Buying time on the tax-payer's dime

By now everybody has heard about the EU-IMF bail-out package, which evidently was sized to impress. All in all, the bail-out fund announced by the EU is valued at almost $1 trillion in tax payer funds, including guarantees (the whole package is a complex and complicated web of commitments). A massive transfer of wealth is underway. By necessity, the funding for this giant mother of all bail-outs must come from those in the euro area who produce wealth, so that those who have squandered wealth can be propped up.

 

The end result will be a further structural weakening of the euro area economies. Note also that the politicians have not asked the producers of wealth if they are giving permission for this cross-border theft. It has been presented as a fait accompli, and that's that. The Federal Reserve meanwhile has pledged to reopen the swap lines with European central banks that were employed in 'Crisis, Act 1' to relieve dollar funding pressures in the European banking system.

A recent sharp rise in LIBOR and OIS (overnight indexed swaps) spreads indicated that once again, banks in Europe have stopped trusting each other. This renewed rise in perceived counterparty risk was a direct result of European banks being large holders of 'PIIGS' debt, and was reflected in CDS on numerous euro area banks rising above the highs of 2008. This $1 trillion package is not counting the fact that the ECB has now relented on the issue of buying government debt of euro-area member nations directly.

Apparently, the German ECB board members were less than thrilled about the prospect of debt monetization, and so everybody was at pains to stress that these would be 'sterilized'. What we have here is obviously the European version of the Fed's collateral swaps of 2008.

 

The printing press is waiting in the wings

Let us briefly recall: in order to reliquefy the markets during the initial iteration of the crisis, the Fed instituted a program of exchanging 'liquid, safe assets' such as t-notes and t-bonds for 'illiquid and difficult to value assets', such as formerly AAA rated MBS that had turned into toxic waste without bids. This was done via the TSLF (term securities lending facility), which promptly cut the treasury holdings on the Fed's balance sheet in half. At the time I remarked that the US dollar's backing had come to resemble that of the Assignats of the French revolution.  The Fed stressed back then (just as the ECB is doing now) that the reason for using these collateral swaps was that they didn't impinge on monetary policy, as no money printing would occur. It was all about shoring up the quality of bank balance sheets.

While the ECB's announced program is presented as something slightly different, it is in fact the very same thing in principle. The only way the ECB can 'sterilize' these interventions is if it sells as many securities as it buys under the program. Since the intent of the program is evidently to relieve banks from their current holdings of 'toxic sovereign waste', the only way this makes sense is if the ECB  ultimately exchanges higher quality securities it currently holds for lower quality ones on the books of the euro area banks (i.e., sovereign PIIGS bonds, as well as bonds of suspect private issuers).

Now let us think back to the Fed's TSLF. Somehow, quite a few of  those treasuries that were swapped out  never seem to have made it back to the Fed. Instead, the Fed suddenly announced an outright quantitative easing program (less euphemistically known as 'money creation from thin air' or 'government debt monetization') that achieved exactly what the collateral swaps were  designed to prevent: a giant inflation of the money supply. In the process, the Fed got to replenish its holding of treasury notes, while making it really easy for the US treasury to fund itself in spite of a vast increase in its fiscal deficit. Money TMS rose at an annualized rate of 15%, and the Fed's balance sheet exploded into the blue yonder, where it remains to this day.

This is why I conclude that the ECB's announcement to buy euro area government bonds amounts to the 'printing press waiting in the wings'. The ECB is about to stuff its balance sheet with what everybody knows is the debt of either utter deadbeats  like Greece, or the debt of likely future deadbeats, i.e. the rest of the PIIGS, paper that has become a hot potato indeed. The sterilization effort then will reduce the amount of higher quality assets on its balance sheet. At the end of the day, it will find itself in the position the Fed found itself in in late 2008/early 2009. It will be unable to swap the toxic stuff back, because that would immediately undo the intended effect of the swaps, as the underlying solvency problems that have made certain sovereign debt toxic will likely remain unsolved. At the same time, it will then find it problematic to just continue to swap good assets for bad, since that would place it in the ridiculous situation of becoming a major central bank with a balance sheet that resembles a radioactive waste dump. So the next logical step will then be to emulate the Fed and begin outright monetization.

Of course we don't know for certain at this time if it will come to that. All we know for sure is that the bail-outs elsewhere (in the US and UK) have inexorably led to this outcome. Granted, the German board members will be miffed and likely voice their objections, as they have done already. For all its real and imagined faults, the post WW2 Germany has always been a fount of monetary rectitude – the trauma of the devastating Weimar inflation is deeply etched into the national psyche as something that must not be allowed to happen again. On the other hand, the inherently devaluation-friendly entire rest of the ECB board will be able to point to the fact that private credit growth in the euro area has collapsed, and urge the adoption of further Keynesian remedies (the Keynesian 'remedies' are fiscal spending and inflation – both are utterly ruinous for the economy, but a large contingent of economists in fealty to the State hold them to be good things, or at the very least 'necessary evils'). Lastly, even if the ECB strictly sterilizes all its government bond purchases, this activity will distort market prices – of course this is precisely the objective, but the economic effect will be a further misdirection of scarce resources.

 

 

Verbal attacks on 'speculators' reveal the politicians' and bureaucrats' disdain of the free market

Along with Mrs. Merkel declaring the European Union to be in battle with 'perfidious speculators', an entire smorgasboard of EU politicians and their bureaucratic lackeys have sounded the alarm over the impudence of financial market participants who dare to pay up for sovereign CDS and sell the bonds of fiscally unsound euro area nations. From French president Nicholas Sarkozy , to Greek prime minister Papandreou to Spain's prime minister Zapatero, to EU commission president Jose Barroso, to the internal market commissioner Michel Barnier (who like Sarkozy and Trichet, seems to be  a typical product of the overbearing French State's bureaucrat factory), all 'vowed to fight speculators'.

A brief overview of Monday's press headlines shows that this is the tack the entire EU political class has decided to take in trying to sell its gigantic intervention to a reluctant public:

 

EU vows to fight the speculators

EU creates permanent aid fund to ward off speculators

EU Finance Ministers Battle to Defend the Euro Against Speculators

Sarkozy, Barroso Urge Firm Action To End Speculation Over Greece

 

… and so on and so forth.

And there we naïvely thought the crisis was the fault of profligate and fibbing governments! It seems we were wrong – it's all the fault of some more or less mysterious 'speculators'.

 

Let me quote Barnier verbatim, as reported in the Wall Street Journal (link broke on August 5th 2010):

"We are ready to increase the sanctions against abnormal speculative action."

Abnormal speculative action? It simply leaves one speechless. One wonders though, do they like those speculators a tad better today?

 


 

5 year CDS on the major PIGS (sans Ireland) – today the market sold them vigorously in a first reaction to the bail-out announcement.

 


 

The Monday short squeeze in the SPX. Sometimes you just gotta love those speculators.

 


 

Those of you who have read my article on Hoover know that Hoover held the stock market in utter disdain. Throughout his presidency he blamed a shadowy Wall Street conspiracy for trying to destroy the country's economy and thwarting his valuable interventionist efforts. Politicians painting themselves to be in a heroic struggle with the markets, where 'evil speculators' are trying to undermine their well-meaning exertions, is a canard at least as old as the financial markets themselves. The reality is that economic dislocations, which are reflected in financial market dislocations, are invariably almost exclusively the work of the very governments shouting the loudest about the alleged misdeeds of investors whenever said investors are trying to save what they can.

As Ludwig von Mises writes in Human Action, chapter 18, 'Action in the Passing of Time', section 8, 'The Mobility of the Investor':

 

Entrepreneurial profit and loss emanate from the dedication of factors of production to definite projects. Stock exchange speculation and analogous transactions outside the securities market determine on whom the incidence of these profits and losses shall fall. A tendency prevails to make a sharp distinction between such purely speculative ventures and genuinely sound investment. The distinction is one of degree only. There is no such thing as a non-speculative investment. In a changing economy action always involves speculation. Investments may be good or bad, but they are always speculative. A radical change in conditions may render bad even investments commonly considered perfectly safe. Stock speculation cannot undo past action and cannot change anything with regard to the limited convertibility of capital goods already in existence. What it can do is prevent additional investment in branches and enterprises in which, according to the opinion of the speculators, it would be misplaced. It points the specific way for a tendency, prevailing in the market economy, to expand profitable production ventures and to restrict the unprofitable. In this sense the stock exchange becomes simply "the market," the focal point of the market economy, the ultimate device to make the anticipated demand of the consumers supreme in the conduct of business.”

 

In other words, all entrepreneurial activity is in fact 'speculation'. If one regards the composition of profits reaped by entrepreneurs, if there were no entrepreneurial profit element – which can be said to be the result of 'correct speculation' –  there would be no incentive to engage in the production of goods and services. If a putative entrepreneur were happy to just reap the interest on the capital he employs, he might as well offer it in the loanable funds market for the use of others. Wages he can earn elsewhere as well, by offering his labor to other entrepreneurs. So earning a wage and earning interest is not enough – there has to be a the possibility of reaping a speculative profit by producing what consumers want. The stock exchange in turn, as the venue where speculators express an opinion about various lines of business by driving up the prices of certain stocks while driving down those of others, renders valuable information about which lines of business are likely to be profitable (let us leave aside here for a moment that in an inflationary fiat money system, investment manias can distort these signals, just as inflation distorts other important market signals; in a truly free market,  stock price signals would evidently be rather more reliable).

We can conclude that when politicians attack speculators, trying to scapegoat them for the messes they themselves have produced, they reveal an inherent disdain for free market processes.

One should therefore strongly guard against uncritically going along with such assertions.

 

 

On the road to perdition

As mentioned above, one immediate  effect of these breathless bail-out  announcements will be to buy the EU, and with it the euro, a little bit of time. To the extent that wealth is now transferred to prop up what are obviously unsound credits, the economies of the EU will suffer additional structural damage, on top of that already suffered over the past two years by the massive Keynesian government spending burden that has weighed down these economies in the wake of the initial crisis.

In short, there is absolutely no light at the end of the tunnel. It is probably pretty safe to assume that the countries on the receiving end of the bail-outs will end up not adhering to their austerity commitments, as that is politically extremely difficult. Wealth and resources are once again forcibly taken from where they are now profitably deployed to save bond holders who have taken undue risks. Once again a massive dose of interventionism is preferred over a free market solution and the liquidation of unsound investments. All of this has once more happened over the heads of those who are going to pay for it.

Obviously, there is a limit to these interventions. Once the destruction of wealth exceeds a certain threshold, further bail-outs will become impossible. Given that the burden on wealth producers is increasing ever more, we must expect economic growth to disappoint, which will make it all the more likely that the defaults will eventually escalate in spite of this massive bail-out (by the way, since the IMF is also forking over funds, tax payers of non-EU nations are likewise involuntarily involved in the exercise). Can the EU possibly pull off another bail-out if this one fails? The answer is clearly no. That will be impossible to finance, and what's more, it will invite a tax payer and voter revolt.

Incumbent European politicians are already facing electoral defeats – both Gordon Brown and Mrs. Merkel's CDU have just lost important elections (one national, one regional) over the weekend. This is the bearish social mood in action: it creates dissension and disharmony. 'Inclusionary' political projects such as the euro tend to lose more and more popular support, in accordance with Bob Prechter's socionomics theory.

The euro looks now very oversold and bearish speculative bets against it have become extremely one-sided, which normally results in at least short a term bounce. However, the long term forces arrayed against the euro are now formidable indeed. While the market's attention is currently still focused on the weakest links in the euro area, faith in the entire global monetary system could eventually be lost. After decades of 'papering over' every crisis with more and more debt and money from thin air, we seem to be coming ever closer to the moment where the greatest fiat money experiment in history finally fails and falls apart.

 

Charts: Bloomberg, stockcharts.com

 


 
 

 
 

Dear Readers!

You may have noticed that our so-called “semiannual” funding drive, which started sometime in the summer if memory serves, has seamlessly segued into the winter. In fact, the year is almost over! We assure you this is not merely evidence of our chutzpa; rather, it is indicative of the fact that ad income still needs to be supplemented in order to support upkeep of the site. Naturally, the traditional benefits that can be spontaneously triggered by donations to this site remain operative regardless of the season - ranging from a boost to general well-being/happiness (inter alia featuring improved sleep & appetite), children including you in their songs, up to the likely allotment of privileges in the afterlife, etc., etc., but the Christmas season is probably an especially propitious time to cross our palms with silver. A special thank you to all readers who have already chipped in, your generosity is greatly appreciated. Regardless of that, we are honored by everybody's readership and hope we have managed to add a little value to your life.

   

Bitcoin address: 1DRkVzUmkGaz9xAP81us86zzxh5VMEhNke

   
 

Your comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Most read in the last 20 days:

  • Can Germany Be Made Great Again?
      When Germany Was Great! Ever since the start of the deliberately conceived “migrant crisis,” orchestrated by NWO elites, the news out of Germany has been, to say the least, horrific. Right before the eyes of the world, a country is being demographically destroyed through a coercive plan of mass migration.  The intended consequences of this – financial strain, widespread crime and property destruction, the breakdown of German culture – will continue to worsen if things are not...
  • Yanking the Bank of Japan’s Chain
      Mathematical Certainties Based on the simple reflection that arithmetic is more than just an abstraction, we offer a modest observation.  The social safety nets of industrialized economies, including the United States, have frayed at the edges.  Soon the safety net’s fabric will snap. This recognition is not an opinion.  Rather, it’s a matter of basic arithmetic.  The economy cannot sustain the government obligations that have been piled up upon it over the last 70...
  • Incrementum Advisory Board Meeting, Q3 2017
      Global Monetary Architecture The quarterly Incrementum Advisory Board meeting was held last week (the full transcript is available for download below). Our regulars Dr. Frank Shostak and Jim Rickards were unable to attend this time, but we were joined by special guest Luke Gromen of research house “Forest for the Trees” (FFTT; readers will find free samples of the FFTT newsletter at the site and in case you want to find the link again later, we have recently added it to our blog roll)....
  • Views From the Top of the Skyscraper Index
      Views From the Top of the Skyscraper Index On a warm Friday Los Angeles morning in spring of 2016, we found ourselves standing at the busy corner of Wilshire Boulevard and South Figueroa Street.  We were walking back to our office following a client wire brushing for events beyond our control.  But we had other thoughts on our mind.   Iron workers (the non-distraught variety) atop the 10 ton spire of the Wilshire Grand Center in Lost Angeles. This image is vaguely...
  • Bitcoin, Gold and Silver
      Precious Metals Supply and Demand Report That’s it. It’s the final straw. One of the alternative investing newsletters had a headline that screamed, “Bitcoin Is About to Soar, But You Must Act by August 1 to Get In". It was missing only the call to action “call 1-800-BIT-COIN now! That number again is 800 B.I.T..C.O.I.N.”   Bitcoin, daily. In terms of the gains recorded between the lows of 2009 and the recent highs (from less eight hundredths of a US cent per...
  • Prepare for Another Market Face Pounding
      “Better than Goldilocks” “Markets make opinions,” goes the old Wall Street adage.  Indeed, this sounds like a nifty thing to say.  But what does it really mean?   The bears discover Mrs. Locks in their bed and it seems they are less than happy. [PT]   Perhaps this means that after a long period of rising stocks prices otherwise intelligent people conceive of clever explanations for why the good times will carry on.  Moreover, if the market goes up for...
  • Seasonality: Will Patterns that Worked in the Past Also Work in the Future?
      Historians of the Future Every investor makes trading decisions based on what happened in the past – there is no other way. What really interests us is the future though. After all, what happens in the future ultimately determines investment success.   When in doubt, you can always try to reach the pasture...  In Human Action, Ludwig von Mises described stock market speculators as akin to “historians of the future”. This is without a doubt the most trenchant definition of...
  • Bitcoin Forked – Precious Metals Supply and Demand Report
      A Fork in the Cryptographic Road So bitcoin forked. You did not know this. Well, if you’re saving in gold perhaps not. If you’re betting in the crypto-coin casino, you knew it, bet on it, and now we assume are happily diving into your greater quantity of dollars after the fork.   Bitcoin, daily – adding the current price of BCH (the new type of Bitcoin all holders of BTC can claim at a 1:1 ratio), the gain since the “fork” amounts to roughly $1,000 at the time we...
  • What Went Wrong With the 21st Century?
      Fools and Rascals   And it’s time, time, time And it’s time, time, time It’s time, time, time that you love And it’s time, time, time… - Tom  Waits   Tom Waits rasps about time   POITOU, FRANCE – “So how much did you make last night?” “We made about $15,000,” came the reply from our eldest son, a keen cryptocurrency investor. “Bitcoin briefly pierced the $3,500 mark – an all-time high. The market cap of the...
  • Czar vs. Pope
      Vladimir the Great Sums Up Pope Francis the Fake Vladimir Putin has once again demonstrated why he is the most perceptive, farsighted, and for a politician, the most honest world leader to come around in quite a while.  If it had not been for his patient and wise statesmanship, the world may have already been embroiled in an all-encompassing global conflagration with the possibility of thermonuclear destruction.   Vladimir Putin is sizing up Pope Francis with his “good...
  • Bitcoin Has No Yield, but Gold Does – Precious Metals Supply and Demand Report
      Bitcoin and Credit Transactions Last week, we said:   It is commonly accepted to say the dollar is “printed”, but we can see from this line of thinking it is really borrowed. There is a real borrower on the other side of the transaction, and that borrower has powerful motivations to keep paying to service the debt. Bitcoin has no backing. Bitcoin is created out of thin air, the way people say of the dollar. The quantity of bitcoins created may be strictly limited by...
  • Is Historically Low Volatility About to Expand?
      Suspicion Asleep You have probably noticed it already: stock market volatility has recently all but disappeared. This raises an important question for every investor: Has the market established a permanent plateau of low volatility, or is the current period of low volatility just the calm before the storm?   All quiet on the VIX front... what can possibly happen? [PT] - click to enlarge.   When such questions regarding future market trends arise, it is often...

Support Acting Man

j9TJzzN

Austrian Theory and Investment

Own physical gold and silver outside a bank

Archive

350x200

THE GOLD CARTEL: Government Intervention on Gold, the Mega Bubble in Paper and What This Means for Your Future

Realtime Charts

 

Gold in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Gold in EUR:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Silver in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

Platinum in USD:

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]

 


 

USD - Index:

[Most Recent USD from www.kitco.com]

 

 
Buy Silver Now!
 
Buy Gold Now!
 

Oilprice.com