin to fathom, Mark Carney is considered a “superstar” among central bankers. Presumably this was one of the reasons why the British government helped him to execute a well-timed exit from the Bank of Canada by hiring him to head the Bank of England (well-timed because he disappeared from Canada with its bubble economy seemingly still intact, leaving his successor to take the blame).   This is how Mark Carney is seen by...
  • old friendsAn Old Friend Returns
      A Rare Apparition An old friend suddenly showed up out of the blue yesterday and I’m not talking about a contributor who had washed out and, after years of ‘working for the man’, decided to return for another whack at beating the market. Instead I am delighted to report that I am looking at a bona fide confirmed VIX sell signal which we haven’t seen for ages here.   Hello, old friend. Professor X and Magneto staring each other down in the plastic...
  • tortoiseThe Fabian Society and the Gradual Rise of Statist Socialism
      The “Third Way”   “Stealth, intrigue, subversion, and the deception of never calling socialism by its right name” – George Bernard Shaw   An emblem of the Fabian Society: a wolf in sheep's clothing   The Brexit referendum has revealed the existence of a deep polarization in British politics. Apart from the public faces of the opposing campaigns, there were however also undisclosed parties with a vested interest which few people have heard about. And...
  • storming the storeRetail Snails
      Second Half Recovery Dented by “Resurgent Consumer” We normally don't comment in real time on individual economic data releases. Generally we believe it makes more sense to occasionally look at a bigger picture overview, once at least some of the inevitable revisions have been made. The update we posted last week (“US Economy, Something is Not Right”) is an example.   Eager consumers storming a store Photo credit: Daniel Acker / Bloomberg   We'll make an...
  • The CongressThe Fed’s “Waterloo” Moment
      Corrupt and Unsustainable James has been a big help. Trying to get him to sleep at night, we have been telling him fantastic and unbelievable bedtime stories – full of grotesque monsters... evil maniacs... and events that couldn’t possibly be true (catch up here and here).   He turned his head until his gaze came to rest on the barred windows of the main building. Finally, he spoke; as far as I was aware these were the first words he had uttered in more than five years....
  • Zimbabwe_$100_trillion_2009_ObverseGood Money and Bad Money
      Confidence Gets a Boost OUZILLY, France – Last week’s U.S. jobs report came in better than expected. Stocks rose to new records. As we laid out recently, a better jobs picture should lead the Fed to raise rates. This should cause canny investors to dump stocks.   Canny investors at work (an old, but good one...) Cartoon via Pension Pulse   But the stock market paid no attention. It follows logic of its own. Headlines told us that last Friday’s report “boosted...
  • web-puzzled-man-scratching-head-retro-everett-collection-shutterstock_91956314News from TINA Land
      Distortions and Crazy Ideas We have come across a few articles recently that discuss some of the strategies investors are using or contemplating to use as a result of the market distortions caused by current central bank policies. Readers have no doubt noticed that numerous inter-market correlations seem to have been suspended lately, and that many things are happening that superficially seem to make little sense (e.g. falling junk bond yields while defaults are surging; the yen rising...

Austrian Theory and Investment

Support Acting Man

Own physical gold and silver outside a bank

Archive

j9TJzzN

350x200

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com